Easy Paradox
53 posts


Preorder is now live for the Ichibansho One Piece Card Game Luffy Figure with OPTCG Luffy Promo Card at GameStop.
$99.99
sovrn.co/1ll43xc
Other retailers does not currently state the card is included but may be updated at a later date.
Amazon amzn.to/4tKwXCr
EE ee.toys/7SEQ8V
Releases May 25th at GS #ad


Andy Collectz@AndyCollectz
The English OPTCG Ichiban Luffy Promo Card appears to be included with the Ichibansho Monkey D. Luffy Anniversary Oda Figure! Info per GameStop landing page: sovrn.co/1ll43xc Other listings on Amazon and EE does not currently state the card is included but may be updated. Amazon amzn.to/4tKwXCr EE ee.toys/7SEQ8V Releases May 25th at GS #ad
English

@DistantCoder The thread is interesting bcz the outcome is unfortunate for the 1 player. Since its best of 1. It definitely isnt sharking because in this scenario player 1 put 4 cards in life then draw for turn. Then your searcher you see the next 4/5. Thats like 7 cards deep. Unrepairable
English

So I read through the entire thread and have many thoughts.
1. The player in question here should have paid attention to their match and should be held accountable for creating a damaged gamestate. If people are willing to give him the leniency saying that it was an honest mistake that he didn't catch, I don't see how they can say that their opponent couldn't have just as easily missed the mistake. To suggest that the opponent realized the mistake and waited is genuinely unreasonable and isn't a good argument unless you can undeniably prove that they did so maliciously. If you cannot prove it beyond "it feels scummy" then your argument is invalid.
2. A lot of people are saying that the first judge's ruling of just randomly putting the extra card back was a reasonable one. This is legitimately crazy. In this situation the draws for turn would have been different and putting the card back randomly somewhere on top of the deck would alter the way the game would have gone, thus is not a correct way to fix the gamestate. In this situation the gamestate was 100% irreparable because there was no way to rewind the gamestate to a point where the game would have played out identically to how it would have had the mistake not happened. Any situation in which we create a new gamestate that is legal but isn't identical to what the gamestate WOULD have been is an unreasonable way to fix the issue in a tournament setting.
3. People are calling the opponent a shark for appealing the initial judge's decision. Let me make this very clear: You are NEVER a shark for appealing a ruling, EVER. Appealing doesn't make you an asshole, doesn't make you a shark nor does it make you "that guy". The appeal system in any TCG exists specifically so that you have the right to get a 2nd opinion when you disagree with a judge's initial ruling. This can go both ways, you can appeal and have the head judge confirm the floor judge's ruling which gives you confirmation that the initial ruling was correct, which is a good outcome OR it confirms that the floor judge made a mistake (this can happen often) and you appealing has caused you to instead get a correct ruling. The appeal system is there to protect players and make sure that they are ruled for fairly in a majority of situations. In their position I would have also appealed as the floor judge's initial ruling was not reasonable and I think that the head judge's call here was 100% correct. An irreparable gamestate caused by the player most at fault (the one who made the mistake) resulting in a game loss is the most reasonable course of action.
4. I think the only real mistake the head judge made in this situation is that they didn't also issue a warning to the opponent who didn't notice OP's mistake. They also had a reasonable amount of opportunity to catch the mistake and should be given a warning for not having caught it when it happened. However, I think it is not reasonable to assume the player maliciously waited before calling a judge as there is no way to prove it.
5. Another big thing that needs to be talked about, is that OP's thread here does not own up to their own mistake AT ALL and instead directs full blame to their opponent and accuses them of maliciously trying to force them into an illegal gamestate in order to "earn a free win off the judge call". I think it's unfair that this player is starting a witch hunt against his opponent when the opponent genuinely did everything right. If they caught a mistake and called the judge when they noticed the mistake happened, then appealed when they disagreed with the floor judge, then they did everything exactly the way they were supposed to. In Yu-Gi-Oh, this behavior of calling someone out for "maliciously trying to gain an unfair advantage due to a judge call" would result in that player making the accusation being suspended for a certain duration of time.
Overall, I think it's unfortunate that this player got a game loss, but the reality is that they got a loss for their own mistake and here they are clearly attempting to deflect the blame when in reality they are the player most at fault for causing their own game loss.
English

🟣OP15 Purple Enel 1st/2nd Win% & Card Win Rates!🟣
📊 Access the NEW!!! Full Stats Dashboard:
🆕 Decklist page is free for everyone!!!
stats.tcgmatchmaking.com
🔗 Visit Patreon for more details: patreon.com/posts/op15-ene…
💬 Reply with which leader’s 1st/2nd stats you want to see next!

English

We're warming up for Reveal. This is your chance to win 🎮😤
Reply with #BlackOps7 #ScufxCODSweepstakes to enter for a chance to win a Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 Scuf Instinct Controller!

English

NOT HAVING THE SAME STANDANDS OR SOME TYPE OF STANDARD IS ABURD. IS IT EYE TEST OR IS RECORD IS A MIX OF BOTH. DO WE JUST MAKE IT UP AS WE GO ALONG
ESPN@espn
The FULL College Football Playoff top 25 rankings 🔥
English
Easy Paradox me-retweet
Easy Paradox me-retweet

Reducing aim assist and giving controller more of MnK’s movement options is the healthiest path for this game. Controller has been clearly stronger than MnK for multiple years. Competitive has been slowly shifting to controller dominated, ranked has been controller dominated for years, and r5 had less than 10 MnK players in the top 1,000. Surprised but happy for the future of input balancing in Apex Legends.
English
Easy Paradox me-retweet

Make his finest asset yours
Follow & Repost with #XboxCheekyControllerSweepstakes for a chance to win a custom Xbox Series X console & 2 Cheeky Controllers designed by Deadpool.
Ages 18+. Ends 8/11/24. Rules: xbx.lv/4cxoA4B
@Marvel Studios' Deadpool and Wolverine, in theaters July 26

English
Easy Paradox me-retweet

The NHL has facilitated a sale of the Coyotes to Ryan and Ashley Smith, owners of the Utah Jazz. The team will begin playing there next season.
The move will be announced next week, at the conclusion of the NHL regular season, sources told ESPN. espn.com/nhl/story/_/id…
English
Easy Paradox me-retweet











