D Mart

@ma1ybe @Justice4OJOKFKR Well who is the child porn on the Internet for? Who do people think will be looking at it? Who would be acceptable to look at it? Its the wrong argument. Get it off the Internet.

not a drag queen, not LGBTQ, not a lesbian....A PASTOR.

@DefectiveMcToof @BrotherCounsel Have you read the full statute for Mass. Witness Intimidation? I am not sure how his charges are worded. Not sure if they apply to videos as well as in person. I am not seeing it as a first amendment issue—the statute is not specific though. So anything can go i guess

@mart794665 @BrotherCounsel Because he didnt threaten anyone 😂😂 he used his 1A to ask questions

As I said on my show today, it's both nonsensical and immature to assume that supporting someone's constitutional rights means I agree with everything they say or do.

@GeauxTgr66 @GlammaSooz @im_an_A_G @MafiaMasshole @WKnoxGrott @DBeck57030037 @Proctor4Gov At least the sound barrier was still hovering in place. 🙃 Which, of the many, timelines/testimonies are you working from?

@mart794665 @GlammaSooz @im_an_A_G @MafiaMasshole @WKnoxGrott @DBeck57030037 @Proctor4Gov The impact happened after Ryan and his friends left and Julie went back inside

For all the Antis @MafiaMasshole @WKnoxGrott @DBeck57030037 @Proctor4Gov @MamaLama43 ANSWER THIS: IF Karen was going 24 mph in reverse, she would have traveled at least 100 feet AFTER hitting the brakes. She would have taken out all vehicles in the driveway of 34 Fairview ********************** For a 6,000 lb vehicle traveling at 24 mph in reverse, the total stopping distance is approximately 80 to 95 feet on dry, level pavement. This total distance is the sum of the "thinking distance" (reaction time) and the "braking distance" (physical stopping of the vehicle).Breakdown of Stopping DistanceReaction Distance (~53 feet): Assuming a standard reaction time of 1.5 seconds, a vehicle moving at 24 mph (35.2 ft/s) will travel roughly 52.8 feet before the driver even hits the brake pedal. Braking Distance (~27–42 feet):On dry asphalt (coefficient of friction \(\mu \approx 0.7\)), a typical vehicle takes about 27.5 feet to come to a halt after the brakes are applied.For a 6,000 lb vehicle, while basic physics suggests mass cancels out, real-world factors like brake efficiency and tire load often result in a slightly lower deceleration rate (around 0.5g to 0.6g), extending this portion to 35–42 feet. Factors Affecting Reverse Braking Braking in reverse at high speeds (24 mph is considered very fast for reversing) introduces significant instability: Weight Transfer: When braking hard in reverse, the vehicle's weight shifts toward the rear (the front of the vehicle in its direction of travel). Since most vehicles have more powerful brakes and better traction on the "true" front wheels, this weight shift can reduce overall braking effectiveness. Handling Instability: High-speed reversing is inherently unstable. Slamming the brakes at 24 mph in reverse can cause the vehicle to "fishtail" or spin because the steering wheels are now trailing the direction of travel, making it difficult to stop in a straight line. Road Conditions: On wet or slippery surfaces, the stopping distance can easily double, reaching over 150 feet ******************************** Unlike the McAlberts & Friends -- PHYSICS DOESN'T LIE

@PodcastSTS Peace in the home is invaluable!!

Do I get Mike and risk possible divorce?

@GlammaSooz @im_an_A_G @MafiaMasshole @WKnoxGrott @DBeck57030037 @Proctor4Gov I am glad you mentioned the silent part of “collision.” Wasnt Julie Nagel also going to the window/door? People coming in. People going out. AH-MAZING.

@im_an_A_G @MafiaMasshole @WKnoxGrott @DBeck57030037 @Proctor4Gov @MamaLama43 On a wet and slightly snow covered curved road that goes slightly uphill and nobody saw or HEARD anything. An 8 cyl vehicle going in reverse is loud. Jen Macabre and Doughboy Matt were at the windows/door constantly and never saw or heard a thing.

@DefectiveMcToof @BrotherCounsel So why is it touted as “First Amendment” issue since Mass has a witness intimidation law?

@mart794665 @BrotherCounsel And thats the point.

@DixieNormu95224 I see what looks like swelling around his one eye. I believe that is the only intent of this photo.

