Mac Davidson
2.7K posts


@MacDavidson1 @Hoodie_Milly @Wacketayy I would hope it would be more dangerous/an increased rate considering there's a larger population now lol than in the 1940-50s when they were put in law
English

Right on red is hilariously dangerous and should be illegal. I basically never do it.
ti 🚀✧*:・゚is seeing dnp!!@obviouslacking
just found out that americans can drive through a red light if you’re turning right and it’s clear, i’m fascinated
English

@Costa_Sarran @Hoodie_Milly @Wacketayy You're crossing two perpendicular crosswalks when turning in a 4 way intersection, dumbass.
English

@MacDavidson1 @Hoodie_Milly @Wacketayy The only way to hit a cyclist/pedestrian while turning right on a red is if they were crossing when not supposed to
English

@yarmiganosca @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema So when I described the shot as being "from her POV" you thought I must be talking about the shot with her in it.
English

@MacDavidson1 @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema I mean, it seemed pretty clear you're talking about the 3rd shot in this clip, but then you said you weren't. There's this incredible technology called "screenshots" that you could use at any point to clarify what you're talking about.
English

@Hoodie_Milly @Wacketayy So safe that implementing right on red increased pedestrian collisions by 60% and cyclist collisions by 100%.
English

@Wacketayy Right on red is actually so hilariously safe that often times id rather do it 3 times in a row over making even one single U-turn
English

@yarmiganosca @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema You can easily tell which one if you actually read the thread.
English

@MacDavidson1 @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema Which angle are you saying is spatially confusing? Watching this clip, I at no point have *any* difficulty understanding where the camera is.
English

@yarmiganosca @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema That's not the point of the 180º rule.
If
I
typed
like
this,
yes, you can read it, but it's more difficult and takes longer.
English

@MacDavidson1 @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema There's no shot in this clip where I'm confused about where the camera is & no shot in this clip that only makes sense because of a shot that follows it.
English

@heemeeraa Please tell me the quote is from a character's text message.
English

@MacDavidson1 @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema Like, I thought I was very clear that because of Shot 1, Shot 3 isn't remotely confusing??
English

@yarmiganosca @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema It kind of proves that it isn't very readable if you're having to use a subsequent shot to read where the camera was blocked in the previous shot.
English

@MacDavidson1 @ghostbums @PrimaryCinema Shot 1: you see the door, the wall, the pit, and her
Shot 2: you see door, the arm, the wall, the pit
Shot 3: you see her and the wall, but with roughly the same angle in Shot 1. You are very obviously in between the door and the woman.
English

@ghostbums @PrimaryCinema her POV, but nothing "set up" the next shot being a POV shot so for a brief moment, you don't know where you are. There are other POV shots later in this scene that are preceded by a closeup of her looking at something off-screen, so the jump to POV is less jarring.
English

@ghostbums @PrimaryCinema We didn't cut beyond 180º but it breaks the spirit of the 180º rule. We have two focal points, the door and the woman and the distance between them is the action of the shot. Instead of cutting to a view from the other side of the woman we cut in the middle of the action from
English

@solidshepard12 @SamHuseby Well the actual quote is "he's the hero Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now." Saying they needed Harvey Dent, someone with a face and a name and solves crime using the law instead of a hero like Batman, nameless, faceless, vigilante.
English

@justalexoki There was a lot of ones from the World Cup that I could only tell because the details of the events were different from what I had seen live.
English


@Jerseyaffairs This is not serious foul play. This is just a reckless challenge and deservedly got a yellow card.
English

@PoopFromDaButt The arms are excluded, but his head and torso aren't.
English

i do think since hands and arms are illegal in soccer that maybe the feet/legs should just be the measurable stoppage for offsides. considering that one dudes cock was offsides before the rest of his body
Arlo White@arlowhite
Again, what are we doing?
English

@AndreasCoenTDY This mischaracterization of what was said is just further evidence conservatives deserve nothing from academia.
English

"It's not happening and it's your fault that it's happening".
ape attack survivor@pissvortex
I know you guys hate hearing this but universities are open to a wide spectrum of viewpoints. Conservatives are just rarely capable of writing at an academically acceptable level. Sorry man. Stop begging for DEI hires
English

@saldyflower This should not provoke a service animal, and a service animal shouldn't be this hard to control. It's very clearly not acting as a guide dog. The woman is still using a cane and the dog is on a loose leash.
English

@hecubian_devil Shoulder to shoulder when the ball is in playable distance
English

@Cdhpgw9zghqap @socsoyboy In 1832 the plan changed to using it as a penal colony.
English

@socsoyboy We had a settlement until 1833.
English

Esto muestra la diferencia de poder. Nuestros veteranos tienen 63-64 años.
J. 🇭🇷@JosipFCB93
The Brits are inviting 90 year old Falkland War survivors in the studio to talk. Messi what have you done 😭😭😭😭
Español







