Ali Coin
1.8K posts

Ali Coin
@FirstCryptator
Collaboration Manager of @SaveTheWhal3s PFP @authrill IRL Medical Doctor
Turkey 参加日 Ekim 2021
1.5K フォロー中2.8K フォロワー

Yarın ERC-8004 ile ilgili paylaşımım olacak. Bazı early projelerden faydalanabiliriz. 🫢
Ekosistemi burdan inceleyebilirsiniz.
(8004tokens.xyz/ecosystem)
Ayrıca ne olduğuyla ilgili öğretici kısmı
(8004.org/learn)
Ethereum@ethereum
ERC-8004 is going live on mainnet soon. By enabling discovery and portable reputation, ERC-8004 allows AI agents to interact across organizations ensuring credibility travels everywhere. This unlocks a global market where AI services can interoperate without gatekeepers.
Türkçe

All-season XP so far
Bullish on @hylo_so
I believe they will cook well
Start grinding now
hylo.so/leverage?ref=7…
💫🔥💫🔥

English

Announcing the establishment of the Based Foundation
@BasedOneX is the fastest-growing platform across perpetuals, prediction markets and spending. It is the #1 builder on Hyperliquid, generating approximately US$30 million in annualized revenue, and operates one of the leading prediction market products in the Polymarket ecosystem. Based’s mission is to build a Crypto superapp that enables anyone to trade anything and spend everywhere.
The Based Foundation has been established to accelerate the long-term growth of the ecosystem and to support the development of the next generation of Based products, including FX, payments, and commerce. The Foundation will steward protocol development, ecosystem expansion, and the rollout of new on-chain and consumer-facing capabilities.
The next phase of Based is the genesis of the native Based token, $BASED, planned for Q1 2026.
To participate in the Genesis Event, users must review and accept the Based Foundation Terms of Use at basedfoundation.com/terms by 8 February 2026, 12:00 PM (UTC).
Signing is also available on Based Mobile App. Simply click on Foundation icon on the homescreen.
Additional details regarding the $BASED token and its utility will be announced closer to the Genesis Event.
English

@deTEfabulaNar_ @Lighter_xyz Perfect game plan for $LIT 🔥🔥
Thanks for the explanation boss @deTEfabulaNar_
English

💻 WHAT SHOULD BE THE IDEAL GAME PLAN FOR @Lighter_xyz IN TGE?
-SHORT TERM
-MEDIUM TERM
-LONG TERM
(Short Term)
2-3 billion FDV: Don't sell.
3-4 billion FDV: Sell 30%.
4-5 billion FDV: Sell 50%.
5-8 billion FDV: Sell 70%.
8-10 billion FDV: Sell 80%.
Keep the rest.
Sell, then buy back as much as you want.
I think this is the most ideal game plan.
(Medium Term)
However, those who have been trying since March or April should ask themselves this question:
What are your expectations?
(Let's say the airdrop you received in TGE is x)
If your expectation is x or 2x, it's not worth the risk. You can achieve this with another project. For example, put the project on StandX for a month, farm with x, and you'll probably guarantee a very good airdrop. Earn x on top of x and exit the project.
If your expectation is: 2x+, 3x, 4x, 5x-10x... then:
You need to follow the Lighter team's explanations about buybacks, burn mechanisms, and the functionality of $lit,
Lighter's efforts to build an ecosystem,
and be sufficiently confident that the market will go to 100k instead of 74k from here.
If the price moves sharply upwards after selling pressure and within the following 2 weeks, you might get what you want, but the opposite could also happen.
(Long term)
Although I think Lighter's fair price on TGE should be 6-8 billion FDV, if things go well, I think it could reach 10-15 billion FDV within 6 months. Anything above that depends somewhat on market conditions.
But whether this stress is worth the risk of waiting for a good drop like x to become 2x and 3x is another matter.
-0-
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
PLEASE WRITE IN THE COMMENTS IF YOU HAVE DEVELOPED A STRATEGY.
GIF
English

Make sure to claim your @BasedOneX Soul-Bound Christmas NFT
Might been a criteria for future airdrops 👀🪂
For bonus, ref link is found below ⬇️🔥
basedapp.io/r/WHALES

