Luke Tebbs

Zionist lies are pretty obvious if you know where to look. They follow much the same strategy used by Holocaust deniers. Whatever the despicable atrocity they're accused of, they say it never happened, but also say it was justified if it did.

@Malarkiansghost @SjBarrister @not3bad @BellRibeiroAddy "AI developer" & blue tick account (paid per interaction). Probably an Israeli bot farm.

@SjBarrister @not3bad @BellRibeiroAddy Your ministers in government are literally Jewish supremacists you lying sack of shit.

Gaza has been a major factor behind voters leaving our party. In one recent poll, 53% of former Labour voters said it was a decisive factor. Why is this government willing to expend so much political capital to ensure weapons companies can keep arming Israel?

@SjBarrister @BellRibeiroAddy 1. They're our allies because they stuff Labour party campaign coffers. Do you believe in democracy? Or should we fall in line with whoever the glorious leader pledges our allegiance to. 2. The UN, ICJ, see the reverse of that. 3. Off to the re-education camps for us then?

@BellRibeiroAddy 1. Because they are our allies. 2. Because they are fighting genocidal fucking maniacs. 3. Are you mentally unwell?

It's the hill Labour, and seemingly @Keir_Starmer, want to die on. The most sensible thing Starmer could do now is admit he got this wrong and accept that Israel has committed, and continues to commit, war crimes in Gaza. Beyond the obvious fact that innocent lives hang in the balance, it would finally be a decisive act of leadership from Labour. Starmer has to decide what his legacy will be. Will he be remembered as a former human rights lawyer who buried his head in the sand while some of the most heinous alleged crimes of our time unfolded? Or as a leader who was willing to stand up for what he believed was right, even when it was politically difficult? Never mind the political impact it would have on the Conservatives and Reform. If they continue to support or excuse actions that amount to war crimes, they should be forced to defend that position publicly. Their support deserves the same scrutiny and condemnation as the crimes themselves. The longer Labour refuses to confront reality, the more damaging that choice becomes, not just politically, but morally.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 On an unrelated note, as much as your authoritarian double-think is deeply disturbing to me, I'm sorry you had to suffer with cancer. Nobody deserves that.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 Aren't you? One of the defendants was hit with a sledgehammer while he was trying to protect his (female) friend. You said "no excuse for hitting anyone with a sledgehammer". I'm wondering if you're flexible on that as you are on the genocide convention and gendered violence.

Sam is a hero. Full stop

Just to be clear: Palestinians who refuse to “voluntarily” enter this concentration camp will be MURDERED. That’s the plan. Stated openly. And people still insist with a straight face that this isn’t genocide.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 Ahhhh..... so now they're stereotyping the poor guard? If he'd of just moved out of the way and let him approach his friend, then Volante wouldn't have needed to hit him with a sledgehammer to get to her? Mark, your morals are as flexible as warm rubber band at a yoga retreat.

@luketebbs @MikeDeadman3 Aye tis the rub "looking like", Speculation.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 The jury were shown the injuries Devlin sustained from being struck by the guard. Can you guess what weapon was used? Devlin was trying to get in between Volante and Rogers, as "he was looking like he wanted to hurt her" Let me guess, sledgehammer attacks on women are now fine?

@luketebbs @MikeDeadman3 Don't hit people with sledgehammers, violent criminals and psychos do that. There is no excuse for hitting someone with a sledgehammer. You haven't the brains to get that so go away.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 I'll repeat again - even on retrial, the prosecution failed to convince a jury that Sam intended to harm anyone. Supplying those drones to Israel is a violation of the Genocide Convention. This is why it's so absurd for you to claim to be against violence or care about the law.

@luketebbs @MikeDeadman3 So sledgie Sam was holding the hammer above his head for what?

