AL_ATHRAM

Discrepancies in the Bible and Refuting the Crucifixion Doctrine zain4u.com/vb/showthread.… zain4u.com/vb/forumdispla…

The ignorant man is the enemy of himself.. In the distorted Torah, in some of its paragraphs, it turns into a shameful pornographic publication that you and all churches are ashamed of reciting in their places of worship. And how you and those churches are ashamed, who say: What you are ashamed of is the Lord's holy words. Muslims recite the entire Qur'an from the beginning to the end and in a beautiful voice throughout the nights of Ramadan on Live broadcast. You will not find a reader or a Muslim ashamed to recite or hear it. Rather, you will find the Qur'an sometimes penetrates into his conscience and you see tears flowing from his eyes for fear and humility. Jesus calls for searching the Bible and doubting everything until it reaches the truth. A false image of Allah's prophets and messengers in the Old Testament. The Old Testament books say about Abraham, the Messenger of Allah: “14 And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair. 15 The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh: and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house. 16 And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels. 17 And the LORD plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. 18 And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me? why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? 19 Why saidst thou, She is my sister? so I might have taken her to me to wife: now therefore behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way. 20 And Pharaoh commanded his men concerning him: and they sent him away, and his wife, and all that he had.”( Genesis 12) (Noah .. “20 And Noah began to be an husbandman*, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.” ( Genesis 9) Lot.. “30 And Lot went up out of Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with him; for he feared to dwell in Zoar: and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters. 31 And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth: 32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. 33 And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. 34 And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. 35 And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. 36 Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father.” ****** What wisdom and sermon can Bible readers benefit from reading this story? If the prophets are like this, and they are the bearers of the guiding word of Allah, what is left for debauchery and fools? How do they address Allah! If we turn the pages of these Bibles to get acquainted with the etiquette of supplication and reverence, we find the discourse with Allah is characterized by boldness and accusation!! And read with me this one of several of similar texts: In (1kings 17) that Elijah the Prophet addressed Allah _The Bible says: “20 And he cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, hast thou also brought evil upon the widow with whom I sojourn, by slaying her son?” When an ordinary person reads the previous texts in the Bible that stigmatize the prophets and messengers of Allah, and who has Allah singled out for revelation those descriptions. Does he have in mind that these words are revelatory or semi-revelatory? ****** One can only dwell in sorrow and distress as he hears these words, which come only from a sick mind and heart. In these texts, there is abuse to the prophets and messengers of Allah when they attribute to them what the junkies and rabble are afraid of. By what means is this abuse to the prophets? They wrapped these abuses in the garment of infallible heavenly revelation so that no one would dare to deny it. Is this the biography of messengers and prophets of Allah or the biography of bandits and thieves? The philosophers and sane scholars reject to describe Allah as ignorant. They also reject the saying that Allah mischaracterizes his ambassadors to his creation. How then does this align with those texts that call the prophets and messengers with worst manners? If the prophets and messengers of Allah have these degenerate qualities, then why companions of evil to be blamed? There is no doubt that those texts that stigmatize the prophets and messengers with these despicable qualities are incompatible with the requirements of sound reason and straight logic in what these elite people should be, which makes it clear that the aforementioned texts are among the additions of human beings who did not respect Allah, His messengers or prophets. Jesus said: ******* “17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till* heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till* “(Matthew 5) Reuben commits adultery with his father's wife: “21 And Israel journeyed, and spread his tent beyond the tower of Edar. 22 And it came to pass, when Israel dwelt in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father's concubine: and Israel heard it. Now the sons of Jacob were twelve*: 23 The sons of Leah; Reuben, Jacob's firstborn, and Simeon, and Levi, and Judah, and Issachar, and Zebulun: 24 The sons of Rachel; Joseph, and Benjamin: 25 And the sons of Bilhah, Rachel's handmaid; Dan, and Naphtali: 26 And the sons of Zilpah, Leah's handmaid; Gad, and Asher: these are the sons of Jacob, which were born to him in Padanaram.”( Genesis 35) Israel did not express his anger at this heinous act, but rather remained silent on it and blessed his eldest son, Reuben: “3 Reuben, thou art my firstborn, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power: 4 Unstable as water, thou shalt not excel; because thou wentest up to thy father's bed; then defiledst thou it: he went up to my couch.( Genesis 49). Judah commits adultery with his daughter-in-law (wife of his son) Tamar: Judah is one of the tribes and the bravest son of Jacob, (Genesis 17) “12 And in process of time the daughter of Shuah Judah's wife died; .... and went up unto his sheepshearers* to Timnath, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite. 13 And it was told Tamar, saying, Behold thy father in law goeth 14 And she put her widow's garments off from her, and covered her with a vail, and wrapped herself, and sat in an open place, which is by the way to Timnath; 15 When Judah saw her, he thought her to be an harlot; 16 And he turned unto her by the way, and said, Go to, I pray thee, let me come in unto thee; (for he knew not that she was his daughter in law.) And she said, What wilt thou give me, that thou mayest come in unto me? 17 And he said, I will send thee a kid from the flock. And she said, Wilt thou give me a pledge, till thou send it? 18 And he said, What pledge shall I give thee? And she said, Thy signet, and thy bracelets, and thy staff that is in thine hand. And he gave it her, and came in unto her, and she conceived by him. 24 And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt. 25 When she was brought forth, she sent to her father in law, saying, By the man, whose these are, am I with child: and she said, Discern, I pray thee, whose are these, the signet, and bracelets, and staff. 26 And Judah acknowledged them, and said, She hath been more righteous than I; because that I gave her not to Shelah my son. And he knew her again no more. 27 And it came to pass in the time of her travail, that, behold, twins were in her womb…. 29 And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? this breach be upon thee: therefore his name was called Pharez.30 And afterward came out his brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah.” A hideous, impudent and dirty image are gathered Judas's morals from pretending to be religious. Judas, the adulterous criminal, asks that Tamar be taken out and burned because she is an adulteress. When he realized that she is pregnant as a result of her adultery, he said: " She is more innocent than me. " It is more correct for him to say, I am lecherous than she. He is a lecherous who pretends to be religious according to the distorted texts of the Torah to which your Lord Jesus committed you: --- “17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.”( Luke 16) ****** Tamar gave birth to twins from her adultery in Judah: one “Pharez” and the other “Zarah" These twins are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus. Descended from the fornication of "Pharez" David, as they claim. As for Suleiman ibn David, he was also, according to them, a fornicator. When David, according to their claim, assaulted wife of his neighbor and commander of his army Uriah the Hittite and gave birth to her adulterer David, according to their slander, Suleiman. Rahab .. “17 And the city shall be accursed, even it, and all that are therein, to the LORD: only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.”( Joshua 6) Amnon the son of David, the grandfather of the firstborn Messiah, fornicates with his sister Tamar according to the advice of Hakim the son of Israel. Israel, named Jonadab the son of Shimei, {who is brother of David}, advised the boy to ask his father, the king, that his sister should come and feed him bread with her hand, of course, as the Bible says about him in chapter 13 of the second book of Samuel: “3- and Jonadab was a very subtil man.”( 2 Samuel 13). This is what God described him to us as a very wise man. What He indicated to him in his wisdom: “5 And Jonadab said unto him, Lay thee down on thy bed, and make thyself sick:” “1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar (a harlot ) ; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz of ( Rachab; a harlot Joshua 6:17) and Booz begat Obed of) Ruth David's grandmother is a harlot ) 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been ( the wife of Urias; a harlot ) 7 And Solomon begat Roboam; ….. 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, )Jechonias Sterile( begat Salathiel; …. 15; and Matthan begat Jacob; .. 16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Matthew 1) . *** These are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus, even though he was born without a father. So, what is this honorable lineage that you attribute to Jesus, and what glorification, honor, or even deification do you mean? ***** Is it possible that one of the ancestors of Jesus whom you sanctify is an adulterer, four of whom are adulterous children of an adulteress? Then you raise him to the ranks of the gods?! Is this of religion, morality and logic?!

As an Ex-Muslim, let me explain Muhammad and “The Satanic Verses” in the Quran.  This will shock you. was a good prophet until he wasn't. I wanted to believe he was sincere, that maybe he was just misunderstood, maybe he repented later on in his life.  But the more I studied the timeline of his ministry, the harder it was to ignore the shift. Early Muhammad in Mecca preached peace, talked about one God, and tried to win over Jews and Christians. But later in Medina, that’s when it changed. Suddenly, it transitioned to power and polygamy and violence, and revelations started sounding a lot like personal convenience. Then there’s a part nobody really wants to talk about in apologetics - “the Satanic verses.” Ibn Ishaq, Islam’s earliest biographer, says Muhammad delivered verses that glorified pagan idols and then blamed it on Satan. And you tell me, how does a prophet mistake a demon’s voice for God’s? Imagine if Paul or Peter did that. Imagine if Jesus said, “oops, that part was from the devil.” You would never trust that message again. But with Muhammad, there’s a double standard where you’re not allowed to question. Even when he married a child, took extra wives, and had people killed, you’re told to submit. And that’s when I knew. A real prophet doesn’t serve himself. He sacrifices himself to serve others. Only one man in history never changed under pressure and still laid down his life. And that’s Jesus Christ.

