Debidoodoo

7.3K posts

Debidoodoo

Debidoodoo

@debidoodoos

Derby Bergabung Aralık 2010
738 Mengikuti436 Pengikut
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Alan
Alan@A1an_M·
This story is a good example of quite a number of things. 1. It's a good example of the poor quality of BBC "science journalism". 2. It's a good example of how big corporations and their interests have captured mainstream media. 3. It's a good example of why we really need independent social media (and why governments and large corporates, which have essentially merged together (into a form of corporatism as Mussolini define it) don't like social media and want it censored). Let's look at what the story says. The headline says "Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine". Specifically, they say "Between 2020 and 2024, no cervical cancer deaths were recorded in women aged 20 to 24 - the first time that had happened over a five-year period." But routine vaccination of 13 year olds only started in 2018. So the earliest children vaccinated in 2018 would only have been 19 in 2024 at the end of their study period. And we know that even prior to vaccination starting, the number of deaths in 20 to 24 year olds was always close to zero (see graph). So the claim is misleading. Not factually incorrect, but giving a false impression. It's disinformation, in fact. Making us think the vaccine has caused a dramatic improvement, when it has not. If we look at that graph, we can see that the trend is for deaths in all age groups to fall over time, a long time before vaccination started. So the decline in deaths is clearly due to something else (routine cervical screening and earlier treatment being the prime candidate). The BBC journalist who wrote this story has clearly put zero critical thinking into it. The company responsible for the HPV vaccine might as well have just written it verbatim and given it to the BBC to publish. Maybe they did? Let's project ourselves into the future, where all social media users have to provide government ID to access social media, and governments can track who is posting what, and identify and single out "troublemakers", critics and whistle-blowers for their social media posts. Do you think they will stop at censoring and banning people breaking the law, or do you think they will tackle people who are merely criticising flaws in the narrative using data and evidence? Well, we don't need to be Mystic Meg to imagine the future. We can just look back to 2020-1 and see what happened then. Exactly what I described. Government disinformation units tackling what they called "misinformation" and "disinformation" which turned out to be inconvenient truths about lockdowns, vaccines, masks, social distancing, government statistics. So without social media, big corporations and governments can get away with pushing their propaganda through unquestioning mainstream media journalists. That's why we need independent social media. As for the HPV vaccine: it might turn out to be a life-saver. But given that the first cohort of teenagers who received the vaccine in 2018 are now only 31, and the median age at diagnosis with cervical cancer is 45, we are not going to know for sure from empirical data for another decade or more. There are also potential confounders here. In parallel with the introduction of the HPV vaccine for teenagers, cervical cancer screening processes have been changed. Screening is starting at a later age, and is now focusing on detecting HPV rather than directly looking for cancer, and increasing the intervals between screenings. These changes alone may well result in the appearance of less cancer in younger age groups, but risk a big spike in cancers being detected at a later age. The authorities are tilting the table in favour of the vaccine pushers in the short term, but possibly at the expense of women in the longer term. And the other thing we will likely never know is whether the total effect on health from the HPV vaccination is a net positive. Little point in saving 20 cervical cancer deaths per 100,000 people if the vaccine itself is directly causing more than 20 deaths and chronic illnesses per 100,000 people from adverse effects. Why won't we ever know this? Because long-term comparisons of death and illness from all causes between vaccinated people and those receiving a saline placebo is almost never done. Studies always look narrowly at the target disease alone with a very brief and temporary consideration of adverse effects. This ⬆️ is the kind of in-depth analysis our national broadcaster should be doing, in the public interest. Not just parroting vaccine manufacturer talking points. But when you point this out, you get accused of being a conspiracy theorist, and the BBC sets the spook-y Marianna Spring on you. 🙄🕵️‍♀️
Alan tweet media
BBC News (UK)@BBCNews

Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine bbc.in/4ovjOLq

English
31
151
408
15.7K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
@RickOpland @9mmsmg Some people got 3 years jail time for a tweet. A boy recently got arrested and charged for throwing a rubbish bin which hit nobody. All of them in response to horrific incidents involving "people of another culture". What can we do?
English
0
0
0
32
Rick Opland
Rick Opland@RickOpland·
@9mmsmg The tolerance of the British people is unbelievable. The fact that hundreds of fathers didn’t get revenge and take out as many as possible is something I can’t comprehend.
