Mike Cameron

116.1K posts

Mike Cameron banner
Mike Cameron

Mike Cameron

@mikercameron

Dad, husband, retired maths and computer science teacher, slave to two cats. I could, so I taught.

England Bergabung Mart 2008
1.6K Mengikuti5.4K Pengikut
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
@afneil Scotland will, of course, be boycotting the knockout rounds.
English
1
0
41
1.2K
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
Ludicrous suggestions doing the rounds that European nations should boycott the World Cup in America. Well, let me tell you this — Scotland is going come hell or high water. If no one else turns up we might even have a chance of winning. Of course if England had qualified but not Scotland you can bet your bottom dollar the usual SNP loudmouths would be calling for England to pull out.
English
214
259
3.9K
143.6K
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
One thing we’ve found out for sure today - the US military WILL carry out illegal orders.
English
0
0
0
116
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
I know of a school that is going through a redundancy process with a consultation period over Xmas and a significant input to the decision making will be based on a single lesson observation of all members of staff to be carried out in the New Year. Merry Christmas everyone.
English
0
0
1
141
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
Shock horror! Original OBR estimates re private schools VAT changes turn out to be mostly correct, if anything an underestimate of the tax being raised.
Mike Cameron tweet media
English
0
0
0
89
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
Seen some negative comments about this. Seems a good way of prompting parents to get their kids into school and help with attendance issues, where every little helps.
Department for Education@educationgovuk

What would you do with an extra 30 minutes in your day? 🤔 Free breakfast clubs are transforming mornings for 500,000 children - that's 95 precious hours back each year while children get a nutritious start to their day. Part of our Plan for Change ✨

English
0
0
1
130
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
@StuartLock @MrJLauder @MoreMorrow So that would save about £30 per student per annum (assuming no extra costs required). Is that enough to make a significant difference to their experience/outcomes? Also, I would worry that the next stop on from 2000 to 300 is to zero. Not sure the system would manage that.
English
1
0
1
171
Stuart Lock
Stuart Lock@StuartLock·
@MrJLauder @MoreMorrow I dunno. I don’t think the taxpayer should be paying 2000 people to do a job like mine/ Dans. What about just 300 of us to run 24k schools (and if it’s not me, there’s loads I can do- that’s fine)?
English
2
0
4
4.2K
Dan Morrow
Dan Morrow@MoreMorrow·
People talk often about the need for MAT mergers and consolidation. There is some merit to this. However-we should deploy collective scepticism on this as the result could be corporate concentration which we’ve all seen does not end well for every other aspect of public services
English
6
0
8
1.3K
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
@BodilUK I’d love to see this question also posed as “4 + 8 = 5 + _ “ to see if there was any difference in outcome.
English
2
0
1
44
Bodil Isaksen
Bodil Isaksen@BodilUK·
Fill in the gap: 4 + 8 = _ + 5 Under half of Key Stage 2 and 3 equivalent students answered correctly in this study. How do you think British kids would do?
Gerry Varty@gerryvarty

@rastokke Looking at the first question took me back to an NCTM study I read a few decades ago, and replicated several times since in different districts. academic.sun.ac.za/mathed/174/Alg…

English
1
0
0
259
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
And at a stroke, the BBC story is off the front pages and the airwaves are full of people saying how much they support the government. Political journalists are so easy to play.
Ben Riley-Smith@benrileysmith

