DEC UNS Bahía Blanca

⚖️ Pregunta para abogados: ¿Usar inteligencia artificial para redactar escritos, consultar criterios o revisar expedientes viola la confidencialidad con tu cliente? Déjame tu respuesta. 👇

Las dos fotos del uso de la IA generativa a nivel global -El 84% del mundo AÚN no la usa (6.8 billones de personas) -Un 16% está usando IA gratuita (1.3 billones). El 0,3% está pagando por IA (15-25 millones). Pero... 3 años despues del lanzamiento de internet sólo el 0,3 % de la población mundial la usaba. La IA generativa en tres años es 16%. La velocidad de expansión es vertiginosa

Un abogado pide, como prueba, citar a ChatGPT a la audiencia para que las partes lo interroguen sobre los dictámenes, la historia clínica y ciertos hechos. El TS de Cali (MS: Homero Mora), en auto de 17 de marzo, confirma negativa. Buena decisión, aunque no gustará a los que abogan por la libertad probatoria, sin reparar en principios.

Lawyers on both sides cite non-existent cases, court admonishes both but sanctions neither. "Perhaps due to the asynchronous Thelma and Louise, neither side requests sanctions."

Public opinion on same-sex marriage across Latin America.

La psicología conductual y la psiquiatría farmacológica operan bajo la lógica del capitalismo: el síntoma es una falla que impide producir. Si dejas de estar triste para volver a trabajar, el sistema dice que estás "curado", aunque sigas siendo un extraño para ti mismo.

Everyone's reading OpenClaw's China adoption as a productivity story. The workplace coercion numbers tell a different story. Over the past three weeks, nearly 1,000 people have lined up outside Tencent's headquarters in Shenzhen to get a single piece of software installed on their laptops. Engineers from cloud providers are hosting free public installation events. Local governments are offering up to $690,000 in subsidies for companies building on the platform. The headlines framed this as enthusiasm. Mass adoption. China leaping ahead in agentic AI. But here's the number that should concern you: at one of China's largest finance groups, managers told employees they would be "immediately replaced or let go" if they didn't use the AI agent. Let's trace what's actually happening. OpenClaw runs locally on your machine and can take proactive actions across your entire system. The software requires deep system permissions. It needs access to your email, calendar, file system, messaging platforms. This isn't a browser extension. It's root-level access to your digital life. And in China, that access isn't optional anymore. Cindy Weng, a 35-year-old product manager in Shenzhen, was told she needed to stay for an AI contest during Lunar New Year, a week-long holiday. The company had just adopted OpenClaw and managers wanted employees to prove, competitively, that they could use it. "Since OpenClaw came along, things have gotten insanely competitive," she said. "We're practically being crushed by the grind." The contest was postponed after employee pushback. But the pressure didn't ease. Managers made it clear: learn the tool or be replaced. This pattern is repeating across Chinese companies. At a Beijing research facility, employees are ranked monthly based on how much they use Cursor. Software engineers report being told their roles could become "obsolete in the not-so-remote future" if they don't integrate AI into every workflow. Meanwhile, a cottage industry has emerged. Engineers are charging 500 yuan ($72) to install OpenClaw on-site. If you get cold feet about giving an AI agent access to your entire digital life? They'll charge you the same amount to uninstall it. The government's response reveals the contradiction. Chinese authorities have banned OpenClaw from state-run enterprises and government agencies over security concerns. The National Vulnerability Database warned that improper configuration could create serious cybersecurity risks. At the exact same time, local governments in Shenzhen, Wuxi, Longgang, and Hefei are offering subsidies, startup programs, and policy initiatives to accelerate OpenClaw adoption. The Wuxi high-tech district is dangling 5 million yuan for manufacturing applications. Beijing is simultaneously banning OpenClaw on government networks while local governments subsidize companies building on it. This isn't a bug in policy. It's the strategy: capture the economic upside of agentic AI while keeping it out of the party-state's own systems. But the private sector has no such protections. Companies are racing to adopt because the productivity gains are real and the opportunity cost of abstaining is becoming untenable. Banning AI agents in 2026 is like trying to ban spreadsheets in 1985. why this matters beyond China? this is what AI adoption looks like when there are no labor protections. No collective bargaining over what level of system access is reasonable. No negotiation over whether employers can mandate competitive ranking based on AI usage. No opt-out for workers who don't want to grant root-level permissions to an autonomous agent. The technology moves faster than regulation. Companies adopt because competitors are adopting. Workers comply because non-compliance means replacement. And the engineers charging $72 to uninstall? They're the only ones who recognized this might not end well.