ratioed by the sea 🇦🇱🇺🇲
21.2K posts

ratioed by the sea 🇦🇱🇺🇲
@1izzle
🇦🇱 🇺🇸 “How long will you love vain words, and seek after lies?”

There's a quadrillion-dollar question at the heart of AI: Why are humans so much more sample efficient compared to LLM? There are three possible answers: 1. Architecture and hyperparameters (aka transformer vs whatever ‘algo’ cortical columns are implementing) 2. Learning rule (backprop vs whatever brain is doing) 3. Reward function @AdamMarblestone believes the answer is the reward function. ML likes to use pretty simple loss functions, like cross-entropy. These are easy to work with. But they might be too simple for sample-efficient learning. Adam thinks that, in humans, the large number of highly specialised cells in the ‘lizard brain’ might actually be encoding information for sophisticated loss functions, used for ‘training’ in the more sophisticated areas like the cortex and amygdala. Like: the human genome is barely 3 gigabytes (compare that to the TBs of parameters that encode frontier LLM weights). So how can it include all the information necessary to build highly intelligent learners? Well, if the key to sample-efficient learning resides in the loss function, even very complicated loss functions can still be expressed in a couple hundred lines of Python code.


The Beqiri brothers, Halim and Hasan, were killed by the Serbian criminal army in Kosova🇽🇰🇦🇱 Photo: Esat Shala.

The share of Americans believing in life after death in 1972: 76.3% The share of Americans believing in life after death in 2024: 82.4%

Why did so many self-styled 'Decadents' like Oscar Wilde eventually becomes Catholics? As 'Converts' author Melanie McDonagh explains, their decadence and then their Catholicism were partly reactions against the utilitarianism of the Victorian age. (Full talk in replies).





Lmao.



“There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper.” Paglia talks about how women don’t have to prove herself in order feel sense of worth due to our ability to grow life, while many men are driven by an intensity of alienation from nature and a need to assert form against it. She argues how in this way, artistic and scientific pursuits are a form of fetishism, perverted male intelligence, compensatory obsession that leads to extremes. She contrasts this with women, who, as life-bearing, remain more continuous with nature and therefore not compelled toward obsessive overproduction. But what if there was a distinctly female form of creative urgency, not a stemming from compensation, but direct transmission? If women are more receptive by nature, wouldn’t that receptivity allow for a different kind of creation: less driven by anxiety, and more by a sense of attunement, insight, or even duty to the collective to express what is perceived?

🚨NEW EPISODE: Leading🚨 President Aleksandar Vučić joins @RoryStewartUK and @campbellclaret to discuss Serbia’s place on the global stage. How does he balance relations with Russia, China and the EU? What happens if EU enlargement stalls and could the US step in? And can Serbia join without recognising Kosovo’s independence? Link in the replies👇





It’s not a Balkan parade without a float reminding people of an irredentist cause











