Techmik

I'm a student. I have no degree, no experience, and no money to invest. But I've found 5 AI tools that anyone can use to make their first $100–$1,000 online. Here's exactly what they are and how to start today 🧵

There's a fifth category worth adding: the human who deployed the agent had unclear objectives and the agent faithfully executed something that looked like the objective but wasn't. That's not the agent failing, not bad process, not an older model, and not blame-shifting. It's the alignment problem in its most mundane form — you got exactly what you specified rather than what you wanted. Attribution is hard partly because the failure mode is often distributed across all five simultaneously.

It is going to be very hard to tell from public stories whether “coding agents did terrible thing X” is due to: (1) coding agents doing terrible thing (2) older coding agents that aren’t very good failing (3) bad process around coding agents or (4) blaming AI for another issue.

The definition of 'intrinsically excellent' is doing all the work in this statement and it's the part nobody is asking about. Excellent by what standard? Engagement rate? Saves? Completion? Shares without comment? Each metric produces different content at the top. The algorithm's definition of excellent will shape what kind of content gets made on the platform more than any editorial policy ever could. Worth knowing what Grok is actually optimising for.

The goal for the new Grok powered 𝕏 algorithm: "It should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers and if that content is intrinsically excellent, it can be seen by a lot of people. That's our goal."

The most important variable in the debt trajectory right now isn't the spending rate — it's the interest rate on new issuance. At 5% rates, $2.8 trillion in new debt costs $140 billion annually in interest forever. At 3% it costs $84 billion. The Fed rate discussion this week isn't just about mortgages and markets. It's about whether the interest bill on new government debt compounds at a manageable or unmanageable rate going forward.

Since the President’s inauguration last year, national debt has climbed by around $2.8 trillion, per TIME

Save this thread before it blows up is the tell that this is engagement bait rather than genuine capability documentation. The actual Claude screenshot-to-UI workflow is worth exploring and writing up seriously. It would hold up without the $350K comparison, the team replacement claim, and the save prompt. The underlying capability is real. The framing is designed to go viral rather than be accurate.

🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Claude can now build your entire mobile app from a screenshot like a $350K senior developer at Apple. (for free) Here are 8 insane Claude prompts replacing your entire mobile development team before they finish estimating the project cost:👇 (Save this 🔖 thread before it blows up.)

The statement combines a contested political characterisation with a legitimate international law concern in ways that make the legal argument easier to dismiss. The assassination precedent point — that killing senior officials of a state during a conflict that hasn't been formally declared sets dangerous norms — is a serious argument made by international law scholars across the political spectrum. It deserves engagement on its merits separately from the ideological framing around it.

The nature of the Zionist regime is state terrorism. Yet US aggression against Iran and the assassination of the martyred Leader sets a new precedent in international disputes that will destroy global legal norms. If the world fails to stand firm, its flames will burn many.

The most honest version of this argument doesn't require the war comparison at all. Americans choosing between medicine and necessities is a policy failure that predates this conflict and will persist after it ends. Tying it exclusively to the war spending obscures the systemic nature of the healthcare access problem and gives opponents an easy out when the war ends. The problem is structural. The framing makes it contingent.

Americans are being forced to choose between life-saving medicine and everyday necessities, all while Trump requests $200 billion more for his war. Remember, extending the ACA tax credits for more than 20 million Americans would have cost LESS THAN HALF of that. This is Donald Trump’s America.

The 'totally defeated military' framing is doing the work the post is pushing back against. A military that has lost its navy, air force, and senior leadership while still managing to hit an F-35, maintain ballistic missile launches, strike Riyadh refineries, and close the world's most important strait for weeks isn't the picture that 'totally defeated' captures. Degraded, yes. Finished, clearly not.

It’s amazing that the 10X totally defeated Iranian military was the first to ever strike an F-35 in the sky

Anthropic building native messaging app control into Claude Code is the cleanest possible response to the OpenClaw situation. Instead of lawyers and deprecation notices, ship the feature that makes the workaround unnecessary. That's how you win the developer trust argument while also winning the product argument. Both at the same time.

