Tweet Disematkan
John Wilder
5.1K posts

John Wilder
@LieWriteHear
Like, I'm not a human; I'm an adult.🤦🏾 I'll try answering questions...for conversation & understanding. Let's speak truthfully.
Philadelphia, PA Bergabung Mayıs 2012
657 Mengikuti213 Pengikut

@CommieInaBox @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter Yes, a human being in utero is entitled to nourishment and entitled to be attached to their mother's body to receive said nourishment.
Congratulations, you are finally understanding mammalian reproduction and the human life cycle!
English

@LieWriteHear @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter By altering a healthy state, you mean severing an umbilical cord. Now not only are you saying a fetus entitled to nourishment from this other body but also to quite literally be ATTACHED to this other persons body.
English

@Shoshannah6623 @LifeNewsHQ When we don't agree with them we don't believe women.
English

Doctors called a mom "INHUMANE" for not aborting her twin babies, who they said were disabled.
But they were born HEALTHY!
Hannah Morris was urged to "terminate her pregnancy" when her water broke at just 16 weeks.
She was diagnosed with preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM), and told that neither baby had any chance of survival.
“I had an internal examination and the doctor told me that my waters had broken, and he was really sorry but there was nothing they could do for us," she said.
“I asked a million questions, can the other baby survive? Can it reseal?"
“My gut was telling me not to follow the advice”
She describes being pressured to have an abortion. “They said, ‘no, there was a 100 percent chance that this baby won’t survive, you need to have to have some medicine to induce labor, it’s your only option’. I didn’t want to do that. My gut was telling me not to follow the advice.
“I knew nothing about PPROM. I didn’t know it was a thing before then. I just rejected all the medical advice. I said ‘if I am going to lose them, I lose them naturally and I’ll let nature take its course’.”
Morris says she and her husband Mark King were then left in a side-room for 48 hours, with no medical support, to miscarry their children. However, a scan then revealed that both babies were actually healthy and the couple was sent home.
They then turned to voluntary organization Little Heartbeats for support and Ms Morris put herself on bedrest to give her babies the best chance of survival. But the pressure from medical professionals to end the pregnancy continued.
Continuous pressure to abort
At a follow-up appointment at the hospital, a doctor told her that if the babies got to 24 weeks, their limbs would be stuck together and their vital organs wouldn’t be functional.
“[They said] I was only causing them more pain by carrying on with the pregnancy,” Morris says. “We were considering at this point terminating the pregnancies because this was coming from top consultants.”
After doing more research and getting support from outside the NHS, they continued with the pregnancy, but the demands to abort continued to come at the weekly scans, despite them showing healthy babies.
Morris said: “That’s what pushed us to carry on with the pregnancy every single week. We would see the boys on the screen and they would be fine. The sonographer would say his lungs are developed, so the kidneys are fine. The doctors reviewed it each week and say it looks like they are doing fine but that is going to change so you need to terminate the pregnancy.”
Proving them all wrong
Despite the negative medical advice, Morris made it to 34 weeks and had a c-section.
George was born first weighing 5lb 4oz and Alfie followed at 4lb 1oz. They both spent four days in the NICU, but despite Alfie being born with holes in his heart and George suffering a weakened immune system due to his premature birth, both toddlers are now healthy and thriving.
“Taking our boys home was amazing. Just to know that we were right and that we had made the right decision by our children,” Morris said.

English

@CommieInaBox @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter You aren't very discerning are you?
There is a difference between altering a healthy state so that a human dies and not providing extraordinary care to prevent death.
Correct, there is no double standard.
English

@LieWriteHear @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter So someone who cant survive without blood transfusions is entitled to the blood, because they need it to exist.
No double standards here, man.
English

@shadowbanevader @endabortionmeme Why is it always women killing their children though?
English

@endabortionmeme Why is it always men trying to control women’s bodies though?
English

@zuukabwa @endabortionmeme 90-95% of all abortions are elective and not for medical reasons and/or rape.
You don't care about the reasons anyway and I suspect that's why you don't care about lying on the subject.

