Da9ny
6.9K posts

Da9ny
@c_ctex
Tesla owner in Houston, TX

This is our plan for the coming days. The next game we’ll attend is Germany’s Round of 32 match in Boston on the 29th. Since we have 7 days to get there, we decided not to take the direct route and instead make a huge detour through Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and a few other states. Any recommendations for places or cities to visit along the way are very welcome!





🟥Oil permabulls need to read this: 💥China’s weekly crude oil imports fell last week to the lowest level in 11 years. 💥On a monthly basis, June crude imports are on track to be the lowest in 10 years. (Kpler data) 💥Every barrel of this decline vs pre-crisis levels is a real drop in global oil demand.


Ro Khanna has yet another idea on what could be paid for by taxing Elon: “For 5% tax one time on Elon Musk, you could have universal child care in America. $10 a day for every family." Ro never stops daydreaming about different ways to spend Elon's money.


I have invited you personally several times. Why didn’t you accept?


Demanding that Iran end its support for Hezbollah is effectively equivalent to demanding that it abandon one of the central pillars of its regional security strategy. A country willing to launch direct attacks on Israel in response to events in Beirut is demonstrating that its relationship with Hezbollah is not a disposable bargaining chip but a long-term strategic commitment. If President Trump makes these demands the centerpiece of negotiations, one of two things will happen: either he will be forced back into a conflict he does not want, or he will end up tolerating the very behavior he promised to stop as Iran continues supporting Hezbollah. The credibility of threats to resume military action is also questionable. Trump himself has acknowledged the limits of what military force can achieve. If the United States is unwilling to commit the resources necessary to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by force or physically remove Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles, then what exactly would be the objective of another war? The more Washington threatens action without following through, the more American deterrence risks eroding. That is particularly problematic given that Iran's perception of U.S. resolve appears to have weakened during the conflict itself. Meanwhile, diplomatic contacts continue in Switzerland, and Tehran has little incentive to make major concessions. If Trump's goal is ultimately a negotiated agreement, repeated military threats may not bring him closer to that objective. They could instead lock him into commitments that are either politically or strategically impossible to fulfill. The broader reality is that America's leverage over Iran was limited before the war and may be even more limited afterward. Any successful policy will have to start from that fact rather than from assumptions about what Washington can compel Tehran to do. #iran

Reports from Geneva: The Americans had planned a joint photo and handshake at the start of the meeting — senior members of the Iranian delegation refused.







No Ambassador @dannydanon, you don't know the first thing about UN law. As a matter of procedure, there is no rule that grants Member States an unrestricted right to personally attack UN officials, nor is there a rule prohibiting officials or the presiding officer from responding procedurally. International civil servants serve the Organization, not individual Member States. Article 100 specifically requires Member States to respect the exclusively international character of the responsibilities of the Secretary-General and Secretariat staff and not seek to influence them in the discharge of their functions. Personal attacks aimed at intimidating, or pressuring UN officials, breach that obligation.

Watch: During a UN discussion, an attempt was made by Special Representative @_VanessaFrazier to interrupt my remarks and shut down legitimate criticism. I refused to be silenced.









