A. S.

387 posts

A. S. banner
A. S.

A. S.

@LoCtrl

...

参加日 Kasım 2016
448 フォロー中2.1K フォロワー
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@echetus That entire section of online dipshits who revel in deepitudes like his avatar would suggest is such an intellectual cesspool
A. S. tweet media
English
0
0
8
228
Stakeholder Consultant
Maybe the Russian high command is exhibiting the same disregard for the lives of common soldiers they’ve shown since the dawn of time. Or maybe… the Ukrainians are doing “The Most Dangerous Game” with POWs
Stakeholder Consultant tweet media
Melian Refugee@escapefrommelos

two things that “radicalized” me about this useless stupid war: 1) these videos are often posted with masturbatory glee 2) the victims are always uniformed but very often unarmed and without helmets… almost like they’re PoWs who have been released and hunted on video for sport

English
17
5
230
10.9K
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
I would agree with certain philosophers (?) that Straussians are cultish pseudo-intellectuals if it weren’t the case that there are powerful ideas open discourse around which is deliberately suppressed.
English
0
0
1
124
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
Why do base jumping when you can do drunk driving instead?
English
1
0
1
116
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason Is California correct or not? I think yes, because (1) cougars formerly had a massive range, (2) fragmentation of populations is how extinction “creeps up” to non-migratory species that are sparsely spread out.
English
1
0
0
35
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason Santa Monica population is in a way irrelevant. It is not protected as a unit *because* it is a unit. It is protected because it is of a larger whole (genetic pool) which California deems to be more important than federal authority does. We can argue about that separately.
English
2
0
0
54
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason Actually yes considering that cougar range formerly covered almost entire continental US.
English
1
0
0
75
Mason
Mason@webdevMason·
@LoCtrl In green are the animals that qualify for protection under CESA. Do cougars meet that definition?
Mason tweet media
English
1
0
0
247
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason If a species is listed under CESA in California then it is by definition not a Least Concern species in California, which makes the premise of your question invalid. See, i can play language games too!
English
1
0
0
32
Mason
Mason@webdevMason·
@LoCtrl Sure do, and no Least Concern species "goes extinct" when a miniscule population dies off. So again, why are any cougars protected by the California Endangered Species Act, which explicitly only protects species and subspecies?
English
1
0
1
39
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason Literally the animals currently living in Santa Monica mountains. A population. Not a subspecies. Not a species. Do you know what a population is in genetic terms?
English
1
0
0
44
Mason
Mason@webdevMason·
@LoCtrl What is a Santa Monica cougar? If it's just a cougar that is currently in Santa Monica, extinction is definitely not a concern, right?
English
1
0
1
41
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason Do you understand the genetic rationale a conservationist might have for preventing Santa Monica cougars from going extinct that is apart from the “omg a subspecies” rhetoric?
English
1
0
0
43
Mason
Mason@webdevMason·
@LoCtrl Do you understand that the California Endangered Species Act doesn't protect animals that aren't threatened or endangered, regaedless of the unrelated merits for doing that?
English
1
0
1
34
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason They want Monica mountain lions to share their genes with others. Genetically if that were to happen, it would *prevent* - not enable - Santa Monica cats from becoming a distinct subspecies.
English
1
0
0
33
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason No absolutely not. In fact the actual reason for protection (and also for the bridge) is preventing genetic isolation while maintaining diverse genetic pool.
English
2
0
0
48
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason In fact if you want to know the actual reason these population are protected (biological/generic rationale) — i can tell you — just ask.
English
1
0
0
39
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason That is irrelevant. The distinct populations specified by CESA are protected *not* (and i emphasize *not* again) due to a makeshift invention of a subspecies as you repeatedly incorrectly claim.
English
1
0
0
38
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason You seem to assume that existence of California law implies that that law considers California mountain lions unique. It foes not.
English
1
0
0
48
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason Oh yes i do now. They are protected under it as a species — not as a unique Santa Monica subspecies that you imagine.
English
1
0
0
47
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@webdevMason Okay let’s spell it out like one would do for 6th-grader. There is a policy rationale and then there is rhetoric/writing in an article (often by ill-educated writers). You are responding to the latter not to the former.
English
1
0
0
46
Mason
Mason@webdevMason·
@LoCtrl At this point I just don't think you understand anything I've said. I don't know if it's an ESL issue or what, but I don't know how to explain that what I'm telling you is factual information, not my opinion.
English
1
0
0
50
A. S.
A. S.@LoCtrl·
@olivertraldi I would say yes; however what makes the above ideas special is also that they gained fast social validation on social media, something that LLM cannot provide almost by definition. Of course, in a future internet there may be LLM user accounts so…
English
0
0
1
51
Oliver Traldi
Oliver Traldi@olivertraldi·
Human writing involves generating these little ideas that frame human phenomena and orient us toward them in a specific way. Some examples: "sore winners", "shape rotators/wordcels", "celebration parallax", "longhouse". Have LLMs come up with any orienting concepts like these?
English
17
3
106
8.9K