BillyTheRetard

943 posts

BillyTheRetard

BillyTheRetard

@HoustonPuddle

Correcting Leftist Drivel

All over the place Bergabung Ocak 2010
1.3K Mengikuti138 Pengikut
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@AaronBastani Electrification comes from cheap electricity. Cheap electricity comes from cheap energy sources. It is the left, not the right who are largely against cheap energy sources.
BillyTheRetard tweet media
English
1
2
33
680
Aaron Bastani
Aaron Bastani@AaronBastani·
Yep. The right’s obsession with renewable energy as ‘woke’ is only going to look more stupid with time. Electrification is perfectly sensible from perspective of energy security. Cars, train, buses.
JamesFennell MBE@FennellJW

80% of buses are electric in China. This has nothing to do with Net Zero, its all about energy security. We need to be a lot less ideological about the energy mix - if we make it lets use it, wind. nuclear, oil, gas or solar.

English
248
191
1.7K
124.6K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@AaronBastani The 80s Oil & Gas windfall is massively over-stated. The idea we could have anything like a Norwegian style sovereign fund is for the birds.
BillyTheRetard tweet media
English
1
0
9
886
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@joshemden Incredibly bad faith argument. Of course retrofitting is more expensive than installing for new-builds - it (often) requires bringing old stock up to standard so the heat pump can actually work. Retrofitting for new-builds would be much, much cheaper.
English
0
0
0
203
Josh Emden
Josh Emden@joshemden·
Some bad numbers here New-build solar & heat pumps ~three times cheaper than retrofitting them Cost is more like £5k-£7k, saving £800-£1,000 per year. Disaster! If Cameron hadn't scrapped the standard in 2015, we'd have 2 million more homes insulated from gas prices by now
Robert Colvile@rcolvile

The Future Homes Standard: - Means that from 2028 new homes CANNOT be on the gas network - Your home HAS to have solar panels on the roof, equivalent to 40% of the ground floor area - It will cost £10,000 more to build Homes designed by Ed Miliband, paid for by you...

English
20
22
206
24.3K
BillyTheRetard me-retweet
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
Senior Iranian official tells Drop Site News that U.S. President Trump was “not being truthful” in his post earlier on TruthSocial, announcing an additional 5-day pause on his threat to bomb Iranian energy infrastructure at the request of Iran, with the official stating: “[Trump] is not being truthful. We have not submitted any request regarding potential U.S. attacks.”
English
102
199
1.5K
376.3K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@johnmbridge_ @defossardf Paris has ghettoisation *because* of social housing. There are tons of cities + towns with no or low social housing that don't have ghettos. Bizarre to look at Paris (25% social housing) and ponder "what happens if we get rid of social housing?"
English
1
0
2
55
John M Bridge🔸
John M Bridge🔸@johnmbridge_·
@defossardf Smth I worry about with scrapping affordable housing is you end up w/ much more stratified cities. I worry London could end up w/ the kind of ghettoisation you see in Paris. Do you have views on how best to avoid this?
English
5
0
0
314
Fred de Fossard
Fred de Fossard@defossardf·
We have to do away with whole concept of affordable housing and mandating it in new developments. It is nothing other than an additional tax on the law abiding, and a subsidy for criminality and worklessness. Any sensible family should steer well clear of these estates.
Nigel Forrester@NigelForrester9

I don’t know whether this is the same place, but I know lots of these new developments in Cambridgeshire have this 40% affordability requirement and the result has been middle-class homeowners being terrorised by actual criminals, with the leaseholders (for some reason) always siding with the criminals over everyone else.

English
12
8
170
9.7K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@johnpmerrick Read plenty from magazines like Jacobin, Current Affairs, Novara etc. It's poorly researched, vibes-politics, low quality stuff. Good example would be something like this which is full of sophistic argument and poor analysis: currentaffairs.org/news/rent-cont…
English
1
0
3
78
John Merrick
John Merrick@johnpmerrick·
While it's fun to laugh at someone who wrote such obvious nonsense, i do have a broader point buried in the article too. It's hard today to think of someone from the British right writing a serious book –– in fact, it's hard to picture them even reading one
John Merrick tweet media
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

Matt Goodwin’s intellectual suicide In his new book, Reform’s in-house academic set out to articulate his ideas. He produced trash By @johnpmerrick #Echobox=1774363145" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newstatesman.com/ideas/2026/03/…

English
39
54
373
101.2K
Michael Gove
Michael Gove@michaelgove·
The Miliband ascendancy
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

