John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

16.7K posts

John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 banner
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@LoamAndLight

Englishman. Restore Britain supporter.

England Bergabung Aralık 2025
947 Mengikuti1.9K Pengikut
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Katie Lam
Katie Lam@Katie_Lam_MP·
In just 8 years, China pumped out more carbon emissions than Britain has produced in 250 years. Net zero is wrecking our industry, and driving up our energy bills, but it's having zero impact on global climate. It's time to scrap Net Zero for good.
English
298
2.1K
8.4K
79.1K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Andy
Andy@PositivFuturist·
The whole Zack Polanski thing is so funny.. It’s like.. nobody in Labour has ever had a proper job or built anything, but think that they’re good people and thus qualified to run a civilisation. Polanski : failed actor, failed hypnotist, literally done fuck all his entire life, completely indoctrinated with leftist vibe based bullshit - “hold my beer”. And the only reason leftists buy it is that they have to believe the problem is people since all their policies have been maximally implemented already.
English
4
14
142
5.2K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Dan Salt
Dan Salt@Danjsalt·
You'll struggle to find a more perfect paragraph to describe the current moment "Labour doesn’t have a Keir Starmer problem. It has a Labour problem. It is organisationally and ideologically estranged from its working-class support base. Labour today is a deracinated, hollowed-out vehicle for the professional managerial class. The only politicians it can produce are different brands of the same technocratic, managerial product." spiked-online.com/2026/06/20/and…
English
17
105
384
7.8K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Ben Harris
Ben Harris@btharris93·
"pivots the party hard right" Cannot even imagine how deluded and out of touch you have to be with reality to believe this about Starmer.
onion person@CantEverDie

>becomes prime minister >wins largest majority seen in labour history >pivots the party hard right, cracks down on palestinian protestors and privacy rights >completely destroys the labour party >resigns what was bro doing any of this for

English
26
127
3.6K
113.9K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Josh Otten
Josh Otten@ordinarytings·
Incoming heat wave in the UK got me moving like Lee Kuan Yew
Josh Otten tweet media
English
5
267
5K
80.2K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Guido Fawkes
Guido Fawkes@GuidoFawkes·
Burnham’s economic architect Miatta Fahnbulleh recommends, among other things: •A wealth tax and yet another windfall tax on oil and gas. •Mass nationalisation e.g. of land, transport, and energy. •Extending national insurance to investment income. •A cap on interest rates and charges on every form of consumer credit. •Hiking capital gains tax to income tax levels. •Hiking divided tax to income tax levels. •Abolition of the upper earnings limit for national insurance. •Huge expansion of the benefits system including a “minimum income guarantee” paid to everyone apart from the rich. •Nationalisation of banks and creation of new “green” banks with taxpayer funds. •Block on private banks lending to anyone with a “large amount of greenhouse gas emissions” and “penalisation of banks that provide too many carbon-intensive loans.“ •Forced sale of existing businesses to employees. •A tripling of the stamp duty surcharge to 9% for multiple homeowners and an increase to 6% for non-residents.
Cut My Tax@CutMyTaxUK

There are two worrying aspects to this New Statesman article: 1. Andy Burnham apparently doesn't have many brains. 2. Miatta Fahnbulleh is filling the gap. Quasi-Marxist Miatta Fahnbulleh, who wants a wealth tax, widespread nationalisation inc. banks, land, transport & energy & the forced sale of existing firms to employees, is one of the worst people to put in charge of economic policy. She's a high tax fanatic tax who wants there to be 'free basic energy' & for state owned companies to flood the energy market. 1/3

English
274
534
1.2K
454.4K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Mike Jones
Mike Jones@technopopulist·
The methodology is flawed, as you say. But there is no doubt that 10,000+ girls were raped, and the total number of rapes involved is in the millions. I don’t think the number of victims was as high as 250,000, but it was still VERY high, and involved sustained abuse by thousands and thousands of men, repeatedly over time.
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania

