Humint collector

Another Expert Shuts Down The 11 “Missing/Dead Scientists” Conspiracy Theory! It seems that people are starting to now speak out against the viral conspiracy theory of the 11 missing/dead scientists. @CoffindafferFBI was interviewed on @NewsNation and went against the viral narrative, that made its way all the way up to @realDonaldTrump @POTUS, and states what I started saying three days ago: there is no conspiracy! These cases, when looked at individually, can be eliminated one-by-one from having any connection to the other in the context of how they either went missing or died. All the copy-paste journalism out there has everyone hyper-fixated on each of the 11 individual’s careers, but simple research shows very quickly that the context in their deaths are the REAL key. This goofy conspiracy theory started with UFO activists/believers claiming General McCasland’s disappearance was somehow related to the current push for UFO disclosure and the coming documents from the Trump administration. That is easily proven wrong based off McCasland’s wife’s public statements and her 911 call that can be found here (x.com/legacyprogramv…) From there, people started trying to find other “scientists” (McCasland was not a scientist) and started to try to link them professionally. Then @DailyMail ran articles about it, and instead of doing simple research into each of the cases, they ramped up the conspiracy with misinformation and propaganda. For example, they said that the death of Michael Hicks was mysterious because a cause of death wasn’t public. They were wrong! In the image below, you can clearly see that the coroner did list a cause of death: cardiovascular disease with Morbid Obesity as a contributing condition at the age of 59. That’s a natural cause-related death. There is no mystery, yet @Daily_MailUS pushed it as one. All my research from three days ago that led to me being vocal about this is listed here (x.com/legacyprogramv…). Thank you to those who tried to amplify my posts/findings (@AdamKinzinger @Liv_Boeree @michaelshermer) and others with smaller followings like mine. @CBSNews finally caught on shortly after my posts with this post which I echoed here (x.com/legacyprogramv…) And lastly, here was my most recent breakdown in which I laid out short bullet points for each case to show there just wasn’t a connection (except my interest in Casias and Chavez because of the manner of their disappearance in New Mexico), in which I tagged multiple news agencies and correspondents (@NewsNation @FoxNews @WillCainShow @conlin_lauren @EricBurlison) who I saw promoting parts of this conspiracy without putting out all the information. A version of the posts here (x.com/legacyprogramv…) In conclusion, there is no conspiracy. People die every day. Some by natural causes, some in tragic accidents, some by suicide, and some are by murder/homicides. You have to look at each case individually and let the context of their deaths/disappearances guide you and not hyper-fixate on trying to find connections professionally to other deaths. The only time that is relevant is when multiple people from the same department within the same company, or working on the same project in the same building, goes missing in a relatively close timeframe. That’s when you have potential for this type of conspiracy…but that’s not what is happening here.

.@POTUS: I recently directed @SecWar to begin releasing government files relating to UFOs and unexplained aerial phenomena. I am pleased to report this process is well underway. We've found many very interesting documents — and the first releases will begin very, very soon. 👽

Amy Eskridge's death is the latest to be grouped in a conspiracy about missing or dead scientists who had a connection to government research. Eskridge's father, a former NASA employee, says nothing is suspicious about his daughter's suicide in 2022, despite reports that Eskridge had expressed fears her life was in danger at the time. More: tinyurl.com/mnvss3bc @NancyLoo