Absolute Darling 🌻 | (scRota)

Sempre estimulo a melhoria, mas acho q é possível também trabalhar em outras portas, se a porta da arte fechar. Mangá incrível com arte feia, é possível? youtube.com/watch?v=ucz5uO…

Nada é mais pavoroso do que a programação da tv aberta dia de sábado e domingo

@tagame nível da tosquice

「ブラジル人は貧しくて、海賊版でしかゲームできない子がいるから、 海賊版は悪いことじゃないんだよ。 子どもたちにゲームするなって言うの？」 はい。 貧しくて買えないなら安く違法コピーを買って遊べばいい。と教えるべきじゃないな。 高くてゲームできないなら別のことをやれと教えます。

Essa lagarta de mariposa produz um som fofo por contrações do corpo, ela força o ar através dos espiráculos, que são os buraquinhos que elas usam para respirar. Dito isso, deixe ela em paz imediatamente. 🥺

@mwinstonf3 @kameatamaLoL @eusoudande @Vic39027 @birufgc bater na mesma tecla não vai adiantar nada. sugiro educadamente que se retire.

@ScarrletEl @kameatamaLoL @eusoudande @Vic39027 @birufgc 注目: 10万人あたりの性犯罪率

Pq os brasileiros estão se justificando pros japoneses sobre pirataria? Meu irmão a gente não deve explicações pra ninguém deixem de vira-latismo.

@mwinstonf3 @kameatamaLoL @eusoudande @Vic39027 @birufgc ironia mais fraca que já vi. o país mais atrasado em direitos humanos entre os ricos nem tem moral pra falar algo aqui.

@kameatamaLoL @ScarrletEl @eusoudande @Vic39027 @birufgc 日本じゃありえないよねw 創作物のロリの人権について賢ぶって語る前に、実際のロリの人権を守れよって話。

@kameatamaLoL @mwinstonf3 claramente o cidadão ou está inventando ou exagerando.

@ScarrletEl @mwinstonf3 @eusoudande @Vic39027 @birufgc 本当に存在すんのかよ...怖いな。

@miriammartinho falácia do apelo ao medo / mas q diabos o cara vai querer matar uma pessoa aqui na América Latina, sendo o grande inimigo são os EUA? claramente uma transferência que não nos pertence. além de claro conhecimento 0 de geopolítica, cultura e história

@ScarrletEl Você não tem capacidade para entender o que as pessoas escrevem. Imagine saber fazer ironia. Muita comédia. 😏

🧠 🇻🇦 Papa Leão XIV tem QI estimado em 145, formação em matemática e teologia e fala 7 idiomas.

@miriammartinho tua persistência no ad hominem já revela tua pobreza cognitiva, mais fundada na emoção, pra não dizer histeria. falácia do comentário 1: a de generalização apressada /mentirosa, combinada com um viés de confirmação e uma falsa equivalência.->

@nrken19 incredible how your conclusion is way more honest compared to some individuals i ve seen recently

More readable article about the new study. “How farming changed us: Ancient DNA reveals natural selection sped up in recent human evolution” phys.org/news/2026-04-f…

isso, os Hispanos eram um dos grandes guerreiros da antiguidade. mas o BR médio prefere endeusar os vikings.

@robertsepehr @SamanthaTaghoy being redhead has nothing to do with blue eyes in those regions...

@SamanthaTaghoy It takes a very low IQ to not be able to grasp that demographics of a given geography can change over thousands of years, especially given wars, migrations, and the Arab slave trade. The Mesopotamian Bronze Age and early civilizations were White, as was Jesus's Davidic bloodline.

Nigéria é incrível mesmo

@al_batalyawsi cabeça de pica

¿Por qué esa obsesión con enlongar los cráneos?

