Tom Faherty

13.6K posts

Tom Faherty banner
Tom Faherty

Tom Faherty

@ThomasFaherty

Psychology & Environmental Science Researcher at the University of Birmingham, Theme Park enthusiast, and supporter of the oxford comma.

Birmingham, England Bergabung Mart 2009
691 Mengikuti437 Pengikut
Tom Faherty
Tom Faherty@ThomasFaherty·
@UberUKI_Support My partner placed an order which was marked as delivered/complete but we did not receive the order. When trying to contact the driver, they do not pick up / it does not connect. Trying to raise the issue on the app but it says it is already resolved?
English
0
0
1
19
Avanti West Coast
Avanti West Coast@AvantiWestCoast·
@ThomasFaherty Hi Tom, sorry to hear that. Any lost property found onboard would be handed into the terminating station, London Euston is managed by Network Rail. Please fill in a lost property form with them here lostproperty.org/index.php - Sam
English
1
0
1
104
Tom Faherty
Tom Faherty@ThomasFaherty·
@AvantiWestCoast Hello! My partner and I were travelling on the 12:21 from Birmingham New Street to London Euston, and he left his grey/blue jacket with “Club de Sorento” written on it. Is there any chance this was picked up by staff at Euston?
Tom Faherty tweet media
English
1
0
0
307
Tom Faherty
Tom Faherty@ThomasFaherty·
@chilternrailway Glad I asked! I assume I can claim compensation for the amount of time from MYB to BMO the journey would have taken i.e., 2:03 compared to ~ 3 hours it will take
English
0
0
0
75
Chiltern Railways
Chiltern Railways@chilternrailway·
@ThomasFaherty Hi, this is due to the current disruption on the line, we will advise when ticket acceptance is removed. Please keep an eye on our social media channels for updates. I do apologise again. ^VB
English
1
0
0
218
Chiltern Railways
Chiltern Railways@chilternrailway·
Today, Sunday, 13th April. Due to an event at Wembley Stadium, a heavily modified timetable is in operation. Trains will not run from/to Birmingham Moor Street, Solihull, Dorridge, Lapworth, Hatton or Warwick for the entire day. For full details, see: chilternrailways.co.uk/tickets-and-ti…
Chiltern Railways tweet media
English
2
0
0
3.5K
Tom Faherty
Tom Faherty@ThomasFaherty·
@chilternrailway Thanks for confirmation - Is that all day or just due to the Banbury signal failure presently? :)
English
0
0
0
120
Chiltern Railways
Chiltern Railways@chilternrailway·
@ThomasFaherty Hi Tom, I apologise for the inconvenience caused by the disruption. Unfortunately we do not have ticket acceptance with LNWR. You can use your ticket at no extra cost on Avanti services from London Euston. ~ AK
English
1
0
0
250
TowersTimes
TowersTimes@TowersTimes·
Whilst The Welcom-Inn remains closed, the outdoor bar, which has been renamed Capt. Black’s Courtyard Tap House this season, is open and selling a brand new beverage from Rural Brewing Co, Beornen Beer 🔥🍺
TowersTimes tweet mediaTowersTimes tweet mediaTowersTimes tweet media
English
2
2
51
3.9K
Tom Faherty
Tom Faherty@ThomasFaherty·
@SchwurDesJosh Obviously it should be turned into a turntable and then they should add track from the turntable to the brake run and THEN add lsms
English
1
0
2
56
Tom Faherty
Tom Faherty@ThomasFaherty·
@coaster_gen Not got a horse in the race, but disappointment at the performance of a theme park which charges +£60 per visit +£10 per parking when getting on 6 rides max in 9 hours seems… fine?
English
0
0
2
115
CoasterGen
CoasterGen@coaster_gen·
If you are tuning in for negativity do one. There are plenty of vids already out there for that 👀 "Disappointing" "Shocking" "HONEST OPINION" Yeah, it was stressful chasing rides and avoiding the Explosive diarrhoea but I've seen more shit come out of content creators since the incident anyway so nothing new. Yes, Towers was bad on an opening day that is not a negative its a fact but you know what I had a lovely time being with mates and checking out the new ride which btw is fucking awesome.
The Chain Dogs Podcast@TheChainDogs

WE'RE BACK! This week we talk all things Toxicator at Alton Towers Resort and the opening weekend as a whole! We want to hear your thoughts too, so join us LIVE at 8PM! youtube.com/watch?v=JrAjFm…

English
4
0
12
3.5K
Tom Faherty me-retweet
Sean Coulborn, PhD
Sean Coulborn, PhD@SeanCoulborn·
Our new paper reveals distinct atrophy patterns 🧠within & between FTLD-TDP subtypes. These findings underscore the need to consider both pathological subtype & genotype 🧬 in future classification & treatment approaches. #FTLD Read more: doi.org/10.1002/acn3.7… @UCSFmac @UCSF
Sean Coulborn, PhD tweet media
English
2
5
14
999
Masane MiyaPA
Masane MiyaPA@MasaneMiyaPA·
The track is NOT Smooth but metal pipe falls
English
10
28
331
66.1K
Tom Faherty me-retweet
Publishing with Integrity
Publishing with Integrity@fake_journals·
Who reviewed this paper? A few days ago @gcabanac tweeted about a paper that had published a remark that it had been forced to cite irrelevant papers. You can see the tweet here: buff.ly/3UMIguf. We remarked that if it was not so serious, it would be funny. Since reading that tweet, we have not been able to get it out of our head, so we thught that we would document it in a little more detail. We are doing this for three reasons. 1️⃣ In our view, it descerves more detail to be made available. 2️⃣ We'd like these details to be be kept as a matter of public record, so we are posting similar posts on our X account and our LinkedIn account. 3️⃣ It should be of interest to this community, so we hope that this raises even further the ethical issues around this topic. The first image shows the paper that we are looking at. What is interesting is the text that appears on at the end of the introduction (highlighted in red). This appears to show that the reviewer insisted that a set of 13 papers be cited, else they would not accept the paper. It would be interesting to see the review repport, so that we could be certain what had been said. If you want to see the paper, it is available here: buff.ly/4fndXm0 In the rest of this 🧵, we show the papers that have been asked to be cited (i.e. [35]-[47]). These have been taken from the paper mentioned above. You'll notice (as we have highlighted it) that every paper is "et al." meaning, of course, that there are quite a few authors on each paper. Gicven that we cannot see all the authors, the other images on this 🧵 shows the full set of authors on each of these 13 papers. We leave it an an exercise for the reader to hazard a guess as to the reviewr is?
Publishing with Integrity tweet media
English
70
608
2.9K
700.7K