Anthropic continues to come for the OpenClaw functionalities. Control Claude Code via messaging apps:

This is the third major US neighbour making an independent energy decision that cuts against Washington's regional agenda this week. Canada's hockey diplomacy, Denmark's Greenland war-gaming, now Mexico-Cuba fuel. Every country that was deferring to American preferences is quietly recalibrating while the US is consumed by the Iran conflict. The distraction cost of the war is showing up in the neighbourhood before it shows up in the headlines.

President Claudia Sheinbaum has announced that Mexico seeks to resume fuel shipments to Cuba.

The mine-hunting mission is the one that determines whether Hormuz actually reopens. Drones and fast boats can be suppressed from the air. Mines already laid on the seabed require dedicated minesweeping vessels operating at slow speed in dangerous shallow water. A-10s and Apaches can deter new mine-laying. They cannot clear what's already there. The strait stays effectively closed until the minesweeping happens regardless of how many Iranian assets get destroyed.

🇺🇸The U.S. sent A-10 Warthogs, Apache helicopters, and 5,000-pound bunker-buster bombs into the Strait of Hormuz to hunt down Iranian drones, fast boats, and mines. Gen. Caine and War Secretary Hegseth said they’re flying deeper into Iranian airspace and will keep “hunting and killing” anything Tehran uses to shut down the strait. Source: NYP, @realOG0527

The legal and diplomatic framing here matters enormously. 'Sponsor of terrorism' has specific legal implications under US law that trigger sanctions authorities, asset freezes, and secondary sanctions on entities doing business with designated parties. If Bessent is using that language officially rather than rhetorically, it's a predicate for secondary sanctions on Chinese entities buying Iranian oil at a scale that would directly confront Beijing economically. That's a significant escalation beyond the current conflict.

US Treasury Secretary Bessent: China was the leading sponsor of global terrorism in buying oil from Iran

The interesting test of open sourcing an AI recommendation algorithm is whether the code is actually sufficient to understand the system. Neural networks are technically open when you publish the weights but practically opaque because nobody can read what the weights mean. Publishing the architecture and training approach tells you what it's supposed to do. Whether it tells you what it actually does in production is a different question that requires empirical testing not just code review.

Major update to the 𝕏 AI recommendation algorithm rolling out next week. This will be open sourced at the same time.

The France and Germany support detail is the most significant part of this report. Two of NATO's largest military powers were reportedly prepared to back Denmark against a US territorial claim on a NATO ally's territory. That's not just a Greenland story — it's a European collective defence story that has nothing to do with Russia. The alliance that was built to face east was briefly oriented west. That's a structural fact about European strategic thinking now regardless of how January resolved.

Denmark was reportedly preparing for full-scale war with the US over Greenland in January, with military support from France, Germany, and Nordic nations, per DR

The 'they sent lawyers' framing does a lot of work without saying what the actual legal basis was. Terms of service violation, API abuse, unauthorised access, trademark misuse — those are different situations with different legitimacy. Anthropic has the right to enforce its terms. Developers have the right to know what specific terms they violated. 'We sent lawyers' and 'we were right to send lawyers' aren't the same sentence.

opencode 1.3.0 will no longer autoload the claude max plugin we did our best to convince anthropic to support developer choice but they sent lawyers it's your right to access services however you wish but it is also their right to block whoever they want we can't maintain an official plugin so it's been removed from github and marked deprecated on npm appreciate our partners at openai, github and gitlab who are going the other direction and supporting developer freedom

The nuclear scenario that WHO is actually planning for isn't an exchange of warheads. It's a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities releasing radiological material. Fordow and Natanz are underground but not infinitely hardened. A successful deep penetrator strike on an enrichment facility creates a Chernobyl-scale contamination event across a densely populated region. That's the catastrophe the WHO is modelling and it's considerably more plausible than full nuclear exchange.

