BrewGuy61

"Again and again, our major institutions, from the media to the judiciary, have amplified Trump’s presence; again and again, we have failed to name the consequences. Fascism can be defeated, but not when we are on its side." newyorker.com/magazine/dispa…

@ScienceFan231 @usncorpsman89 @Rationalist69 @michaelshermer Snopes is wrong on this one. And you're really showing your ass by defending the indefensible here. You probably thought telling the Proud Boys to "stand back and stand by" was just fine, too.

@lizzybetsdad @usncorpsman89 @Rationalist69 @michaelshermer … and said he was specifically referring to those who were there only to participate in the statue protest.” They then reveal their sources.

People think it's perfectly okay to lie in the name of a "greater good". For example, these are all Leftist lies: Trump said there are fine people on both sides. Trump is controlled by Russia. Trump is a rapist. Trump is a racist. Trump is a pedophile. Trump is Hitler.

@tophersimmons @ddale8 Weird how you have a specific cite for the one time "86" is used in the sense every honest person knows it;s used (i.e., "get rid of"), but when it comes to all the times it supposedly meant "kill," you're all "trust me, bro."

@ddale8 The Candidate (1972): A political film where a character is told to "86 the sideburns". Various Mafia Social Club Scenes: The term is commonly used in films portraying NYC Prohibition or gangster eras when referring to killing someone or tossing them out.

Entirely sincere question: has anyone seen a mafia movie in which a mobster orders a murder by saying "86 'em"?

@CindyCoops @JCRich @ddale8 No, you're not, you miserable, lying cunt.

@JCRich @ddale8 I'm just interested in the truth.

@JCRich @CindyCoops @ddale8 Bullshit.

@CindyCoops @ddale8 The saying predates the Vegas mob and did not mean to kill someone. Comey's defense will be "I understood the saying to mean to get rid of or take someone/something out of a restaurant, and I thought Trump should be impeached." How will anyone prove otherwise?

@CindyCoops @JCRich @ddale8 You're a fucking liar.

@JCRich @ddale8 There is not just one specific meaning, but all of its uses involve getting rid of. One of the uses is when ordering a lethal hit on someone. Something Comey knows very well. And now that we're fleshing out the context of his little stunt, that becomes even more clear.

There has never been a shred of evidence produced showing that there was any discernable number of non-Nazi/pro-statue protesters on the streets of Charlottesville that weekend."

...– but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?” This could be a compelling argument. There’s just one problem:

@carney Because anyone that would willingly serve the Most Corrupt President in American History is undoubtedly too corrupt to serve in a position of public trust.

Great point. Why does Powell think he’s personally the lynchpin of Fed independence? Does he not think the other governors are up to the job?

......Did Trump specifically say, “Some neo-Nazis are fine people?” No. Did he say that there were “very fine people on both sides” of a neo-Nazi rally? Yes!"