The ignorant man is the enemy of himself.. In the distorted Torah, in some of its paragraphs, it turns into a shameful pornographic publication that you and all churches are ashamed of reciting in their places of worship. And how you and those churches are ashamed, who say: What you are ashamed of is the Lord's holy words. Muslims recite the entire Qur'an from the beginning to the end and in a beautiful voice throughout the nights of Ramadan on Live broadcast. You will not find a reader or a Muslim ashamed to recite or hear it. Rather, you will find the Qur'an sometimes penetrates into his conscience and you see tears flowing from his eyes for fear and humility. *** Jesus calls for searching the Bible and doubting everything until it reaches the truth. A false image of Allah's prophets and messengers in the Old Testament. The Old Testament books say about Abraham, the Messenger of Allah: “14 And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair. 15 The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh: and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house. 16 And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels. 17 And the LORD plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. 18 And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me? why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? 19 Why saidst thou, She is my sister? so I might have taken her to me to wife: now therefore behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way. 20 And Pharaoh commanded his men concerning him: and they sent him away, and his wife, and all that he had.”( Genesis 12) (Noah .. “20 And Noah began to be an husbandman*, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.” ( Genesis 9) Lot.. “30 And Lot went up out of Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with him; for he feared to dwell in Zoar: and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters. 31 And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth: 32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. 33 And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. 34 And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. 35 And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. 36 Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father.” **** What wisdom and sermon can Bible readers benefit from reading this story? If the prophets are like this, and they are the bearers of the guiding word of Allah, what is left for debauchery and fools? How do they address Allah! If we turn the pages of these Bibles to get acquainted with the etiquette of supplication and reverence, we find the discourse with Allah is characterized by boldness and accusation!! And read with me this one of several of similar texts: In (1kings 17) that Elijah the Prophet addressed Allah _The Bible says: “20 And he cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, hast thou also brought evil upon the widow with whom I sojourn, by slaying her son?” When an ordinary person reads the previous texts in the Bible that stigmatize the prophets and messengers of Allah, and who has Allah singled out for revelation those descriptions. Does he have in mind that these words are revelatory or semi-revelatory? ******>>>>***** One can only dwell in sorrow and distress as he hears these words, which come only from a sick mind and heart. In these texts, there is abuse to the prophets and messengers of Allah when they attribute to them what the junkies and rabble are afraid of. By what means is this abuse to the prophets? They wrapped these abuses in the garment of infallible heavenly revelation so that no one would dare to deny it. Is this the biography of messengers and prophets of Allah or the biography of bandits and thieves? The philosophers and sane scholars reject to describe Allah as ignorant. They also reject the saying that Allah mischaracterizes his ambassadors to his creation. How then does this align with those texts that call the prophets and messengers with worst manners? If the prophets and messengers of Allah have these degenerate qualities, then why companions of evil to be blamed? There is no doubt that those texts that stigmatize the prophets and messengers with these despicable qualities are incompatible with the requirements of sound reason and straight logic in what these elite people should be, which makes it clear that the aforementioned texts are among the additions of human beings who did not respect Allah, His messengers or prophets. Jesus said: <<<<<<>>>>> “17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till* heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till* “(Matthew 5) Reuben commits adultery with his father's wife: “21 And Israel journeyed, and spread his tent beyond the tower of Edar. 22 And it came to pass, when Israel dwelt in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father's concubine: and Israel heard it. Now the sons of Jacob were twelve*: 23 The sons of Leah; Reuben, Jacob's firstborn, and Simeon, and Levi, and Judah, and Issachar, and Zebulun: 24 The sons of Rachel; Joseph, and Benjamin: 25 And the sons of Bilhah, Rachel's handmaid; Dan, and Naphtali: 26 And the sons of Zilpah, Leah's handmaid; Gad, and Asher: these are the sons of Jacob, which were born to him in Padanaram.”( Genesis 35) Israel did not express his anger at this heinous act, but rather remained silent on it and blessed his eldest son, Reuben: “3 Reuben, thou art my firstborn, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power: 4 Unstable as water, thou shalt not excel; because thou wentest up to thy father's bed; then defiledst thou it: he went up to my couch.( Genesis 49). Judah commits adultery with his daughter-in-law (wife of his son) Tamar: Judah is one of the tribes and the bravest son of Jacob, (Genesis 17) “12 And in process of time the daughter of Shuah Judah's wife died; .... and went up unto his sheepshearers* to Timnath, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite. 13 And it was told Tamar, saying, Behold thy father in law goeth 14 And she put her widow's garments off from her, and covered her with a vail, and wrapped herself, and sat in an open place, which is by the way to Timnath; 15 When Judah saw her, he thought her to be an harlot; 16 And he turned unto her by the way, and said, Go to, I pray thee, let me come in unto thee; (for he knew not that she was his daughter in law.) And she said, What wilt thou give me, that thou mayest come in unto me? 17 And he said, I will send thee a kid from the flock. And she said, Wilt thou give me a pledge, till thou send it? 18 And he said, What pledge shall I give thee? And she said, Thy signet, and thy bracelets, and thy staff that is in thine hand. And he gave it her, and came in unto her, and she conceived by him. 24 And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt. 25 When she was brought forth, she sent to her father in law, saying, By the man, whose these are, am I with child: and she said, Discern, I pray thee, whose are these, the signet, and bracelets, and staff. 26 And Judah acknowledged them, and said, She hath been more righteous than I; because that I gave her not to Shelah my son. And he knew her again no more. 27 And it came to pass in the time of her travail, that, behold, twins were in her womb…. 29 And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? this breach be upon thee: therefore his name was called Pharez.30 And afterward came out his brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah.” A hideous, impudent and dirty image are gathered Judas's morals from pretending to be religious. Judas, the adulterous criminal, asks that Tamar be taken out and burned because she is an adulteress. When he realized that she is pregnant as a result of her adultery, he said: " She is more innocent than me. " It is more correct for him to say, I am lecherous than she. He is a lecherous who pretends to be religious according to the distorted texts of the Torah to which your Lord Jesus committed you: *********** “17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.”( Luke 16) ***** Tamar gave birth to twins from her adultery in Judah: one “Pharez” and the other “Zarah" These twins are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus. Descended from the fornication of "Pharez" David, as they claim. As for Suleiman ibn David, he was also, according to them, a fornicator. When David, according to their claim, assaulted wife of his neighbor and commander of his army Uriah the Hittite and gave birth to her adulterer David, according to their slander, Suleiman. Rahab .. “17 And the city shall be accursed, even it, and all that are therein, to the LORD: only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.”( Joshua 6) Amnon the son of David, the grandfather of the firstborn Messiah, fornicates with his sister Tamar according to the advice of Hakim the son of Israel. Israel, named Jonadab the son of Shimei, {who is brother of David}, advised the boy to ask his father, the king, that his sister should come and feed him bread with her hand, of course, as the Bible says about him in chapter 13 of the second book of Samuel: “3- and Jonadab was a very subtil man.”( 2 Samuel 13). This is what God described him to us as a very wise man. What He indicated to him in his wisdom: “5 And Jonadab said unto him, Lay thee down on thy bed, and make thyself sick:” “1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar (a harlot ) ; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz of ( Rachab; a harlot Joshua 6:17) and Booz begat Obed of) Ruth David's grandmother is a harlot ) 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been ( the wife of Urias; a harlot ) 7 And Solomon begat Roboam; ….. 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, )Jechonias Sterile( begat Salathiel; …. 15; and Matthan begat Jacob; .. 16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Matthew 1) . /// These are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus, even though he was born without a father. So, what is this honorable lineage that you attribute to Jesus, and what glorification, honor, or even deification do you mean? //// Is it possible that one of the ancestors of Jesus whom you sanctify is an adulterer, four of whom are adulterous children of an adulteress? Then you raise him to the ranks of the gods?! Is this of religion, morality and logic?!

Many of you may find this hard to believe. The first image reflects what my spiritual state used to be, I would often see myself in dreams surrounded by different kinds of snakes. The second image represents what happened after I gave my life to Jesus. He cleansed everything and brought complete change.

B) Predicting that Judas the Betrayer will accompany Jesus in the Hereafter: Mathew 19: (27- Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? 28- And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel). Judas Iscariot was one of the twelve disciples to whom this prophecy was said, but after his betrayal to Jesus, he became known as (Son of Perdition) because he was expelled from accompanying Jesus in this Life and in the Hereafter. Accordingly, this prophecy was not and cannot be fulfilled. Predicting that Jesus will stay in tomb for three days and three nights: The summary of your reply in page (6) of your message, line (9) states: So Jesus raised on Sunday, in (the third day). Three days means three parts of such three days i.e. (Part of Friday + Saturday + part of the Sunday). In the past, they used to consider a part of day as one day. That is the way Christians understood it, and also, the Jews who addressed Jesus, and we nowadays also understood it like that. But what about the three nights mentioned by Jesus: (... and three nights, so shall it be ..... and three nights). How do you calculate these three nights!! It is Friday night + Saturday Night + a missing night which is Sunday night!... Predicting that Jesus will stay in tomb for three days and three nights: The Jews asked Jesus to let them see a sign. Mathew 12: (38-Then some of the scribes and Pharisees answered him, saying, “Teacher, we wish to see a sign from you.” 39- But he answered them, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. 40- For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth). Such statement is common in all bibles and was mentioned in most of them. Mark mentioned it in (8:31, 9:31 and 10:34). It is mentioned by Luke with significant difference, which is: Luke 11: (29- And as the crowds were thronging together, He began to say, This generation is an evil generation; it seeks a sign, and a sign shall not be given to it except the sign of Jonah. 30- For even as Jonah became a sign to the Ninevites, so also will the Son of Man be to this generation). The three days mentioned also by John (2:19). In the Book of Jonah we read the story of Jonah as the following: Jonah 1:17 (Now the LORD provided a huge fish to swallow Jonah, and Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights) Jonah 2 (1- In my distress I called to the Lord, and he answered me 10- and the LORD commanded the fish, and it vomited Jonah onto dry land). In order to fulfil such prophecy, the one who was crucified should remain in his tomb three days and three nights; however, the Bibles mentioned that the crucified person was taken from the cross Friday’s evening (The day of crucifixion), and then: (When evening had fallen, since it was the day of preparation, that is, the day before the Sabbath. 43- Joseph, the honorable member of the Council, from Arimathea, who was also himself awaiting the kingdom of God, came; and gathering courage, he went in to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus. 44- And Pilate marveled that He had already died, and calling to him the centurion, he questioned him whether He had been dead long. 45- And when he found out from the centurion, he granted the corpse to Joseph. 46- And Joseph purchased a piece of fine linen, took Him down, and wrapped Him in the fine linen. And he laid Him in a tomb which was hewn out of rock and rolled a stone against the door of the tomb). (Mark 15:42-46) The disciples and followers of Jesus found the tomb empty in the early hours of Sunday Dawn. Matthew 28: (1- Now late on the Sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, Mary the Magdalene and the other Mary came to look at the grave….. 5- And the angel answered and said to the women…. 6- He is not here, for He has been raised). John 20:1 (Now on the first day of the week, Mary the Magdalene came early to the tomb while it was yet dark and saw the stone taken away from the tomb) By calculating the days and nights, we find the following: - The number of days spent by the dead person in his tomb is 1 day only (Saturday). - The number of nights spent by the dead person in his tomb is just two nights (Saturday night and part of Sunday night). Accordingly, it is impossible to fulfill the prophecy of staying in the tomb for three days and three nights. 1) Anointing Jesus’s body with spikenard:- Ø (Mark 14: 1 After two days was the feast of the passover, and of unleavened bread: and the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might take him by craft, and put him to death. 2- But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar of the people. 3- And being in Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, as he sat at meat, there came a woman having an alabaster box of ointment of spikenard very precious; and she brake the box, and poured it on his head. 4- And there were some that had indignation within themselves, and said, Why was this waste of the ointment made? 5- For it might have been sold for more than three hundred pence, and have been given to the poor. And they murmured against her). Ø (Mathew) mentioned this incident in (26: 6-9) and also Luke (7: 36 – 39 “And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat…..“) and (John 12: 1-6). The discrepancy between the Bibles: Place of incident: a) In the house of Simon the leper (Mark & Mathew). b) In Pharisee’s house (Luke). c) In the house of brothers Lazarus, Mary and Martha (John). Who is the woman? a) Unknown (Mark & Mathew). b) Sinner woman (Luke). c) Believing woman i.e. Mary the sister of Lazarus (John). What did she do? a) She anointed Jesus’s head with spikenard. (Mark & Mathew). b) She anointed his legs with pure nard (Luke & John). Reaction of onlookers: a) They had indignation for wasting anointment (Mark). b) The disciples were indignant (Mathew). c) Pharisee wondered whether Jesus knows who and what sort of woman touching him, (Luke). d) Judas Iscariot was indignant for wasting (John) 2) Preparing Last Supper:- Ø Mark: 14 (12 And on the first day of Unleavened Bread, when they sacrificed the Passover lamb, his disciples said to him, “Where will you have us go and prepare for you to eat the Passover?” 13 And he sent two of his disciples and said to them, “Go into the city, and a man carrying a jar of water will meet you. Follow him, 14 and wherever he enters, say to the master of the house, ‘The Teacher says, Where is my guest room, where I may eat the Passover with my disciples?’ 15 And he will show you a large upper room furnished and ready; there prepare for us.” 16 And the disciples set out and went to the city and found it just as he had told them, and they prepared the Passover. 17 And when it was evening, he came with the twelve.) Ø Matthew : 26: (17 Now on the first day of Unleavened Bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Where will you have us prepare for you to eat the Passover?” 18 He said, “Go into the city to a certain man and say to him, ‘The Teacher says, My time is at hand. I will keep the Passover at your house with my disciples.’” 19 And the disciples did as Jesus had directed them, and they prepared the Passover. Here we observe the following:- There is difference between (Mathew) and (Mark) regarding the story of preparing for supper: 1) Mark: He sent two disciples to prepare the supper. 2) Matthew: He made all disciples prepare the supper. 3) The writer of the verse No. (Mark 14:17 when it was evening, he came with the twelve) knows nothing about the journey of the two disciples mentioned in the verse No. (14:13). Should he knows the content of such verse (14:17), he would surely have written (He came with the Ten), instead of (the twelve) i.e. verse (14:17) should be read as the following: (And when it was evening, he came with the ten). 4) Timing of last supper:- According to Matthew (26: 17- 19), Mark (14: 12-17) and Luke (22: 7-8), the last supper was the Passover; however, John (18:28) states that the Passover was in the evening after the death of Jesus. (John 18: 28- Then the Jews led Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness the Jews did not enter the palace; they wanted to be able to eat the Passover). John states that the last supper attended by Jesus with his disciples took place before the Passover. John 13: (1-5 Now before the feast of the Passover, ……. And supper being ended, ……. and began to wash the disciples' feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded). John states also that they led Jesus in the evening of day preceding the Passover. John 18: (28- Then the Jews led Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness the Jews did not enter the palace; they wanted to be able to eat the Passover). The discrepancy between of Bibles in respect of last supper and its timing resulted in difference in an essential point regarding the crucifixion case. Now if we adopt the narrative of (Mark, Mathew and Luke) it means that Jesus had eaten the Passover with his disciples in Thursday evening, and little later on, in the same evening of Thursday, he was led/captured. As such, the crucifixion took place on Friday. But if we adopt the narrative of (John), it would mean that Jesus was led on Wednesday evening and the crucifixion took place on Thursday. So, did the crucifixion take place on Thursday or Friday?