A CERTAIN IDEA OF ED MILIBAND by @Will___lloyd The story of the post-Blair Labour party, if it can be contained in one individual, is the story of Ed Miliband. This is not a story about backstabbing brothers, back room deals with “union paymasters”, election promises printed on tomb stones, questionable slogans on mugs, bacon sandwiches, or double kitchens; nor anything as vulgar as retail policies aimed at marginal constituencies. Miliband’s story is really about the exhilaration of ideas: where they come from, why some of us fall in love with them, and what propels those ideas from the fringes of the debate to the fulcrum of an era. This is not an argument about whether those ideas and the policies they eventually become are right or wrong. It’s a story about the long-term political power that commanding those ideas allows an individual to wield. It is about the years of Edward Samuel Miliband - and Milibandism - which might be seen as the latest, or perhaps even the last, attempt to restore a social democratic political economy in Britain. Since July 2024, when Labour returned to government, it has been hard to work out precisely the point of this administration: to spend a bit more here and there, but leave an abject economic settlement largely intact; or to be much more than that, to fundamentally reshape Britain? For the last 20 months, Miliband has stood distinctly apart from those growing doubts. Even his enemies admit that the Minister for Energy Security and Net Zero knows what he is doing. That, in large part, is why he is so hated by his opponents. Miliband is getting social democratic things done at scale: during an era of uncontrollable global conflict, which began with the Ukraine war and is spiralling in Iran, when the direction of energy policy has become the most fiercely disputed issue in British politics. Miliband and his ideas have become a lightning rod for opponents of this government. (“Eco-zealot”; “madman”; “hysterical eco-obsessive”; “muddled climate zealot”; “demented fantasies”; these are Fleet Street editorials’ relentless tribute to his perceived threat.) And yet, as one of those critics, a source who had worked with Miliband during his leadership of the Labour Party between 2010 and 2015, grudgingly admitted: “There is something about Ed that is significant. He is a symbolic figure… the last flickering of social democracy.” Cover art by Mona Eing and Michael Meißner

English
12
9
38
65.2K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@MDC12345678 @Will___lloyd Your allegories to the 1930s are good ones. Chamberlain, Halifax etc too would have considered themselves realists of a certain kind.
English
0
0
1
12
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@MDC12345678 @Will___lloyd Agreed. I think it's worth noting (in light of the John Bew article) that he too would consider himself an energy realist. It's just that realism pertains to the "climate emergency". These are the terms on which Miliband-ism must be fought.
English
1
0
1
86
Maurice Cousins
Maurice Cousins@MDC12345678·
This is another superb piece by @Will___lloyd! I have been fascinated by Ed Miliband for years. He is no fool. He is one of the most gifted and consequential politicians of his generation. I've read his book Go Big and listened to plenty of podcasts with him over the years. I respect him because he has reshaped the terms of the debate and forced his opponents onto his ground. Arrogant and complacent Conservatives mock him and consistently underestimate him. In doing so, they miss the point. Since 2008, they have largely been operating within a framework he helped define. Much of what followed since 2010 was shaped on his terms! I do not doubt his intentions. But his thinking on energy is wrong, and in places, dangerously so. We will soon see the effects of his refusal to budge. That said, I have long thought he merits a chapter in Vernon Bogdanor’s series on the weathermakers of British politics. His imprint on foreign policy and energy and climate policy will outlast him. It seems Will has got there first this beautifully written piece! And, like Ed M, I am an admirer of his father’s Socialism for a Sceptical Age! It is a thoughtful and revealing work by a brilliant writer. He grasped more about the post–Cold War settlement than most. It is no surprise that Miliband knows it so well. Its influence is clearly visible in his politics today. A weird thing in Westninster is how people don't read the works of their ideological opponents.
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

