Max

1.9K posts

Max

Max

@Oostermax

PhD student. Data scientist adopted by environmental epidemiologists. Interested in causal inf, modelling, meta-science, epi, policy etc. Sports enthusiast.

Utrecht Bergabung Şubat 2011
3.5K Mengikuti308 Pengikut
Michiel de Hoog
Michiel de Hoog@michieldehoog·
@MartinRafelt Did anyone ever do a 'modern' analysis of the greats? Pele, Maradona, Beckenbauer, Cruijff, Zidane? Watch them for five games? I watched some Zidane (more than highlights reel) recently and it struck me how often he did nonsensical stuff. It hurt me! ;-)
English
2
0
0
776
Martin Rafelt
Martin Rafelt@MartinRafelt·
What's absolutely crazy here is that EVERY SINGLE ONE is perfectly placed and weighted. The more I see from Maradona, the more I feel that he is actually...sort of underrated nowadays? Touch by touch, the most perfect and imaginative player of all time.
90s Footballers@90sPlayers

Maradona loved a rabona pass

English
87
219
4.4K
167.4K
Max
Max@Oostermax·
@MatthewBJane showing up unannounced on the same day every week and people still fall for the bit..
English
0
0
1
212
Kareem Rifai 🌐
Kareem Rifai 🌐@KareemRifai·
Can any of these viral posts claiming that hospital-issue pagers were being blown up provide any actual evidence, because the viral "civilian health worker" who was confirmed dead from a pager explosion just had his funeral. And, uh... yeah.
Kareem Rifai 🌐 tweet mediaKareem Rifai 🌐 tweet media
michael wave@michael___wave

“why do so many ‘health workers’ have Hezbollah Pagers?” because Hezbollah Pager isn’t a real thing. because that’s what happens supply chains are contaminated. just because the propaganda needs you to be very stupid to believe it doesn’t mean you’re obliged to become that stupid

