Mark

37.8K posts

Mark

Mark

@JonesMarkLB

New Jersey, USA 参加日 Kasım 2019
177 フォロー中194 フォロワー
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)
That's not what it means. The 14th amendment could have said that you were subject to *ONLY* US jurisdiction. It didn't. Subject to jurisdiction means can we apply laws to you. Easy litmus: * Do we have a right to arrest and detain you if you break a law? Yes = you're subject to our jurisdiction currently.
Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec

"Subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" means those who have primary allegiance to the United States and not a foreign power The 14th Amendment does not apply to foreign citizens on US soil and never did

English
57
21
204
17.7K
Mark
Mark@JonesMarkLB·
@myonlinetrust @gearboxphilly @CaveatLector you don’t seem to even remotely comprehend the topic that you’re trying to discuss. “Subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means you are subject to the laws of the United States and can be punished by the U.S. government for breaking those laws.
English
1
0
0
15
Mark
Mark@JonesMarkLB·
@gearboxphilly @CaveatLector @myonlinetrust @adamscochran “commit an act that is criminal in a foreign country, you can be charged, arrested, prosecuted for, even if the act itself is not criminal in the foreign country” is the act criminal in the foreign country or not? Make up your mind.
English
1
0
0
22
Atomixion
Atomixion@Atomixion2·
@JonesMarkLB @gynepareidolia @marcorandazza nobody would ever say "not included are my mom, mother, or mama." you know it and everyone else knows it. nobody talks that way. thats not how english works. you're playing stupid for shitlib internet points or because you're a botfarm account.
English
2
0
0
37
Mark
Mark@JonesMarkLB·
@Atomixion2 @gynepareidolia @marcorandazza ….what difference do you think that makes in the sentence? foreigners who are families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the US government aliens who are families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the US government
English
1
0
0
22
Atomixion
Atomixion@Atomixion2·
@JonesMarkLB @gynepareidolia @marcorandazza there would be no reason to list them separately if that were true. "not included are this, this, this or this." hes not saying "not included is this said three differennt ways, this aka this aka this." Thats why the word *or* is there. it's basic english.
English
1
0
0
66
Mark
Mark@JonesMarkLB·
@ClayTravis Clay are you just discovering that China and the United States are different countries with different laws?
English
0
0
2
8
Clay Travis
Clay Travis@ClayTravis·
An American citizen’s baby can’t become a Chinese citizen by being born on the soil of China. Can anyone explain why a Chinese citizen’s baby should be able to become an American citizen by being born on the soil here? It’s absolute insanity.
English
3.4K
7.7K
38.4K
1.1M
Mark
Mark@JonesMarkLB·
@CaveatLector @myonlinetrust @adamscochran …let’s simplify this for you. do you think you are subject to arrest by the U.S. government while in a foreign country for breaking a US law?
English
2
0
0
37
Caveat lector!
Caveat lector!@CaveatLector·
@myonlinetrust @adamscochran > born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction thereof just means born in the US and in the US It doesn't, though. US citizens REMAIN subject to US jurisdiction even when they're not "in the US", just like for pretty much every other country.
English
2
0
2
74
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick@ReichlinMelnick·
Because that’s not true. “Subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excludes a narrow set of children whose parents are NOT fully under U.S. jurisdiction: - Diplomats (diplomatic immunity) - Native Americans (Quasi-sovereign nations) - Occupying soldiers (U.S. gov not in control)
Marc J. Randazza 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🇧🇷@marcorandazza

why not just write it without the highlighted text, if it means the same thing with or without the highlighted text?

English
10
48
246
15.2K