6) False Witnesses : Matthew 26 ((60- But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. At the last came two false witnesses, 61- And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days)). Mark 14 ((57- And there arose certain, and bare false witness against him, saying, 58- We heard him say, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and within three days I will build another made without hands)). Luke 22 ((70- Then said they all, Art thou then the Son of God? And he said unto them, Ye say that I am. 71- And they said, What need we any further witness? for we ourselves have heard of his own mouth)). Here are the discrepancies in the Bibles about the false witnesses : A) There is a false testimony (Matthew & Mark). B) There is no false testimony but a confession by Jesus (Luke). C) The false testimony is: I am able to destroy the temple of God (Matthew). D) The false testimony is: I will destroy this temple that is made with hands (Mark). E) Two false witnesses testified against Jesus (Matthew). F) All people testified against Jesus (Mark). G) No one testified against Jesus (Luke). 7) Smiting the servant by sword: Matthew 26 ((51- And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest's, and smote off his ear. 52- Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. 53- Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?)) Mark 14 ((47 And one of them that stood by drew a sword, and smote a servant of the high priest, and cut off his ear)). Luke 22 ((50 And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear. 51- And Jesus answered and said, Suffer ye thus far. And he touched his ear, and healed him)). John 18 ((10- Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant's name was Malchus. 11- Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?)). Here are the differences regarding this event: A) Only Matthew mentioned about twelve legions of angels. B) Only Luke mentioned healing of the ear when Jesus touched it. C) Only John mentioned the name of the hitter and the victim. The hitter was Peter while the victim is the servant Malchus. 8) Judas Hanged Himself Matthew 27 ((3- Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, 4- Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? See thou to that. 5- And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself)). Other than Matthew, the other Bibles did not mention any thing about what Judas did when Jesus was arrested and harmed by the soldiers, servants and priests. 9) The Discussion between the priest and Jesus Mathew 26: ((62- And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee? 63- But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God. 64- Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless, I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. 65- Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy)). Luke 22 ((66- And as soon as it was day, the elders of the people and the chief priests and the scribes came together, and led him into their council, saying, 67- Art thou the Christ? tell us. And he said unto them, If I tell you, ye will not believe: 68- And if I also ask you, ye will not answer me, nor let me go. 69- Hereafter shall the Son of man sit on the right hand of the power of God)). Mark 14 ((60- And the high priest stood up in the midst, and asked Jesus, saying, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee? 61- But he held his peace, and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? 62- And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven)). John 18 ((19- The high priest then asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his doctrine. 20- Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing. 21- Why askest thou me? ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I said)). Who is the questioner and what is the Question? A) Matthew: The questioner is the High Priest and the question is: Is Jesus son of Allah? B) Mark: The questioner is the High Priest and the question is: Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? C) Luke: The questioner is the present people and the question is: Art thou the Christ? D) John: The questioner is the High Priest and the question was about: Jesus’s disciples, and his doctrine. E) Mark and Mathew: Jesus coming in the clouds. F) Luke and John: Did not mention that he will come in the clouds. As such, there is difference between the Bibles regarding the questioner, the question, and the answer. Also, some of such questions and answers indicate that Jesus is son of Allah while others indicate that he is a prophet for people.

Muslim: Your Bible is corrupted. Me: Okay… and? Muslim: It’s altered and full of contradictions. Me: Alright, noted. Muslim: Jesus didn’t write the Gospels. Me: True. Muslim: The Gospel writers are anonymous, so it’s unreliable. Me: Exactly why I don’t see how “Muhammad is mentioned in a corrupted Bible” so the Quran is wrong for saying he was mentioned. Muslim: He is in the Bible! How can you say the Quran is wrong? Me: Oh okay… where exactly? Muslim: Deuteronomy 18:18, Isaiah 42, John 17, Song of Solomon. Me: Interesting. So is the Bible still corrupted or not? Muslim: Well… not all of it is corrupted. Me: So it’s corrupted… but also trustworthy… depending on the argument? Muslim: We only accept the parts that agree with the Quran. Me: So a corrupted book becomes reliable… when it agrees with your conclusion? Muslim: It’s not completely corrupted, just partially. Me: So… half-trust it when convenient, half-discard it when inconvenient? Muslim: The Quran is the final preserved truth. Me: Got it. You said Isaiah 42 is about Muhammed right? Muslim: Yes, Isaiah 42 is about Muhammad. The prophecy points to a prophet arising in Arabia. Me: Okay, let’s read it: “Behold My Servant… I have put My Spirit upon Him…” So does Allah have a spirit? Muslim: No, Allah doesn’t have a spirit but it means Jibril. Me: But it literally says “My Spirit” and “put upon Him.” Muslim: You’re misinterpreting it, it doesn’t mean that exactly. Me: So the text says one thing… but it means another thing when needed? Muslim: That’s not what it means. Me: So what does it means? Muslim: To you is your religion, and to me is mine, there is no compulsion in religion. Me: uhm😅