English
10
0
29
541
9mmSMG
9mmSMG@9mmsmg·
Whats happened in the UK is so repulsive that I don't even like thinking about it. What these Pakistanis have done can't be undone, but it can never happen again. Our government needs to make the UK feel the pressure from this. Honestly if they weren't a nuclear country I'd say the United States should completely take them over. This horror needs fixing. Everyone involved in the government and media needs to face justice. They all need to go back.
English
99
134
2.2K
26.7K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Paul Weston
Paul Weston@PWestoff·
Imagine the 24/7 Whore Media coverage if a report dropped this week on Far-Right, white, Christian rape-gangs targetting 250k+ Muslim girls in Britain. We know the coverage would be fanatically insane. Yet the other way around? SILENCE! Why so? @BBCNews @SkyNews @dailytelegraph
Paul Weston tweet media
English
32
157
427
6.4K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Dean Smith
Dean Smith@DeanSmi47962704·
Dean Smith tweet media
ZXX
8
117
145
2.7K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
A long, but worthwhile read, with sources.
Christian@InTheTrenchesUK

"Save this post. Every fact in it is sourced to the BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, Sky and Met data. The only thing they never did was put it all in one place. So I did." The Sadiq Khan Story: How a Bus Driver's Son Became the Most Dangerous Man Ever to Hold Office in London. This is not a hit piece. This is a record. Every line is publicly sourced. Every fact has been printed by the BBC, the Guardian, the Telegraph, the Standard, Sky News, LBC, or the Met Police's own data. The only thing missing from the official record is anyone with the spine to put it all in one place. So here it is. The full picture. Start to finish. Decide for yourselves. 1968. The Arrival. Amanullah and Sehrun Khan arrive in England from Pakistan. He drives a London bus for 25 years. She sews clothes at home. They raise eight children in a council flat in Tooting. By any honest measure, this is a story Britain should be proud of. The country opened its door, an immigrant family worked hard, and their son rose. The problem is not where he came from. The problem is what he chose to do with what Britain gave him. The Lawyer Years. Whose Side Was He On? Before politics, Sadiq Khan was a human rights lawyer. And the human rights he chose to fight for tell you everything. 2001. Khan personally represents the Nation of Islam in the High Court and successfully overturns the UK's 15 year ban on Louis Farrakhan, one of the most notorious antisemites alive on the planet. A man who calls Jews "termites." Khan got him the legal right to walk back into Britain. Source: Wikipedia, Guardian, Standard. 2001 to 2006. Khan's law firm consults on the defence of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person ever convicted in a US court of direct involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Source: Full Fact, Guardian. 2005 to 2006. Khan personally visits Babar Ahmad, a terror suspect, in Woodhill Prison. Ahmad's own father was an extremist Khan would later share a platform with in Parliament itself in 2012. Source: Evening Standard. Post 7/7. Khan signs an open letter blaming the London bombings, the murder of 52 innocent Britons on their way to work, on British government policy. Not on the bombers. On us. Source: Middle East Forum, ConservativeHome. 2004 to 2013. Khan shares a platform NINE times with Suliman Gani, a Tooting imam who has called women "subservient" to men, condemned gay people, and called for the establishment of an Islamic state. Source: BBC, Guardian, Evening Standard. That is not a defence lawyer doing his job. That is a pattern. That is a worldview. The Mayoralty. The Wrecking Ball. Since taking office in May 2016, here is what London has actually looked like under Sadiq Khan. Not opinion. Numbers. Knife crime, up 72%. From 9,100 offences in the year to June 2016 to 15,639 in the year to June 2025. The 2024/25 figure of 16,147 is the highest of any year of his mayoralty. Source: Daily Mail, Evening Standard, Met Police data. Khan was officially rebuked by the Office for Statistics Regulation for falsely claiming knife crime was falling. The state's own statistics watchdog had to publicly correct the Mayor of London. Source: Evening Standard. Robbery up 59%. Residential burglary up 37%. Source: GLA Conservatives, Met Police data. A record 30 teenage homicides in 2021. Thirty children, in one city, in one year. Source: Evening Standard. Two tier policing, on the record. A damning think tank report called for Khan to be stripped of policing control, finding officers "failing to arrest those committing criminal damage or shouting 'jihad' at pro Palestinian rallies." His reduction of stop and search has had, in the report's own words, "a catastrophic impact on the fight against crime." Source: LBC. This is the man lecturing you about safety. ULEZ. The Greatest Highway Robbery in British History. The Ultra Low Emission Zone was sold as a clean air