kjpaw
1.4K posts

kjpaw
@matlabdogboy
ceramics & nanomaterials 🤏 multiferroic composite structures & NV/optical magnetometry personal account 🥰 views are my own priv 》@matlabdogboyyy 🏳️⚧️

if you don’t hold your macbook like this you’re not agentmaxxing enough


Going to church in NYC is such a different experience than going in TX. Been trying to figure out the best way to describe it, but really it’s what makes everything in NYC better (at least for me). It’s real. Nothing fake about it. It’s not performative. You’re there because you want to be. You’re there because you need to be. All walks of life are in that church. The guy ripping the keyboard has dreads and is wearing a Yankees cap with green cargos. He has a toothpick in his mouth he’s smiling. The woman singing is all soul and she’s got jeans on and a simple black cardigan. The pastor is a hipster wearing a Sherpa denim jacket. Everyone around me is listening and praying. It’s not forced. You think God is dead in this city until you gather in a place where everyone is worshipping and you realize God is more alive here than anywhere you’ve ever been. What makes New York so special, in my opinion, is that nothing fake survives here. And that’s why God is alive here.




A weird thing about Department of Energy labs is that they’re *forced* to work on novel problems. More specifically, supercomputing work that is: “not well suited to university or private sector research”. This creates odd design choices. DOE compute isn’t “hyperscaler shaped” at all. In fact, they have a rule where they have to use two distinct architectures across each generation of supercomputer. I think the best example of being “weird shaped” is probably Aurora. It was the first x86 CPU with on-package HBM! Intel abandoned the idea after just a single generation. It was so neat though. You could allocate directly into HBM if you wanted, OR run it like a cache in front of regular DDR5 memory, OR if you workload fit…keep the whole thing in HBM. With current HBM supply issues, I don’t think we’ll ever see a CPU with HBM on package again (they’ll all go to GPUs…), but seems fun to play with!








A weird thing about Department of Energy labs is that they’re *forced* to work on novel problems. More specifically, supercomputing work that is: “not well suited to university or private sector research”. This creates odd design choices. DOE compute isn’t “hyperscaler shaped” at all. In fact, they have a rule where they have to use two distinct architectures across each generation of supercomputer. I think the best example of being “weird shaped” is probably Aurora. It was the first x86 CPU with on-package HBM! Intel abandoned the idea after just a single generation. It was so neat though. You could allocate directly into HBM if you wanted, OR run it like a cache in front of regular DDR5 memory, OR if you workload fit…keep the whole thing in HBM. With current HBM supply issues, I don’t think we’ll ever see a CPU with HBM on package again (they’ll all go to GPUs…), but seems fun to play with!

Sam Altman: "We are no longer that far away from an [AI] model that.. knows ... about your life... knows about what you're doing... [and] what you care about"