Amazing level of BS is behind the estimate of 250,000 white girls victimized by "Muslim rape gangs." What they did was: 1) Come up with a number for Telford, Oxford, and Rotherham, the center of the scandal 2) Extrapolate to the rest of the country Imagine if, to calculate murders in America, you looked at Detroit, Chicago, and Baltimore and then assumed all of America has the same murder rate. But wait, there's more! Even the original numbers are nonsense. To get the original estimate for Oxford, they included all supposed victims of sexual exploitation or grooming, by Muslims or anyone else. This means that they assumed 100% of victims were white girls and 100% of the perpetrators were Muslims for all cases of sexual exploitation! The report also switches between saying there were 250,000 victims, and 250,000 instances of victimization, without any explanation why. For Telford, they went back 40 years, though I don't think that there were Muslim rape gangs in the 1980s. The Oxford number includes all instances of "grooming," whether or not they involved sexual contact at all, and not much is shared about the methodology. It is a complete guess. I often hear rightists say "the liberals lie so I don't believe anything." What conclusion are we supposed to draw from the fact that rightists are this indifferent to facts?

English
5
6
42
1.7K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Adam Wren
Adam Wren@aswren·
@EspressoLucid He’s just decided that it’s bullshit & therefore… Many people like this, important to not give them ammo & just refute their claims or we’ll end up backsliding. It’s still not quite something you’d discuss at work but we were almost there. Government inquiry is important now
English
1
1
39
683
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Espresso Lucid
Espresso Lucid@EspressoLucid·
@aswren His replies baffle me. It just comes across as denial at any cost and clutching at straws to not change his mind.
English
1
2
33
685
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Adam Wren
Adam Wren@aswren·
It’s worth reading through this to see someone grasp for increasingly bizzare reasons to maintain their worldview
Michael Tracey@mtracey

@aswren Instant red flag

English
24
33
399
21.7K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
I want to be really clear in my response. I am not going to retract anything, I stand by every single word. Labour are calling for me to apologise. The answer is no. Industrial rape across almost every town and city in Britain. Sexual torture. Murder. Endless rape. I sat there for two weeks, listening to these girls. I heard how one girl was raped by a dog, as Muslim men bet on what the animal would do. Girls drugged and locked in cages, like rats. Another, raped by 700 men over three years. Dozens and dozens of these stories through our inquiry, and we are barely scratching the surface. This was allowed to happen EXACTLY because politicians were cowards, refusing to discuss it. I will not make that same mistake. I said what I said, and I meant it. The Labour Party have blood on their hands, yet they think they can demand an apology from me for highlighting the systemic evil they allowed to infect our entire country? They can piss off. I am angry about it. Furious. When you hear directly from these girls about what they have been through, it changes the way you see politics. Forever. Our report will be out very soon. When that happens, I don’t want any apologies from the Labour Party. I don’t care about that. I want to see those politicians responsible for covering up this atrocity behind bars for what they have done to these girls.
Rupert Lowe MP tweet media
English
4.1K
29.1K
121.1K
3.2M
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Ste 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧
I am honestly in despair at the reactions to this from the so-called patriotic right. The idea that the economy matters at all when the nation itself is at stake is not patriotism. Britain is not an economic zone. It is the homeland of the British people. This prioritisation of economics is what led to the Boriswave. It is what is stopping us making the changes we have to make. We cannot accept framing immigration through economics ever, for good or for ill. The economy must come second to the good of the nation. That should be the most basic requirement of any patriot.
LBC@LBC

“You'd rather live in poverty than allow economic immigrants to come here!” "Damn right!" The debate over Restore Britain's immigration policy between @cfdownes_ and @Femi_sorry gets intense...

English
69
73
877
30.4K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Charlie Simpson 🇬🇧
Charlie Simpson 🇬🇧@CharlieSimpsonA·
EXCLUSIVE: There is a lot of talk on social media at the moment about who should be the deputy leader of Restore Britain. One potential candidate for the role is Charlie Downes. I spoke to Mr Downes today, and here is what he had to say about the calls for him to become deputy leader and whether he wanted the job: "I’ll do whatever Rupert believes is most useful for me to do! I’m not wedded to any job title, but I appreciate the support."
English
25
14
190
16.2K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
GB Politics
GB Politics@GBPolitcs·
🚨NEW: Charlie Downes on whether he wants to be deputy leader of Restore Britain and the support he’s received for the role: "I’ll do whatever Rupert believes is most useful for me to do. I’m not wedded to any job title, but I appreciate the support." [@CharlieSimpsonA]
English
30
67
1.8K
49K
John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 me-retweet
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
@naushabah_khan Who do you think you’re quoting? Because it’s a very serious allegation to suggest I have ever said that?
English
169
634
13.1K
155.1K