policy. The data says otherwise. £500 million plus extracted from London drivers since the 2023 expansion alone. Source: Daily Mail FOI data. 2.4 million penalties issued. One every 15 seconds. Source: Daily Mail FOI data. £9 million of public money spent on a propaganda blitz to sell Londoners a policy they did not want. Source: Daily Mail, City Hall Conservatives. Independent impact assessment: ULEZ expansion had a "negligible effect on air quality." Source: Sky News. Sky News investigation: Khan's office accused of an "alarmingly cosy relationship" with scientific advisors, conspiring to silence research that contradicted his agenda. Source: Sky News. He bankrupted small businesses. He taxed pensioners off the road. He told you it was for the children's lungs. The science says it did nothing. The receipts say it raised half a billion pounds. You do the maths. TfL. Effectively Bankrupt. £11 to £12 billion in debt. Paying £400 million a year just in debt interest. Bailed out by central government seven times. Described in the House of Commons as "effectively bankrupt." Source: BBC, Telegraph, Guardian. This is the same man who increased the GLA council tax precept by 71% since 2016, from around £276 to over £510 for the average Band D household. Source: Full Fact, Evening Standard, BBC. You pay more. The trains break down more. The buses are more dangerous. The Met is stretched thinner. Where did the money go? The Cultural War on London Itself. In June 2020, days after the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, USA, Khan set up the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm. A £250,000 taxpayer funded panel to review which British statues, street names and memorials should remain standing. Source: Daily Mail, Express, Telegraph. The commission's first scandal was its own commissioner. Toyin Agbetu was forced to resign after antisemitic and inflammatory social media posts were exposed. The man Khan picked to judge which British heroes deserved to stand had a record so toxic he had to be quietly dropped. Source: Telegraph, CUFI. This is the man deciding which parts of British history are allowed to remain visible in the British capital. The Grooming Gang Cover Up. London Edition. In February 2026, the Express revealed that Sadiq Khan was not only denying the existence of grooming gangs in London but actively dismissing first hand evidence from whistleblowers as "malicious" and "politically motivated." In May 2026, a survivor of grooming, a woman who was repeatedly trafficked directly into the capital, publicly accused Khan of "living under a rock" and wilfully turning a blind eye to a grooming gang epidemic in his city. Source: Express, May 2026. This is not a historical scandal he inherited. This is happening now. To children. In his city. And he is doing the same thing every authority did in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oldham and Bradford for twenty years. He is calling the people who tell the truth liars, and he is calling the victims politically inconvenient. History will hang this around his neck. And it should. The Met, Hobbled. The Palantir Block. May 2026. Khan personally blocks a £50 million contract between the Metropolitan Police and Palantir, an AI firm that had helped the force investigate corrupt officers including Wayne Couzens and David Carrick. Source: BBC, Guardian, GB News. Palantir's UK boss publicly accused Khan of "putting politics above public safety." A senior figure stated that the Mayor was "making the Metropolitan Police fight criminals with their hands tied behind their backs." Source: BBC, GB News. The same man who has presided over record knife crime, record phone theft and the collapse of stop and search just stripped the Met of the very tool that catches their own corrupt officers. Ask yourself why. And Now, the Flag. This is the part most Londoners have not yet fully clocked. Pay attention. New Year's Eve 2025 into 2026. Sadiq Khan turns the London Eye into the flag of the European Union. During Britain's own New Year fireworks. In the capital of the United Kingdom. The Union Jack? Reduced to a guest appearance. Source: Telegraph, GB News. GB News commentator Tom Harwood named it for what it was: "A foreign flag before our own." In response, Khan publicly "joked about declaring independence for London" and openly briefed about Britain rejoining the EU. Source: GB News, Evening Standard. He has used the phrase "take back control", the slogan of the Brexit campaign he despises, to demand more devolved power for himself in City Hall. Source: london.gov.uk official record. Read this carefully and read it twice. The Mayor of London has flown a foreign flag over the river Thames on New Year's Eve, publicly mused about declaring his city independent from the United Kingdom, and is now reportedly about to be elevated to a peerage and dragged into Starmer's cabinet after the 2026 local elections. Source: Wikipedia, March 2026 reporting. This is not a politician. This is a project. London is the prize. And the prize is being prepared for someone other than the British