固定されたツイート
三六
3.1K posts
三六 がリツイート
This is hydroseeding, a practice used around the world to grow grass quickly.
In the past, China-haters used footage of this being done in China and claimed China was painting itself green for publicity.
This is how derranged the haters actually are. They will lie about ANYTHING if they think it will make more people dislike/fear China.
If someone only posts rac!st or hateful content about China, question why, and do a little research.
English
三六 がリツイート
三六 がリツイート
holy shit, the BBC just edited the passage from their anonymous "Iranian source" and removed the begging for being left without electricity, water and being nuked to death. So they admitted to fabricating the quote without any formal correction. This is utterly insane
English
三六 がリツイート
We went from “free Iran” to “kill their whole civilization” really fast…
English
三六 がリツイート
@Bulvarpress Ben olsam çocuğa Çin Seddi’ni neden yaptınız diye sorardım
Türkçe
6 yaşındaki Çinli bir çocuk, İngilizce pratik yapmak için sokakta birine yaklaştı.
Konuştuğu kişinin Türk çıkmasıyla sohbet Türk dondurmasına döndü.
Türkçe
@nxt888 Official investigation into the USS Vincennes' captain cleared him of wrongdoing, as he interpreted radar data to believe that the Iranian airliner was an Iranian F-14 Tomcat attacking the Vincennes. Iran had previously damaged the USS Samual B. Roberts through mining.
English
"An accident."
Interesting word choice, Andrew.
The Vincennes was not in the Strait of Hormuz by accident. It was there because the U.S. Navy was actively operating in Iranian territorial waters during a war in which Washington was covertly backing the other side.
It was not an accident that the U.S. was arming Saddam Hussein while he used chemical weapons on Iranians.
It was not an accident that the Reagan administration gave Iraq satellite intelligence to strike Iranian positions.
It was not an accident that the U.S. was running Operation Praying Mantis against the Iranian navy in the same theater, in the same period.
The Vincennes was not there by coincidence. It was part of a sustained U.S. military operation against a country that had not attacked the United States.
Iran Air 655 was a scheduled commercial passenger flight.
It was squawking civilian identification codes.
It was climbing.
It was in Iranian airspace.
290 people were killed because the U.S. military was operating aggressively in a theater it had no right to be in, against a country it was already covertly at war with, and then shot a civilian airliner.
Now tell me: what country gives its military commanders medals for accidents?
Not accidents they tried to prevent and failed.
Not accidents followed by accountability, investigation, apology.
This accident. This specific one. With 290 bodies.
The U.S. government reviewed what happened, considered the evidence, and decided Captain Rogers deserved an honor.
Legion of Merit.
That decision is the statement. Not mine.
The U.S. government made it. I am just asking you to look at it directly instead of reaching for "Iranian threats" the moment someone asks you to.
You are defending the medal.
You just do not realize it because calling someone a shill is easier than facing what your own government chose to reward.
Andrew E. Harrod@AEHarrod
@nxt888 Please stop using horrible tragedies in dangerous circumstances to shill for brutal dictators. I remember the news about the Vincennes. @jihadwatchRS @BRyvkin @InfoAgeStrategy @CalFreiburger
English
@Apocalypse_Hi @Danyixia どこの国だろうと悪い人は必ずいるし、凶暴な犬も必ずいます。全世界の人に中国が嫌われている現状をあなたは知らないんですか？もちろん中国人にも素敵な人は沢山います。私もその人達の事は好きです。でも中国人によって困ってる人が沢山います。だから私は中国という国が好きではありません。
日本語
三六 がリツイート
While calling Iranians "crazy bastards," Trump is actually the very manifestation of Einstein's definition of insanity: bombing Iran got Hormuz closed, bombing it harder isn't exactly the way to get it reopened 🤷♂️
In fact if anything I suspect it strengthens Iranians' resolve:
English
三六 がリツイート
This Japanese dude was "shocked" when his UK international school daughter felt "ashamed to be Japanese" after learning about the Nanjing Massacre. He held a family meeting and tried to convince her it was exaggerated Chinese propaganda.
This is a big slap in the face to those
English
三六 がリツイート
You notice you never see the West push the Gulf states to be democratic countries. They only bully African countries to adopt democratic philosophy so they can have puppets in place.
English
三六 がリツイート
The UK controlled Iran's oil for decades getting 84% of the profits.
When Iran tried to take it back in 1951
The CIA & MI6 launched a coup.
They overthrew democracy, restored the Shah, and secured the oil.
That's the real history they don't teach.
English
三六 がリツイート
You said Hồ Chí Minh "chose war."
Let me reconstruct the timeline so we're working from actual events rather than impressions.
1858: France begins military conquest of Vietnam.
1887: France formally establishes French Indochina.
1945: Hồ Chí Minh declares Vietnamese independence after Japanese occupation ends.
1945: France announces its intention to recolonize Vietnam.
1946: Hồ Chí Minh negotiates in Paris. Signs preliminary agreements.
1946: France shells Haiphong. Kills six thousand civilians. Occupies Hanoi.
1954: Vietnam defeats France at Điện Biên Phủ. Geneva Accords mandate national elections.
1956: United States prevents the elections because Hồ Chí Minh would win 80 percent.
1965: United States begins massive military escalation.
1975: Vietnam wins.
At which moment in that sequence did Hồ Chí Minh "choose war" in the sense that implies a peaceful alternative was available and he rejected it?
The French chose war in 1946 when they shelled Haiphong.
The Americans chose war in 1956 when they cancelled the election.
The Americans chose war again in 1964 with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. The attack that justified it was fabricated. They knew. They escalated anyway.
Hồ Chí Minh responded to wars that were brought to his country.
For over a century, from 1858 to the end of the American war in 1975, Vietnam was a country being fought over by foreign powers.
The question is not why Hồ Chí Minh chose war.
The question is why you describe as a choice something that was, for the Vietnamese people, simply the condition of existence under colonialism.
Jim Krepelka@KrepelkaJim
@nxt888 Ho chi minh was a communist first everything else 2nd. Old man was drunk on power didnt care how many people died. He could ve been like Aung San gradually negotiated. Or like Fidel Castro only declare socialism win after the revolution. Ho Chi Minh refused to wait chose war.
Română