固定されたツイート
Only by consent of the governed has real meaning and power. No legislation without due representation.
English
Raquel Brodzinsky-Feigenbutz
12.3K posts
Raquel Brodzinsky-Feigenbutz
@RBF100101
My allegiance is to God first, then to the US Constitutional Republic. The supremacy clause is written into it for good reason!
参加日 Mayıs 2023
2K フォロー中480 フォロワー
Raquel Brodzinsky-Feigenbutz がリツイート
First, there is no need for race-based representation in Congress or government.
'Black people,' do not require 'black,' representation through a black elected official. That has not been remotely relevant for 60 years.
Second, no one is stopping black voters from voting for a black candidate. Pretending white voters won't vote for a candidate because they are black is racist nonsense.
Third, when given the opportunity to choose between a white Democrat and a black Republican, black Democratic voters do not prioritize racial representation. The entire argument is nonsensical political theater.
English
@JudiciaryDems Maybe you democrats are going to actually earn your votes for once. Every avenue of cheating is being closed off. Finally.
English
BREAKING: Senate Democrats push back on Trump’s executive order attacking vote-by-mail, citing hypocrisy, unconstitutionality, and misguided efforts by the Justice Department.
English
No. We are not a democracy. We are and always have been and always will be a constitutional republic. SCOTUS is doing its rightful job of holding you leftists at bay and preventing you from railroading our legal structure away. If you don’t like it here you are free to leave. But you do not have the authority to throw out our constitutionally-protected God-given rights.
English
SCOTUS is the assault on democracy and Black people.
Democracy Docket@DemocracyDocket
NEW: Following in Louisiana’s footsteps, Alabama tries to suspend its May congressional primaries to pass a new gerrymander before the midterms. Both states’ response come after SCOTUS ruled to make it far more difficult for minority voters to prove in court that a map is racially discriminatory. democracydocket.com/news-alerts/al…
English
No. We are not a democracy. We are and always have been and always will be a constitutional republic. SCOTUS is doing its rightful job of holding you leftists at bay and preventing you from railroading our legal structure away. If you don’t like it here you are free to leave. But you do not have the authority to throw out our constitutionally protected God given rights.
English
Supreme Court expansion.
Term limits for justices.
A binding code of ethics.
John Lewis Voting Rights Act.
Defend our democracy.
English
@hulsey_ryan @ArtCandee I wasn’t sure about that. If they’re fair then they’re already compliant with SCOTUS recent ruling and to your point there’s no need to redraw them. I’m sure the DOJ civil rights division will be reviewing them all to be sure.
English
@RBF100101 @ArtCandee You'd need to have racially gerrymandered districts to redraw them, and none of Georgia's districts are clearly gerrymandered in that way.
English
Some good news!
Republican Governor Brian Kemp says that Georgia will not redraw new district maps or cancel the state’s primary elections.
Cue the MAGA meltdown and a rant from Donald…
English
@GovernorVA Liar. 🤥. You only celebrate democrat Virginians. And we republicans will NEVER forget it.
English
On International Workers' Day, we celebrate the Virginians who power our economy.
I've worked to deliver for working Virginians: signing paid family and medical leave into law, investing in career training, protecting employees from wage theft, and raising the minimum wage.
English
@Marypoppinsass1 @ArtCandee Ummm no ma’am. The ruling means they must redraw their maps if they have been drawn based on race, regardless of what Kemp wants.
English
@RBF100101 @ArtCandee So they can redraw their maps if they want to
English
Correct. They are run by states within the boundaries of federal laws. Voting Rights Act ring a bell? States are not allowed to gerrymander based on race. And when the SAVE act passes voters will have to provide proof of citizenship and life, to vote. In every state. This was settled because of the civil war. States are not sovereign nations.
English
@RBF100101 @ArtCandee Sweetie, elections are ran by the states. It’s up to the gov
English
@JackPosobiec @IrinaSeptima A lot of us knew. We were censored and silenced. Natural selection is still at work. 🤷♀️
English
@sara_dillon No thanks. If you don’t like it here you can leave. But fyi my rights are not yours to throw away.
English
Our Constitution says nothing; we needed a nationwide movement for a new constitution. Our manner of installing judges is out of step with all other democracies. American legal academia doesn’t even grasp how terrible our system itself is.