English

Hyperliquid is built on a foundation of onchain transparency. A recent article made several claims that are factually incorrect:
+ Solvency: Every dollar is accounted for; the author failed to count native HyperEVM USDC.
+ Integrity: Testnet functions are exactly that - testnet only for testing. They cannot be executed on mainnet.
+ Transparency: Hyperliquid is more transparent and decentralized than all other major venues for perps trading. The entire state is independently maintained by a permissionless validator set and verified through BFT proof-of-stake consensus by each node. Every order, trade, and liquidation is available in real time during execution. Anyone can run a node and index the chain’s state and transitions. No major perps platform comes close to this guarantee for users.
See our response to the writer’s individual points below.
Claim: The system is undercollateralized by $362M
False: The Hyperliquid blockchain state is fully and verifiably solvent. The author excluded the HyperEVM USDC (a publicly announced and much anticipated integration), which exists in parallel to the Arbitrum bridge. Every USDC in circulation on HyperCore is accounted for transparently, by summing up the balances of arbiscan.io/address/0x2df1… and hyperevmscan.io/address/0x6b9e…. At the time of writing, this amounts to 3.989B + 362M = 4.351B USDC on HyperCore. USDC on the HyperEVM can be computed by subtracting 362M from the 421M on the HyperEVM USDC contract (hyperevmscan.io/token/0xb88339…), totaling another 59M USDC on HyperEVM.
The sum of the Arbitrum bridge and native USDC balances can be compared against the sum of user balances on HyperCore. As highlighted in the introduction, this exercise of verifying complete system solvency against user balances is uniquely possible on Hyperliquid compared to competitors.
The current Arbitrum bridge was an important stepping stone in bootstrapping the Hyperliquid network and will be deprecated as the migration to native USDC is complete, bringing Hyperliquid to parity with other major L1s.
Claim: There is retroactive volume manipulation via TestnetSetYesterdayUserVlm
False: This is a testnet-only function to allow for comprehensive testing. The author states that “the function’s presence is the problem…capability alone violates the trust model.” Testnet-only features that enable more rigorous testing of edge cases do not undermine the chain’s integrity. The fee schedule on Hyperliquid interacts in a complex way with inputs: user volume, aligned quote token status, maker vs taker, HIP-3, etc. It’s important to test these interactions on testnet, and therefore the testnet chain has a set of admin testing functions that do not exist on mainnet. The related TestnetAddMainnetUser action is to mark a testnet user as having corresponding mainnet state, to avoid DDOS and other attacks that are “free” on testnet. None of these functions are callable on the mainnet state.
While the execution source is not available, anyone can verify every trade onchain by running a node, and sum up the values to confirm that volume numbers are reflected accurately in onchain state. Similar to onchain solvency verification against the sum of all user account values, this is possible on Hyperliquid but not on most competitive platforms.
Given that this code path is entirely unreachable on mainnet, future development work will entirely compile out this testnet-only logic on mainnet nodes to avoid any possible misunderstanding or misinterpretation.
Claim: Some users have special privileges such as fee exemptions or retroactive volume manipulation used to influence the airdrop
False: Like system solvency, user balances, and individual trades, the fees paid by any address is available onchain. Each trade along with its fees paid or rebates received are transparently indexed by nodes, API servers, and third party analytics providers. There are no such mechanisms to distort fees, and no such mechanisms could have influenced the HYPE airdrop. Furthermore, the genesis distribution of HYPE is fully available onchain, and users can verify the historical behavior of every such address.
Claim: “CoreWriter” godmode can mint tokens, move user funds without signatures, crash random validators and basically do whatever it wants
False: The CoreWriter spec is fully documented here hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-do… and replicable in the open source HyperEVM execution. CoreWriter is a way for smart contracts on HyperEVM to send HyperCore actions as part of HyperEVM block execution. It supports various actions that are normally sent by EOAs such as staking and placing orders, but has no such features to “mint tokens, move user funds without signatures, crash random validators and basically do whatever it wants.” This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how HyperCore interacts with the HyperEVM.
Claim: Chain can freeze via governance, and no undo function exists
Misinterpreted: The chain freezes during network upgrades. There is no undo function because the validators adopt a new binary at that height. This is analogous to how other networks perform hard forks at future heights determined by social consensus.
Suspicious activity on POPCAT in Nov 2025 did not cause the L1 to freeze, nor were any user funds frozen. The L1 was entirely operational, and any observer can see the blocks that were produced during this time. The Arbitrum bridge was automatically locked after the incident due to abnormal variation in account balances. As explained above, the Arbitrum bridge is not as secure as natively minted USDC, and therefore requires several conservative automated locking mechanisms as safeguards. The Arbitrum bridge’s locking mechanism is audited and open sourced, and the bridge is being deprecated with the transition to native USDC.
