Indubitable Dave
26.4K posts





#Breaking: Manitoba will ban youth from using social media and AI chatbots, Premier Wab Kinew announced on Saturday. The proposed law protecting youth from the harmful effects of social media will be the first of its kind in Canada. cbc.ca/news/canada/ma… #mbpoli



#AMAD Meeting No. 4 April 21, 2026 45th Parliament, 1st Session Re: Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada (MAiD) -Eligibility of Persons Whose Sole Underlying Medical Condition is a Mental Illness parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Harmony/en/Pow…

Suisse : doublage en français par IA (l'original en allemand fait foi) de la conférence organisée par des avocats suite au choc de la révélation du contenu des contrats signés avec Moderna. "Lors de cette conférence de presse organisée par l’Alliance pour une Suisse libre (ABF Schweiz), des juristes analysent les contrats rendus publics conclus avec Moderna et Novavax – et en tirent des conclusions de grande portée. Parmi les points abordés figurent notamment : * les dispositions en matière de responsabilité à la charge de la Confédération * l’absence de garanties quant à l’efficacité et à la sécurité * les conséquences politiques et juridiques possibles Andrea Staubli (avocate, modératrice) Rémy Wyssmann, avocat et conseiller national (UDC) Philipp Kruse, avocat LL.M."

🚨Update🚨 Supportsean.ca



Early Western Settlers in Canada were required build a home, and break at least 30 acres of land (create farmland) each year for 3 years, or they did not get ownership of the land No one was given the land for "free" they had to pay for it and contribute to retain ownership


Glad to post this update and now a court victory in this matter: @JeffEvely @JCCFCanada

Good news lives here. 💙 Explore Our Ottawa—the 2025 archive page is home to more than 110 positive stories from last year, highlighting heroism on and off duty, community impact, kindness, and service. ottawapolice.ca/en/news-and-up… Have a heartwarming story or a positive interaction with an Ottawa Police officer? We want to hear it. You could be featured on Our Ottawa 2026. Share your experience: ourottawa@ottawapolice.ca Let’s fill social media with stories of kindness, connection, and community. 🚓 #ourottawa ~ Les bonnes nouvelles sont ici. 💙 Découvrez *Notre Ottawa* — la page d’archives 2025 regroupe plus de 110 histoires positives de l’an dernier, mettant en lumière l’héroïsme en service et hors service, l’impact dans la communauté, la bienveillance et le dévouement. ottawapolice.ca/fr/news-and-up… Vous avez une histoire touchante ou une interaction positive avec un membre du Service de police d’Ottawa? Nous voulons vous entendre. Vous pourriez être mis en vedette dans Notre Ottawa 2026. Partagez votre expérience : notreottawa@ottawapolice.ca Remplissons les médias sociaux d’histoires de gentillesse, de liens humains et de communauté. 🚓 #notreottawa




Review of Sean Hartman's Autopsy Found COVID-19 Vaccine was Cause of Death Cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough @P_McCulloughMD reviewed this case and determined this young boy indeed died of fatal vaccine myocarditis. M. Nathaniel Mead, Jessica Rose, William Makis, Kirk Milhoan, Nicolas Hulscher and Peter A. McCullough. Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH & INNOVATION. Jan-Mar 2025, VOL. 3, ISSUE 1, pp. 1-43, DOI 10.61577 ijcri.2025.100001 reseaprojournals.com/journals/cardi…



BREAKING: Ontario Court of Appeal Dismisses Lawsuit Over Teen Sean Hartman’s Death Following COVID-19 Vaccination. In a significant decision released today, the Hartman v. Canada (Attorney General) ruling was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal, dismissing a lawsuit brought against the federal government over the death of a teenage boy following a COVID-19 vaccination. The court found that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and agreed with a lower court decision to strike it in its entirety. The case was brought by Daniel Hartman, whose 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, died in September 2021. Sean, who had been described as previously healthy, was found dead beside his bed 33 days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Following the vaccination, he had been taken to hospital due to symptoms his father believes were related to the vaccine. Sean’s father, Dan Hartman, says his son chose to get vaccinated so he could continue playing hockey, as vaccination was required for participation in many sports and activities at the time. Hartman’s lawsuit alleged that federal officials, including the Minister of Health, were negligent in approving, promoting, and monitoring the vaccine, and that they acted with reckless indifference or wilful blindness to potential risks. The Court of Appeal acknowledged the devastating nature of Sean Hartman’s death, describing it as a tragic loss for his family and community. However, the judges concluded that the legal claims could not succeed. Central to the ruling was the finding that the federal government does not owe a private duty of care to individual members of the public when making broad public health decisions during a pandemic. Instead, such decisions are made in the interest of the population as a whole, often requiring difficult trade-offs that may carry risks for some individuals. The court also determined that the claim failed to establish the necessary elements for misfeasance in public office. Specifically, there were no material facts showing that government officials acted in bad faith or knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct that would likely cause harm to Sean Hartman. The judges noted that the clinical trial data referenced in the lawsuit supported the conclusion that the vaccine was highly effective, undermining the argument that officials knowingly promoted a harmful or ineffective product. In addition, the court found that the public statements cited in the claim were directed broadly at Canadians and did not create a specific relationship or obligation toward Sean Hartman as an individual. As a result, there was no legal basis to establish the proximity or duty of care required for a negligence claim. Shockingly, the court also claimed that allowing Hartman’s case to proceed could have broader consequences, including discouraging governments from making urgent public health decisions during emergencies due to fear of legal liability. The Court of Appeal further upheld the lower court’s decision to deny leave to amend the claim, finding that the proposed changes would not have addressed the fundamental legal deficiencies. The judges emphasized that lawsuits must be based on clearly pleaded facts, not on the possibility that supporting evidence might emerge later. Ultimately, the court concluded that while the circumstances surrounding Sean Hartman’s death are deeply tragic, the law does not support holding the federal government liable under the claims presented. The appeal was dismissed, bringing the case to a close, with no costs awarded to either side. The Canadian Independent spoke with Dan Hartman by phone this evening. He said he is “seriously considering” taking the case to the Supreme Court and that he and his legal team will evaluate their next steps over the coming week. Hartman noted that the cost of taking the case to the Supreme Court could exceed $20,000. He added that he does not want to ask those who have already donated to his cause to contribute further but said, “What other option do I have?” Dan believes the courts are not willing to find the government liable or hold it accountable, as doing so would amount to an admission of wrongdoing. He also argues that such a finding would make his larger lawsuit against Pfizer significantly easier to pursue. If you want to donate to Dan’s legal fund, you can do so at the link in the comments section.