people. The Pattern. Now Look At It Whole. Step back. Look at the line. A lawyer who freed Farrakhan, defended terror cases, visited terror suspects in prison, signed letters blaming 7/7 on Britain, and shared platforms nine times with a radical imam. A mayor who oversaw a 72% rise in knife crime, was officially rebuked for lying about it, and presided over a record 30 teenage murders in a single year. A tax collector who extracted half a billion pounds from drivers under a scheme his own assessors said does nothing for air quality. A debtor who broke TfL and made you pay for it through a 71% precept hike. A culture warrior who pointed a commission at British statues and put an antisemite on it. A denialist who calls grooming gang victims liars in 2026, the same year Britain finally began saying their names. A saboteur of policing who blocked the AI contract that catches dirty cops. A flag flier who lit the London Eye in the colours of a foreign union and floated independence for his own city. This is not incompetence. Incompetence does not move in one direction for 25 years. This is a worldview, executed with patience, protected by the press, and rewarded with a knighthood and, if Starmer gets his way, a seat in the Lords. Final Word. London is the greatest city in the world. It was that long before Sadiq Khan walked into City Hall. It will be that long after he is dragged out of it. He inherited a capital that was the envy of Europe. He will leave behind a city more violent, more taxed, more divided, more hostile to its own history and more detached from the country that built it than at any point in living memory. There is one question that matters now. It is the question every Londoner, every Englishman, every Briton needs to put to themselves before the next ballot is cast. Whose city is this? Because it is not theirs. It never was. And it never will be. 🇬🇧

English
0
0
0
1
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Bernie
Bernie@Artemisfornow·
🚨 Listen very carefully to what Tony Blair and Larry Ellison of Oracle are telling you. Everything about you will be centralised as data, run by AI, from your genome to your behaviour. You will be watched & monitored constantly. The Panopticon is being built without consent. And when it’s built they won’t need to bother asking you anything anymore. Why do you really think they need those data centres 🚨
English
377
3.2K
5.2K
103.1K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
When You Can't Beat Reform, Change The Rules. Labour Just Did. There is a line in a democracy that, once crossed, changes everything. When those in power begin adjusting the rules of the game to determine its outcome, the game is no longer democracy. It is managed succession. That line was crossed again on Tuesday night. Two days before the Makerfield by-election, Labour rushed a change to the mayoral voting system through the House of Lords. Regional mayors will now be elected using the supplementary vote system rather than first past the post. The change applies immediately. It will govern whoever replaces Andy Burnham as Mayor of Greater Manchester if he wins on Thursday and stands down. The government's defence is that it is simply restoring the system used before Boris Johnson changed it in 2021. That argument requires the public to believe that a change Labour could have introduced at any point in two years of government became urgent on Tuesday evening, forty eight hours before the vote that triggers the election it is designed to affect. Lord Hayward, a Conservative peer and experienced pollster, was precise in the Lords. There is no other justification for the haste, he said, other than that it solves the Labour Party's problems and prevents Reform winning a mayoralty. Not clumsy. Not rushed. Designed. The mechanics explain why. Under first past the post, Reform could win the Greater Manchester mayoralty on a plurality of votes in a fragmented field, precisely as it won all eight council wards in May's local elections with around fifty percent of the vote. Under the supplementary vote system, voters express a first and second preference. Lib Dem and Green voters, given a second preference, will direct those votes to Labour overwhelmingly. The change does not affect Thursday's by-election. It affects the mayoral contest that follows it, constructing an anti-Reform coalition from the second preferences of smaller parties that Reform itself cannot access. Lord Jackson identified the wider implication. This is potentially a strategy for a progressive alliance being rolled out ahead of a general election, he said, with the aim of locking out the Conservatives and Reform from power. Burnham's allies have already confirmed he would scrap first past the post nationally in favour of proportional representation. The supplementary vote is the local pilot for a national project. Pool second preferences, lock out the right, govern indefinitely on a minority of first preference votes. This is not the first time. Earlier this year Labour delayed local elections after the Electoral Commission stated explicitly that