
⚖️⚖️⚖️Seek💫a✨star🚀
995 posts

⚖️⚖️⚖️Seek💫a✨star🚀
@RustyScupper7
aka cnici sarkasm aka xspptsux aka seekastar Cant Stop Won’t Stop


Hey Dr E @thedocespo, do you remember when Drew said the FINRA letters very valuable indications a resolution was coming or that he knows McCabe has blockchain in mind? Instead of focusing on "Book Entry" registration to get a sharecount it's always something else to focus on because he said it while manipulating the MMTLP community to support an open market resolution with so called guardrails. Guardrails that never existed in the first place because automation and algorithmic programing involved with all US securities especially when listed on the OTC Markets. Always ignoring the validation and authentication process of the underlying asset! (Series A Preferred). The art of Deception, Deflection, and Disruption continues...👇 from Drew and Crew!

Makes you wonder what is so special about the Deelay Nas Transcript from May of 2024. Whatever it is, somebody doesn't want the public to know until June of 2026. restructuring.ra.kroll.com/bbby/Home-Dock…

Hearing someone is massively offside short on $ABXX, likely a fund. SEC has layed down the hammer on shortsellers within @AnsonGroupFunds group before: sec.gov/enforcement-li… Escape route for the shorts: 1) hammer the stock, 2) private placement ( @JoshCrumb won't place them)

Normal shareholders do not behave like Drew, Michael, and S1 Gray. Coordinating deflection! I wouldnt be surprised if all 3 of these criminals are proxies or acting "locates" for short institutions. Set up to collect a premium to ensure all legacy obligation risk is minimal. No wonder they flip flop aliases and narrotive so often. They are professionals at what they do! They will befriend you with false intent and create fake interactions with shills that make them look like their defending shareholder concerns. They play the average person for a fool. Its time to wake the fuk up and see it for what it is! Deception!

⚖️ MMTLP / MMAT / TRCH / NBH William Kelly v. FINRA Court: U.S. District Court, District of Nevada Filing Date: March 26, 2026 👈 Filing: Plaintiff’s Response to FINRA’s Third Notice of Supplemental Authority ⸻ 🧾 Layman’s Breakdown (NLA) This filing is Kelly basically telling the judge: 👉 “FINRA is trying to win using cases that don’t actually answer the real question.” 🔑 The Main Argument Kelly says the case is NOT about whether FINRA was doing something “regulatory.” It’s about this instead: 👉 Did FINRA actually have the legal authority to do what it did? If the answer is no, then: 🚫 FINRA does NOT get immunity ⸻ ⚖️ Why FINRA’s Cases Don’t Help Them Kelly argues FINRA is citing cases from other courts (Texas, Connecticut), but: •Those courts used different legal standards •They never analyzed the key issue (authority vs. no authority) •They just assumed FINRA was acting within its role 👉 In simple terms: FINRA is saying “we’re immune,” but skipping the step of proving they were allowed to act in the first place ⸻ 🚨 The Big Allegation Kelly focuses on two specific actions: 1.Changing issuer-submitted data 2.Turning a temporary halt into a permanent shutdown (MMTLP deletion) 👉 He claims both were done without legal authorization ⸻ 🧠 The Strategy (Very Important) Kelly is forcing the court to decide this first: 👉 “Was this within FINRA’s delegated authority?” Only AFTER that can immunity even be considered. 💥 This blocks FINRA from getting the case dismissed early. ⸻ 🧨 Rolo Case – Not a Win for FINRA Kelly points out: •Rolo was dismissed without prejudice (meaning it can be refiled) •The court barely analyzed immunity •The plaintiff in Rolo actually called FINRA’s actions regulatory 👉 Kelly does the opposite — he says they were outside authority ⸻ 🏛️ Supreme Court Angle (Sneaky Strong) Kelly brings in a new Supreme Court case: 👉 You can’t act like a private company AND claim government immunity at the same time 💥 Translation: FINRA can’t “have it both ways” ⸻ 🔥 Big Picture Kelly’s core message: •No court has actually answered this question yet •FINRA keeps winning by avoiding the real issue •This court must finally decide it ⸻ 🎯 Bottom Line 👉 If the judge agrees FINRA may have acted outside its authority, then: 💥 Immunity could fall apart 💥 Case moves forward (no dismissal) dropbox.com/scl/fi/k3wpt5r…





MMTLP #FAFO #Veterans #1stAmendment 🔥 THREAD: New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) Takes the SEC’s Gag Rule to the Supreme Court, and YES, it connects to MMTLP. @annvandersteel @TheRobbCarter @cvpayne 🚨BREAKING: NCLA just filed a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the SEC’s unconstitutional Gag Rule. A rule that forces people to give up their First Amendment rights for life if they settle with the agency. This is a massive moment. Why does this matter? Because the SEC’s Gag Rule is designed to do one thing: 👉 Silence the people who know the truth about SEC actions. Forever. And if you’re in the MMTLP community, this should hit hard. You’ve lived the consequences of a system where the SEC can act in the dark, hide records, and avoid accountability while the public is left with redactions, denials, and silence. MMTLP exposed a simple reality: · When regulators can operate without transparency, investors pay the price. · When regulators can silence people, the truth never reaches the public. · The Gag Rule is the architecture that protects that system. In MMTLP, we’ve seen: • FOIA blackouts • Withheld factual records • A U3 halt with no explanation • 14 months of trading on a placeholder • Zero transparency from the agencies involved Now imagine adding a lifetime gag order on top of that. That’s exactly what the SEC does in settlements: “Sign this agreement, and you can never publicly dispute our allegations even if we were wrong.” That’s not regulation. That’s censorship. NCLA is right: The SEC should not have the power to silence Americans for life. And MMTLP proves why. When the public can’t hear from the people closest to the facts, the narrative belongs entirely to the agency no matter how incomplete or inaccurate. If the Supreme Court strikes down the Gag Rule, it won’t just be a First Amendment victory. It will crack open the wall of secrecy that has shielded the SEC for decades the same secrecy that has fueled the MMTLP transparency crisis. Sunlight is coming. Accountability is coming. And the era of regulators operating without scrutiny needs to end. MMTLP is the case study. The Gag Rule is the mechanism. The Supreme Court is now the venue. The fight for transparency is bigger than one ticker. It’s about restoring the public’s right to speak, to know, and to challenge government power. And that fight just moved to the highest court in the country. More to come! MMTLP remember, FOCUS. The SEC Can Silence You for Life youtu.be/_OhBoqGVdAA?si… via @YouTube


>>>🚧🛑WHOA...WHOA...WHOA!!! 🛑🚧<<< Did they really put that in WRITING?!?... YES,YES THEY DID!!! #FOIA #Receipts SEC/FIF FOIA Analysis 🔽🔽🔽 docs.google.com/document/d/1rG…




POLL RESULTS: 76.8% of North Carolinians say that property tax is a financial burden on their household budget. #NCGA #NCPOL






















