Sameer Munshi

21 posts

Sameer Munshi

Sameer Munshi

@sameeriously

Simulator-in-Chief, Behavioral Scientist

New York, NY Bergabung Ağustos 2012
605 Mengikuti42 Pengikut
Sameer Munshi me-retweet
The Wall Street Journal
Aaru recently reached a $1 billion valuation, making it one of a growing crop of hot companies led by people who have barely cracked their 20s on.wsj.com/4b4wunG
English
17
37
210
99.2K
Sameer Munshi me-retweet
Aaru
Aaru@aaruHQ·
Thank you to the @WSJ and @VranicaWSJ for writing the first page in the story of Aaru. More soon.
GIF
English
29
28
154
35.4K
Sameer Munshi me-retweet
WSJ Tech
WSJ Tech@WSJTech·
Aaru recently reached a $1 billion valuation, making it one of a growing crop of hot companies led by people who have barely cracked their 20s on.wsj.com/4cADDx7
English
1
2
17
2.9K
Coin Bureau
Coin Bureau@coinbureau·
🚨KALSHI CEO DEFENDS KHAMENEI MARKET AFTER BACKLASH Tarek Mansour addressed criticism over the “Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader?” contract, saying it was structured so traders could not profit from a death and reiterating that Kalshi does not list markets that settle on death. Kalshi will refund fees, reimburse post-death trades, and settle earlier positions at the last traded price.
Coin Bureau tweet mediaCoin Bureau tweet media
English
46
16
136
30.4K
Kostya Medvedovsky
Kostya Medvedovsky@kmedved·
Kalshi promoting a Khamenei "leaves office" market while everyone thinks he's dead, knowing that if he is dead they freeze the market and pocket the fees. Just incredibly cynical stuff. I'm a big fan of Kalshi and prediction markets generally, but this is really horrible behavior.
Kostya Medvedovsky tweet media
English
100
58
1.4K
305.8K
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz
So it's useless for hedging and only useful for gambling?
Tarek Mansour@mansourtarek_

On Khamenei: We don’t list markets directly tied to death. When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death. That is what we did here. I know some of you disagree and prefer that we list these markets without a death carveout because it keeps the rules simple and because many traditional markets, like oil futures, can be proxy markets for war and death. But we believe that’s different than having a market directly settling on someone’s death, which is not allowed for US regulated entities. What’s the point of the market, then? A market on Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader was important because leadership changes in Iran have major impact on the world order: • geopolitical implications • economic consequences • national security considerations • oil and commodity prices, many of which move based on news and expectations around this outcome And it’s always possible for a ruler to step down or transition power without death, even in autocracies. It just happened in Venezuela. In these instances, we make the caveat clear in the rules and in the market page, but today is a good learning that we can do more in terms of improving the UX and adding more ways to surface the rules. We are committed to improving. In the meantime, here’s what we’re going to do: • We are reimbursing all fees from this market • If you have a position from before Khamenei died, you will be paid out on the last-traded price before his death. (This was clear in our rules) • If you have a position from after he died, we’re going to fully reimburse your cost of entry

English
44
52
566
121.2K
Joe Weisenthal
Joe Weisenthal@TheStalwart·
Worth reading the replies and QTs
Tarek Mansour@mansourtarek_

On Khamenei: We don’t list markets directly tied to death. When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death. That is what we did here. I know some of you disagree and prefer that we list these markets without a death carveout because it keeps the rules simple and because many traditional markets, like oil futures, can be proxy markets for war and death. But we believe that’s different than having a market directly settling on someone’s death, which is not allowed for US regulated entities. What’s the point of the market, then? A market on Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader was important because leadership changes in Iran have major impact on the world order: • geopolitical implications • economic consequences • national security considerations • oil and commodity prices, many of which move based on news and expectations around this outcome And it’s always possible for a ruler to step down or transition power without death, even in autocracies. It just happened in Venezuela. In these instances, we make the caveat clear in the rules and in the market page, but today is a good learning that we can do more in terms of improving the UX and adding more ways to surface the rules. We are committed to improving. In the meantime, here’s what we’re going to do: • We are reimbursing all fees from this market • If you have a position from before Khamenei died, you will be paid out on the last-traded price before his death. (This was clear in our rules) • If you have a position from after he died, we’re going to fully reimburse your cost of entry

English
30
11
265
145.9K
Tarek Mansour
Tarek Mansour@mansourtarek_·
Reposting because my other message was unclear: We settled the market to last traded price before time of death (per our rules). All positions, no matter when they were opened, got paid out on the last-traded price before his death. On top of that, if you bought a position yesterday (post time of death) for a higher price, we reimbursed you the difference between the price you bought and the last traded price before time of death. In addition, we reimbursed all fees paid in the total market for all users.
English
135
3
68
127.3K
Tarek Mansour
Tarek Mansour@mansourtarek_·
On Khamenei: We don’t list markets directly tied to death. When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death. That is what we did here. I know some of you disagree and prefer that we list these markets without a death carveout because it keeps the rules simple and because many traditional markets, like oil futures, can be proxy markets for war and death. But we believe that’s different than having a market directly settling on someone’s death, which is not allowed for US regulated entities. What’s the point of the market, then? A market on Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader was important because leadership changes in Iran have major impact on the world order: • geopolitical implications • economic consequences • national security considerations • oil and commodity prices, many of which move based on news and expectations around this outcome And it’s always possible for a ruler to step down or transition power without death, even in autocracies. It just happened in Venezuela. In these instances, we make the caveat clear in the rules and in the market page, but today is a good learning that we can do more in terms of improving the UX and adding more ways to surface the rules. We are committed to improving. In the meantime, here’s what we’re going to do: • We are reimbursing all fees from this market • If you have a position from before Khamenei died, you will be paid out on the last-traded price before his death. (This was clear in our rules) • If you have a position from after he died, we’re going to fully reimburse your cost of entry
English
999
63
1.1K
3.8M
Ned Koh
Ned Koh@virtualned·
Currently at the Who’s Exaggerating Forum (WEF) watching a spare cot on the promenade being sold 25k/night @seekingtau
English
2
0
10
1K
khushi
khushi@khushkhushkhush·
believe it or not good work culture is just telling everyone how you feel very directly all the time, and way too many startups suffer from an excess of kumbaya
English
24
17
808
31.3K
khushi
khushi@khushkhushkhush·
we are approximately two months away from the word simulation being just as overhyped, misrepresented, and annoying as the word agents
English
13
0
104
10.7K
Sameer Munshi me-retweet
Katy Milkman
Katy Milkman@katy_milkman·
If you invite people to save $5 a day instead of $150 a month, a must-read new field study shows you can quadruple enrollment in savings programs + eliminate the wealth-gap in who saves. Great paper just out from @HalHershfield @shlomobenartzi @steveshu: bit.ly/2WHfM7t
Katy Milkman tweet media
English
1
60
187
0
Sameer Munshi me-retweet
Shlomo Benartzi
Shlomo Benartzi@shlomobenartzi·
My latest @WSJ piece is about the current panic gripping financial markets, and how we can help investors avoid costly mistakes. I share several questions to identify investors at the highest risk of panic selling and I outline useful solutions for them. wsj.com/articles/heres…
English
3
11
21
0