the justification was not legitimate, that extending mandates damages public confidence and creates a conflict of interest by allowing those in power to decide how long they may remain there without consent. The Commission's objection was noted and ignored. Reform demolished Labour anyway. Now the same instinct has been applied to a different mechanism. Not cancellation this time. Electoral system change, deployed with surgical precision forty eight hours before the vote that triggers the election it is designed to affect. Governments confident in their mandate do not need to change the rules two days before the ballot. They face the electorate and take their chances. The timing of Tuesday night's Lords motion is not a coincidence. It is a confession. The voters of Makerfield vote on Thursday. The question of who governs Greater Manchester after that, and under what rules, was settled in the Lords on Tuesday. Nobody voted for that. "Burnham's allies have already confirmed he would scrap first past the post nationally in favour of proportional representation."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
300
2.2K
3.8K
108.3K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
British Patriot UK 🇬🇧
🚨Sadiq Khan read the reports of young girls being drugged, threatened & gang-raped in London hotels by Muslim grooming gangs - then repeatedly denied they even existed. His cover-up enabled years of horror. When will he finally face accountability? 🇬🇧
British Patriot UK 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
602
2.9K
7.1K
75.3K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Svetlana Lokhova
Svetlana Lokhova@RealSLokhova·
📰 What is a D-Notice? The UK government doesn’t want you to know something important? They send a quiet letter to every major newspaper, TV station and website saying: “Please censor this story for ‘national security’” It’s called a D-Notice (now DSMA-Notice). Here’s the dirty truth: It’s “voluntary”… but almost everyone obeys No court, no vote, no public debate Just a cosy club between spies and editors deciding what YOU are allowed to read Real stories about war crimes, spying on citizens, or government lies get killed in secret It’s not a law. It’s self-censorship by gentlemen’s agreement, the most British form of censorship ever invented. They call it “protecting the country.” In fact, they are protecting the powerful from the public. This system has been running since 1912. Still going strong in 2026. The “free press” isn’t as free as they tell you.
English
111
2.8K
7.3K
100.6K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Mike Yardley
Mike Yardley@YardleyShooting·
Wake up. Labour must be called out. They are talking about banning VPNs, overnight curfews and total control of the internet. This is authoritarian state stuff outside our tradtions of liberty and should be resisted loudly by anyone committed to magna carta and our constitution.
English
87
971
3.7K
33.3K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
David Shaw
David Shaw@David90shaw·
🚨 A 14 year old girl told a social worker she was being sexually abused. The social worker asked if she wanted to audition for Emmerdale because of her "experience." She was then trafficked across Britain for six months. Raped by multiple men. When police finally found her abuser he was released without charges. She was sent home. This is in the official inquiry report. This happened on British soil. To a British child. And Keir Starmer spent five years as Director of Public Prosecutions and then blocked a national inquiry into it for years after that. He did not fail these girls. He looked the other way while it happened and then spent a decade making sure nobody was held accountable for it. RT if you are absolutely done with every single person who protected this system over these children. 🇬🇧🔥
David Shaw tweet media
English
185
4K
10.4K
151.4K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
David Shaw
David Shaw@David90shaw·
🚨 THE MOST DANGEROUS BORDER LOOPHOLE IN BRITISH HISTORY. Nobody in the mainstream media is talking about this. That is exactly why I am here! While Keir Starmer and Edi Rama (Starmer's ally who shut down TikTok to "save the kids") pretend their deal will stop the boats, they are hiding a terrifying reality. 🤡 We already know the Belfast knife suspect literally travelled straight through our wide open, unmonitored land border with the Irish Republic. Now think about what happens when Starmer completes his plot to drag us back under Brussels rules! The EU is actively pushing to admit Albania as a full member state. Once Albania joins, their citizens will gain substantial EU free-movement rights, allowing them to fly legally straight into Dublin. Because of the Windsor Framework and the Good Friday Agreement, there can never be a physical hard border between Ireland and Belfast. We are talking about the Albanian mafia, which is already the biggest and most powerful criminal network in Europe. By aligning Britain back with the EU, Starmer is creating a permanent, legal highway for these violent gangs to fly to Dublin, drive straight into Northern Ireland with zero checks, and vanish into the UK. It is a complete and utter sham designed to look tough while surrendering your security to Brussels. RT if you demand we stay completely OUT of the EU and protect our country! 🔁🇬🇧🔥