13) After Giving up the Ghost : Mathew ((27:51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; 27:52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 27:53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. 27:54 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God)). Mark: ((15:37 And Jesus cried with a loud voice, and gave up the ghost. 15:38 And the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom. 15:39 And when the centurion, which stood over against him, saw that he so cried out, and gave up the ghost, he said, Truly this man was the Son of God)). Luke: ((23:47 Now when the centurion saw what was done, he glorified God, saying, Certainly this was a righteous man)). John: ((19:30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. 19:31 The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away. 19:32 Then came the soldiers, and brake the legs of the first, and of the other which was crucified with him. 19:33 But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs: 19:34 But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water)). Reading the afore-mentioned texts, we noticed the following: A) (Mathew) alone mentioned the following miracles: (The earth did quake, and the rocks rent; the graves were opened; many bodies of the saints which slept arose and came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city). B) (John) alone mentioned the story of breaking the legs and the blood coming out of Jesus’s side. C) (Mathew & Mark) mentioned that the soldiers testified and admitted that Jesus is son of God. D) (Luke) mentioned that the centurion is the one who was astonished, then testified and admitted that Jesus was a righteous man. E) As per the narrative of Mark (15: 37-47) Jesus’s body was never anointed after death; contrary to what was stated by John (19:40). F) (Mathew) alone mentioned (27: 62-66) that the Jews requested Pilate to send soldiers to secure the tomb. “so they went and made the tomb secure by sealing the stone and setting a guard”. 14- Resurrection of Jesus: a) Those who came to see Jesus’s sepulcher:- Luke ((24:1 Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulcher, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them)). Mathew ((28:1 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulcher)). Mark ((16:1 And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him)). John ((20:1 The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulcher, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulcher)). The Present People are: John: One woman. Mathew: Two women. Mark: Three women. Luke: Some women and other people. Purpose of coming:- 1) Mathew: to see the sepulcher 2) Mark and Luke: Brought sweet spices to anoint Jesus Time of coming to the sepulcher: 1) Matthew and Luke: Dawn or early morning. 2) Mark: After sunrise. 3) John: It was yet dark. These are the discrepancies in the narratives of the disciples, who are supposed to be inspired and supported by the Holy Spirit. B) What the women have seen when coming to the sepulcher? Matthew: ((28:1 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulcher. 28:2 And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it)). Mark: ((16:2 And very early ………… 4- And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away: for it was very great. And entering into the sepulcher, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted)). Luke: ((24:1 Now upon the first day ………. 2- And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulcher. 3- And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus. 4- And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments)). John: ((20:1- ………. 2- Then she runneth, and cometh to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple, whom Jesus loved, and saith unto them, They have taken away the LORD out of the sepulcher, and we know not where they have laid him. 3- Peter therefore went forth, and that other disciple, and came to the sepulcher. 11- But Mary stood without at the sepulcher weeping: and as she wept, she stooped down, and looked into the sepulcher, 12- And seeth two angels in white sitting, the one at the head, and the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain)). The discrepancy about what the women have seen: 1) Mark: The Angel of the Lord descended before the women came, sat in the tomb, then the women saw the Angel of the Lord. 2) Matthew: The Angel of the Lord descended at the time when the two women came, then rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. 3) Luke: Two angels descended before the women came. The stone was rolled back before they reach. When they looked, they saw two angels stood by them. 4) John: Two angels descended before Marry comes for the second time. They rolled back the rock before she comes, then they sat within the sepulcher. When she looked into the sepulcher, she saw the two angels. 5) Mark: When the women reached the sepulcher, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment. 6) Mathew: His appearance was like lightning and his clothing was white as snow. 7) Luke: Two men in shining garments. 8) John: Two angels in white sitting, the one at the head, and the other at the feet. After seeing the Sepulcher: Mark: ((16: 1-8 …… Then they went out and fled from the tomb, seized with trembling and bewilderment. They said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid)). Matthew: ((28: 1-8 ….. And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified. He is not here: He has been raised from the dead…. then they went away quickly from the tomb, fearful yet overjoyed, and ran to announce this to his disciples)). Here we observe the following: 1- Mark: The women did not obey the order of the angels because they were afraid. 2- Matthew: The women obeyed the order of the angels and gave full report to the disciples about what they have seen. C) When Jesus appeared to women: Matthew: ((28:9 And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him. 10- Then said Jesus unto them, Be not afraid: go tell my brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me. 11- Now when they were going, behold, some of the watch came into the city, and shewed unto the chief priests all the things that were done. 12- And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave large money unto the soldiers, 13- Saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept)). Mark: ((16:9 Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils. 10- And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept)). Luke: ((24:13 And, behold, two of them went that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore furlongs. 14- And they talked together of all these things which had happened. 15- And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them)). John: ((20:11 But Mary stood without at the sepulchre weeping: and as she wept, she stooped down, and looked into the sepulcher, 15 - Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? ………… Jesus saith unto her, ….. but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto ………. 18 - Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the LORD, and that he had spoken these things unto her. …. 20- ….)). The discrepancy between the Bibles regarding when and to whom Jesus appeared: 1) Matthew: Jesus appeared to two women. 2) Mark and John: Jesus appeared to Mary Magdalene only. 3) Luke: Jesus did not appear to women for the first time, but he appeared to men. 4) Matthew: Jesus appeared to the two women when they were on their way back to the city. 5) John: Jesus appeared to Mary when she stood at the sepulcher. 6) Matthew and Mark: Jesus requested the two women to tell his disciples that they go into Galilee, and there they will see him. 7) John: Jesus asked the woman to go to the disciples and to tell them that Jesus is going to his Father and their Father. 8) Mark mentioned one young man sitting on the right side of the tomb, but Luke mentioned two men. Mark (16:7- But go and tell his disciples and Peter, ‘He is going before you to Galilee; there you will see him, as he told you); however, Luke stated that the appearance of Jesus did not took place in Galilee, but in Jerusalem and its surroundings (Luke 24:13-35). D) Appearance of Jesus to Disciples: Mathew 28 ((16- The eleven* disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had ordered them. 17- When they saw him, they worshiped, but they doubted.18- Then Jesus approached and said to them, “All power in heaven and on earth has been given to me)). Mark 16 ((14- [But] later, as the eleven were at table, he appeared to them and rebuked them for their unbelief and hardness of heart because they had not believed those who saw him after he had been raised. 15- He said to them, “Go into the whole world and proclaim the gospel to every creature)). Luke 24 ((13- Now that very day two of them were going to a village seven miles from Jerusalem called Emmaus…. 30- And it happened that, while he was with them at table, he took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them. 31- With that their eyes were opened and they recognized him, but he vanished from their sight. 32- Then they said to each other, “Were not our hearts burning [within us] while he spoke to us on the way and opened the scriptures to us?” 33- So they set out at once and returned to Jerusalem where they found gathered together the eleven and those with them….52- they did him homage and then returned to Jerusalem with great joy)). John 20: ((14- When she had said this, she turned around and saw Jesus there, but did not know it was Jesus. 15- Jesus said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping? Whom are you looking for?” She thought it was the gardener ... 19- On the evening of that first day of the week, when the doors were locked, where the disciples were, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst and said to them, “Peace be with you.”20- When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. The disciples rejoiced when they saw the Lord…. 26- Now a week later his disciples were again inside and Thomas was with them. Jesus came, although the doors were locked, and stood in their midst and said, “Peace be with you…)). John 21: (1- After this, Jesus revealed himself again to his disciples at the Sea of Tiberias. He revealed himself in this way.)) There is discrepancy in the Bibles regarding how many times Jesus appeared, how he appeared, to whom he appeared and what were the things he requested from his disciples: 1) How many times Jesus appeared:- • Matthew: Two times • Mark and Luke: Three times. • John: Four times. 2) To whom Jesus appeared:- A) Mathew: 1- Mary Magdalene 2- The eleven disciples B) Mark: 1- Mary Magdalene 2- Two followers; not disciples. 3- The eleven disciples. C) Luke: 1- Two followers; not disciples. 2- Simon. 3- Disciples. D) John: 1- Mary Magdalene. 2- The disciples without Thomas. 3- The disciples with Thomas. E- The disciples who were fishing: 1- Mark, Mathew and John: Jesus appeared first to Mary Magdalene; but she did not know him and thought that he is the gardener. Luke has completely different narrative. He stated that Jesus appeared first to two men going to Emmaus Village. 2- Mark, Mathew and Luke: Jesus appeared one time only to the disciples. But John talked about appearing three times in different ways. 3- Mark and Mathew: Jesus appeared to the eleven disciples in Galilee. Luke and John: Jesus appeared to the eleven disciples in Jerusalem. 4- Most importantly, all Bibles agreed that the person who appeared to Mary Magdalene and the Disciples was strange man. They did not know him. They were in doubt whether he was Jesus or not, although they were living with Jesus and knew him very well. Consequently, how can we know whether it is really Jesus or another person who appeared to Marry and the Disciples? As such, it is clear that the opponents of Jesus i.e. chief priests and guards, did not see resurrection of Jesus and did not see Jesus after resurrection. The only thing they agreed upon is that they found the tomb, in which Jesus said to be buried, empty. So, stating that Jesus raised from the dead but no one saw him is a matter lacking the factual grounds, because of the discrepancy between the Bibles regarding such resurrection, although resurrection of Jesus is deemed one of the fundamental pillars of the Christian doctrine. See the story of (Daniel) who came out alive from the den of lions. Daniel 6: ((15- Then these men assembled unto the king, and said unto the king, Know, O king, that the law of the Medes and Persians is, That no decree nor statute which the king establisheth may be changed. 16 - Then the king commanded, and they brought Daniel, and cast him into the den of lions. Now the king spake and said unto Daniel, Thy God whom thou servest continually, he will deliver thee. 17 - And a stone was brought, and laid upon the mouth of the den; and the king sealed it with his own signet, and with the signet of his lords; that the purpose might not be changed concerning Daniel. 18- Then the king went to his palace, and passed the night fasting: neither were instruments of musick brought before him: and his sleep went from him. 19 - Then the king arose very early in the morning, and went in haste unto the den of lions. 20 - 20 And when he came to the den, he cried with a lamentable voice unto Daniel: and the king spake and said to Daniel, O Daniel, servant of the living God, is thy God, whom thou servest continually, able to deliver thee from the lions? 21- Then said Daniel unto the king, O king, live for ever. 22- My God hath sent his angel, and hath shut the lions' mouths, that they have not hurt me: forasmuch as before him innocency was found in me; and also before thee, O king, have I done no hurt. 23- Then was the king exceedingly glad for him, and commanded that they should take Daniel up out of the den. So Daniel was taken up out of the den, and no manner of hurt was found upon him, because he believed in his God. 24- And the king commanded, and they brought tho se men which had accused Daniel, and they cast them into the den of lions, them, their children, and their wives; and the lions had the mastery of them, and brake all their bones in pieces or ever they came at the bottom of the den)). In the story of Daniel, both of the friends and enemies confirmed and testified the story, which is deemed sufficient evidence to substantiate such event. However, in the story of Jesus, this did not happen. No one of the opponents of Jesus saw him after death. (Mathew Commentary, page 448-450). To substantiate the resurrection of Jesus, both opponents and friends should have seen Jesus raising from the dead, which is a missing element that renders the story of Jesus resurrection groundless. 3- What Jesus requested his disciples to do: Mathew 28-19: a- Go therefore and make disciples of all nations. b- baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Mark 16:15: Proclaim the gospel to the whole creation. Luke 24:47: Repentance and forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name. 49: stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high. John 21:5: Children, do you have any fish. 4- What Jesus given to the disciples: Mathew 28:20: I am with you always, to the end of the age. Mark 16: 17-18: Miracles similar to those of Jesus. Other Remarks: Only Luke mentioned that Jesus has eaten broiled fish with the disciples. Only John mentioned the story of Jesus’s appearance at Tiberias Lake. Only Mark mentioned the story of the miracles given by Jesus to the disciples. Although Mark, John and Luke mentioned that Jesus ascended to the heavens to be with his Father, Matthew did not mention such event although he is an inspired disciple of Jesus, and although such ascending is deemed one of the most important issues in the Christian doctrine. Discrepancies regarding cleansing the temple, and the fig tree: Matthew: 21: (12- And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, 13- And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves. 14- And the blind and the lame came to him in the temple; and he healed them. 15- And when the chief priests and scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children crying in the temple, and saying, Hosanna to the son of David; they were sore displeased, 16- And said unto him, Hearest thou what these say? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea; have ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise? 17 - And he left them, and went out of the city into Bethany; and he lodged there. 18- Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered. 19- And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away. 20- And when the disciples saw it, they marvelled, saying, How soon is the fig tree withered away! 21- Jesus answered and said unto them, Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and doubt not, ye shall not only do this which is done to the fig tree, but also if ye shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; it shall be done). Mark : 11 (12- And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry: 13- And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet. 14- And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it. 15- And they come to Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves; 16- And would not suffer that any man should carry any vessel through the temple. 17- And he taught, saying unto them, Is it not written, My house shall be called of all nations the house of prayer? but ye have made it a den of thieves. 18- And the scribes and chief priests heard it, and sought how they might destroy him: for they feared him, because all the people was astonished at his doctrine. 19- And when even was come, he went out of the city. 20- And in the morning, as they passed by, they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots. 21- And Peter calling to remembrance saith unto him, Master, behold, the fig tree which thou cursedst is withered away. 22- And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have faith in God. 23- For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith. 24- Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them“. Discrepancies: 1- Matthew: Cleansing the temple by Jesus from the sellers and moneychangers happened before he passes by and curses the fig tree. 2- Mark: The story of the fig tree happened before cleansing the temple. 3- Matthew: Jesus passed by the fig tree, cursed it and the tree dried up in the same day. 4- Mark: Jesus passed by the fig tree, cursed it and on the next day, it dried up. Mark stated “for the time of figs was not yet”. So if Jesus is really God or Son of God, as said, isn’t it strange that he did not know that it was not the time of fig although the common people know such simple things! Also, he saw the fig tree afar off but did not see whether it has fig or not! The two bibles stated that such hungry god went to the tree but did not find fig, and cursed it! Unfulfilled Predictions: A) Predicting the end of world in first Gregorian century:- Matthew: ( 10 : 1 – 23 ) (... 23- When they persecute you in one city, flee to another; for truly I say to you, you will by no means complete the circuit of the cities of Israel until the Son of man arrives). That is the return of Jesus to the earth will occur before his disciples finish evangelization in the cities of Israel, and before the death of those who lived in the era of Jesus in the first half of the first Gregorian century. Mathew 16: (27- For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. 28 - Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom) In other words, the afore-mentioned texts confirm that the end of the world and the coming of Jesus again to Earth should occur before the death of the generation which lived in the first Gregorian Century. Matthew 24: (29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken 30- And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. ……. 34 - Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled). Mark (13: 24-30) and Luke (21: 25-32) agreed with the narrative of Matthew regarding such predictions; however, nothing of them occurred as predicted by Matthew. As such, the predictions, which were attributed to Jesus in the Bibles about the end of the world in the first Gregorian century, were not fulfilled; thus, no one can argue or plead otherwise.