@Aquele_Mesm @MilanBillPaul @Jonnn1Jonn @VidaemOrbita_ @levisback quem não tem útero, não tem opinião. simples

@MilanBillPaul @Jonnn1Jonn @VidaemOrbita_ @levisback A diferença é que tu defende matar por conveniência

"Onde quer que haja adoração a animais, ali haverá sacrifício humano". G. K. Chesterton

@Jonnn1Jonn @VidaemOrbita_ @levisback burro demais

@VidaemOrbita_ @levisback Se matares uma pessoa em coma ou com anestesia, ela tbm n vai sentir dor, é esse o teu argumento patético para justificar o assassinato de seres humanos indefesos?

rivalidade entre as línguas chegou até aqui na América do Sul

se f0der, q capas lindas! #howdowerelationship #GL #yuri

@daydrea1995 produto de soft power. melhor te vacinar hem

@ScarrletEl @seleavril @shakivagal Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk ué

n entendo essa devoção que brasileiro tem por japonês, se eles soubessem o que o japonês médio pensa de brasileiro...

@seleavril racismo interno todos sabem disso. mas usar o lugar mais fértil para o bolsonarismo não me parece suficiente.

@ScarrletEl @shakivagal @daydrea1995 e esse aqui?

@revenuenexus this is not what the study concludes. plus we don't have data of other groups to compare with.

@doctorveera @Nature @aliakbari23 How embarrassing! Even the most liberal of white liberals are biologically supreme 😂

A new paper in @Nature from David Reich, @aliakbari23 and colleagues breaks the conventional understanding of recent human evolution. The field believed that strong selection in the recent past (~10,000 years) was rare, with few exceptions like the lactase persistence locus. In this paper, the authors challenge that belief, showing that we weren't looking at the problem right. Previous studies that looked for evidence of selection using ancient DNA addressed the problem cross-sectionally, asking if allele frequencies differed across populations more than what one would expect based on genetic drift and migration. Most arrived at the conclusion that population structure primarily explained the observed differences. Here, the authors addressed the problem longitudinally, accounting for when ancient individuals lived by explicitly modeling time as a variable in the analysis. It turns out doing it this way dramatically increases power, increasing the number of genome-wide significant selection signals by 20-fold! Looking at why accounting for the time variable led to such dramatic changes in results, the authors find that previous studies missed so much because selection often happened not on new variants leading to dramatic sweeps (the conventional model: new variant -> selection -> increase in frequency) but on already existing variants driven by transient environmental pressures. Many of these variants underwent reversals, selected up when a pressure existed, then purged when it disappeared or the trade-off cost became dominant. A great example is the TYK2 variant, where an allele boosting immunity was selected for thousands of years because it protected against TB, then got purged as TB endemicity declined and the autoimmune cost took over. The scale of what they found is striking: hundreds of loci showing strong selection in the past 10,000 years with a median selection coefficient of ~0.86%. This number is pretty big in evolutionary terms, meaning allele frequencies have been shifting by ~1% per generation in a consistent direction. Previous selection scans found a maximum of 20 loci, and this one finds hundreds. That isn't an incremental change. It fundamentally reframes our understanding of how common strong selection has been in recent human history. Some of the most striking findings come from polygenic selection, where hundreds of small-effect alleles were pushed in the same direction simultaneously. Polygenic scores based on large-scale GWAS of today predict recent negative selection for traits like body fat, waist circumference and schizophrenia, and positive selection for others like cognitive traits. One important caveat is that GWAS phenotypes are measured in industrialized societies today, and how well they capture what was actually being selected in ancient environments is debatable. For me personally, these findings have direct implications for drug discovery. When using human genetics to find drug targets, we often fixate on the benefit and risk profiles of variants visible today. But we need to be aware that a variant's benefit:harm ratio might be environmentally contingent, and could reverse when the wrong environment manifests. An evolutionary understanding of a variant's association with traits is therefore essential. The same logic applies, perhaps even more urgently, to embryo selection. Selecting embryos based on polygenic traits is humans making permanent, heritable decisions for their offspring with a narrow view of today's environment. The ancient DNA record now shows that cost-benefit landscapes flip over time. So, an embryo carrying man-made selections is carrying those changes into an unpredictable future environment. The broader takeaway is that human evolution didn't freeze in the last 10,000 years. We just lacked the tools and datasets to see its movement. The current findings are based on European populations. I am curious to see these analyses extended to other populations too, like South Asian, East Asian and African populations, which might be holding more surprises to blow our minds. Akbari et al. Nature 2026 nature.com/articles/s4158…