A CERTAIN IDEA OF ED MILIBAND by @Will___lloyd The story of the post-Blair Labour party, if it can be contained in one individual, is the story of Ed Miliband. This is not a story about backstabbing brothers, back room deals with “union paymasters”, election promises printed on tomb stones, questionable slogans on mugs, bacon sandwiches, or double kitchens; nor anything as vulgar as retail policies aimed at marginal constituencies. Miliband’s story is really about the exhilaration of ideas: where they come from, why some of us fall in love with them, and what propels those ideas from the fringes of the debate to the fulcrum of an era. This is not an argument about whether those ideas and the policies they eventually become are right or wrong. It’s a story about the long-term political power that commanding those ideas allows an individual to wield. It is about the years of Edward Samuel Miliband - and Milibandism - which might be seen as the latest, or perhaps even the last, attempt to restore a social democratic political economy in Britain. Since July 2024, when Labour returned to government, it has been hard to work out precisely the point of this administration: to spend a bit more here and there, but leave an abject economic settlement largely intact; or to be much more than that, to fundamentally reshape Britain? For the last 20 months, Miliband has stood distinctly apart from those growing doubts. Even his enemies admit that the Minister for Energy Security and Net Zero knows what he is doing. That, in large part, is why he is so hated by his opponents. Miliband is getting social democratic things done at scale: during an era of uncontrollable global conflict, which began with the Ukraine war and is spiralling in Iran, when the direction of energy policy has become the most fiercely disputed issue in British politics. Miliband and his ideas have become a lightning rod for opponents of this government. (“Eco-zealot”; “madman”; “hysterical eco-obsessive”; “muddled climate zealot”; “demented fantasies”; these are Fleet Street editorials’ relentless tribute to his perceived threat.) And yet, as one of those critics, a source who had worked with Miliband during his leadership of the Labour Party between 2010 and 2015, grudgingly admitted: “There is something about Ed that is significant. He is a symbolic figure… the last flickering of social democracy.” Cover art by Mona Eing and Michael Meißner

English
4
3
15
7.6K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@Layo_FH The "benefits class" is relatively privileged compared to the the working underclass (low-paid, privately renting precariously). This causes great cognitive dissonance in some people.
BillyTheRetard tweet media
English
0
0
9
854
Leo Gibbons
Leo Gibbons@Layo_FH·
If you live in social housing in the West End you’ve basically won the lottery of life. You’re living in area that 99% of us could never dream of living in, on a rent that would leave us speechless. Privileged.
noticer@noticer195684

@Layo_FH By tiny elite, do you include the socially housed, who you work for?

English
18
52
1.4K
92.6K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@tomcopley "Ordinary people" = people that don't qualify for state subsidies. It's a totally reasonable term to use.
English
0
0
0
12
Aaron Bastani
Aaron Bastani@AaronBastani·
The people responsible for Britain losing two decades after 2010 will soon tell you that what we really need is cuts to public spending, and tax cuts for the wealthy too, of course. Just unserious: it’s not about spending more, or less. We need to now be thinking like a developing country: cheap energy, cheap housing, development of human capital, technological autonomy, food and energy security. Anyone whose idea of ‘supply side reform’ being the same as cutting corporation tax is presently as useful as an umbrella in a hurricane.
English
101
125
772
53K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@s8mb It's just "basic Keynes", dude. Spending multipliers. For every £1 you put into renewable energy you get £1.50 back. That's it. There's no more to it. That's how it works. x.com/TheGreenParty/…
The Green Party@TheGreenParty

“It is basic Keynes — we need to look at the long-term impact of investment, how it brings money back into the economy and builds purchasing power for ordinary people.” @ZackPolanski answering a question on borrowing and our long-term economic strategy at his speech at the New Economics Foundation.

English
0
0
2
354
Sam Bowman
Sam Bowman@s8mb·
This may sound alarming, but I think the Chancellor Ed Miliband will be a restraining force.
Sam Bowman tweet media
English
6
1
58
12.9K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@watling_samuel English people have always preferred houses with gardens (sandwiched between a dual carriageway and a railway track), Samuel
BillyTheRetard tweet media
English
0
0
1
35
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@s8mb Also, helping alleviate global price pressures by increasing global supplies is inherently quite good, actually. Milliband's isolationism would make Trump blush!
BillyTheRetard tweet media
English
0
0
1
183
Sam Bowman
Sam Bowman@s8mb·
There's really no point having a domestic car manufacturing industry in Britain. The price of cars is set on the global market - producing them in the UK doesn't reduce the cost of cars here at all. And cars produce CO2. Why would we want this?
English
156
57
801
58.3K
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@skulthorp @lukas_ohl Selling for a loss does not equal not being bought. In this case it doesn't even make sense given New Acres is build for rent. This is what happens when you quote tweet an account who thinks we should all be living in social housing.
English
0
0
0
30
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@StijnWenders @skulthorp Developers are merely conduits for our demand. The reason this demand for beautiful new architecture isn't being met is because state diktat makes it economically unviable. If they could offer a competitive advantage by cost-effectively building more beautifully, they would.
English
1
0
0
14
BillyTheRetard
BillyTheRetard@HoustonPuddle·
@StijnWenders @skulthorp This is what private developers used to speculatively build before needing to submit planning documents longer than War and Peace, forcing them to conform to an innumerable list of petty requirements concerning lighting, noise, environmental impact etc
BillyTheRetard tweet mediaBillyTheRetard tweet mediaBillyTheRetard tweet media
English
1
0
0
21