10) Bearer of the Cross: Mathew 27 ((32- And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to bear his cross)). Mark 15 ((21- And they compel one Simon a Cyrenian, who passed by, coming out of the country, the father of Alexander and Rufus, to bear his cross)). Luke 23 ((26- And as they led him away, they laid hold upon one Simon, a Cyrenian, coming out of the country, and on him they laid the cross, that he might bear it after Jesus)). John 19 ((16- Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Jesus, and led him away. 17- And he bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha)). Who is the bearer of the cross? A) Mathew, Mark and Luke: The bearer of the cross is Simon a Cyrenian. B) John: The bearer of the cross is Jesus himself. Matthew and John were two of the original Twelve Apostles. They were often with Jesus and were inspired by the Holy Spirit; so how they differ in such incident. 11) Giving Jesus a drink before crucifixion: Mathew ((27:34 They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink. 27:48 And straightway one of them ran, and took a spunge, and filled it with vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink)). Mark ((15:23 And they gave him to drink wine mingled with myrrh: but he received it not. 15:36 And one ran and filled a spunge full of vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink, saying, Let alone; let us see whether Elias will come to take him down)). Luke ((23:36 And the soldiers also mocked him, coming to him, and offering him vinegar)). John ((19:28 After this, Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, saith, I thirst. 19:29 Now there was set a vessel full of vinegar: and they filled a spunge with vinegar, and put it upon hyssop, and put it to his mouth. 19:30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost)). Differences: A. Mathew and Mark: When Jesus called God, one of the soldiers brought spunge with vinegar and made him drink. B. Luke: The soldiers tried to make Jesus drink vinegar. But Luke did not mention that it was mingled with gall/ myrrh. C. John: Jesus asked for a drink. They gave him vinegar and he drank it. 12) Jesus upon crucifixion: Luke ((23:33 And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there they crucified him, and the malefactors, one on the right hand, and the other on the left. 23:34 Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots. 23:42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom. 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, to day shalt thou be with me in paradise)). John ((19:25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. 19:26 When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! 19:27 Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home)). A. (Mathew and Mark) did not mention that Jesus made certain statement in such situation. B.(Luke and John) gave two different narratives: 1- (Luke) stated that Jesus asked his Father to forgive those who crucified him and said to one of the malefactors that he will be in Paradise with Jesus because he defended him. 2- (John) mentioned that upon crucifixion, his mother was standing with some women. Also, the beloved disciple of Jesus was standing there and he told his mother that such disciple is just like her son. 3- (Luke) alone mentioned such prayers, which were not only deleted from the other bibles, but also deleted from some important versions attributed to Luke himself.

Some Evidence for the Truth of Islam zain4u.com/vb/forumdispla… The ignorant man is the enemy of himself.. In the distorted Torah, in some of its paragraphs, it turns into a shameful pornographic publication that you and all churches are ashamed of reciting in their places of worship. And how you and those churches are ashamed, who say: What you are ashamed of is the Lord's holy words. Muslims recite the entire Qur'an from the beginning to the end and in a beautiful voice throughout the nights of Ramadan on Live broadcast. You will not find a reader or a Muslim ashamed to recite or hear it. Rather, you will find the Qur'an sometimes penetrates into his conscience and you see tears flowing from his eyes for fear and humility. Jesus calls for searching the Bible and doubting everything until it reaches the truth. A false image of Allah's prophets and messengers in the Old Testament. The Old Testament books say about Abraham, the Messenger of Allah: “14 And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair. 15 The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh: and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house. 16 And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels. 17 And the LORD plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. 18 And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me? why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? 19 Why saidst thou, She is my sister? so I might have taken her to me to wife: now therefore behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way. 20 And Pharaoh commanded his men concerning him: and they sent him away, and his wife, and all that he had.”( Genesis 12) Would any of people with manners accept to trade in the beauty of his woman!? So how about the prophet of Allah, his messenger, peace be upon him?! (Noah .. Genesis 9) “20 And Noah began to be an husbandman*, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.” Lot (Genesis 19): “30 And Lot went up out of Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with him; for he feared to dwell in Zoar: and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters. 31 And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth: 32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. 33 And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. 34 And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. 35 And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. 36 Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father.” What wisdom and sermon can Bible readers benefit from reading this story? If the prophets are like this, and they are the bearers of the guiding word of Allah, what is left for debauchery and fools? How do they address Allah! If we turn the pages of these Bibles to get acquainted with the etiquette of supplication and reverence, we find the discourse with Allah is characterized by boldness and accusation!! And read with me this one of several of similar texts: In (1kings 17) that Elijah the Prophet addressed Allah _The Bible says: “20 And he cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, hast thou also brought evil upon the widow with whom I sojourn, by slaying her son?” When an ordinary person reads the previous texts in the Bible that stigmatize the prophets and messengers of Allah, and who has Allah singled out for revelation those descriptions. Does he have in mind that these words are revelatory or semi-revelatory? One can only dwell in sorrow and distress as he hears these words, which come only from a sick mind and heart. In these texts, there is abuse to the prophets and messengers of Allah when they attribute to them what the junkies and rabble are afraid of. By what means is this abuse to the prophets? They wrapped these abuses in the garment of infallible heavenly revelation so that no one would dare to deny it. Is this the biography of messengers and prophets of Allah or the biography of bandits and thieves? The philosophers and sane scholars reject to describe Allah as ignorant. They also reject the saying that Allah mischaracterizes his ambassadors to his creation. How then does this align with those texts that call the prophets and messengers with worst manners? If the prophets and messengers of Allah have these degenerate qualities, then why companions of evil to be blamed? There is no doubt that those texts that stigmatize the prophets and messengers with these despicable qualities are incompatible with the requirements of sound reason and straight logic in what these elite people should be, which makes it clear that the aforementioned texts are among the additions of human beings who did not respect Allah, His messengers or prophets. Jesus said: “17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till* heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till* “(Matthew 5) Reuben commits adultery with his father's wife: “21 And Israel journeyed, and spread his tent beyond the tower of Edar. 22 And it came to pass, when Israel dwelt in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father's concubine: and Israel heard it. Now the sons of Jacob were twelve*: 23 The sons of Leah; Reuben, Jacob's firstborn, and Simeon, and Levi, and Judah, and Issachar, and Zebulun: 24 The sons of Rachel; Joseph, and Benjamin: 25 And the sons of Bilhah, Rachel's handmaid; Dan, and Naphtali: 26 And the sons of Zilpah, Leah's handmaid; Gad, and Asher: these are the sons of Jacob, which were born to him in Padanaram.”( Genesis 35) Israel did not express his anger at this heinous act, but rather remained silent on it and blessed his eldest son, Reuben: “3 Reuben, thou art my firstborn, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power: 4 Unstable as water, thou shalt not excel; because thou wentest up to thy father's bed; then defiledst thou it: he went up to my couch.( Genesis 49). Judah commits adultery with his daughter-in-law (wife of his son) Tamar: Judah is one of the tribes and the bravest son of Jacob, (Genesis 17) “12 And in process of time the daughter of Shuah Judah's wife died; .... and went up unto his sheepshearers* to Timnath, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite. 13 And it was told Tamar, saying, Behold thy father in law goeth 14 And she put her widow's garments off from her, and covered her with a vail, and wrapped herself, and sat in an open place, which is by the way to Timnath; 15 When Judah saw her, he thought her to be an harlot; 16 And he turned unto her by the way, and said, Go to, I pray thee, let me come in unto thee; (for he knew not that she was his daughter in law.) And she said, What wilt thou give me, that thou mayest come in unto me? 17 And he said, I will send thee a kid from the flock. And she said, Wilt thou give me a pledge, till thou send it? 18 And he said, What pledge shall I give thee? And she said, Thy signet, and thy bracelets, and thy staff that is in thine hand. And he gave it her, and came in unto her, and she conceived by him. 24 And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt. 25 When she was brought forth, she sent to her father in law, saying, By the man, whose these are, am I with child: and she said, Discern, I pray thee, whose are these, the signet, and bracelets, and staff. 26 And Judah acknowledged them, and said, She hath been more righteous than I; because that I gave her not to Shelah my son. And he knew her again no more. 27 And it came to pass in the time of her travail, that, behold, twins were in her womb…. 29 And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? this breach be upon thee: therefore his name was called Pharez.30 And afterward came out his brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah.” A hideous, impudent and dirty image are gathered Judas's morals from pretending to be religious. Judas, the adulterous criminal, asks that Tamar be taken out and burned because she is an adulteress. When he realized that she is pregnant as a result of her adultery, he said: " She is more innocent than me. " It is more correct for him to say, I am lecherous than she. He is a lecherous who pretends to be religious according to the distorted texts of the Torah to which your Lord Jesus committed you: “17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.”( Luke 16) Tamar gave birth to twins from her adultery in Judah: one “Pharez” and the other “Zarah" These twins are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus. Descended from the fornication of "Pharez" David, as they claim. As for Suleiman ibn David, he was also, according to them, a fornicator. When David, according to their claim, assaulted wife of his neighbor and commander of his army Uriah the Hittite and gave birth to her adulterer David, according to their slander, Suleiman. Rahab .. “17 And the city shall be accursed, even it, and all that are therein, to the LORD: only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.”( Joshua 6) Amnon the son of David, the grandfather of the firstborn Messiah, fornicates with his sister Tamar according to the advice of Hakim the son of Israel. Israel, named Jonadab the son of Shimei, {who is brother of David}, advised the boy to ask his father, the king, that his sister should come and feed him bread with her hand, of course, as the Bible says about him in chapter 13 of the second book of Samuel: “3- and Jonadab was a very subtil man.”( 2 Samuel 13). This is what God described him to us as a very wise man. What He indicated to him in his wisdom: “5 And Jonadab said unto him, Lay thee down on thy bed, and make thyself sick:” (2 Samuel 13) “1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar (a harlot ) ; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz of ( Rachab; a harlot Joshua 6:17) and Booz begat Obed of) Ruth David's grandmother is a harlot ) 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been ( the wife of Urias; a harlot ) 7 And Solomon begat Roboam; ….. 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, )Jechonias Sterile( begat Salathiel; …. 15; and Matthan begat Jacob; .. 16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Matthew 1) . These are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus, even though he was born without a father. So, what is this honorable lineage that you attribute to Jesus, and what glorification, honor, or even deification do you mean? Is it possible that one of the ancestors of Jesus whom you sanctify is an adulterer, four of whom are adulterous children of an adulteress? Then you raise him to the ranks of the gods?! Is this of religion, morality and logic?! They, the Biblical writers, want only to convince us that he is of David 's lineage, because this is of great importance, which is to try to prove that he is the expected king of the Jews, who must be of David's lineage to inherit the king of his ancestors. Have you seen more distortion than this?