English
19
256
546
18.3K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Robert Abel
Robert Abel@rj_abel·
It’s all coming out now. Starmer’s “seized” Russian tanker was allegedly stripped of its registration, made stateless, uninsured and crewless before the military boarded it. Less daring maritime heroics, more stage-managed theatre. Batman without the ‘Kapows’ - typical Starmer
Robert Abel tweet media
English
288
3K
7.7K
82.3K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Dave
Dave@DaveKent101·
Just when you thought that Labour and the Climate Scam could not get any worse, it has. UK taxpayers are paying an extra £770 million per year to give France surplus electricity because our national grid cannot handle all the extra electricity generated by wind turbines when the wind is blowing. This is because under existing rules, energy companies can sell “surplus energy” . Yet Labour are insisting on building even more wind turbines before the grid is remotely ready or we have enough battery storage.🤦‍♂️ Guess what though?🤔 It is about to get even worse! On account of Labour signing us up to the EU energy market, we will have to fire up gas power stations to sell surplus energy to the EU. This is because the grid cannot transfer the excess energy from wind turbines in Scotland so we have to pay twice through our bills to generate EVEN MORE electricity so as to sell to the EU at cheap prices! Even the energy companies are criticising this utter nonsense. What a scam this all really is.
Dave tweet media
English
28
661
953
8.6K
SilverF*x
SilverF*x@dantwodaughters·
@benonwine @LuaneLittl32359 Because the people that let them in would then be held accountable. This is self preservation of the political class, they are terrified that they will be drawn and quartered.
English
1
0
9
110
Benonwine
Benonwine@benonwine·
Why isn’t the Rape of 250,000 white girls (Children) by predominantly Muslim men on the FRONT-PAGE of every newspaper in the UK. WHY!!!!!
English
1.1K
6.4K
40.6K
316.9K
Julie Armstrong
Julie Armstrong@jollyjamba·
@benonwine The UN's 'Replacement Migration' policy being followed by the leaders of every advanced nation relies on the multicultural fantasy to programme native populations to accept mass immigration. Any evidence that challenges the fantasy has to be denied or concealed.
English
1
2
6
95
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
@renaes2b @real_shirelass @POTUS As a Brit I would welcome any help to remove ALL our treasonous politicians, but especially Starmer and this awful Marxist government. We are rapidly heading towards communism and anyone who objects, verbally or in person, gets arrested.
English
3
1
4
105
Renae Weeks
Renae Weeks@renaes2b·
@real_shirelass As an American I am asking @POTUS to suspend ALL international deals with the UK until they remove these POS from office. Since the Royals won't stand up for their own people. Just my opinion
English
6
2
50
2.2K
The Yorkshire Lass
The Yorkshire Lass@real_shirelass·
🚨UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and London Mayor Sadiq Khan have both been named in the Rape Gang Report for covering up the Rape of children and standing with the Pakistani Muslim men to rape, torture, traffic and murder young girls who were just children. Our Prime Minister along with other prominent leaders and politicians facilitated the rape and trafficking of these girls to these evil bastards. They allowed it to happen and were 100% involved. THIS SHOULD BE ON THE FRONT OF EVERY SINGLE NEWS PAPER AND MSM!!!!
English
228
3.4K
11.6K
191.2K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Darren of Plymouth
Darren of Plymouth@DarrenPlymouth·
ARTICLE 19 - Universal Declaration of Human Rights “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” Keir Starmer has no legal authority to implement a social media ban. Where are the human rights lawyers? Oh wait… Starmer is one.
English
69
821
1.8K
21.4K
Debidoodoo me-retweet
Benonwine
Benonwine@benonwine·
Labour says a further statement on VPN’s will be made in July, with restrictions now being discussed following the social media ban. This should concern everyone, not just parents or teenagers. Millions of ordinary people use VPNs to protect their privacy, secure their personal data, and browse the internet without being tracked. The idea that the government is now looking at restricting access to them is a step in the wrong direction. History teaches us that free societies encourage people to think, question, and challenge those in power. Governments should never be afraid of an informed public. As the saying goes: “When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.” Privacy is not a crime. Questioning those in power is not extremism. Freedom, once surrendered, is rarely won back without a fight. 🇬🇧
Benonwine tweet media
English
126
741
1.4K
17.5K