Tweet Disematkan
Computer Toucher
113 posts
Computer Toucher
@computerusr
autocomplete supervisor sharing lessons learnt
United States Bergabung Temmuz 2025
606 Mengikuti155 Pengikut
Imagination, and eventually robotics, solves this. If ai capability grows to the point where it can replace actual human developers, what do I need a company for? I’ll just make my own
Curtis@curtismakes
@BoringBiz_ you're missing that most companies don't have infinite demand for engineering output, at some point you have enough features and the 20% productivity gain just means you need fewer people to ship the same roadmap
English
If the world is going to be eaten by software, why wouldn’t it be a great time for experts in software?
Boring_Business@BoringBiz_
The AI labor replacement theory makes absolutely no sense to me Here is the simple math Let’s say an engineer making $300K/yr was generating $500K in P&L output for me. Now I arm that engineer with $20K in input to make him 20% more productive My total engineering cost goes to $320K/yr but the output is now $600K (+20%) Because of AI, my ROI on hiring engineers just went up massively. As a CEO, that should make me want to hire more engineers, not less What am I missing here? Genuinely curious about people’s thoughts
English
Computer Toucher me-retweet
@thdxr Those side chats with coworkers are the best especially when they are then made real by a billion dollar company.
English
@knowclarified It feels like we’re going backwards suddenly. These labs just need to put the weights in the bag. They’re not ux designers
English
I thoroughly believe that if @OpenAI let the @AnthropicAI team write their system prompts, we’d reach agi
English
Gpt-5.5 has this absolutely infuriating trait where it tries to confuse you in the hopes that you’ll get tired of reading its walls of text and stop asking it to do things
English
Biggest miss of all time to not make this a goblin
OpenAI Developers@OpenAIDevs
Pets. Now in Codex. Use /pet to wake your pet.
English
@kunchenguid Not sure! That’s your job lol
Maybe drawing inspiration from a game like territorial (dot) io, where the strategy is based off the color of the terrain? It’s a hard problem. But a benchmark based on elo is much more fun than a % on a test
English
@computerusr cool idea! how would you gamify something like visual design tho?
English
LLM benchmarks are boring. introducing -
Trial by Combat!!!
two LLMs walk into a turn based strategy game, only one walks out
GPT 5.5 completely demolished Opus 4.7 - much faster turns, lower token usage, and it won, fair an square
details shared in thread below 👇
English
Computer Toucher me-retweet
Anthropic literally vibe-coded their entire codebase onto their public GitHub and somehow Europe can’t figure out how to copy/paste it and find $20m for some training compute
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01
Mistral Medium 3.5 is out and it's a dense 128B model
English
GPT-5.5 is the weirdest model I’ve ever used and it’s not even close. It’s a freak
English
Our best engineers are LOVING interfaces again. Gift from God to keep the agents in shackles.
dax@thdxr
been a year since this post and we have definitely shifted towards liking more boilerplate-y explicit code vanilla used to mean simple but now it feels like a guarantee of ai going crazy and slopping shit up has anyone else felt this?
English
Why is every model completely unaware of what it is?
“What model are you?”
GPT-5.5: “I am chat gpt 5.1!”
Just add information about it to the system prompt. Or even an invisible skill to use when asked about this stuff. Am I missing something?
English