The most important timeline in Canton history apparently rests on a screenshot with no metadata, changing stories and a family shuttle service between Fairview and Maple St. at 12:10 by Allie. Julie was contacted very early. Leaving Maple st to go to 34 Fairview. Returning to pick up Chris Albert, Then going back again. Staying only 30 minutes before heading back home. If multiple adults rapidly converged, transported people between homes, and communication suddenly became more controlled (“don’t text,” “talk tomorrow,” etc.), how do they not see that we naturally interpret that as heightened concern or damage control. Given the compressed timeline, rapid family movements, and later concern about texting sensitive details, people reasonably question whether conversations occurred off-phone before formal statements were solidified Later we see “don’t text about it” “tell them he never went in the house” And then the next time the public sees Colin Albert…people notice a bruise around his eye that many thought looked consistent with a fight. Maybe all innocent. Maybe all coincidence. But you cannot blame the public for asking whether the real panic that night was about getting ahead of the story BEFORE people started asking questions.

@BrotherCounsel I am referring to the charges. Not whatever he does anywhere else.

@BrotherCounsel I am confused about the TB charges. My impression is witness intimidation charges has less to do with what was said but that there is some level of harassment that would be seen as attempts of interference. So not a first amendment issue. What he said goes to defamation.

@ketchupcourtH @alexasrewm This was a great chat between you two.

It was a pleasure discussing the Stefon Diggs trial with @alexasrewm and going through the impact of Mila Adams testimony. Link to watch: youtu.be/AXjucXcNYSk

@DixieNormu95224 Also fascinating: why would anyone be bothered who is looking at their public donor pages? I should have counted all of the times during this trial experience I felt like I was back in 7th and 8th grade with the chatter. A-mazing.

It’s fascinating watching people call someone “creepy” for reading a PUBLIC donor page that was intentionally created for PUBLIC visibility. Nobody hacked anything. Nobody exposed private records. Nobody leaked confidential info. The entire purpose of the fundraiser is literally public donations public comments public support public perception You can’t use a donor page as a giant public PR billboard and then suddenly act horrified when people analyze the patterns on that SAME public page. That’s not “gossip.” That’s scrutiny.

@letstalkliveytc It seems a common/shared affliction in some regions. A big Hmm…

Four days after John O’Keefe died, Jennifer McCabe gave her first statement to Trooper Kathleen Prince of the Norfolk SPDU. In that statement, Jennifer said Karen Read was asking things like, “Could I have hit him?” But Jennifer also told investigators something important: she said Karen was so hysterical and saying so many things that she did not actually think Karen HIT John. Even in a later statement taken by Former Lt. Brian Tully on April 6th almost 3 months later. Her statement was very similar. So the question is fair: How did Jen's statement appear to evolve from “Could I have hit him?/Did I hit him?” to later testimony before the grand jury and during the trials where the wording changed to “I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!”? Hmm...

@PrettyLiesAlibi Still no tissue or wipe of the eye (or did I miss it?) i saw her wiping the corner of her eye during another person’s comments.

The MOST emotion Kouri Richins has shown is with her brother's statement

@defense_diaries I predict she does the Donna Adelson testimony style without taking the oath.

Kouri Richins will be making a Statement In Allocution. This will be a thing. If you think she will be accepting responsibility…think again. #KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial

@maga_alina47 If people have the freedom to pose such a ridiculous question on X, she has the freedom to wear what she wants

@GIJossy How sweet! 😊

Good Morning!!! I guess they're late for school!! Lol!!

@letstalkliveytc Good point!

Things that make you go hmmm... Karen Read’s SUV was photographed in the Canton PD Sallyport filthy from the winter storm covered in salt, sand, and water spots. Yet somehow none of that debris and water never appeared to penetrate the broken and exposed taillight area.

@DJ_CallingBeing @CallingBeings Are there other methods for donations?

I want to thank you @CallingBeings Cab Fans, during tonight's episode you got us half way to our goal of $888 to hire Carolyn Clapper to connect with Officer John O'Keefe! Thank you! ❤️🫶🏻🙏🏻❤️

@TexasS20339 @paul_giannetti Didnt he make wild accusations about Mike Crawford for having questions early on in Karen’s persecution? It was loud and extreme in his corrosive way. I dont think it was that long ago. I think he even tried to turn people against Mike over this, if you can imagine such a thing

@paul_giannetti First of all, “dummy” it’s in character for him so not a leap. Second of all, “idiot” I am employed and can’t listen to internet drivel all day like the turtle cultists.

@GIJossy What i especially take note of is EVERYONE can be in shock, misstate, misrepresent, alter a memory, recall it differently after the events—except Karen. And they are right fighters. No matter what, they are right. Like a pack of banshees

Another great find! Lets keep digging!!! We are auditting while they are running scares looking for ways to avoid accountability! Dont quit y'all! This is soon coming to an end!