***What’s really going on with these No10 briefings that Keir Starmer is prepared to fight a leadership challenge?*** Here’s my best guess after a load of calls… It seems clear tonight that Downing Street deliberately wanted out there the idea the PM will battle to keep his job Well-informed pieces from Guardian’s @PippaCrerar, Times’s @patrickkmaguire and BBC’s @ChrisMasonBBC and @hzeffman dropped this evening carrying No10 figures / Starmer allies making that argument. Downing Street folks have since told @Telegraph the same. One said: “Any attempt to bring political instability into a Government with a very stable majority would be economically and politically extremely unwise.” The clear message tonight: Starmer will face down any challenge. Some cabinet ministers - Wes Streeting in particular but also Shabana Mahmood - have had fingers of blame pointed at them from Starmer allies. Accused of being on manoeuvres. An extraordinary night of briefing wars has followed. Streeting’s team on record has denied: “These claims are categorically untrue." Mahmood ally has called them “nonsense”. The question then becomes… why has No10 picked this moment to elevate the idea his position is under threat? It feels like an early attempt to smoke out any plotters and get Labour MPs rallying round Starmer before an incredibly tricky Budget (one in which he’s expected to break the manifesto by raising income tax). Wes Streeting is on the media round tomorrow (as Downing Street figures well know). He’ll be bounced into publicly pledging loyalty to Starmer. Starmer himself is at PMQs tomorrow. Presumably he will insist he’s not going anywhere, to cheers from Labour MPs (as usually happens for leaders in PMQs). Perhaps the hope from No10 is to repeat the dynamic from Labour conference, when Andy Burnham publicly floated his ambitions and the party as a whole slapped him down / rallied to Starmer’s side. This feels like an attempt to repeat, calling the bluff of other leadership pretenders to smooth the post-Budget fallout. But there is also one resounding takeaway: That No10 even feels it needs to mount this operation shows there is at least some genuine degree of concern about Starmer’s position. And that is why tonight has been so telling.

English
0
0
0
89
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
@michael_merrick The axis is “rank” so gives no real information about relative income - they could all be within a couple of quid of each other. It’s also income net of tax without any other attempts to look at differences (eg medical costs). Plus it’s still the top 15 out of 200.
English
0
0
1
23
Michael Merrick
Michael Merrick@michael_merrick·
We are not a wealthy country
Michael Merrick tweet media
English
4
0
2
697
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
@adamboxer1 The change in memory and storage capacity and price is what makes me certain there must be an alien apace ship in Area 51.
Mike Cameron tweet media
English
1
0
0
186
Adam Boxer
Adam Boxer@adamboxer1·
I now have approximately 36TB of storage to house the Carousel Teaching videos, and according to ChatGPT that's around 25 million floppy disks, which would occupy the size of a medium warehouse TECHNOLOGY IS SO COOL
English
5
0
24
3.4K
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
@soniasodha That’s not what I said. But that’s fine, carry on as you were.
English
2
0
2
636
Sonia Sodha
Sonia Sodha@soniasodha·
@mikercameron Eradicating poverty is not going to eradicate child sexual abuse.
English
2
2
70
767
Sonia Sodha
Sonia Sodha@soniasodha·
Completely disagree on this. Grooming gangs a particular phenomenon not looked at by Independent Inquiry on Child Sexual Abuse. Louise Casey was clear on need for specific inquiry including to look at why men from some cultural backgrounds over-represented in the data. People in authority don’t need another excuse to avoid the issues including why people looked the other way for so long.
Fraser Nelson@FraserNelson

In Oldham and Rochdale, it was grooming gangs of mainly Pakistani heritage. In Blackpool, white men acting alone. In Glasgow, drug addicts. Same evil, different faces. An inquiry cannot confine itself to only one aspect of this scourge. My column:- times-comment.com/gangs678

English
72
322
1.9K
127K
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
@soniasodha It’s not a cop out at all. It’s the harder job. How do we eradicate poverty, disadvantage, extreme inequality? Doing that will reduce the numbers of vulnerable people. But no one wants to do that because it’s too hard. By all means address offending behaviour at the same time.
English
5
0
3
783
Sonia Sodha
Sonia Sodha@soniasodha·
@mikercameron That’s a cop out. You need to look at what drives the offending behaviour as well as characteristics of victims. There are so many lessons and recommendations from IICSA that relate to protecting vulnerable children that haven’t been implemented by last government or this one.
English
5
6
133
2.3K
Mike Cameron
Mike Cameron@mikercameron·
“Leeds fortunate there.” Yeah, fortunate that Attwell is the ref.
English
0
0
0
159