TeslaPunk
3.3K posts






ELON MUSK NEWS: I mean, she is not even trying to hide it... Elon's lawyers filed a motion on today in Delaware’s Court of Chancery seeking recusal of Chancellor Kathaleen St. J. McCormick from consolidated Tesla shareholder lawsuits. She is the Judge who forced Elon to buy Twitter billions over than what it was worth, and voided his 2018 Shareholder Approved Tesla Performance Pay Package. The motion cites her alleged "support" on LinkedIn of a post by jury consultant Harry Plotkin that mocked Elon and his law firm Quinn Emanuel after the California federal jury verdict awarding $2 billion to plaintiffs because Elon wanted to pause the Twitter deal until bot counts were confirmed. McCormick’s account showed a "Katie McCormick supports this" banner. A separate "liked" post from an account tied to her chambers criticized Musk as well. Per McCormick, "I either did not click the ‘support’ icon at all, or I did so accidentally. I do not believe that I did it accidentally." Per Elon, "Absolute corruption." Elon once said McCormick’s "an activist cosplaying as a judge." She actions continue to prove this statement true...


Lets talk “Professor Jiang” and why is he suddenly everywhere? Who is he? The man behind the “Predictive History” channel is Jiang Xueqin (江学勤). He is not a tenured professor at a major Chinese university, but an educator who has taught at international schools in China and has been involved in curriculum development and writing. The “professor” label used online is, at best, loosely applied. His YouTube channel “Predictive History” has grown rapidly, producing polished English-language geopolitical content for a global audience. Here’s where it gets interesting. YouTube is officially blocked in mainland China. Yet his content is consistently uploaded, high production quality, and clearly targeted at Western viewers. That does not prove anything on its own, but it does raise a basic structural question about how and from where this operation is run. Now look at the messaging. Across videos, the themes are highly consistent: - U.S. decline is inevitable - China’s system is more stable and long-term oriented - Western alliances are weak or hypocritical - A China-led multipolar world is both natural and preferable These positions closely mirror narratives promoted by the Chinese Communist Party in its external messaging. At the same time, there is little to no direct criticism of Beijing on politically sensitive issues — something that is notable given how tightly speech is controlled inside China. So you end up with a pattern: A “professor” without a clear traditional academic footprint. Content produced for Western platforms that are blocked in China. Messaging that consistently aligns with state narratives. And growing visibility at a time when information competition is intensifying. None of this proves coordination. But it does raise a legitimate question: Is this simply an independent commentator who happens to align with Beijing’s worldview or part of a broader ecosystem shaping how China is understood abroad? And more importantly, how should audiences evaluate credibility when labels like “professor” are used so loosely in geopolitical discourse? #China #CCP #InformationWarfare #Geopolitics #MediaLiteracy #Influence #YouTube #Narratives


🚨 BIG WIN for Elon Musk 🚨 A Delaware judge named Kathaleen McCormick just had to step down from ALL of Elon’s court cases. Elon’s lawyers proved she liked a mean LinkedIn post that made fun of him about Twitter deal. Biased judge exposed and gone. Fairness wins big time!









Chinese "professor" Jiang says that the United States should willingly forfeit it's role as the #1 global superpower to China and Russia, to which Tucker Carlson agrees and then blames Israel for preventing that from happening. Dude, what happened to Tucker?







Chinese restaurant's robot waitresses 😳 This is scary.


