What's the difference?

@Jonathan_Elk correct .. Jesus said, there will be false prophets after me.

Actually it’s Christianity’s belief that every prophet after Jesus is a False prophet and Islam’s belief that Christians are kafirs and infidels. Happy to assist. Jews have nothing to do with that, except them also being Kafirs is the eyes of Islam.

Some Evidence for the Truth of Islam zain4u.com/vb/forumdispla… The ignorant man is the enemy of himself.. In the distorted Torah, in some of its paragraphs, it turns into a shameful pornographic publication that you and all churches are ashamed of reciting in their places of worship. And how you and those churches are ashamed, who say: What you are ashamed of is the Lord's holy words. Muslims recite the entire Qur'an from the beginning to the end and in a beautiful voice throughout the nights of Ramadan on Live broadcast. You will not find a reader or a Muslim ashamed to recite or hear it. Rather, you will find the Qur'an sometimes penetrates into his conscience and you see tears flowing from his eyes for fear and humility. Jesus calls for searching the Bible and doubting everything until it reaches the truth. A false image of Allah's prophets and messengers in the Old Testament. The Old Testament books say about Abraham, the Messenger of Allah: “14 And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair. 15 The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh: and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house. 16 And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels. 17 And the LORD plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. 18 And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me? why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? 19 Why saidst thou, She is my sister? so I might have taken her to me to wife: now therefore behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way. 20 And Pharaoh commanded his men concerning him: and they sent him away, and his wife, and all that he had.”( Genesis 12) Would any of people with manners accept to trade in the beauty of his woman!? So how about the prophet of Allah, his messenger, peace be upon him?! (Noah .. Genesis 9) “20 And Noah began to be an husbandman*, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.” Lot (Genesis 19): “30 And Lot went up out of Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with him; for he feared to dwell in Zoar: and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters. 31 And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth: 32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. 33 And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. 34 And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. 35 And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. 36 Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father.” What wisdom and sermon can Bible readers benefit from reading this story? If the prophets are like this, and they are the bearers of the guiding word of Allah, what is left for debauchery and fools? How do they address Allah! If we turn the pages of these Bibles to get acquainted with the etiquette of supplication and reverence, we find the discourse with Allah is characterized by boldness and accusation!! And read with me this one of several of similar texts: In (1kings 17) that Elijah the Prophet addressed Allah _The Bible says: “20 And he cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, hast thou also brought evil upon the widow with whom I sojourn, by slaying her son?” When an ordinary person reads the previous texts in the Bible that stigmatize the prophets and messengers of Allah, and who has Allah singled out for revelation those descriptions. Does he have in mind that these words are revelatory or semi-revelatory? One can only dwell in sorrow and distress as he hears these words, which come only from a sick mind and heart. In these texts, there is abuse to the prophets and messengers of Allah when they attribute to them what the junkies and rabble are afraid of. By what means is this abuse to the prophets? They wrapped these abuses in the garment of infallible heavenly revelation so that no one would dare to deny it. Is this the biography of messengers and prophets of Allah or the biography of bandits and thieves? The philosophers and sane scholars reject to describe Allah as ignorant. They also reject the saying that Allah mischaracterizes his ambassadors to his creation. How then does this align with those texts that call the prophets and messengers with worst manners? If the prophets and messengers of Allah have these degenerate qualities, then why companions of evil to be blamed? There is no doubt that those texts that stigmatize the prophets and messengers with these despicable qualities are incompatible with the requirements of sound reason and straight logic in what these elite people should be, which makes it clear that the aforementioned texts are among the additions of human beings who did not respect Allah, His messengers or prophets. Jesus said: “17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till* heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till* “(Matthew 5) Reuben commits adultery with his father's wife: “21 And Israel journeyed, and spread his tent beyond the tower of Edar. 22 And it came to pass, when Israel dwelt in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father's concubine: and Israel heard it. Now the sons of Jacob were twelve*: 23 The sons of Leah; Reuben, Jacob's firstborn, and Simeon, and Levi, and Judah, and Issachar, and Zebulun: 24 The sons of Rachel; Joseph, and Benjamin: 25 And the sons of Bilhah, Rachel's handmaid; Dan, and Naphtali: 26 And the sons of Zilpah, Leah's handmaid; Gad, and Asher: these are the sons of Jacob, which were born to him in Padanaram.”( Genesis 35) Israel did not express his anger at this heinous act, but rather remained silent on it and blessed his eldest son, Reuben: “3 Reuben, thou art my firstborn, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power: 4 Unstable as water, thou shalt not excel; because thou wentest up to thy father's bed; then defiledst thou it: he went up to my couch.( Genesis 49). Judah commits adultery with his daughter-in-law (wife of his son) Tamar: Judah is one of the tribes and the bravest son of Jacob, (Genesis 17) “12 And in process of time the daughter of Shuah Judah's wife died; .... and went up unto his sheepshearers* to Timnath, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite. 13 And it was told Tamar, saying, Behold thy father in law goeth 14 And she put her widow's garments off from her, and covered her with a vail, and wrapped herself, and sat in an open place, which is by the way to Timnath; 15 When Judah saw her, he thought her to be an harlot; 16 And he turned unto her by the way, and said, Go to, I pray thee, let me come in unto thee; (for he knew not that she was his daughter in law.) And she said, What wilt thou give me, that thou mayest come in unto me? 17 And he said, I will send thee a kid from the flock. And she said, Wilt thou give me a pledge, till thou send it? 18 And he said, What pledge shall I give thee? And she said, Thy signet, and thy bracelets, and thy staff that is in thine hand. And he gave it her, and came in unto her, and she conceived by him. 24 And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt. 25 When she was brought forth, she sent to her father in law, saying, By the man, whose these are, am I with child: and she said, Discern, I pray thee, whose are these, the signet, and bracelets, and staff. 26 And Judah acknowledged them, and said, She hath been more righteous than I; because that I gave her not to Shelah my son. And he knew her again no more. 27 And it came to pass in the time of her travail, that, behold, twins were in her womb…. 29 And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? this breach be upon thee: therefore his name was called Pharez.30 And afterward came out his brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah.” A hideous, impudent and dirty image are gathered Judas's morals from pretending to be religious. Judas, the adulterous criminal, asks that Tamar be taken out and burned because she is an adulteress. When he realized that she is pregnant as a result of her adultery, he said: " She is more innocent than me. " It is more correct for him to say, I am lecherous than she. He is a lecherous who pretends to be religious according to the distorted texts of the Torah to which your Lord Jesus committed you: “17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.”( Luke 16) Tamar gave birth to twins from her adultery in Judah: one “Pharez” and the other “Zarah" These twins are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus. Descended from the fornication of "Pharez" David, as they claim. As for Suleiman ibn David, he was also, according to them, a fornicator. When David, according to their claim, assaulted wife of his neighbor and commander of his army Uriah the Hittite and gave birth to her adulterer David, according to their slander, Suleiman. Rahab .. “17 And the city shall be accursed, even it, and all that are therein, to the LORD: only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.”( Joshua 6) Amnon the son of David, the grandfather of the firstborn Messiah, fornicates with his sister Tamar according to the advice of Hakim the son of Israel. Israel, named Jonadab the son of Shimei, {who is brother of David}, advised the boy to ask his father, the king, that his sister should come and feed him bread with her hand, of course, as the Bible says about him in chapter 13 of the second book of Samuel: “3- and Jonadab was a very subtil man.”( 2 Samuel 13). This is what God described him to us as a very wise man. What He indicated to him in his wisdom: “5 And Jonadab said unto him, Lay thee down on thy bed, and make thyself sick:” (2 Samuel 13) “1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar (a harlot ) ; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz of ( Rachab; a harlot Joshua 6:17) and Booz begat Obed of) Ruth David's grandmother is a harlot ) 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been ( the wife of Urias; a harlot ) 7 And Solomon begat Roboam; ….. 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, )Jechonias Sterile( begat Salathiel; …. 15; and Matthan begat Jacob; .. 16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Matthew 1) . These are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus, even though he was born without a father. So, what is this honorable lineage that you attribute to Jesus, and what glorification, honor, or even deification do you mean? Is it possible that one of the ancestors of Jesus whom you sanctify is an adulterer, four of whom are adulterous children of an adulteress? Then you raise him to the ranks of the gods?! Is this of religion, morality and logic?! They, the Biblical writers, want only to convince us that he is of David 's lineage, because this is of great importance, which is to try to prove that he is the expected king of the Jews, who must be of David's lineage to inherit the king of his ancestors. Have you seen more distortion than this?

While the Jesus of the Qur’an shares a name, beneath this surface similarity lies a calculated divergence from the biblical figure. In the Islamic narrative, Jesus becomes a mere pawn, strategically deployed to refute Christian beliefs and bolster Muhammad’s self-aggrandizing claims. Islam does not respect the Jesus of the Bible, the Christian faith, or its followers; it is hostile to all three. The Quran, while reluctantly acknowledging the virgin birth, specifically denies Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection, brazenly disregarding well-established historical facts. This altered narrative insists that Jesus was taken to heaven and is prophesied to return in the future, not as a savior, but to “destroy the cross” and eradicate all religions except Islam (Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir, Vol. 3, pp. 31-32). This isn’t a subtle disagreement; it’s a direct assault on the cornerstone of Christianity. Contrast the New Testament’s teachings of love and compassion with the Quran’s portrayal of Jesus lacking depth and wisdom, presented in a way that is, in fact, blasphemous from a Christian perspective. In this narrative, biblical figures like Moses and Jesus are reduced to peripheral roles, their significance overshadowed by the relentless glorification of Muhammad’s prophethood. The rich historical details of Jesus’ kindness and moral character, which abound in the New Testament, are conspicuously absent in the Quran’s version. Instead of profound life lessons, the Islamic narrative diminishes Jesus to a mere predecessor of Muhammad, devoid of the wisdom attributed to him in Christian scriptures. The Quran explicitly labels Christians as blasphemers (5:17, 5:72), accusing them of inventing lies about Allah (10:68-69) — a crime deemed the worst. The consequences, according to the Quran, are severe: Christians will suffer in Hell. As they endure torment, good Muslims, including Jesus, are envisioned to mock them, asking, “Where is their Lord?” (22:19-22). This isn’t theological disagreement; it’s a disturbing depiction of scorn and derision towards Christians, which has grim consequences in this life as well, particularly evident in the treatment of Christians in lands ruled by Islamic law. The Quran’s portrayal of Jesus lacks genuine reverence, laying bare Islam’s deep-seated hostility towards Christianity and its central figure. As the layers of this narrative are unraveled, it is evident that the purported respect for Jesus in Islam is a carefully constructed façade, concealing a reality that challenges the very core of Christian beliefs. Troubling and threatening Qur’anic verses about Christians include: Christians are told that Jesus is only a messenger of Allah, not his Son (Qur’an 4:171). Allah did not have a son; he had no need of one (Qur’an 19:35). Christians are wrong — Jesus was not crucified (Qur’an 4:157). Those who believe in the divinity of Christ are “disbelievers” (Qur’an 5:17). Christians “forgot a good part” of the divine revelations they received (Qur’an 5:14). Those who believe that Jesus is God’s Son are accursed (Qur’an 9:30). Christians who do not become Muslims “are the most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6). Muslims must fight against and subjugate Christians (Qur’an 9:29). The uncompromising Islamic doctrine concerning Christians includes hostility (“take them not as friends”), contempt and hatred (they are “the most vile of creatures”), and jihad (“fight those who believe not in Allah,” “strike terror” in their hearts). Islam does not respect the Jesus of the Bible, the Christian faith, or its followers. It is hostile to all three. As the stark disparities between Islamic and Christian narratives about Jesus become apparent, it is crucial to recognize the depth of this ideological divide. The purported respect for Jesus in Islam appears to be a carefully constructed façade, concealing a reality that challenges the very core of Christian beliefs. The troubling and threatening Qur’anic verses about Christians underscore the uncompromising stance of Islam, fostering hostility, contempt, and a call to subjugation. The enduring objective, as consistently upheld by Islam, is the pursuit of absolute global hegemony—a planetary manifestation of Islamic destiny.

