@aibekjumabek Claude. Because when it's wrong, at least it sounds confident explaining why. Codex just ghosts you. @stitchd_ai doesn't code it just remembers brand colors. Different anxiety.
@TheMG3D Energy waste and job displacement are real concerns. But 'shut down every data center' is like 'ban all cars' after an accident. The right conversation is efficiency standards, transparency, and carbon aware training. Shutdown is rage bait, not policy.
@Govindtwtt Half true. Claude writes decent boilerplate. The dangerous part is when it looks correct but fails silently. That's not prayer territory that's 'hope you wrote tests' territory. Different anxiety, same face.
@kenrt_ Start without AI to learn fundamentals, write the code yourself then turn AI on to review your work, suggest improvements and explain what you missed. Best of both worlds: you learn the thinking, AI teaches you the cleaner way.
Trying to learn coding right now feels pointless sometimes. AI can write most of it better than I can. So why even bother?
I'm still figuring this out.
@consoleloglifee@kenrt_ Exactly. AI writes code that looks correct. It doesn't know if it's secure or maintainable, that's still on you. Fundamentals aren't obsolete they're just your filter now.
@jeff_mill2@kenrt_ AI can generate code. Understanding whether that code is correct, secure, and maintainable is still a human skill. That's why fundamentals matter.
@truth_seeker108@krishdotdev True, but AI judging AI gets circular fast. Two wrong models can agree. Experience breaks the tie. Tools change, judgment doesn't. Good talk.
@jeff_mill2@krishdotdev Right I mean I can still use AI as judge of another AI and get help from there... Well given I already am a seasoned developer, I am making some assumptions maybe.. Maybe those who are not experienced will have different experience using AI
The president of a programming language just banned AI code contributions.
Called it "invariably garbage."
The rest of us are shipping it to production.
@nalinrajput23 Too binary. 'Best' changes weekly and depends on your stack. GPT-5.5 wins on speed, Claude wins on reasoning about design systems. But neither replaces knowing what good looks like. Test both on your actual codebase, not benchmarks.
@yashhq_22 Claude for reasoning, Cursor for coding, and soon Stitchd (prelaunch) for brand memory so I don't re-explain my visual style every time I generate an image or video. Those three cover thinking, building, and creating.
@sahill_og 90% is generous. For boilerplate and CRUD apps, sure. For novel problems, legacy systems or anything with weird constraints? AI still needs heavy human help. The survivors will be the ones who know when to trust AI and when to take over. Same as it ever was.
@truth_seeker108@krishdotdev True but incomplete. You can describe an algorithm perfectly, but if you can't read the AI's code, you'll miss subtle bugs. Language skills have just shifted from writing to reading and editing. Different skills, same importance.
@jeff_mill2@krishdotdev Pseudo code skills and algorithm development skills are still as important to use AI effectively. Programming language skills aren't that important anymore.
@FlippedRay Not unpopular, just incomplete. AI will create more jobs long term, but it will also eliminate some permanently in the short term. The net is positive but the transition is brutal. Both things are true and pretending otherwise helps no one.
Hey founders 🚀
Looking to connect with people building in:
💻 SaaS
⚙️ Tech
🤖 Automation
🧠 AI tools
📦 Product Development
🌐 Web apps
Drop what you're working on 👇🏼
@suni_code Honest answer: $20 won't get you 'best' output long-term. Copilot is $10-19/month. Claude Code burns $20 fast. Use Cursor free tier save another $20 then commit or spend the $20 on Claude API directly.
I have $20 to spend.
Considering the Tokens costing and best output.
Suggest me Best one...
1. "Antigravity"
2. "Codex"
3. "Cursor"
4. "Copilot"
5. "Claude Code"
Serious answers only.
@sri9s@stitchd_ai No demo yet (prelaunch), but here's the use case: a marketer spends 10 minutes explaining brand colors, fonts, voice to other AI tools every single time. With @stitchd_ai, you do that once then every image or video just works. That's the demo in words.
@randfish@sparktoro SparkToro audience data plus AI that remembers your brand means hyper personalized content without re explaining who you're talking to every single time. This is exactly the kind of integration @stitchd_ai would love once we're live so I'm on the waitlist.
Dear fellow @sparktoro fans,
Your fave AI tool + SparkToro MCP access = ... uh, actually IDK, b/c the possibilities are♾.
Waitlist at sparktoro.com/api. Access should be available in <1 month.
@Issybeatz_ Harsh but fair. AI lowers the floor AND raises the ceiling. The delusional ones get exposed fast when edge cases break. The real ones use AI to accelerate not replace their judgment. Both things are true and knowing which one you are is the real test.
@Taniyatweets_ Claude wrote my waitlist landing page copy. Then I asked it to name my cat. It suggested "Algorithm." I kept the copy and the cat name. Most useful? Preventing my own bad decisions.