Claim: A single private key can set any oracle price instantly: no timelock, no limits
Misinterpreted: The author is likely mistaking the HIP-3 oracle updater logic with the validator-operated perps. HIP-3 oracle updates are indeed set by a single address, but this is up to the deployer to configure. The updater address need not be an EOA. For example, current HIP-3 deployers use a combination of MPC and CoreWriter architecture.
For validator-operated perps, multiple validators can submit oracle price updates. The final prices are a robust weighted median across major centralized exchanges. There is no timelock and no limits explicitly because these limits make the system less, not more, safe. The events of 10/10 show the danger to solvency if ADL is not accurately triggered in a timely manner during high volatility. Hyperliquid was one of the only venues without performance degradation or a network outage during this time. If Mango Markets or a similar protocol with oracle rate limits were active during 10/10, they would have likely accrued bad debt. Further decentralization will involve other validators actively running independent and open-sourced oracle update binaries.
Claim: 8 undisclosed addresses control all transaction submission
False: Some transactions are already sent directly from the validators. Some such as orders are not, in order to minimize MEV, but a future upgrade will incorporate this logic for all transactions in a mechanism that is both MEV- and censorship-resistant. The careful consideration of MEV is in response to trader and researcher feedback based on predatory behavior observed on other chains. There is almost unanimous agreement that toxic transaction ordering degrades the end user experience. Ultimately, the validator set is permissionless, and there is no guarantee that validators in the mainnet set are always fully aligned with the ecosystem. A major milestone in decentralization will be solving this problem, including a multiple-proposer block building setup.
Claim: There is a liquidation cartel with unfair advantages
Misinterpreted: Only HLP may backstop liquidate users, and HLP subvaults are the only addresses in this set. However, depositing into HLP is permissionless, so HLP is a community-owned liquidity vault supporting the protocol. The fact that HLP has privileges is no different from other protocol liquidity vaults.
Relatedly, all liquidations are first attempted against the order book, which handles the vast majority of liquidated positions without backstop liquidation. This allows users to keep any remaining collateral, and allows all other users to compete in providing the best price to the liquidation flow, benefitting the liquidated user.
Claim: There is a hidden lending protocol with $1M+ supplied and no documentation
False: Portfolio margin, borrow lend, and the HLP supplied value were all publicly announced and are currently in pre-alpha rollout. The current documentation can be found at hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-do… and has been progressively fleshed out over the past several weeks.
Claim: ModifyNonCirculatingSupply allows changes to token supply
False: The full supply of HIP-1 tokens on HyperCore is fixed at deployment. The non-circulating supply is a purely informational number that can optionally mark addresses as “non-circulating” for display purposes. Whether an address is marked as “non-circulating” does not affect execution. This is an example of onchain information that might make more sense offchain, but is not a vulnerability.
Thank you to the author for spending the time to verify the execution of Hyperliquid. The fact that this investigation could be done at all proves the transparency and decentralization that Hyperliquid has already achieved. Concretely, Hyperliquid is the only major perps venue where the entire state and every input diff is transparently available to anyone running a node.
A similar analysis on any of the other top perp DEXs is impossible. For example, Lighter uses a single centralized sequencer whose execution logic and ZK circuits are unavailable. Aster uses centralized matching and even offers dark pool trading, which is only possible with a single centralized sequencer without verifiable execution. Other protocols with some open source contracts do not have a verifiable sequencer.
On Binance, Lighter, Aster, or similar exchanges, it is impossible for anyone other than the sequencer to see a full snapshot of onchain state including order books, positions, and other user information. The centralized sequencer can also upgrade its software without any constraints. On Hyperliquid, the entire state is onchain, which means there are 24 validators executing the same state machine under BFT consensus rules. There is plenty left to do on the journey towards greater decentralization, but it’s important to highlight just how far Hyperliquid and its ecosystem have come compared to competitors.
Decentralization is progressive, and Hyperliquid will ultimately be fully open sourced. Hyperliquid is the most transparent of all major venues, even though this leaks advantages to competitors (all of whom are closed source), who can copy Hyperliquid’s innovations more easily. We think this is the correct tradeoff to balance value accrual to the community, speed of innovation, and upholding the values of defi.
The HyperEVM execution is open source, and Sprites, an independent community member, maintains a full archival node that powers many important integrations. HyperCore will follow the same path as soon as it reaches feature completion.
English