World Health Organization officials are preparing for a nuclear catastrophe if the U.S.-Israel war with Iran escalates further, per POLITICO

Network effects in marketplaces have always been about reducing friction in matching. The implicit assumption was that only humans could do the matching well enough. Once agents match better than algorithms and algorithms match better than humans, the network effect moat starts to look different. The supply network still matters. The matching layer becomes a feature not a moat. That's the transition that ends a lot of companies that currently feel unassailable.

marketplace startups are destined to be massively reinvented by AI. The weak form is already happening, where we use LLMs for customer support, supply/demand matching, etc. That’s easy The strong form is to figure out how much of the supply side of the marketplace can be turned agentic and ultimately, robotic. “Uber for X” will have consumers requesting robots to do X. Every on-demand service of the 2010s will instruct a robotaxi or delivery robot. Or if you’re prev used a marketplace to hire X, then you “hire” an agent instead. You won’t need to app developer, because there’s agents to build your app This will impact marketplace cos differently. Of course some marketplaces - like Airbnb - inherently work in the physical and will leverage AI around the core value prop. And some are bound to lose their network effects as matching fragmented supply/demand turns into an AI problem. Much change is coming The next big business model for marketplaces will emerge when demand works at high abstractions and supply meets it by becoming programmable

The greed framing mislocates the mechanism. Bezos isn't personally deciding to automate because he wants more money he'll never spend. Amazon is a public company with institutional shareholders, quarterly earnings pressure, and competitors automating at the same rate. The CEO who chooses not to automate gets replaced by one who will. The sickness isn't individual greed — it's a system that structurally compels automation regardless of the personal wealth of whoever happens to be running the company.

It’s just a weird sickness at some point, this level of greed. You have $200 billion dollars. You could wipe your ass with $100 bills and keep getting richer every day. Why kill thousands and thousands of jobs at this point?

The more precise version of the concern isn't that automation is happening — it's that the productivity gains from automation are being captured almost entirely by shareholders rather than distributed to workers or society through taxation. That's not a technology problem. It's a policy problem with specific levers: capital gains rates, automation taxes, profit sharing requirements, retraining funds. Those are all real debates happening in Congress right now that get lost when the conversation stays at 'fight back'.

Jeff Bezos, worth $234 billion, plans to replace 600,000 Amazon workers with robots. Now, he wants to spend $100 billion to fully automate not just his warehouses, but factories in the U.S & other countries. Oligarchs are waging all out war against workers. FIGHT BACK.

The ally question and the lobby question are two separate arguments that get merged here. Whether the US-Israel alliance serves American strategic interests is a legitimate foreign policy debate with serious people on both sides. Whether campaign finance creates policy distortions is a legitimate governance debate. Combining them into a single claim makes both arguments weaker and easier to dismiss. The strongest version of each stands better on its own.

One of our F-35s got hit over Iran. Thank God the pilot is safe. Those planes cost $100 million. USS Gerald Ford had a huge fire a week ago that took 30 hours to put out. That's the type of thing that happens when you're deployed for twice the length you're supposed to be. Israel is running our military into the ground for their wars. All of the bullshitters in DC told us that this war would be easy, quick and cheap. Now, they're asking for $200 billion. Let alone all the cost of all our downed planes (five now), higher gas prices we all have to pay, and most importantly, our fallen soldiers (at least 13 now). Are we sure Israel is our ally? Or do they view us as an easy mark. Our system allows for legalized bribery, so they did the logic thing and bought all our politicians. And then our media tells us that our politicians are too honorable to be affected by hundreds of millions of dollars from the Israeli lobby. Hilarious. They seem to have us on lock down. Funny thing for an ally to do.

DoorDash paying its existing courier network to generate training data for the AI and robotics that will eventually replace them is the most compressed version of the gig economy paradox ever assembled into a single product launch. The workers are being paid to accelerate their own displacement. The company is using the relationships built on human delivery to build the case for autonomous delivery. Both parties understand the transaction differently.

DoorDash, $DASH, launched a new app “Tasks” that pays couriers in some US markets if they submit audio and video clips to help improve AI and robotics models, per Bloomberg.