❌〶he🎯racle™🍿

Some people actually think this image is real from Artemis II from NASA. This is the "original high resolution image" - Not from a camera but from ADOBE PHOTOSHOP and LIGHTROOM. As clearly shown in its own METADATA. #NASA #Artemis #lies

@oh_womp @deadlinky Not CAMERA ORIGINAL.

@X_the_Oracle @deadlinky "Photoship and lightroom" yeah you have no idea what youre yapping about lol. But, I thought the metadata was faked!!! If you read it, it shows it was only in photoshop to be exported from the raw to a jpeg lmao

Some people actually think this image is real from Artemis II from NASA. This is the "original high resolution image" - Not from a camera but from ADOBE PHOTOSHOP and LIGHTROOM. As clearly shown in its own METADATA. #NASA #Artemis #lies

@GiovanniSagredo @TrendyNow1 Were you like this when you found out Santa isn't real Giovanni.

@X_the_Oracle @TrendyNow1 Again - There aren't too many things funnier to me than retards who think remote-controlled cameras are more complicated technological challenges than interplanetary spacecraft Do you think the ascent rate was a surprise? Y/N?

@oh_womp @deadlinky I did. It said it was edited in Photoshop and Lightroom.

@X_the_Oracle @deadlinky Yeah this guy is cooked.. you know at this point you should grab the entire metadata json and shove it into an AI, even grok lol, see what it says!

The same people who believe these bimbos went into space, believe we landed on the moon in the 60s.

@BoltonWriter @reality_revolt_ Edited in photoshop you seem to struggle with.

@X_the_Oracle @reality_revolt_ It also states the camera used. Or are we casually ignoring that bit of the metadata?

You’re shown carefully selected images, same clouds, same angle, supposedly 12 hours apart, and no one stops to think. A skydiver can film everything in high quality, but somehow a multi-billion dollar mission gives you blurry, choppy footage, and people just accept it. They show you fragments, they distract you when it matters, and as long as no one questions it, the illusion holds realityrevolt.com

@GiovanniSagredo @TrendyNow1 Yeah especially in 1972, using a remote controlled camera and able to send a video signal without a delay issue and perfectly pan the camera up following the Apollo 17 launch all from 384,400 km away from EARTH.

@X_the_Oracle @TrendyNow1 There aren't too many things funnier to me than retards who think remote-controlled cameras are more complicated technological challenges than interplanetary spacecraft 🤣

@GubbaHomestead NASA's "Original Highest Resolution" image of the Earth is edited in Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom as shown in the EXIF METADATA of the image.

Do you genuinely believe this is a REAL photo of earth from the Artemis crew? This video got me in trouble on another platform. Why? Because THEY don’t like it when you question the narrative and bring TRUTH to the people. That’s why.

@jasonwoody @DbauerBR549 @WaitingForPerot Ned Kelly would disagree with you.

@X_the_Oracle @DbauerBR549 @WaitingForPerot Run and hide confirmed. Thanks.

@KinorRapi All we want is the ORIGINAL UNEDITED IMAGE. Asking too much according to some.

@X_the_Oracle And so what ? Do you really think if NASA wanted to hide something they will leave metadata like that? Photos are post prod in LR or PS, it's not a secret

@kevconrad2 Yes I CAN. ADOBE PHOTOSHOP AND LIGHTROOM ALTERED.

@X_the_Oracle You can never prove it’s fake

@jasonwoody @DbauerBR549 @WaitingForPerot

@X_the_Oracle @DbauerBR549 @WaitingForPerot You gonna answer that question or run and hide?

@fucksteve_ They are taking both RAW/NEF and JPG files. The "Original Highest Resolution" file JPG has the Metadata they obviously edited as the long description is written in it and the editing was done also in Lightroom and Adobe Photoshop. WHY YOU TRIGGERED?

@X_the_Oracle It helps to take the dunce cap off before you speak. Every. Single. Digital. Photo. Shot in RAW format REQUIRES digital processing software. You can try to argue, but you'll only look dumber.

@X_the_Oracle You do know what lightroom is used for??

@oh_womp @deadlinky

@deadlinky @X_the_Oracle Yes lol hes likely a bot, funny thing is if you dig through the metadata it shows it was originally a NEF file *nikon raw*, then only used lightroom to export to a jpeg.

@X_the_Oracle You’re positing the image is “not real.” EDITED does not mean FAKE. To even get a camera raw into a file suitable for online uses you have to import it into software to save as PNG or JPG… So it doesn’t even have to be edited to come from photoshop or Lightroom.

@TrendyNow1 @GiovanniSagredo The cameraman is still there on the Moon to this day.

@GiovanniSagredo @X_the_Oracle Watch around the 6/7 mark: x.com/BGatesIsaPysch…

@tim818180 Its meant to be "ORIGINAL HIGHEST RESOLUTION" (meaning not edited) but clearly it is EDITED and showing the software in the metadata. People can argue why or make up any dumb reasoning for it, but it's a fact, its opened and edited in photoshop and 100% not CAMERA ORIGINAL.

@X_the_Oracle Somebody will tell you that you are a NASA bot because you are making it more believable with a bad argument. There are 100 reasons why we should be sceptical about this image and space mission, but Lightroom is not one of these reasons

@deadlinky Yes it is not ORIGINAL it is EDITED. Are you slow?

@X_the_Oracle Do you retards really think that photoshop in metadata means a fake image? 😭🥀

@oh_womp @mymomcare @NASA I'm just presenting the facts. Adobe Photoshop deniers just don't want to accept it.

@X_the_Oracle @mymomcare @NASA Can you retain memory at all? You say "oh they edited the metadata!" and then use the metadata to say its manipulated? You have to be a bot LMFAO.

Lock in, we’re Moonbound. Artemis II astronauts are more than halfway to their destination, and preparations for lunar flyby are underway. During their trip around the far side of the Moon, they will capture imagery to share with scientists (and you, too!).

@moonsewage Its EDITED NOT ORIGINAL.

@X_the_Oracle BREAKING NEWS: Photographers use Lightroom!