固定されたツイート
Ron
4.9K posts

Ron
@RonMcLaughlin2
Marine Fires/Reqs O assigned to the USN with ADHD. Postings are my own opinions and don’t represent the USMC's,DoN's or the DoD's positions or opinions.
参加日 Mart 2012
0 フォロー中1.9K フォロワー
Ron がリツイート

The ADM QD AD-1700 Riser is a game-changer for prism optics and red dot + magnifier setups. What’s your take on raising magnified optics? Lately, there’s been a growing trend with setups like ACOGs and ELCANs. Let’s hear your thoughts!
Quick tip: If your ELCAN isn’t securing tightly to your upper receiver’s rail, our riser can help. Its adjustable levers accommodate different pic rail thicknesses, ensuring a better fit and improved tension.
#freedom #American #americandefensemfg #manufacturing #usa


English

@DanielLDavis1 @19_forty_five slight correction, 155mm DPICM uses 2 bomblets. The only difference between the two is 1 has pre-scored body to improve frag and the other is loaded at the base of the projectile with a solid body to withstand both the shock of firing and pusher plate driven ejection.
English

Biden is sending cluster bombs to Ukraine. As seems to be the case every time we send a new weapon/ammo to Kyiv, some call it a 'game changer'. I've used them in combat & while they're quite good, they won't chg course of war. I explain why @19_forty_five 19fortyfive.com/2023/07/i-fire…
English

Devil dogs...looking to connect some allied colleagues with the MCDP 1-4 author team. Who was in on its creation? @AMDuncan0 @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC

English

@PHLexpat youtu.be/lJY_tzqL4ks actually one of the best open sources analysis of the PLA amphibious forces and the PLAN-MC I have seen

YouTube
English

@PHLexpat @AMDuncan0 @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC I am literally watching everyday how the post RET effort moving away from TLR produced by the RET.
The TLRs produced by the RET were what CD&I asked for, to include the ability to embark forces.
English

@PHLexpat @AMDuncan0 @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC So you need to look up the perceived uses for the PLA amphibious forces and why they differ from the PLAN-MC and their building of numerous expeditionary Bde equivalents.
English

@PHLexpat @AMDuncan0 @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC You actually have it backwards, the RET delivered what CMC wanted in the TLRs, the problem we are seeing now is "Big" Navy wants to gold plate and add survivability.
English

@AMDuncan0 @PHLexpat @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC Your snark and false belief does not change the fact the CONOPs being written and the equipping are exact opposite of what your believe them to be.
English

@minnie_mag @BrownellsInc The irons are moving with the part that is moving.
English

@AMDuncan0 @PHLexpat @OIECol @MAGTravF @WDMills1992 @BrianKerg @BA_Friedman @sean_thethinker @ian_tb03 @TECOM_USMC Please do, because defend was used in much of planning for GBASM and embarked was used for much of the planning for the LSM under the LAW program but since I did not see you at those RETs and OPTs you may not know that.
English

@minnie_mag @BrownellsInc Since the barrel is fixed and means of aiming are in the moving part, the movement has does not effect the precision or accuracy
English



