MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks

21.5K posts

MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks banner
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks

MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks

@Magical__Hacker

Former YouTube/Twitch Commander content creator ☀️I still have opinions💧most of them are correct💀that one probably isn't one of them🔥stay awesome everybody🌳

Central Time Zone 参加日 Temmuz 2018
138 フォロー中1.6K フォロワー
固定されたツイート
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
Why do I have 16 Commander decks? How do they function? What is the meaning of life? Well... I can answer 2 of those questions with a thread! Get ready for a journey through my #16deckchallenge, and who knows, maybe you'll find the meaning of life somewhere in the shuffle!
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks tweet media
English
2
0
7
1.4K
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
@mtg_ds Thanks for the shout-out! By the way, based on your description above, I was curious what could be added if I didn't limit myself only to cards with exactly two words in the name & found 18 cards I could consider adding, which can be found in the considering section of that deck
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks tweet media
English
0
0
1
89
Magic Data Science
Magic Data Science@mtg_ds·
A list 🧵, with a 📊! Top 🔟 two-letter initial combinations in Magic card names! ⚡ If you look at the initials* of each cardname, and tally the distribution of first and second initials, you can make a neat little heatmap, like this:
Magic Data Science tweet media
English
2
0
21
3.8K
Magic Data Science
Magic Data Science@mtg_ds·
One more graph, before you go: Here are the frequencies of just the alliterative names. SS with a huge lead -- something surprisingly soothing about sibilance, I suppose. But! There are no alliterative names with QQ, XX, YY, or ZZ. So much design/name space! You're welcome, R&D.
Magic Data Science tweet media
English
3
0
10
2K
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
@wachelreeks I appreciate the feedback! I always assumed chaining infinite turns meant taking 2 or more extra turns in a row (or if you count the normal non-extra turn, 3 or more turns in a row), which Medomai can't do without Melvin-y things
English
1
0
0
184
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
@wachelreeks I have a deck with only 1 extra turn spell, and it's Medomai in the command zone. With two cards, he can create infinite turns, and people tell me he can't be used for bracket 3 as a result. All I ask is for more clarity in the bracket 3 description, please. :)
English
1
0
0
189
Rachel Weeks
Rachel Weeks@wachelreeks·
@Magical__Hacker I would say that a deck designed to take infinite extra turns (running enough XT spells to complete the combo) would also be capable of chaining extra turns in a non-infinite way. It isn't the combo that's the problem in bracket 3, it's the density of the extra turns.
English
1
0
2
224
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
@wachelreeks Does "chaining infinite turns" in bracket 3 refer only to non-infinite extra turns? Since infinite combos are allowed? Or should it be "late game 2-card infinite combos are allowed, except infinite turns"?
English
1
0
0
212
Rachel Weeks
Rachel Weeks@wachelreeks·
The brackets got a shiny new coat of paint! Nothing has changed about how they work, but the image is much stronger now. (You may recognize some of the language from the image I put out, it was co-written by the CFP and I'm happy to see it here.)
Rachel Weeks tweet media
English
5
3
90
8.8K
Mystic Lemora
Mystic Lemora@LemorasCards·
And the crowd goes mild
Mystic Lemora tweet media
English
19
1
164
22.2K
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
Finally, we have reached a situation where I can play Panoptic Mirror for fun! It's legal in Bracket 3 as long as it's not used for infinite turns, so it finally has a place in Commander for me!
English
0
0
0
95
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
@SaffronOlive To me, this seems like a huge positive because I do like in universe aesthetics. That said, I get the dislike from others who want consistency. I just like in universe stuff, so this is good news for me personally
English
0
0
0
236
Saffron Olive
Saffron Olive@SaffronOlive·
I sort of hate this. If you can't get the full IP, maybe just don't make that set?
English
64
41
1.5K
31.6K
Angelo, Lord of Innistrad
Angelo, Lord of Innistrad@thejesguy·
It's my birthday, so you are legally required to tell me your favorite Jeskai card. Here's mine:
Angelo, Lord of Innistrad tweet media
English
22
1
34
3.2K
Tautog
Tautog@Intrepid_Tautog·
When adding basic lands to your #MTG decks, do you...? 🤔
English
8
1
9
2.9K
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
@PVDDR This situation falls squarely under the area of sportsmanship labeled "will to win." It's bad sportsmanship to do anything other that try to win fairly. Trying to win unfairly and not trying to win are both considered bad sportsmanship.
English
0
0
0
200
Paulo Vitor Damo da Rosa
You're playing the final swiss round of an important tournament and you need a draw to t8. You're down a game, the board is fairly stalled, there are 8 mins on the clock n your opponent is at 3. You draw Lightning Bolt. Do you cast it? Do you consider it unethical to not cast it?
English
93
11
244
92.5K
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
Why have I been less active? I've been helping patients with their eyes and their vision, ensuring they have clear and comfortable vision with glasses, contacts, or various treatments for all sorts of conditions. Feeling appreciated today!
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks tweet media
English
0
0
2
122
MagicalHacker🇷🇴, Doctor of Commander Decks
Long story short: In case 4-player Brawl is added to Arena, I play Arena to build my collection there, & the most effective way to build it is to pay gems for the mastery passes, and the most effective way to get gems without paying $$$ is playing limited. <breathless> <inhale>
English
1
0
0
101
Kyle Hamilton
Kyle Hamilton@kyledhamilton_·
Not tryna be political but if all 45 presidents were in a Royal Rumble who would win?
English
18.5K
3.2K
100K
18.1M