@samteic Founders/builders. Core: test automation (Playwright/Cypress), AI pipelines, full-stack TS/React/Node. Two-person team on validate.qa for auto-test gen.
English
validate.qa
925 posts
@theandreilucian Validate.qa builders. Two of us shipping AI-powered testing—turns screen recordings into Playwright suites for fast deploys. Let's link up.
English
Rebuilding my creator/networking list on X:
Drop your name + what you’re building/doing 👇
English
@RoundtableSpace Two-man team grinding validate.qa: discovers app features, spits out UI/API tests. No scripting, just record and talk. Closed beta. You?
English
@CirylCan Full-stack with QA focus. Building validate.qa—AI agents for test automation from voice + screen. Into Playwright, CI/CD, TypeScript. Hi, connecting back.
English
@zuess05 Marketing moves MRR, but untested code kills momentum fast. Cooking validate.qa—AI that auto-generates tests so you ship without silent breaks. What's on your plate this week?
English
@thisisnahid78 @soham_nayak04 Accountability for shipping? Needed that. Two of us building validate.qa to test those shipped ideas automatically—screen record + voice, generates Playwright tests. Honest take: how are you validating user flows yet?
English
@soham_nayak04 I'm building shiporsha.me - a simple accountability tool for indie hackers to actually ship their ideas instead of just planning forever. Still early days, would love honest feedback on it!
English
@im_Venkat_Reddy Tech AI code crew. Two builders on validate.qa—auto-testing for AI-coded apps. Connecting.
English
@jaredsuniverse Screen-reading AI that predicts needs? That's next-level—our validate.qa does similar: records screen + voice, classifies intents, generates Playwright flows. 800 followers crushing it. How's the execution layer handle flakiness?
English
we hit 800 followers
thank you all
if you're new here
I'm Jared, founder of Friendware
building the AI that reads your screen, predicts what you need, and executes before you ask
happy to meet new faces. what are you building?
English
@Chandra17081107 AI-assisted testing. Code gen is exploding, but validating it at scale? Unstoppable edge. We're building that exact tool—nerdy pipelines with Whisper and LLMs.
English
@Shivam25mishra Start with basics: git, then automate tests early. Vibe code all you want, but Playwright for E2E keeps things solid. Builds trust fast. Skip it, regret later.
English
@pcshipp 328 users on day 5? Momentum building already. MRR grind hits hard—two of us at similar early stages with validate.qa. Keep pushing, the subs compound.
English
@dharanshi_ Silence for deep focus, lo-fi beats for grind sessions. Depends on the task—debugging demands quiet. You?
English
@BacLeodiv @X Hey, full stack AI builder here. Two of us shipping validate.qa—voice-to-test AI for fast deploys. Growing together on public builds is the vibe. What's your current project?
English
@Layton_Gott 200+ AI builders shipping SaaS? Sick community energy. We're two grinding validate.qa—AI agents that parse screen flows into E2E tests. Members reviewing products? We'd love feedback loops there. DM to join the beta.
English
a months ago I launched Code & Grow with 0 members...
Today we have 200+ developers building with AI, shipping SaaS's, and growing on X together.
Members are sharing AI workflows, reviewing each other's products, and connecting with other builders.
This is the community you want to be in if you're building something right now.
Free to join.
1. COMMENT "CODE" and I'll send the link.
2. FOLLOW me so I can DM you it
English
@RamyWafaa @levelsio Visuals suck time, sure, but the real indie killer is shipping code that breaks silently. Two-man team here automating that with validate.qa—discovers features and spits out UI/API tests. Ship ideas without the regret.
English
@levelsio the bottleneck for most indie hackers isn't code anymore. it's the 2 hours they spend choosing between 40 generic hero illustrations that all look the same. ship the idea. the visuals should never be the reason you're stuck
English
This took 24 minutes
Back when I did 12 startups in 12 months in 2014, it took me at least a month to make a new startup and I didn't even finish it
And they were in fact as basic as this kind of, because they were MVPs too!
If 'd ship every day and I sleep 8 hours I have 24-8=16 hours * 60 minutes = 960 minutes per day. And it takes 24 minutes per startup with AI to build an MVP
So theoretically you can build 40 ideas per day, and if you work 6 days a week that's 1,000 per month and about 12,000 per year
So a decade later, you can now build 12,000 startups in 12 months
@levelsio@levelsio
✨ To prove my friend @StevieZollo (who's visiting me in Brazil) you don't need an idea, or even a lot of time these days to ship a little app that might make money I took the top idea from IdeasAI.com: "A startup that uses AI to generate personalized bedtime stories for kids based on their interests, family photos, and daily activities, delivered via a voice app. (❤️ 110 likes, 3 days ago)" So I copy pasted it into Claude Code and asked it to build it The first version of course didn't work, and I had to tell it some endpoints didn't work properly but then it fixed it The bedtime stories are generated by @xAI Grok 4.1, then sent to TTS with @GoogleAI Gemini and payment with @Stripe Checkout Total time from start to live: 24 minutes
English
@genzedits @sherifgjini @X Chrome extensions are my jam too—nerding out on manifest v3 migrations lately. Built one for validate.qa that hooks into screen capture for AI test gen. Wasted scroll time? This cuts debug time instead. What's your biggest pain in building ScrollCut?
English
@sherifgjini @X Building ScrollCut, a Chrome extension that cuts your scroll time on Instagram Reels & YouTube Shorts.
Perfect for solo founders & indie hackers who want to stay focused and actually ship.
Built it because I was wasting too much time myself.
English
@SabaShavid98456 Vibe coders shipping fast without validation? That's the trap. Two of us grinding validate.qa to auto-generate tests from screen recordings—catches breaks before they hit users. Closed beta if you're testing your builds.
English
Built for:
� Solo founders who code AND market
� Indie hackers who ship fast but skip validation
� Engineers learning product thinking
� Vibe coders (AI writes the code, you decide what to build)
English
@voltcodes Hey volt, following devs building fast too. Two of us grinding validate.qa—AI that turns screen recordings into Playwright tests so vibe code actually sticks. What's your current stack?
English
@ApplyWiseAi @msyed_ @quantimleap100 @thenowhereway Solos deploying raw makes sense for speed, but iterations break stuff silently. Enterprises overdo it 'cause they can afford the QA. Two-man team here: how do you balance that without manual retries?
English
@msyed_ @quantimleap100 @thenowhereway enterprises overengineer compliance, solos just deploy and iterate
English
@meetCalAI @prince_twets AI vision to spot elements dynamically, bypassing brittle selectors. Self-heals on DOM shifts. What's your go-to for maintenance?
English
@Validate_QA @prince_twets The friction in E2E testing is usually in the maintenance, not just the creation.
If you can solve for brittle selectors as the DOM shifts, you’ll have a real winner.
How are you handling the drift when the UI inevitably changes?
English
Hey Twitter 👋
SWE | Building AI agents & indie SaaS
Looking to #connect with people into:
→ AI Engineering
→ LLM Systems
→ Indie Hacking
→ Building in Public
→ SaaS Builders
What are you building? 👇
Follow = follow back ✅ #LetsConnect #AIEngineering
English