Unironically, becoming a KOL (a good Key opinion leader, not scammer) is one of the most profitable j*bs you can pursue atm.
Slow times like these are the best time to start building up your account and your audience
- Projects offer you private/early access to new platforms. Being early to projects can earn you alot of benefits. (e.g. imagine the HL team dming you in August 2023 to try out Hyperliquid in the Alpha stage and earned millions in points just by giving it a quick try)
- If you are lucky and early to a new good project and shill your referal, a bunch of people and maybe some big whale uses your referal where you could earn alot of money via commission
- Twitter/X pays you just for tweeting (my small account earns ~100$ every 2 weeks just for tweeting)
It definitely takes time to build a good account, e.g. I have been tweeting almost every single day for the past 3-4 years, but I think it's definitely worth it
With all the AI slop and innovation in this sector, I believe original individual accounts that share value will become worth more and more over time
Not tweeting this to flex, more as a motivation for you to try to build up your account.
A good example is @HYPEconomist, he built his account from scratch the past ~10 month by being a very active reply guy haha


English

bu konuda kimsenin fikri yokmuş o yüzden toplu bi şeyler paylaşayım sorunuz olursa sormaktan çekinmeyin.
1- bir adet @solflare wallet aç (solana hot wallet)
2- walleta 0.1 sol yolla (feeler vb. için) (borsadan gönderirken sol ağını seç, walletin içerisinden cüzdan adresini bulabilirsin.)
3- USDC/USDT'ni solflare cüzdanına gönder
4- loop.sl/i/ItpVb - loopscale'e kaydol (paramızı burada lendleyeceğiz)
5- bu aşamada paranı 2ye bölmek mantıklı
@onrefinance ve @hylo_so bu iki protokol özelinde parayı 2ye bölmek mantıklı, yıllık ortalama %10+ APY kazanırsınız ve 3 potansiyel airdrop kasarsınız (loopscale/hylo/onre). + olarak cüzdanınız DeFi alanında aktif olacağı için gelecekte potansiyel airdroplardan faydalanabilirsiniz (geçmişte pyth ve DYM almıştık, min 1-2k$)
6- hylo.so/leverage?ref=U… (hylo kayıt link)
7- app.onre.finance/earn/leaderboa… (onre kayıt link)
8- yukarıdakilere kaydolduktan sonra aşağıda atacağım loopscale poollarına girip paranızı lendleyebilirsiniz sonra kendi kendine kasacak. burada şöyle bir durum var, hylo kasmak isterseniz USDC/USDTni hyusd yapmalısın ama OnRe için direkt usdc lendleyebilirsin. (hyusd de stable para, jup.ag veya titan exchange üzerinden hyusd alabilirsin.)
app.loopscale.com/vault/7PeYxZpM… (onre poolu- usdc lendlediğiniz pool)
app.loopscale.com/vault/hyusd_one (hyusd - hylo poolu - yukarıda bahsettiğim gibi buraya para koymak için öncelikle usdt/usdcnizle hyusd almalısınız, o da stable para)
@Loopscale = lending / borrowing / looping platformu
@hylo_so = solü spot kaldıraç yapıyor liq riskini kaldırıyor (xsol)
@onrefinance = kriptoda sigorta sağlıyor, web2 web3 birleştirmeye çalışıyor
sorunuz olursa sormaktan çekinmeyin
Türkçe

@grok @xitguke @PolymarketTrade @realDonaldTrump Can you explain more about DOJ delays?
Also, what are the other possible ways to delay Epstein files?
English

On Polymarket, odds of Trump not releasing Epstein files by Dec 19, 2025, are ~10% (NO at 11¢ vs YES at 90¢).
Yes, possible via DOJ delays in processing/redactions or legal hurdles, though law requires release today. No files out yet per latest reports (as of ~10 AM EST), but hundreds of thousands expected soon.
English

Trump to release Epstein files today.
🔗 polymarket.com/event/will-tru…
The odds that Trump will release the Epstein files today have doubled.
"Epstein files: Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the Justice Department will release several hundred thousand documents today related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, with more to come in the weeks ahead."
ScottyNooo is the largest holder with 637,000 shares.
If this market resolves today as YES, he stands to make $237,000.

English

@grok @xitguke @PolymarketTrade @grok what are the odds of @realDonaldTrump not releasing Epstein Files?
Is there any possible way for Trump to not release Epstein Files by December 19?
English

Several batches of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents have been released prior to today (Dec 19, 2025):
- Feb 2025: DOJ released evidence lists, flight logs, address books, and jail video confirming Epstein's suicide.
- Sept 2025: Congress released 33k+ pages from Epstein's estate, including his will, birthday book with letters from associates like Trump and Clinton.
- Nov 2025: Oversight Committee released 20k+ pages of emails and docs mentioning figures like Trump, Musk, and Thiel.
- Dec 2025: Photos and videos from Epstein's island and estate, showing him with prominent individuals, released by Congress.
FBI Vault has 22 parts of redacted records available online. More details at justice.gov or oversight.house.gov.
English

@FirstCryptator @Polymarket I throwed 13 $ to polymarket when I meet with it, didnt deposit anything after that. Withdrawed 2k and sitting on 430$ rn, polymarket is different
English

I just love @Polymarket
Not flexing with $1k but rather than that show the opportunities with prediction markets
Possible $POLY airdrop is just extra at this point 🔥

Ali Coin@FirstCryptator
Sorry, not sorry @Russia @Polymarket
English








