0dd

2K posts

0dd banner
0dd

0dd

@odd0racle7

cut-throat. | funnier, smarter, and hotter than you. †

Bergabung Mart 2025
13 Mengikuti42 Pengikut
Tweet Disematkan
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
I highly recommend this book “Classical Architecture’s African Roots” by architect David Muñiz Supple. It goes into great detail on the African (yes, Black people) origins of what modern people consider classical architecture and design. The Odyssey naysayers need to read this
0dd tweet media0dd tweet media
English
2
0
1
587
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@springbrease @GodstimeAtas Wrong, bitch. Black people are the only indigenous race to Africa. Every other group of stinking cunts came later, including you Eurasian invaders.
English
0
0
0
2
Lilith's disciple
Lilith's disciple@springbrease·
@GodstimeAtas It's almost as if different groups are indigenous to different parts of Africa lol
English
2
0
4
574
Typical African
Typical African@Joe__Bassey·
Facial Reconstruction of a 37,000-Year-Old Man from Egypt.
Typical African tweet media
English
670
1.6K
13.6K
1.5M
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@LionWheelEnergy @Sulkalmakh yes, he does. fuck white supremacists. they hate to feel like Black people are first in anything. also, Black people expored the entire continent of Africa. the Sahara Desert wasn’t some impossible to cross barrier keeping Black people stuck South of it like you retards claim
English
0
0
0
4
Leo
Leo@LionWheelEnergy·
@Sulkalmakh I got lambasted by wignats and somehow also Black nationalists last time I said this but he looks like a Sub Saharan and I wonder when we stopped looked like that.
English
4
0
2
1.4K
Ancestral Whispers
Ancestral Whispers@Sulkalmakh·
Facial reconstruction of a 315,000-year-old man from Morocco The first discovery at the Jebel Irhoud site was made in 1961, when a remarkably complete skull of an archaic human was unearthed. Subsequent excavations revealed another cranial vault, the mandible of a child, and several additional bone fragments. The site has been dated multiple times, with estimates ranging from 30,000 to 190,000 years ago. By 2007, the accepted age was approximately 160,000 years. However, new analyses conducted by the same research team demonstrated that the Jebel Irhoud deposits are significantly older, dating between 240,000 ± 35,000 and 378,000 ± 30,000 years ago, with an average age of approximately 315,000 ± 34,000 years. The Jebel Irhoud individuals occupy an intermediate position between modern humans (including Upper Paleolithic Cro-Magnons) and more archaic groups such as Heidelberg humans, Neanderthals, and African Middle Pleistocene populations. This pattern is evident across nearly all studied anatomical features, including the skull, mandible, brain, and dentition. The occipital and temporal bones of Irhoud 1 retain several archaic characteristics, whereas the frontal bone exhibits more derived traits. The face of Jebel Irhoud 1 is essentially indistinguishable from that of modern humans and, in some respects, appears even more modern than that of certain Upper Paleolithic Homo sapiens specimens. The mandible displays a receding chin, although a very weak indication of chin prominence may be present. Considered in isolation, the jaw appears relatively archaic; however, in combination with the facial morphology, it does not seem particularly primitive. Viewed from a three-quarter angle, Irhoud 1 appears remarkably modern, while its archaic features become most apparent in profile. The cranial vault bones of Jebel Irhoud 1 are thick, and the vault itself is low and elongated. The forehead is low and receding, although less sloping than that of European Neanderthals. The brow ridge is massive, postorbital constriction is pronounced, and the occipital region exhibits a chignon-like morphology. The mandibular fossa of the temporal bone is moderately deep and spacious. The articular eminence is well developed, and the postglenoid process is large. The face is extremely high and broad. The upper face is relatively flattened, while alveolar prognathism is strongly expressed. The orbits are tall and square-shaped, and the nose is very broad. A canine fossa is absent, and the alveolar process is high. The teeth are large. The brain morphology resembles that of the Kabwe (Broken Hill) specimen. Cranial capacity has been estimated at 1,305–1,480 cm³. (Hublin et al. (2017), Richter et al. (2017), Antropogenez, S. Drobyshevski (2017)).
Ancestral Whispers tweet mediaAncestral Whispers tweet media
English
46
85
491
63.4K
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@BenReynen @shawn_vverx @ytspost this man is an American white and that feces eating repressed homosexuality gene is still going strong. what is wrong with white men? 🤢
0dd tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@BenReynen @shawn_vverx @ytspost imagine being so ashamed of the euroturd slum you come from that you can’t bring yourself to say it
English
0
0
0
1
lookrio
lookrio@Lookrioo·
@FrancosSon3 @HagazagaH So confidently wrong, there’s 0 dna recovered from that irhoud mf so we will never know
English
2
0
0
101
🇨🇭🏔 Hagaz 🏔🇨🇭 - Emperor of the Alps
There are no proofs he did not look like this btw
🇨🇭🏔 Hagaz 🏔🇨🇭 - Emperor of the Alps tweet media🇨🇭🏔 Hagaz 🏔🇨🇭 - Emperor of the Alps tweet media
Ancestral Whispers@Sulkalmakh

