Snarky Sticky
425 posts
Snarky Sticky
@SnarkySticky
Housekeeping note: This account isn't responsible for emotional damage caused by publicly filed documents, discovery, transcripts, timelines, or screenshots.
参加日 Mayıs 2022
412 フォロー中155 フォロワー
@TeamFUKR @SnarkySticky This was the wrong code…
Here are the zoom codes &, the one at 4:15 will be at the one for the 4th session. 😉
English
I know a lot of people are outraged that Proctor wants to reschedule his deposition in the wrongful death lawsuit, originally scheduled for tomorrow. I get it. And I will not pretend this is some casual scheduling issue either. However, Karen’s newest lawsuit changes the stakes.
Her complaint needs Proctor to be more than a fired, disgusting cop. It needs him to be the bridge between vile texts and an alleged agency-wide conspiracy, planted evidence, corrupt prosecution, and a frame job.
That is a lot of legal weight for one fired cop to carry.
So if his attorneys want more time to prepare him, I understand why. This is sworn testimony. Every answer matters. Every inconsistency matters. Every “I don’t recall” matters.
And yes, he can invoke the Fifth in a civil deposition if a specific answer could reasonably expose him to criminal liability. Of course, the judge is still asking the right questions: When did counsel know? When was the other side told? Why could prep not happen today or this weekend? And where are the receipts?
English
Probably the same things that allow a lot of bad cops to get too comfortable:
bad supervision, weak accountability, old boys’ networks, and people looking away until it becomes impossible.
I have never defended that.
Fire them. Expose them. Investigate who knew what and when.
But that still does not magically prove Karen Read was framed, evidence was planted, every witness lied, every prosecutor joined in, and two entire departments became a murder conspiracy.
English
@SnarkySticky @friskytrtlluv97 What exactly do you think allowed those 2 cops to feel comfortable enough to speak freely like that, to get away with their shit for so long??
English
Breaking: Karen Read found 2 disgusting cops out of roughly 2,540 officers across two agencies and tried to turn that into her valiant effort to "conquer statewide corruption."
👮MSP: 1 out of about 2,500 = 0.04%.
🚔Canton PD: 1 out of about 40 = 2.5%.
👮🚔Combined: 2 out of about 2,540 = 0.08%.
✅Vile texts? Yes.
❌Institutional rot, planted evidence, and a murder conspiracy? Bless your lonely revenge-filled heart. 🖤🖤🖤
English
@SnarkySticky All the evidence I need I'm from here and know more than most
English
@Ninad0703 You are so right! Great. Two bad cops off the street. Now explain how that proves Karen Read did not cause John O’Keefe’s death. ’ll wait.
English
@friskytrtlluv97 I am not saying corruption stops with two cops. I am saying two cops do not prove Karen's BS. Good luck with your bridge.
English
@SnarkySticky If you think the corruption stops with these 2 cops I have a bridge to sell you. It's only $1,000.
English
@mart794665 I loved cracker jacks! Peeling the paper off the prize! Thanks for that memory.
English
@SnarkySticky Snarky
R U just trying to live up to your name 😉
U put a lot of nonsense but never any truths & never a single fact
Maybe adding the just
"Just Kidding"
would help so you don't look totally ill informed
English
If she admits that normal people think she may have gotten away with killing John O’Keefe, then the public story evaporates. It's a control move aimed at creating the impression of social consensus. "Everyone who meets me believes me." It also protects her victim narrative. She will only frame doubt as something that exists among the people who framed her.
English
“Every cop was involved” is not evidence. Name them. Show the acts. Show the documents. Show the common plan. Show how each person caused the specific legal harm alleged. Otherwise, you are doing exactly what Karen’s complaint does: Take vile conduct by 2 people and use it as a paint roller over entire agencies, unrelated cases, every witness, every prosecutor, and every inconvenient fact.
Bad cops should be exposed.
English
@SnarkySticky That is a stupid very misleading post... Every cop was involved most retired and dever quit after getting a cushy Boston gig. All involved in birchmore too
English
@Mtc0627Coakley Correct. One corrupt cop is one too many. That is why he was fired. Now explain how one fired cop magically becomes 2,500 troopers, an entire town department, planted evidence, corrupt prosecution, and a statewide frame job. I’ll wait, even longer, since I am a moron.
English
@commcenterpod @JulieCar94 But she says that his family knows what kind of person she is. And how generous she was with the time she allotted them.
GIF
English
Good time to revisit this.
Karen was pursuing Higgins, not the other way around.
I cannot imagine a more disinterested response than the ones he's gave her on January 23rd, the last time the pair spoke before the night of John O'Keefe's death. This was not a man so passionate about a woman he would contemplate murder.
Julie Carpenter@JulieCar94
DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.
English
@NoodleMom1983 He's 100 right. The conspiracy narrative was always absurd. The evidence did not disappear because Proctor and Goode turned out to be disgusting. Vile texts may prove vile texts. They do not magically prove planted evidence, a frame job, causation, or damages.
English
Dave Aronberg, former State Prosecutor for Palm Beach, Florida, remarks on Karen Read’s newest lawsuit. He says (I’m paraphrasing):
📌 The goal of the suit is PR to help her in her other suits.
📌 The defense’s conspiracy narrative was utterly absurd.
📌 There was/is a massive amount of evidence pointing to her guilt.
📌 Her lawsuit will eventually be dismissed.
English
I think she really believed they were going to “kill it” on live TV. Karen would perform brave victim.
Alan would perform as the victorious lawyer that got her off. Waters would perform serious civil rights counsel. The awful texts would become the whole story. Instead, the hosts asked normal questions, and the whole production started wobbling. Loved every second.
English
grok: explain this photo: Yes, the photo in that tweet is real. It's from summer 2024 (around late June/early July, during jury deliberations in the first trial). It shows Karen Read and her attorney Alan Jackson outside a Boston restaurant, captured by a bystander. Jackson has his arms around her in what looks like a close or playful pose, with others nearby (including someone taking a photo/video).Y
English
Why hasn’t Jackson walked away from this case? He is not considered a civil attorney. Right? What’s the appeal for Jackson?
What about Bohm case? Hard to believe that there are no other cases to defend in LA?
Is it the attention the KR case attracts or something else?
mabbe8@mabbe_8
Why would an innocent person need two lawyers to speak on the Today Show? There is no risk because of double jeopardy. If she was framed and acquitted what is she afraid of?
English