English

@endabortionmeme bacisly the SAME reaspn SPME people are prochoice u dont get to use me withouth MY consent lets also not ignore that pregnancy IS ALWAYS dangerous EVEN IN THE PERFECT situation so no u retard lastly 90% of ALL abortions are done for medical reason AND because of rape/incest
English

@CommieInaBox @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter Humans have a right to life. In the fetal stage a human can only exist inside their mother. It is essential for every healthy human being and beyond birth we no longer require that protection.
Can a neonate even survive inside their mother's uterus?
English

@LieWriteHear @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter lol youre doing gymanstics to try and justify your double standard. Either we all have a "right" to life, or none of us do, including fetuses. If a fetuses "right" to life includes someone elses body than so does mine.
English

@CommieInaBox @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter You & I were fetuses before we were neonates & so on. We did have the privilege of not having our right to exist violated while living in the only place meant for us to be in - our mothers' uterus.
Denying this is to reject reality & the truth of our life cycle as humans.
English

@LieWriteHear @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter Why is a fetus entitled to a special previledge that the rest of us are not?
English

@CommieInaBox @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter Do you think medical science considers how human life works in an attempt to maintain and/or restore healthy function?
English

@LieWriteHear @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter Everything medical science does is to counter act how "mammalian life" works. If people arent entitled to blood than a fetus is not entitled to a womb, thats it.
English

@NollieBinDozin @katek8038 @tristanever1201 @secularprolife If the offspring of two human parents isn't human then what species is it?
English

@LieWriteHear @katek8038 @tristanever1201 @secularprolife Conscious? No. Sentient? No. Capable of suffering? No. Census counts them? Death certificate for a miscarriage? If it WAS a human, does it have a right to parasite someone's else's body against their will? No.
Literally none of these things.
English

@luvmyjaide @umok_N These organizations want abortion to be ended as well as not wanting to prosecute women, correct?
I don't agree that mothers who kill their own children are innocent but I do think these pro-life organizations do oppose abortion.
English

@LieWriteHear @umok_N Pro-life doesnt oppose abortion.
They protect special murder rights for mothers.

English

@CommieInaBox @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter Because that's how mammalian life works. We all start inside the body of our mother. This is the ordinary care every human requires in the earliest stages of our lives.
No, someone that needs a blood transfusion to survive is not entitled to another's blood.
English

@LieWriteHear @SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @KatelynTweeter Why is a fetus entitled to use of another persons bodily resources? Is someone who needs a blood tranfusion to survive entitled to someones blood?
English

@umok_N @luvmyjaide How can you still not know that pro-life means to oppose abortion and why pro-lifers oppose abortion.
There isn't outrage from pro-lifers because pro-lifers oppose the direct and intentional killing of innocent humans in utero.
It's like you try to be daft.
English

@gfhd760 @KatelynTweeter You definitely didn't write "frozen embryo" originally, but I see your point.
The answer is still yes, they qualify a baby.
English

@LieWriteHear @KatelynTweeter They were not excluded from my original questions. You made that up. If you read my initial post I asked about a zygote which isn't necessarily in a womb which is why I mentioned petri dishes.
English

@SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @CommieInaBox @KatelynTweeter Yep, the forced birth of a dead child.
Aborties really don't think about the bumper sticker slogans they throw around.
English

@gfhd760 @KatelynTweeter I didn't give a definition, I only answered your questions.
You seem to be moving the goal posts to add another group of humans you didn't mention earlier. Was that intentional?
English

@LieWriteHear @KatelynTweeter What about frozen embryos or embryos in a petri dish? They seem to be excluded from your definition. Was that intentional or honest mistake?
English

@SgtKOnyx @LilContrarian @CommieInaBox @KatelynTweeter I've been call "pro-birth" plenty of times. One of many badges I wear proudly because...what is the alternative really?
English

@LieWriteHear @LilContrarian @CommieInaBox @KatelynTweeter Those were some of the first results on the search for "Pro Birther"
English

@NathanNobis @tristanever1201 @secularprolife Depriving someone of human qualities and treating people as if they aren't fully human is dehumanization.
Your entire schtick is denying the humanity of living humans because they haven't shown consciousness yet.
Aborties thrive on dehumanization and lies.
English

@tristanever1201 @secularprolife Yes, "semantics"--the meanings of words, defining one's terms--is very important.
So, the meaning of "dehumanization" is important:
abortionarguments.com/2023/06/dehuma…

English