Facial reconstruction of a 315,000-year-old man from Morocco The first discovery at the Jebel Irhoud site was made in 1961, when a remarkably complete skull of an archaic human was unearthed. Subsequent excavations revealed another cranial vault, the mandible of a child, and several additional bone fragments. The site has been dated multiple times, with estimates ranging from 30,000 to 190,000 years ago. By 2007, the accepted age was approximately 160,000 years. However, new analyses conducted by the same research team demonstrated that the Jebel Irhoud deposits are significantly older, dating between 240,000 ± 35,000 and 378,000 ± 30,000 years ago, with an average age of approximately 315,000 ± 34,000 years. The Jebel Irhoud individuals occupy an intermediate position between modern humans (including Upper Paleolithic Cro-Magnons) and more archaic groups such as Heidelberg humans, Neanderthals, and African Middle Pleistocene populations. This pattern is evident across nearly all studied anatomical features, including the skull, mandible, brain, and dentition. The occipital and temporal bones of Irhoud 1 retain several archaic characteristics, whereas the frontal bone exhibits more derived traits. The face of Jebel Irhoud 1 is essentially indistinguishable from that of modern humans and, in some respects, appears even more modern than that of certain Upper Paleolithic Homo sapiens specimens. The mandible displays a receding chin, although a very weak indication of chin prominence may be present. Considered in isolation, the jaw appears relatively archaic; however, in combination with the facial morphology, it does not seem particularly primitive. Viewed from a three-quarter angle, Irhoud 1 appears remarkably modern, while its archaic features become most apparent in profile. The cranial vault bones of Jebel Irhoud 1 are thick, and the vault itself is low and elongated. The forehead is low and receding, although less sloping than that of European Neanderthals. The brow ridge is massive, postorbital constriction is pronounced, and the occipital region exhibits a chignon-like morphology. The mandibular fossa of the temporal bone is moderately deep and spacious. The articular eminence is well developed, and the postglenoid process is large. The face is extremely high and broad. The upper face is relatively flattened, while alveolar prognathism is strongly expressed. The orbits are tall and square-shaped, and the nose is very broad. A canine fossa is absent, and the alveolar process is high. The teeth are large. The brain morphology resembles that of the Kabwe (Broken Hill) specimen. Cranial capacity has been estimated at 1,305–1,480 cm³. (Hublin et al. (2017), Richter et al. (2017), Antropogenez, S. Drobyshevski (2017)).

English
9
0
61
10.2K
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@senpai4blondiee @rahowaii Stfu you faggot ass bot. You’re a whole white man hiding behind a retarded AI woman account. Get a fucking life, cave cunt.
English
0
0
0
2
Blondie Genie
Blondie Genie@senpai4blondiee·
@rahowaii You forgetting even dogs have thinner and prettier hair than blacks? Fking trash theory Whites did not come from blacks, you wish 😂😂😂 fking retarded monkeys
English
1
0
0
18
Saturn ♦️
Saturn ♦️@rahowaii·
Tightly coiled ‘kinky’ hair is probably the ancestral/basal hair texture of Homo sapiens, so this Jebel Irhoud rec’s hair texture is likely. A few human populations like khoisan have very short-growing ‘peppercorn’ textured hair naturally, which is just as recent as wavy hair
Saturn ♦️ tweet media
Ancestral Whispers@Sulkalmakh

