固定されたツイート
MθθΣK
5.8K posts
MθθΣK
@ImMoosking
I'm being controlled by a comically small alien in a mech suit.
参加日 Aralık 2019
707 フォロー中344 フォロワー
@ludwig1651 @shrugdeaIer Show me when SpaceX successfully launched crew to the Moon and back
English
@ImMoosking @shrugdeaIer historians are calling it the worst aged tweet of all time...
English
Artemis II is a great reminder that we still don’t need Elon for literally anything.
English
@ludwig1651 @shrugdeaIer How did the spacex moon mission go? Oh wait....
English
@shrugdeaIer the toilet broke and their emails couldn't get sent out because of microsoft outlook
trump has already said they're using elon next time
you fucking lost, hard
English
@ImMoosking @esjesjesj @Fred_Blurst Interesting, I'd never heard of that. Is there an article or anything I can read about that?
English
Artemis II has been by far the most popular bipartisan thing he’s ever done so of course he wants to fuck it up
FactPost@factpostnews
Donald Trump has proposed cutting NASA science funding by 47%. This would be the largest single-year budget cut in the agency's history.
English
@CoyoteCoils @esjesjesj @Fred_Blurst They had begun talks on moving it to a Lunar flyby before the Trump EO. IIRC towards the end of Obama's term EM-2 was gonna do a lunar flyby and EM-3 would be the one doing the asteroid rendezvous
English
@ImMoosking @esjesjesj @Fred_Blurst Not to defend Trump, but the Artemis program was established under him. Obama's plan was to do an asteroid rendezvous with Orion instead.
English
@esjesjesj @Fred_Blurst The idea of Artemis 2 doing a Lunar flyby dates back to the Obama admin.
English
@Fred_Blurst I mean he was president when it was first planned
English
MθθΣK がリツイート
@GraviosLover @IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Apollo 1 is not mentioned in the graphic.
Also yeah. It cherry picks things. That's the point. The original cherry picks things as well.
English
@ImMoosking @IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Apollo 1 is actually mentioned in the image as well, it's one of two failures of the Apollo program.
However, the image does heavily cherry pick things - it specifically uses Laika whilst ignoring that she launched with Sputnik 2, which had scientific instruments and transmitted
English
@czljp @IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme It doesn't matter if the station habitation module itself works fine; if you fail to get any crew to and from the station it is not a successful station. Nobody has gone to Salyut-1 and lived to tell the tale.
English
@ImMoosking @IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Well, Salyut was a success, albeit on the second attempt.
Soyuz was the issue.
English
@IlPredestinAyo @ZaaggyPiep @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme The distinction on whether the mission was successful or not very much changes that fact. You don't see Americans parading around and bragging that they launched the first space tourist on Challenger in 1986.
English
@ZaaggyPiep @ImMoosking @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Doesn't change the fact that it's the first space station ever
English
@IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme I would call having at least one crew visit the station and live to tell the tale as a success.
English
@ImMoosking @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Depends on what you call a sucess. Soyuz WAS a Space Station that allowed mankind to stay in Space for more than a few hours. The fact that they died during entry changes nothing about the fact that it was a successful space station.
English
@IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme The result of Apollo 1 did not change the fact that the US was first to the Moon. The result of Soyuz-11, however, does change things. With the exclusion of Salyut-1, the title of "first successful space station" goes to the US.
English
@ImMoosking @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Both image include first man on the moon for USA. Apollo 1 is from the same program and had a direct impact on the achievement of Apollo 11 so it would only by fair to include it according to your own logic
English
@bunnicage @Cushmanvi @bahakirlidokme The whole space race was both sides extending the finish line until one of them couldn't reach it. Unless, of course, you'd like to argue that the NAZIs won the space race in 1944
English
English
@bunnicage @Cushmanvi @bahakirlidokme Yeah it's called May 1961. US stated they wanted to go to the Moon and the Soviets responded by starting their own Moon program.
English
@Cushmanvi @bahakirlidokme was there some big get together i missed where they established that the moon was the finish line, cause from here it just looked like the USA extending the finish line over and over
English
@IlPredestinAyo @GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme The only reason the death of Soyuz 11 is included in this response is because the OP listed Salyut-1 as one of the Soviet achievements.
English
@GbaDfff @bahakirlidokme Pure american propaganda. Why not mention the death of the Apollo 1 crew during TRAINING for example ?
English
@Dusk_Writerr @ZayJspx @DanteNotAlmeida @memeticsisyphus You're not talking to those 'Eurosnobs' you're talking to me
English
@ImMoosking @ZayJspx @DanteNotAlmeida @memeticsisyphus And there were no cries of outrage from Eurosnobs who are afraid of getting their hands dirty until the orange guy blew up infrastructure. Clearly the principle matters way less than hatred of the orange guy.
English
Iran straps children to stop American bombs while its leaders hide under mountains.
Open Source Intel@Osint613
WATCH 🔴 Iranians form human shield at Kazeroun power plant ahead of Trump’s threatened strikes.
English
@DanteNotAlmeida @memeticsisyphus They are not valid military targets. That is the whole point.
English
@memeticsisyphus >notice it's illegal to deliberately kill civilians in war
>stack a bunch of civilians on top of your valid military targets
>enemy is legally not allowed to win the war
English
@banksysfather @hashjenni Trump has not been quiet about Artemis what universe are you from
English