Muslims love and adore Jesus Christ Muslims don’t believe Jesus in hell boiling in human excrement Muslims don’t get offended when you say Christ is King Maybe Muslims and Christians aren’t actually enemies

From the distortion of "Matthew" attributed Christ to King Jeconiah called "Pyhoyakin and Coniah". “1 And king Zedekiah the son of Josiah reigned instead of Coniah the son of Jehoiakim, whom Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon made king in the land of Judah.” (Jeremiah 37) This king (barren) has no son. And will not be among his descendants sitting on the throne of David because the Lord deprived him of that. As quoted in the Bible of Jeremiah: “30 Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.”( Jeremiah 22) So, how can (Jeconiah) be one of the ancestors of Christ and he is a barren man? and how will Christ inherit the throne of David his father if he is of the children of this king whose descendants God has deprived of the authority? No one other than "Matthew" can answer these questions! As well as, it is inconceivable that Christ was of the children of two brothers. Matthew and Luke agreed at the beginning of the lineage of Yusuf al-Najjar. Then, they parted to meet Zorobabel Salathiel where " Matthew" made him the tenth grandfather of Yusuf al-Najjar. While " Luke " made him the nineteenth grandfather of Yusuf. Then, the Bibles differed again greatly. Matthew made Christ from the children of the kings of the children of Israel Solomon, Roboam, Abia, Asa, then Josaphat. While Luke made him a descendant of Nathan, which was the son of David and not among his sons from a king over the children of Israel. It is inconceivable that Christ was of the children of two brothers, Solomon and Nathan, the sons of David. Also, it is inconceivable about Zerubbabel and his father Shaltiel. They are either (Christ, Zerubbabel and Shaltiel) of the children of Solomon or of his brother Nathan Jesus said: “13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.( Matthew 13) AS Bosbos said: (In its meaning: to use our mind that Allah gave us. Because He gave us two hands and two feet to use them and it is not reasonable to give us mind so that we do not use them). إِذْ قَالَتِ الْمَلَائِكَةُ يَا مَرْيَمُ إِنَّ اللَّهَ اصْطَفَاكِ وَطَهَّرَكِ وَاصْطَفَاكِ عَلَىٰ نِسَاءِ الْعَالَمِينَ (42) يَا مَرْيَمُ اقْنُتِي لِرَبِّكِ وَاسْجُدِي وَارْكَعِي مَعَ الرَّاكِعِينَ (43) ذَٰلِكَ مِنْ أَنبَاءِ الْغَيْبِ نُوحِيهِ إِلَيْكَ ۚ وَمَا كُنتَ لَدَيْهِمْ إِذْ يُلْقُونَ أَقْلَامَهُمْ أَيُّهُمْ يَكْفُلُ مَرْيَمَ وَمَا كُنتَ لَدَيْهِمْ إِذْ يَخْتَصِمُونَ (44) Allah Almighty says: 42-And [mention] when the angels said, "O Mary, indeed Allah has chosen you and purified you and chosen you above the women of the worlds. 43-O Mary, be devoutly obedient to your Lord and prostrate and bow with those who bow [in prayer]." 44-That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. And you were not with them when they cast their pens as to which of them should be responsible for Mary. Nor were you with them when they disputed. (Surah Al-'Imran) يَا أُخْتَ هَارُونَ مَا كَانَ أَبُوكِ امْرَأَ سَوْءٍ وَمَا كَانَتْ أُمُّكِ بَغِيًّا (28) فَأَشَارَتْ إِلَيْهِ ۖ قَالُوا كَيْفَ نُكَلِّمُ مَن كَانَ فِي الْمَهْدِ صَبِيًّا (29) قَالَ إِنِّي عَبْدُ اللَّهِ آتَانِيَ الْكِتَابَ وَجَعَلَنِي نَبِيًّا (30) وَجَعَلَنِي مُبَارَكًا أَيْنَ مَا كُنتُ وَأَوْصَانِي بِالصَّلَاةِ وَالزَّكَاةِ مَا دُمْتُ حَيًّا (31) وَبَرًّا بِوَالِدَتِي وَلَمْ يَجْعَلْنِي جَبَّارًا شَقِيًّا (32) وَالسَّلَامُ عَلَيَّ يَوْمَ وُلِدتُّ وَيَوْمَ أَمُوتُ وَيَوْمَ أُبْعَثُ حَيًّا (33) ذَٰلِكَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ ۚ قَوْلَ الْحَقِّ الَّذِي فِيهِ يَمْتَرُونَ (34) مَا كَانَ لِلَّهِ أَن يَتَّخِذَ مِن وَلَدٍ ۖ سُبْحَانَهُ ۚ إِذَا قَضَىٰ أَمْرًا فَإِنَّمَا يَقُولُ لَهُ كُن فَيَكُونُ (35) وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ رَبِّي وَرَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُوهُ ۚ هَٰذَا صِرَاطٌ مُّسْتَقِيمٌ (36) Allah Almighty says in Surah Maryam: 28-O sister of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste." 29-So she pointed to him. They said, "How can we speak to one who is in the cradle a child?" 30-[Jesus] said, "Indeed, I am the servant of Allah. He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet. 31-And He has made me blessed wherever I am and has enjoined upon me prayer and zakah as long as I remain alive 32-And [made me] dutiful to my mother, and He has not made me a wretched tyrant. 33-And peace is on me the day I was born and the day I will die and the day I am raised alive." 34-That is Jesus, the son of Mary - the word of truth about which they are in dispute. 35-It is not [befitting] for Allah to take a son; exalted is He! When He decrees an affair, He only says to it, "Be," and it is. 36-[Jesus said], “And indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path.”

As for Suleiman ibn David, he was also, according to them, a fornicator. When David, according to their claim, assaulted wife of his neighbor and commander of his army Uriah the Hittite and gave birth to her adulterer David, according to their slander, Suleiman. Rahab .. “17 And the city shall be accursed, even it, and all that are therein, to the LORD: only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.”( Joshua 6) Amnon the son of David, the grandfather of the firstborn Messiah, fornicates with his sister Tamar according to the advice of Hakim the son of Israel. Israel, named Jonadab the son of Shimei, {who is brother of David}, advised the boy to ask his father, the king, that his sister should come and feed him bread with her hand, of course, as the Bible says about him in chapter 13 of the second book of Samuel: “3- and Jonadab was a very subtil man.”( 2 Samuel 13). This is what God described him to us as a very wise man. What He indicated to him in his wisdom: “5 And Jonadab said unto him, Lay thee down on thy bed, and make thyself sick:” (2 Samuel 13) “1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar (a harlot ) ; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz of ( Rachab; a harlot Joshua 6:17) and Booz begat Obed of) Ruth David's grandmother is a harlot ) 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been ( the wife of Urias; a harlot ) 7 And Solomon begat Roboam; ….. 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, )Jechonias Sterile( begat Salathiel; …. 15; and Matthan begat Jacob; .. 16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Matthew 1). These are the ancestors of the Lord Jesus, even though he was born without a father. So, what is this honorable lineage that you attribute to Jesus, and what glorification, honor, or even deification do you mean? Is it possible that one of the ancestors of Jesus whom you sanctify is an adulterer, four of whom are adulterous children of an adulteress? Then you raise him to the ranks of the gods?! Is this of religion, morality and logic?! They, the Biblical writers, want only to convince us that he is of David 's lineage, because this is of great importance, which is to try to prove that he is the expected king of the Jews, who must be of David's lineage to inherit the king of his ancestors. Have you seen more distortion than this?

I don't mind posts that invite me to read the Quran. What I won't entertain is nonsense saying Jesus is not God. Whoever says Jesus is not the Lord is a liar and an antichrist. You can't convince me otherwise. Keep that in mind when you post to me.