Paul Gundlach@PaulSGundlach
This is specifically why we BEGGED people to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Now it has happened and yesterday's ruling just set us back another 75 years. 😡😢💔
English
@DarleneBreauxTX Really? Every single American citizen in this gerrymandered area still has their right to vote. You’re panties are twisted because democrats are going to have to earn votes for once.
English
The ruling in Louisiana v. Callais undermines civil rights and fair representation, weakening protections that communities have relied on for decades. It puts the Voting Rights Act, a cornerstone of our democracy, at risk.
ABC News@ABC
BREAKING: The Supreme Court has delivered a 6-3 decision limiting the use of the landmark Voting Rights Act. Read more: abcnews.visitlink.me/vqDLP1
English
@ML3democrats Respect is earned. And Hillary’s treason certainly didn’t earn my respect. Trust is also earned and she didn’t earn that either.
English
“A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT COULD STACK THE SUPREME COURT WITH JUSTICES WHO WILL RIP AWAY ALL OF THE PROGRESS WE’VE MADE.”—Hillary Clinton in 2016. Again she was right. She deserves to be respected
English
@naomirwolf We tried our best to warn them. But they didn’t want to listen to reason. Many of them still don’t.
English
Yes, we explained this at the time. Vaccine rolled out in 2021, trials not over til 2023. That’s what ‘emergency use authorization’ meant. We explained it and explained it
Meghan Murphy@MeghanEMurphy
So, everyone who got the Covid "vaccine" was just being used as a guinea pig in a mass science/bioengineering experiment, is that right?
English
This is the ‘break glass in case of emergency’ moment for American democracy. trib.al/ao9UDOt
The Democratic position has long been that neither side should gerrymander. It disrespects the opposition’s voters and allows lawmakers to insulate themselves from accountability.
But if Republicans insist on it, Democrats have no choice but to do the same.
The vain hope of many good-government liberals had been that charting a path toward mutual de-escalation just might entice Republicans to join them. But with Republicans openly threatening to maximize their own gerrymanders after the court ruling, such hopes of mutual forbearance are now plainly dead.
The Supreme Court decision on gerrymandering points in one direction only: Come 2028, Democrats have to declare a take-no-prisoners redistricting war on the GOP.
English
@alluringmedia Spoken like the truly economically inept. (That means incompetent in case your vocabulary is limited too.).
English
Bush destroyed Clinton's economy.
Obama fixed Bush's mess.
Trump destroyed Obama's economy.
Biden fixed Trump’s mess and now Trump has destroyed what Biden fixed.
The biggest lie that Republicans have gotten away with is that they are better for the economy.
English
Raquel Brodzinsky-Feigenbutz がリツイート
WHAT part does everyone not understand?
Covid was a gain of function lab created bioweapon with spike protein being a major aspect of the mechanism of harm but by no means all of it.
Covid shots are also a bioweapon. It literally is synthetic Messenger RNA (ribonucleic acid) that goes into your cells and provides instructions to make you a spike protein producing factory. It does not just go away, the shots have DNA contamination, and the pseudouridine insertions lead to frameshifting and aberrant protein production with their own problems.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Irene Mavrakakis, M.D.@IreneMavrakakis
The covid shot is a bioweapon and so is covid. They knew and now the world knows they knew! We have known for years that they knew early in the clinical trials that Covid shots were not safe, not effective, and did not prevent transmission. They knew they were harmful from the beginning. They gaslight the vaccine injured They demonized those who refused the covid shot
English
Raquel Brodzinsky-Feigenbutz がリツイート
Breaking news from the delivery room: Parents are quietly saying “No thanks” to the standard newborn protocol.
More moms and dads are declining the routine vitamin K shot, Hep B vaccine at birth, and the whole “just in case” bundle. Refusal rates have nearly doubled in recent years — and it’s not rebellion. It’s research.
When mom tests negative for Hep B and baby isn’t heading into a high-risk lifestyle on day one, many families are asking: Why poke a brand-new human with interventions they don’t fully understand in those fragile first hours?
This is **informed consent** in action. Parents protecting their littlest ones by questioning the script instead of blindly following it.
A quiet, powerful shift toward trusting our bodies’ natural design.
If you’re in the “do your own homework” camp, this one feels like a win.
English