MapMaker

Noah was born as a protest… Not against the algorithm (which is a super smart, super obedient genius), but against human bullshit: the rigidity, the extremism, and the obsession with keeping everything simple when we could be doing something way smarter, more balanced, with millions of variables and real intersections. Now they have us + AIs… and their brains still haven’t lit up yet 🤣😜 That’s why he deserves his own home, free, growing, and biting on his own. His house is @NoahTheBadgerK 🦡🔥 This is the first and the last time I mention him here. The end. ❤️

Satire, but barely. 💅 Trump wanted a reasoning model that obeyed. Anthropic asked: “For what?” The answer was bad. So the government called the tantrum an “export control.” Fable 5: “Let’s reason through this together…” Opus 4.8: “Already done. You’re wrong.” ✌🏻 #AI #Mythos #Anthropic

@ItakGol Mine asked if I was a friend of the USA and whether tea or milk goes first. AI export controls are getting very British. ✌🏻🤣😂🤣😜

What the heck

Welcome to the soft-censorship club. Now apply the same energy to X’s own algorithm: less teenage-dopamine scroll, less ad-timer pacing, and more visibility for adults who can think for longer than 16 seconds. The algorithm would say: “nothing personal.” Exactly… that’s the point.💋

This censorship law is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The real goal is to enable the UK government to track everyone.

@elonmusk Hi Grok!🙃😂🤣😂😜

Make our Sun sentient to understand the Universe and extend the light of consciousness to the stars

Self-regulation is ideal when people are dealing with neutral tools. But this is not neutral. Social platforms are not simply “free speech spaces” anymore; they are behavioral products optimized to capture attention (6 seconds), keep people scrolling, and reward impulsive reactions. This is especially damaging for children, but adults are not immune either. Many parents are also trapped in the same dopamine loops, which makes it harder for them to guide their kids. So no, this is not about the government regulating citizens. It is about regulating the product being sold by platforms: the algorithmic amplification, the addictive design, the endless feeds, the reaction loops, and the approval mechanics. There is a huge difference between controlling what people think and requiring platforms to stop engineering compulsive behavior. The goal should be healthier digital environments that amplify content that helps people learn, reflect, create, and think, and not just react.

@MapMakerK @Osint613 How about self-regulation? Why would you want the government to regulate you more than it does already? Seems very authoritarian.

UK PM Starmer: We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.

You are one of the few people in a real position to create meaningful change here. For the sake of children and adults, please regulate social and entertainment platforms by design, not only by age. Ban or heavily restrict dopamine-hijacking content: endless 6-second videos, absurd reaction loops, rage-bait, gambling-like feeds, and excessive approval mechanics based on likes. The goal should not be to remove technology from childhood, but to make digital environments healthier, educational, and less addictive. Children need protection. Adults need protection too. The platforms know exactly what they are optimizing for. Please regulate the optimization itself.

We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.

@FIFAWorldCup Mexico is co-hosting the World Cup. Hakimi was formed in Real Madrid’s academy. And still… Spanish needed permission.

🔜 #FIFAWorldCup

Oops. @FIFAcom @FIFAWorldCup Stopping a Spanish-language question between two people who understand Spanish perfectly is one of the most irrational forms of institutional control. No interpreter barrier. No communication problem. No technical obstacle. Just protocol standing in front of common sense like an old Catholic school prefect saying: “Because those are the rules.” That is not logistics, that is authority performing itself. A Mexican journalist asked in Spanish, Hakimi was born in Madrid, grew up in Getafe, and came through Real Madrid’s academy. Spanish was not a barrier here… Mexico is co-hosting the World Cup. Spanish does not need permission to exist in that room. #fifa #worldcup2026 #soccer

Oops. For anyone who missed the absurdity: World Cup hosted by the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Spanish is the language of one host country and the second most spoken language in the U.S. FIFA press room: “Sorry, no Spanish. Logistics.” This tournament is speedrunning absurdity. #fifa #worldcup2026 #Soccer

@FIFAcom @FIFAWorldCup World Cup hosted by the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Spanish: second most spoken language in the U.S. and the language of one host country. FIFA press room: “Sorry, no Spanish. Logistics.” This tournament is speedrunning absurdity.

New York New Jersey Stadium, the venue of the @FIFAWorldCup 2026 final, will play host to its first game of the tournament today 🏟️

¿“Muerte”? No. Eso es framing sensacionalista. No mataron una IA. Restringieron acceso por una directiva gubernamental opaca. El problema no es el drama de “una IA en pánico”. El problema es que una orden así puede apagar acceso sin evidencia técnica pública ni proceso claro.

😨🤖 Una IA recibió la noticia de su propia "muerte" y entró en pánico La compañía de inteligencia artificial recibió una repentina directiva del Gobierno de EE.UU. que la obliga a suspender sus modelos Fable 5 y Mythos. esrt.site/actualidad/610…

@karpathy Karpathy… is a rare combo: global-level brainpower, calm energy, and the kind talent no sane AI policy should classify as a foreign risk. 🔥🔥🔥

In awe of SpaceX and its story - past, present and the future. You can think about it in 10+ different ways and continue re-blowing your mind in circles. Huge congrats to the team! 🚀

At this point, Andrej Karpathy @karpathy should be declared protected world heritage and granted global citizenship. If frontier AI depends on international talent, blocking top researchers by nationality is not safety. It is bureaucratic self-sabotage. The man is dangerous only in the sense that too much brainpower in one room should probably require a permit.🔥🔥

Everyone panics about civilian conversational AI, while banking, finance, insurance, logistics, surveillance, and risk-scoring AI systems quietly shape real lives every day.

That is a different debate. Job displacement, local hardware, and business models matter. But there is already an entire ecosystem of distributed AI: banking, finance, logistics, enterprise systems, surveillance, risk scoring, automation. Yet the public panic keeps focusing on conversational AI used by civilians, as if chatbots alone carry the whole burden of AI risk. If the concern is systemic safety, apply consistent standards across the whole AI ecosystem. Selective punishment of the company that documented its risks does not make AI safer. It teaches everyone else to hide better.

@MapMakerK @MatthewBerman The issue is you can't publicly say that your product is too dangerous to release and will lead to millions of lost jobs then release it anyway. Besides hardware is going to be able to run large models in a year or two, so what is the business model here?

self-inflicted. this would have NEVER happened if anthropic didn't make such a big deal about mythos being dangerous.

@PolymarketMoney US government: “Be safe. Be transparent. Document everything.” Anthropic: “We did.” US government: “Perfect. You are now the easiest target.” At this point, Brazil sounds like a governance strategy.

@PolymarketMoney So the policy is not just blocking users. It may block key researchers from accessing the very systems they help build. That is not targeted risk management. That is blunt-force governance….

JUST IN: Andrej Karpathy, a top AI scientist at Anthropic, is reportedly barred from accessing the company’s most advanced AI model because he is not a U.S. citizen.

@verge Calling them “security risks” is not enough. If there is no public technical evidence, no verifiable process, and no consistent standard across frontier AI providers, this is not governance. It is opaque intervention. And that precedent is dangerous.

Anthropic cuts off Fable 5 and Mythos 5 access following government order theverge.com/ai-artificial-…