English
75
642
5.3K
328.2K
Max
Max@Oostermax·
@WvanAmsterdam how many of those will be equivalent or will have the same adjustment set for identifying effect of x on y?
English
1
0
1
241
Wouter van Amsterdam
Wouter van Amsterdam@WvanAmsterdam·
A003024 (oeis.org/A003024) is this number problem the death of DAGs as an identification tool? considering all possible DAGs for 10 variables at 1 second per DAG takes >age of the universe
Wouter van Amsterdam tweet media
English
6
3
19
5.7K
Max
Max@Oostermax·
@Woningnieuws je kant net zo goed beargumenteren dat de hogere prijzen rijkere bewoners betekenen en die hebben simpelweg hogere opportuniteitskosten van kinderen
Nederlands
0
0
0
203
De starter 🚩
De starter 🚩@Woningnieuws·
Meer beleggers -> minder gezinnen. Meer beleggers -> hogere prijzen. Hogerge prijzen -> minder babies
Nederlands
3
1
6
1K
Max me-retweet
Michael Nielsen
Michael Nielsen@michael_nielsen·
Just reflecting, tongue-in-cheek, that "no funding" is dollar-for-dollar far and away the best-performing funding strategy ever in science "Works in spare time off from job as patent clerk / programmer at high-energy accelerator / day duties as Abbot": any funder would be proud!
English
2
3
57
10.2K
Max me-retweet
Peter Tennant has moved to Bluesky
Suggested conflict of interest statement for all academic papers: "The authors' career prospects depend on publishing papers with clear conclusions that agree with their previous hypotheses and/or assertions." #AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter
English
2
10
59
10.7K
Max me-retweet
Thom Scott-Phillips
Thom Scott-Phillips@tscottphillips·
Increasingly I feel that academics self-organise themselves not primarily by 'topic of interest' but rather 'epistemology'. Different fields and subfields have different assumptions about what is useful knowledge and how it is acquired 1/2
English
6
26
149
40.3K
Demetri (is over at the other place too)
If you're bored, I've got this example of confounding in R. I want to demonstrate how the confounded estimate is computed using marginal probabilities for the outcome and the exposure, but I can't get the arithmetic right. Would love if you could help gist.github.com/Dpananos/8418a…
English
4
5
63
16.1K
Max
Max@Oostermax·
@carlislerainey who said it that footnotes are for that what the writer wants to say but the reader does not necessarily want to read?
English
0
0
1
210
Carlisle Rainey
Carlisle Rainey@carlislerainey·
Authors vary a lot in how they use footnotes.¹ What's your preferred style? 1️⃣ Many footnotes! 2️⃣ Few footnotes; omit those details! 3️⃣ Few footnotes; put those details to the main text!
English
4
0
1
1.4K
Max
Max@Oostermax·
@camjpatrick or worse you find out they don’t think about you at all
GIF
English
0
0
1
97
Max
Max@Oostermax·
@carlislerainey some hybrid between distill.pub, pubpeer.com and repositories like Github? Possibly with some credit system where you need to review after a number of submissions.
English
0
0
1
92
Carlisle Rainey
Carlisle Rainey@carlislerainey·
Oh no! Thanos has snapped his fingers and turned Elsevier, Spring, Taylor & Francis, etc., to dust. ☹️ We need a new way to distribute our papers. Starting from scratch, how do we replace the current publication process? New for-profit publishers? Do we keep peer review?
English
12
1
18
7.5K
Max
Max@Oostermax·
@frieke72 @Woningnieuws @Lukkezen je kan de overwaarde gewoon verzilveren met een omgekeerde hypotheek of je casht de overwaarde met de verkoop van het huis en gaat vervolgens bijv. huren. Bij laatstgenoemde word je in tegenstelling tot andere huurders een huurder met veel vermogen op de rekening
Nederlands
1
0
2
215
frieke72 @ mstdn.social
frieke72 @ mstdn.social@frieke72·
@Woningnieuws @Lukkezen Uh... Begrijp het misschien niet goed, maar van ozb waardestijging kun je geen boterham meer eten 🤷 (beklaag me niet over die stijging, maar het idee dat je er iets mee kunt)
Nederlands
1
0
1
362
Jasper Lukkezen
Jasper Lukkezen@Lukkezen·
Nederlanders be like ...
Jasper Lukkezen tweet media
English
4
2
42
4.4K
Max me-retweet
Carlisle Rainey
Carlisle Rainey@carlislerainey·
Too often we borrow the style of professional programmers who need speed and maintainability. Scientists on the other hand, need clarity and correctness. Code that's easy to understand for non-experts is really valuable for scientists.
English
1
2
6
855
Max me-retweet
Carlisle Rainey
Carlisle Rainey@carlislerainey·
3 goals of sharing data + code underlying empirical research articles: (1) easily reproduce results (e.g., click Run) (2) document every decision, even those not mentioned in the paper (3) demonstrate to the community that you implemented the analysis as you claimed
English
3
9
40
7.3K
Riccardo Fusaroli
Riccardo Fusaroli@fusaroli·
I want to learn how to calculate some form of intraclass correlation (ICC) across groups in multilevel models (w #brms), e.g. across repeated measures modelled as random/varying effects. Any resources out there? @tjmahr, I remember you did something like that?
English
4
3
13
5.7K
Max
Max@Oostermax·
@ryancbriggs you can get a pretty accurate idea of your body fat by comparing what you see in the mirror against informal references like these builtlean.com/wp-content/upl… there's also skinfold meters with reference tables
English
0
0
1
35
Ryan Briggs
Ryan Briggs@ryancbriggs·
Or better yet, any ideas for checking which mode is more accurate that don’t invoke going to the doctor?
Toronto, Ontario 🇨🇦 English
2
0
0
355
Ryan Briggs
Ryan Briggs@ryancbriggs·
I got a scale that can estimate body fat, etc. It has an “athlete mode.” I assume it runs a different model on the sensor data if you’re an “athlete.” I’m not, but I’m reasonably fit and seemingly get rowing times ~in the top 1/3 of my age group. Do I turn on athlete mode?
Toronto, Ontario 🇨🇦 English
2
0
1
1.4K