Facial reconstruction of a 315,000-year-old man from Morocco The first discovery at the Jebel Irhoud site was made in 1961, when a remarkably complete skull of an archaic human was unearthed. Subsequent excavations revealed another cranial vault, the mandible of a child, and several additional bone fragments. The site has been dated multiple times, with estimates ranging from 30,000 to 190,000 years ago. By 2007, the accepted age was approximately 160,000 years. However, new analyses conducted by the same research team demonstrated that the Jebel Irhoud deposits are significantly older, dating between 240,000 ± 35,000 and 378,000 ± 30,000 years ago, with an average age of approximately 315,000 ± 34,000 years. The Jebel Irhoud individuals occupy an intermediate position between modern humans (including Upper Paleolithic Cro-Magnons) and more archaic groups such as Heidelberg humans, Neanderthals, and African Middle Pleistocene populations. This pattern is evident across nearly all studied anatomical features, including the skull, mandible, brain, and dentition. The occipital and temporal bones of Irhoud 1 retain several archaic characteristics, whereas the frontal bone exhibits more derived traits. The face of Jebel Irhoud 1 is essentially indistinguishable from that of modern humans and, in some respects, appears even more modern than that of certain Upper Paleolithic Homo sapiens specimens. The mandible displays a receding chin, although a very weak indication of chin prominence may be present. Considered in isolation, the jaw appears relatively archaic; however, in combination with the facial morphology, it does not seem particularly primitive. Viewed from a three-quarter angle, Irhoud 1 appears remarkably modern, while its archaic features become most apparent in profile. The cranial vault bones of Jebel Irhoud 1 are thick, and the vault itself is low and elongated. The forehead is low and receding, although less sloping than that of European Neanderthals. The brow ridge is massive, postorbital constriction is pronounced, and the occipital region exhibits a chignon-like morphology. The mandibular fossa of the temporal bone is moderately deep and spacious. The articular eminence is well developed, and the postglenoid process is large. The face is extremely high and broad. The upper face is relatively flattened, while alveolar prognathism is strongly expressed. The orbits are tall and square-shaped, and the nose is very broad. A canine fossa is absent, and the alveolar process is high. The teeth are large. The brain morphology resembles that of the Kabwe (Broken Hill) specimen. Cranial capacity has been estimated at 1,305–1,480 cm³. (Hublin et al. (2017), Richter et al. (2017), Antropogenez, S. Drobyshevski (2017)).

English
12
29
276
17.8K
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@StoneAgeGWOT @namten69 @rahowaii And we don’t give a damn lol. I’d rather have my curls than your lice infested fur. You’re so triggered by human ancestors having curly-kinky hair, it’s crazy.
English
0
0
0
5
Mousterian
Mousterian@StoneAgeGWOT·
@namten69 @rahowaii Ok fine we have fur. Whatever you want to call it I’d rather have my hair than black people hair.
English
2
0
4
75
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@BenReynen @shawn_vverx @ytspost better than your hook nose anglo ancestors eating each other. no shame. just lazy and destitute. couldn’t even grow food or hunt. all those fairytales about witches eating children came from reality. hell you’re lucky your long titty grandma spared you
0dd tweet media
English
1
0
0
16
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@BenReynen @shawn_vverx @ytspost which European slum do you hail from? Ireland? my parents come from two different islands. the amount of Indian in my blood is minuscule. same with European. since when do people identify with tiny percentages of admixture?
English
1
0
0
13
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@BenReynen @shawn_vverx @ytspost it’s pure cope that you have to lie about my lineage just to find a small scrap of dignity. 🤣 saying i’m Indian again and again just makes you look retarded sheep feces is probs toxic to the brain so you may wanna go easy on the dookie mukbangs, Mr Leprechaun 😘
English
1
0
0
10
BeanRainon🌧
BeanRainon🌧@BenReynen·
@odd0racle7 @shawn_vverx @ytspost Indo-Caribbean is pretty common so I did totally nail your shit eating ethnicity. Nope you Indian people use cow dung as tooth paste and moisturizers 😂
English
1
0
0
16
BeanRainon🌧
BeanRainon🌧@BenReynen·
@odd0racle7 @shawn_vverx @ytspost The only people who post this tiny festival are Indian people who try to say white people love shit when in reality Indians are the shit-centric culture. I’m guessing probably your mother is Indian.
English
2
0
0
22
0dd
0dd@odd0racle7·
@BenReynen @shawn_vverx @ytspost if i were biracial i’d say that. who are you to lie to? as if i’m afraid of your reaction? i’m Caribbean to be specific. Black. and um lol nice cope but the only dung eating festival exists in Europe 🤣 ya’ll are cave beasts fr :/
English
1
0
0
13
BeanRainon🌧
BeanRainon🌧@BenReynen·
@odd0racle7 @shawn_vverx @ytspost No you’re a half black half Indian person, and one tiny festival that’s a joke doesn’t compare to how you guys eat cow shit regularly, or how black people live in shit regularly.
English
1
0
0
17