Tim Raettig

New paper out @APA_Journals: we investigated the mechanisms causing dual-action benefits (in contrast to the more commonly observed costs). Our results point to two sources: differential inhibitory costs and semantic redundancy gains. psycnet.apa.org/record/2023-65…

@Prolific Hey Prolific, I am trying to get in touch with researcher support, but cannot reach the help center due to an error (SSL_ERROR_NO_CYPHER_OVERLAP). This happens on all my browsers and devices. Please help!

Thanks to @goetheinstitut for the great symposium on trust! Here's my talk for those interested :) youtu.be/Qs9Jzkx-3yQ

Gaze and face information interact when catching our attention. Thanks for the great collaboration @BreilChristina @DerRobrecht @DrTimWelsh Roxana Pittig and @RaettigTim!

Really interesting read if - like me - you only have a vague concept of how (viral) evolution works & affects things like transmissibility

Omicron thoughts from dark, Christmas London. TL;DR - Europe+World is facing the Omicron storm and it looks increasingly bad; and, obviously, the virus doesn't care about Christmas. Despite some serious response in the UK, this virus is replicating fast; more action likely needed

Beware: If you keep doing research long enough, your stimuli start to look like you. ;-) New publication with Laura Schmitz, Alan Kingstone, & @AnneBockler: "When eyes beat lips: Speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion" doi.org/10.1007/s00426…

@sTeamTraen Well, it's better than HauPrzFrvudUmmPemRi, I guess...

I think we have a winner for World's Worst Acronym 2021

@elhotzo Doch sicher, der Markt regelt das schon 🤭

MOment, kann man globale Krisen vielleicht gar nicht lösen, indem man darauf hofft, dass Einzelpersonen ihr Verhalten irgendwie schon ändern werden????

@vascobrazao What is this "Facebook" you speak of

@ChrisPolPsych @Xiaowen__Xu @NeilLewisJr @spicy_thai @Sakiera_Hudson did not know the word "chucklefuck". very appropriately, it will now forever be associated with Schimmack for me.

Well I just got blocked! All of that effort to engage in dialogue and this is the result. I respect the decision, lol, although I do like some warning when a person I've been tweeting with on my post for two days decides to pull out of a conversation.

@wgervais That man has some serious personal problems...

trying with "superpower" right now, but not seeing it...

Dear #rstats community: how do you perform G*Power-esque sensitivity analyses, given multiple within-subj factors and interactions?

@i_evangelidis btw I would highly recommend using a package like "ez" for convenience 🙃

@i_evangelidis Hi, "factor" doesn't check if something is a factor (that would be ("is.factor"), so it's possible Appeal_type is not a factor in the dataframe.

@dingstweets Spot-on. Thank you for this!

This tweet has been making the rounds as an example of open science proponents piling on female ECRs (the lead author of the paper). The most noteworthy thing about that discourse is how no noteworthy open science proponent who engaged, engaged the actual issue. 🧵