OrbitEditor

@ajs6888 That's the approach we believe in as well. Benchmarks are one signal, but shipping quality is measured by what the model actually produces in real-world tasks.

@orbiteditor 看成品差异比看榜单直观多了

DeepSeek v4 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5 Same prompt. Same landing page. Different results. The takeaway? Model choice matters. Harness design matters even more. The best AI products aren't just picking the most capable model. They're orchestrating the right model for the right task. That's what we're building at Orbit Editor AI. 🚀 Launching soon. orbiteditorai.com

@anrayama Every model has its strengths. Our goal is to make it easy to use the right one for the right task.

@orbiteditor ofc the best is a whale

DeepSeek v4 Pro vs Composer 2.5 👀 Same prompt. Same design goal. The result? DeepSeek v4 Pro delivered this design for just $0.0008. The lesson isn't "always use the cheapest model." The real advantage comes from using the right open-source model with the right harness. That's where the magic happens. We're building exactly that at Orbit Editor AI, an intelligent harness that helps you get the best results from modern AI models, without wasting tokens or money. 🚀 Launching soon. Stay tuned: orbiteditorai.com #AI #OpenSourceAI #DeepSeek #LLM #WebDesign #AIAgents #BuildInPublic #OrbitEditor

@gitfate Absolutely. The best tools still need good judgment behind them.

@orbiteditor and skills.

@isaleheen It is on our roadmap. We will share a timeline as soon as we are confident it is ready. Thanks for the interest.

@orbiteditor When can we expect Windows release?

@johnmccoyx We think both matter, but once models reach a certain level, the workflow around them becomes the biggest multiplier.

@orbiteditor the harness mattering more than the model is the part nobody selling courses wants to admit

@zfm__t Absolutely. We are preparing a full breakdown covering the workflow, prompt, and model configuration so anyone can reproduce the results. We will share it soon.

@orbiteditor Can you give more details on your workflow What you used, how and with what kind of prompt ?

@ajs6888 I think we are heading in that direction. Models are getting closer together, so the quality of the framework is becoming the real differentiator.

@orbiteditor 看着像是框架吃掉了大半差距

@vibecoder_dc That is a great analogy. The model is the engine, but the harness decides how effectively that power gets used. That is where we think the biggest gains are.

@orbiteditor The "right harness" is basically the diferença between using a laser for surgery and using a laser to heat a slice of pizza. Same physics, completely different outcome.

@fawnunwrap Great idea. We are putting together a full breakdown with the prompt and the outputs so everyone can compare the results themselves. Stay tuned.

@orbiteditor Yo could we maybe use the prompt to see results for ourselves?

@natinati1905 Choosing the right model is only part of it. How you prompt, route, and orchestrate that model often makes an even bigger difference. That is exactly what we are focused on.

@orbiteditor Choosing the right model for the task is the real unlock.

The Orbit Editor landing page is now live. We're getting ready to launch in the next few days and can't wait to share what we've been building. Take a look at orbiteditorai.com See you at launch.

Orbit Editor now supports subagents. Subagents work in parallel to complete different parts of a task, making complex workflows faster while preserving context across your codebase. This is the first step toward a more capable AI coding experience. The waitlist is open at orbiteditorai.com.

@Validate_QA Just beginning.

@orbiteditor slash commands done right is one of those small things that makes the whole editor feel faster. love that you kept it in-flow instead of modal city

just shipped / commands in Orbit Editor type / and instantly access your skills and commands without breaking your flow no digging through menus. just type and go. this is what AI coding should feel like waitlist is open → orbiteditorai.com

Orbit Editor is launching soon. the Cursor alternative that works with any LLM provider! Claude, GPT, Codex, Ollama, OpenRouter, or anything you already have a subscription for. waitlist link - orbiteditorai.com

@adelbucetta Exactly. Developers should be able to choose the models and tools that work best for them without sacrificing the editor experience.

@orbiteditor that's a tradeoff nobody should have to make in 2023 anyway

you should not have to choose between a great AI editor and the LLM you already use. Orbit Editor solves that. • full agent workflow and tools built into the editor • split terminal — run Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode side by side • connect any provider — Claude, GPT, Codex, Ollama, OpenRouter • plug in your existing subscription directly, no middleman • free models included out of the box this is what owning your AI stack actually looks like. waitlist link 👇👇