In the name of Allah, most gracious and most merciful - Jesus, prophet of Allah : We now return to see Jesus, the prophet of Allah as Bibles speak about him whereas we find in (Mathew 21:11) “So the multitudes said, "This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth of Galilee." ,(John 6:14) “14 Then those men, when they had seen the sign that Jesus did, said, "This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world." , (Luke 13:33-34) “33 Nevertheless I must journey today, tomorrow, and the day following; for it cannot be that a prophet should perish outside of Jerusalem. 34 " "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, but you were not willing! ” Jesus describes himself as a prophet and that his willingness is not a willingness of God because he did not able to gather the sons of Jerusalem and if he is God such matter would not be difficult for him because "فَعَّالٌ لِّمَا يُرِيدُ " “He does what He intends (or wills).(16)” (surah Al-Burooj ) whereas he says (Luke 33:34) because Israelis killed many of their prophets, as if he says: You would like to kill me as you killed the ones who preceded me. Here he speaks to the community and he intends its inhabitants. Saying that he is a prophet makes it necessary for christians saying that he was killed in Jerusalem whereas he called it "Killer of prophets" but not saying "Killer of God" and that the two pupils described him as prophet humanbeing while they did not know him. If he is a God, he would have denied such description and would explain to them that he is a God & not a prophet. In the Bible (Luke 24:15-19) “Jesus of Nazareth, who was a Prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people,” when he asked them about the matters that happened in Jerusalem (So they said... Jesus of Nazareth, who was a Prophet mighty in deed) and also not denied the saying of Samaritan women stated in Bible (John 4:19) “The woman said to Him, "Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. “ and when the blind was asked how his eyes opened, he replied by saying in Bible (John 9:11) “He answered and said, "A Man called Jesus made clay and anointed my eyes and said to me, 'Go to the pool of “ . The pharisees were fighting Jesus because he was doing charitable deeds in Saturday so they denied his prophethood. In (Luke 7:13-16) “Then fear came upon all, and they glorified God, saying, "A great prophet has risen up among us"; and, "God has visited His people.” And in Bible of (John 7:52) “They answered and said to him, "Are you also from Galilee? Search and look, for no prophet has arisen out of Galilee." we find the saying of {pharisees to Nicodemus "you might...} therefore, we see that the pharisees were exerting an efforts to deny the prophethood of Jesus peace be upon him. If he was a God, then the charge description would have changed. The blind who got his eye sight at hand of Jesus was presented hoping to contest him but he replied as same as stated in the Bible of (John 9:15,17). “hey said to the blind man again, "What do you say about Him because He opened your eyes?" He said, "He is a prophet." “ So , if the public, pupils, women & blind say that he is a prophet and Jesus himself confirms that he is "Prophet, and his enemies try to deny his prophethood, is it permissible to say that he is a God or third of God ? also, is it permissible to leave the express certain meaning & its interpretation & to belive other contrary meaning. The Jewish, among whom Jesus rised, were not considering Jesus more than a human being who alleges the prophethood. So, when they conspired against him, they were afraid of people who respect him as a messenger prophet. See the Bible of (Mathew 21 : 46) “ But when they sought to lay hands on Him, they feared the multitudes, because they took Him for a prophet.”. For more proof see (Mathew 13:54-58) “So they were offended at Him. But Jesus said to them, "A prophet is not without honor except in his own country and in his own house." and (Mark 6: ) “1 Then He went out from there and came to His own country, and His disciples followed Him. 2 And when the Sabbath had come, He began to teach in the synagogue. And many hearing Him were astonished, saying, "Where did this Man get these things? And what wisdom is this which is given to Him, that such mighty works are performed by His hands! 3 " Is this not the carpenter, the Son of Mary, and brother of James, Joses, Judas, and Simon? And are not His sisters here with us?" And they were offended at Him. 4 But Jesus said to them, "A prophet is not without honor except in his own country, among his own relatives, and in his own house." 5 Now He could do no mighty work there, except that He laid His hands on a few sick people and healed them. ” If Jesus was a God or son fo Allah, he would be able to make miracles irrespective of their bad receiving him & his being psychologically affected by same. Also, it is said in (Mathew 21). " 10 And when He had come into Jerusalem, all the city was moved, saying, "Who is this?" 11 So the multitudes said, "This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth of Galilee."” This is the testimony of witnesses who saw him and witnessed his mircales and no one of them said that he is a God or son of Allah. Moreover, we find in (Luke 7) “11 Now it happened, the day after, that He went into a city called Nain; and many of His disciples went with Him, and a large crowd. 12 And when He came near the gate of the city, behold, a dead man was being carried out, the only son of his mother; and she was a widow. And a large crowd from the city was with her. 13 When the Lord saw her, He had compassion on her and said to her, "Do not weep." 14 Then He came and touched the open coffin, and those who carried him stood still. And He said, "Young man, I say to you, arise." 15 So he who was dead sat up and began to speak. And He presented him to his mother. 16 Then fear came upon all, and they glorified God, saying, "A great prophet has risen up among us"; and, "God has visited His people."” Jesus enlivened a dead person after prayed for God to give power & support and after making this great mircale by enlivening that dead person, we find that the witnesses of this incident did not lose their minds and say that he is a God or son of Allah but on the contrary they said (In Luke 7) “16 - A great prophet has risen up among us"; and, "God has visited His people."

Islam says Jesus is not the Son of God. They say Jesus never claimed to be God. They say He was a prophet only. John 5:25, 10:36 and Mark 14:61-62 Jesus clearly claims to be the Son of God, God in otherwords... yet they deny it. The verses show the Jews went crazy over it, they understood He was claiming to be God... they say as much in the scriptures! If Jesus was merely a prophet of God only, then He lied here. A prophet of God can not commit blasphemy against God. So which is it dear students of Islam? Jesus was telling the truth and you have been taught incorrectly with the Bible verses twisted or ignored... OR Jesus lied in these verses?

To my Muslim students read carefully... You won't win me over to Islam. If you believe you hold truth or understand the Bible, listen to it Rightly Divided in those videos I shared. I answer every "contradiction" Muslims pose to Christians. Every doubt and prove where Jesus claims to be, says He is God and allows worship. He says He is the very God of the Old Testament and there is no One with Him then or now, no partners, no other God but Him and no other way to be saved apart from Him. I mute disrespectful posts. Its worth a listen. :)

4) Timing of last supper:- According to Matthew (26: 17- 19), Mark (14: 12-17) and Luke (22: 7-8), the last supper was the Passover; however, John (18:28) states that the Passover was in the evening after the death of Jesus. (John 18: 28- Then the Jews led Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness the Jews did not enter the palace; they wanted to be able to eat the Passover). John states that the last supper attended by Jesus with his disciples took place before the Passover. John 13: (1-5 Now before the feast of the Passover, ……. And supper being ended, ……. and began to wash the disciples' feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded). John states also that they led Jesus in the evening of day preceding the Passover. John 18: (28- Then the Jews led Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness the Jews did not enter the palace; they wanted to be able to eat the Passover). The discrepancy between of Bibles in respect of last supper and its timing resulted in difference in an essential point regarding the crucifixion case. Now if we adopt the narrative of (Mark, Mathew and Luke) it means that Jesus had eaten the Passover with his disciples in Thursday evening, and little later on, in the same evening of Thursday, he was led/captured. As such, the crucifixion took place on Friday. But if we adopt the narrative of (John), it would mean that Jesus was led on Wednesday evening and the crucifixion took place on Thursday. So, did the crucifixion take place on Thursday or Friday? Where is the Bible that was revealed by Allah to Jesus? Where is the Bible of Jesus himself? The four Bibles we have involved discrepancy in almost each incident and each story. Why is there difference between texts and narratives from one Bible to another? If the present Bibles were really a pure revelation from Allah, they would be no discrepancy or difference, and would be one Bible only, not four. Paul Thessalonians1 .. (2:9- For ye remember, brethren, our labour and travail: for labouring night and day, because we would not be chargeable unto any of you, we preached unto you the gospel of God.) Where is the Gospel of God mentioned by Paul? He did not say the Bible of Mathew, Luke, Mark or John, but said the Gospel of God. i.e. the bible revealed by God to Jesus. Where is that Bible/Gospel? Paul says: (Romans 1: 16- For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek) Where is the Gospel of Christ mentioned by Paul? Now we have four well-known Bibles. Paul stated ranks for “Salvation” and mentioned only the Jews and Greek, but did not mentioned the other nations. We noticed that the word “Greek” is added by Paul himself, because it was not mentioned in the four Bibles. It is invented by Paul! What about the Italian, French and Spanish People? Would they have such salvation?! The lack of accuracy proves that it is man-made words and expressions.. it is from the mind of Paul hiThe era of writing the Bibles was full of falsification and alteration. At that time, any one could have claimed that he follows Jesus and tells that his words are inspiration from God, and that (Suddenly there came from heaven a sound like a mighty rushing wind, and it filled the entire house where they were sitting. 3 And divided tongues as of fire appeared to them and rested on each one of them. 4 And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance Acts 2: 1-4), and he will easily find followers, disciples, and supporters. mself, not a revelation from Allah. That alteration and falsification is evident in the statement of Paul (Galatians 1: 6- marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel 7- Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.) It is also evident in (2 Corinthians :11: 12- But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found even as we. 13- For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ) But, is there a Bible other than these Bibles that can be deemed as reliable “reference or origin” for the Christians? The four Bibles contained expressions or references to certain gospel that is attributed sometimes to Jesus as Son of God, and sometimes attributed to God and sometimes attributed to the Kingdom of God. In Matthew 4: 23(And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, ….. ) In Mark 1: (14- Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, 15- And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. ) Paul (Romans 1:9- For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers. It is clear that there is a Bible other than the four Bibles .These Bibles were not there when Jesus talked about such bible/gospel. The four Bibles were attributed to their writers; so, we say Mathew’s Bible, Luke’s Bible .... etc. but the afore-mentioned Bible/Gospel was expressly attributed to Jesus..

1) Anointing Jesus’s body with spikenard:- (Mark 14: 1 After two days was the feast of the passover, and of unleavened bread: and the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might take him by craft, and put him to death. 2- But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar of the people. 3- And being in Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, as he sat at meat, there came a woman having an alabaster box of ointment of spikenard very precious; and she brake the box, and poured it on his head. 4- And there were some that had indignation within themselves, and said, Why was this waste of the ointment made? 5- For it might have been sold for more than three hundred pence, and have been given to the poor. And they murmured against her). (Mathew) mentioned this incident in (26: 6-9) and also Luke (7: 36 – 39 “And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat…..“) and (John 12: 1-6). The discrepancy between the Bibles: Place of incident: a) In the house of Simon the leper (Mark & Mathew). b) In Pharisee’s house (Luke). c) In the house of brothers Lazarus, Mary and Martha (John). Who is the woman? a) Unknown (Mark & Mathew). b) Sinner woman (Luke). c) Believing woman i.e. Mary the sister of Lazarus (John). What did she do? a) She anointed Jesus’s head with spikenard. (Mark & Mathew). b) She anointed his legs with pure nard (Luke & John). Reaction of onlookers: a) They had indignation for wasting anointment (Mark). b) The disciples were indignant (Mathew). c) Pharisee wondered whether Jesus knows who and what sort of woman touching him, (Luke). d) Judas Iscariot was indignant for wasting (John) 2) Preparing Last Supper:- Mark: 14 (12 And on the first day of Unleavened Bread, when they sacrificed the Passover lamb, his disciples said to him, “Where will you have us go and prepare for you to eat the Passover?” 13 And he sent two of his disciples and said to them, “Go into the city, and a man carrying a jar of water will meet you. Follow him, 14 and wherever he enters, say to the master of the house, ‘The Teacher says, Where is my guest room, where I may eat the Passover with my disciples?’ 15 And he will show you a large upper room furnished and ready; there prepare for us.” 16 And the disciples set out and went to the city and found it just as he had told them, and they prepared the Passover. 17 And when it was evening, he came with the twelve.) Matthew : 26: (17 Now on the first day of Unleavened Bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Where will you have us prepare for you to eat the Passover?” 18 He said, “Go into the city to a certain man and say to him, ‘The Teacher says, My time is at hand. I will keep the Passover at your house with my disciples.’” 19 And the disciples did as Jesus had directed them, and they prepared the Passover. Here we observe the following:- There is difference between (Mathew) and (Mark) regarding the story of preparing for supper: 1) Mark: He sent two disciples to prepare the supper. 2) Matthew: He made all disciples prepare the supper. 3) The writer of the verse No. (Mark 14:17 when it was evening, he came with the twelve) knows nothing about the journey of the two disciples mentioned in the verse No. (14:13). Should he knows the content of such verse (14:17), he would surely have written (He came with the Ten), instead of (the twelve) i.e. verse (14:17) should be read as the following: (And when it was evening, he came with the ten).