The Starmer government & perhaps the most conservative judiciary in UK history, are turning Britain into an outpost of the Israeli state in which opposing genocide is a crime while arming it & participating in it are legal & lauded

@0000itsmeagain @WokeratiMarty Nope. Outside of the political class you've bought hardly anyone in the UK supports genocide. actionforhumanity.org/blog/82-of-bri…

@luketebbs @WokeratiMarty I’m not interested in what’s happening in Gaza, only what’s happening in the UK As such I have no time for ProPal terrorist supporters attempting to intimidate all those who are ambivalent or don’t agree with them So pleased to see that there is a growing response to your hate

Outside the illegal Israeli land sale event in London today, Zionists showed pictures of dead Palestinians on their phones to anti-genocide protesters. But as usual, it’s the decent British citizens trying to uphold international law who end up being arrested.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 The jury believed Sam hadn't intended to hurt anyone, unlike the guard who attacked people with a sledgehammer while able to see. It's laughable to suggest discussing motive is whataboutery. They acted to save lives and almost certainly did. kurdistan24.net/en/story/849621

@luketebbs @MikeDeadman3 Of course I am passionately against violence against men and women, that's why I never hit people with sledgehammers. How about those Yezidi women? That's the "Burning" question. I can do whataboutery too.

Palestine Action is in good company. British governments and courts criminalised resistance to slavery, the Chartist movement for universal male suffrage, any organising by trade unionists, and the Suffragette movement to win women the vote. None of our rights were given to us by the ruling class. We had to fight for each of them tooth and nail. The British establishment is always on the wrong side of history, because history is with the struggle of ordinary people, not with the selfish interests of the billionaires and war industries. Those earlier struggles were deemed the terrorism of their day by the very same "liberals" – the British establishment and its useful idiots – who today declare any practical action to stop British complicity in Israel's genocide to be terrorism. Note too as proof of bad faith: the British establishment is well advanced in its efforts to declare entirely peaceful protest – marches through the streets – as anti-social, hate crimes and soon enough terrorism too. The ruling class consider attempts to stop a genocide, even holding a banner against the mass murder of children, to be far worse than racist pogroms in Belfast, which try to burn alive people in their homes because of the colour of their skin.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 So you kind of believe in the rule of law, same as you kind of care about violence against women? Basically, might makes right? theguardian.com/world/2024/mar…

@luketebbs @MikeDeadman3 If they hadn't broken the law they wouldn't have been sprayed. FAFO.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 He was blinded by PAVA. Which is apparently agony, BTW. So talk me through what you'd do. You've been sprayed in the eyes with a chemical weapon. You're in excruciating pain, and you can hear your female friend screaming as the guard that attacked you tries to break her wrist.

@luketebbs @MikeDeadman3 Irrespective of motive no only violent people would hit someone with a sledgehammer, why was he blinded? "Break in" a bloody criminal as well as a violent man.

@0000itsmeagain @WokeratiMarty I wasn't aware the heavily armed gangs that work with the IDF to drive Palestinians off their land were particularly frightened of me.

@luketebbs @WokeratiMarty Nope, but it’s good to see that you no longer intimidate them and they have stood up and countered your hate gatherings.

@SpursIdol @TomLondon6 Funny. I would have thought if you're classifying a group as a terrorist organisation then their beliefs and motivations should absolutely be part of that.

@TomLondon6 Your comments not relevant to the case - the question being decided was about people carrying out violence in UK, not their beliefs or motivations. PAL are/have carried out violence in UK, hence the ban.

MISSING COMPLETELY from the Court of Appeal judgment was that 1. Palestine Action was seeking to end a genocide 2. The weapons they destroyed at Elbit were intended for use in that genocide The Court of Appeal judges will be damned by history for siding with the genocidaires

This Governments branding of protest as 'terrorism' has seen grandparents arrested and dragged through the courts simply for holding up signs. It's deeply authoritarian when people are speaking out against a genocide and for a free Palestine.

@marktheman2010 @MikeDeadman3 So you're saying he wasn't motivated to destroy drones used to kill people, but because he wants to hurt women? And he decided the best way to do that is to break into an arms factory with a group of women, get blinded, then give a female officer an injury requiring paracetamol?

@luketebbs @MikeDeadman3 The subject was Sam the sadistic moron, why change it? What about the Yezidi women? That is the "burning" question.

@TomLondon6 I think that's the point of why the state wants it regulated.

In defence of social media No one can deny it has its dark sides, but the world would never have been properly informed of the GENOCIDE in Gaza if it had only had legacy media to rely on