👑Cryptkpr
43.7K posts



For those who think Coinbase was “unaware” of Epstein’s investment…they 100% were aware. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ FRED EHRSAM (Coinbase Co-Founder)- Hey guys - wanted to check in as you said you'd be back yesterday. BRAD STEPHENS (Blockchain Capital)- I apologize for the lack of communication - Jeff was in a full afternoon board meeting yesterday. Brock is working with his EA to ideally find a time for you two to meet today. We will be back to you shortly. FRED EHRSAM- Ok. I have a gap between noon and 3 PM today, but again, not crucial for me, but would be nice to meet him if convenient. Is it important for him? 🎯🎯🎯

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 Email forwarded by Brock Pierce to Epstein directly from Brian Armstrong from Coinbase giving investors monthly updates. In this monthly report, Coinbase announces their Series C funding which Epstein can be seen partaking in, in the quoted post below. Epstein was scheduled to speak directly with Coinbase Co-Founder, Fred Ehrsam, regarding this Series C funding round. And the wheels go round and round.

Third straight year of losses - totaling an astronomical $210.8 billion (with a B!) - and this guy is supposedly the “steward of the public’s money.” And to think the judge won’t even let us look into him! wsj.com/economy/centra…


White House leaves social media users befuddled by pair of cryptic videos trib.al/IyYfO0K

Hey David, how did we arrive at a place where the Big Banks have a veto over the business practices of their more innovative new competitors? I’m frankly not interested in whether the Big Banks like yield on stablecoins or not. Unlike the Big Banks’ fractional reserve model, stablecoin issuers must retain 100% high-quality, liquid reserves under the GENIUS Act. The fractional reserve banks introduce systemic risk, stablecoin issuers do not. The Big Banks are permitted to pay interest on deposits. Stablecoin issuers should likewise be permitted to pay yield to their customers. There is no logical counter argument. The idea of barring yield on stablecoins is transparently nothing more than pure protection for legacy banks from competition. That’s unAmerican and anti-capitalism. What am I missing?


We’re taking a more proactive, AI-driven approach to strengthening XRPL security. That includes AI-assisted testing across the development lifecycle, a dedicated red team, and higher standards for how changes are evaluated before they go live. As XRPL scales to support global payments, tokenized assets, and institutional use cases, our goal is to continuously strengthen its reliability. The reality is the work of building secure, reliable financial infrastructure is never done. More in the post ↓













