The Moderate Case

Workers are voting in one direction, but leadership is moving the other way… At what point is that no longer representation and a clear divide between voters and those speaking for them? #Ad @LimitGovt

Dude, are you slow? There isn’t going to be more evidence, likely because there wasn’t any to begin with and it was never provided. It was a closed-door “trial” and expedited process with a “judge” denying their claims that they were tortured into confession. Sorry for not believing the regime that just killed 50,000 of its own people for protesting….

@TheModerateCase Confirmation Bias - The post. You admit you have no verifiable evidence for any side in this story, but conveniently choose to believe in the anti IRGC angle. If you have any shred of honesty, you’d avoid putting out any judgment until more evidence was available.

You act like the officer he (theoretically) stabbed just let it happen and wouldn’t have shot him if he had the chance. Also, I don’t need evidence to the contrary because that’s not how a good legal system works. You’re innocent until proven guilty — not guilty because a theocratic, brutal regime that kills its own people and shuts off the internet says so with no verifiable proof. I will choose to not side with the IRGC unless evidence is shown that indicates why I should — and there is none here. It’s sad you blindly believe this.

The burden of proof lies with the regime accusing him — and they provided NONE. Stop simping for theocratic maniacs, please.

No. Jesus said to the man beside him during crucifixion that he would be with him in paradise if he believed. He was never baptized. I believe baptism is an outward expression and declaration of faith. I’m not Catholic, but even your own doctrine teaches “baptism of desire,” so you have absolutely zero argument or biblical backing that baptism is required to inherit the kingdom of God. You are saved by grace through faith, not being dunked under water. Your doctrine is silly. Doesn’t matter anyways. Catholicism teaches that God is not bound by sacraments, even though we are. You should touch up on your own doctrine.

@TheModerateCase Do you believe baptism is a requirement for salvation and the forgiveness of sins?

I believe Jesus is the Messiah and is one in nature with the creator God, was crucified, rose from the dead, ascended into heaven where he sits at the right hand throne, and will one day return and that salvation only comes through him. Don’t tell me who I am or what I believe.

@jvgraz Show us the video.

They never mention that this clown murdered two police officers and was caught on camera doing it.

Tons of leftists defending the public execution of a 19 year old in Iran right now. There is zero provided evidence to show any wrongdoing on his behalf. A mere accusation from the Islamic regime and its judiciary. Nothing else. No appeal allowed. No lawyer. They trust the regime without question. The same regime that just killed 50,000 of its own for protesting. These are the same people who had a meltdown when Kilmar Garcia was deported without due process and defended a woman who hit an ICE officer with her car. These leftists are truly cancerous to the western foundation and way of life.

Show us the video. Also explain away how he was convicted without an option for appeal and was denied a lawyer, as is the case with nearly every case in the Islamic regime’s judiciary. Your evidence is not tangible, it’s an accusation by a regime that killed 50,000 of its own a few months ago.

What the Western media refuses to tell you is that this dude is a criminal who stabbed a police officer to death. This is how Western propaganda works.

Show us the video. When you can’t, try to explain away the morality of public executions and how that’s compatible with our system and why you think we should do it here. Zero evidence — a simple accusation by an Islamist judiciary with no option for appeal or any lawyer. This is what you defend. You’re sick. You are cancerous to the west. Get out.

There is zero evidence provided that he stabbed an officer to death other than the Iranian governments own accusations. He actually denied the accusations and said he was forced into confession under torture and interrogation, something you have (convenient for your narrative) used many times over to side with Hamas terrorists, saying they were interrogated and tortured into admission by Israel. They also accused the thousands of people they killed as being Mossad and CIA… they lie and are evil. Even had he stabbed a cop, you believe a public execution is warranted? You acted like the world was burning down when ICE agents killed someone in a clear act of self defense. You have no shame.

Conveniently leaving out: “according to Iranian state media and judiciary… trial was unfair: tortured confessions, no evidence provided to the public, anonymous, unnamed eyewitnesses, etc.” The war already started. Are you slow?

Zero evidence was provided that he stabbed an officer to death other than the Iranian governments own accusations. They also accused the thousands of people they killed as being Mossad and CIA… they lie and are evil. Even had he stabbed a cop, you believe a public execution is warranted? You acted like the world was burning down when ICE agents killed someone in a clear act of self defense. You have no shame.

He literally stabbed a cop to death. Try that in America you’ll get shot in the head before you can pull the knife out.

Yeah, this is wrong and horrible. But do we really want to play the comparison game here? We all know the pro-Pali and Arab crowd are sending death threats in DMs and comments far more than any Jews or Zionists are… and they’re acting on them. You aren’t a victim.

🚨 BREAKING: Oregon high school principal Jeremy Williams who was placed on leave for celebrating the assass*nation of Charlie Kirk has just been SENTENCED to 5 YEARS in prison over possession of child p*rnography Imagine THAT. Our enemies are disgusting creatures.

Multiple service members have lost their lives. How do we know exactly which family member or father he spoke to in order to determine if this guy who was interviewed is who Pete Hegseth was referring to?

🚨Good News: Erika Kirk and TPUSA have sent a cease and desist order to the X account Project Constitution for making several false and defamatory statements about Erika Kirk and TPUSA. The account made a post last week which received 11 Millions views. The post was a total complete and total lie against Erika Kirk.

@NIKO_KILLZ What part of this specifically would you say is using the lord names in vain?

@TheModerateCase You’re a traitor if you defend someone taking the Lords name in vain, blasphemy.

I think a lot of people are reacting to the wording without really sitting with what was actually being said. This was not a theological statement about Jesus. It was a comment about how power works in the real world. You can fully believe Christ is King and still recognize that throughout history, moral truth by itself has not stopped violent people from acting. From a Christian perspective, I understand why it sounds off. Jesus is not just another historical figure. The entire foundation of Christianity is that what looked like defeat on the cross was actually victory. So when someone frames things in terms of power and armies, it can feel like it’s missing the whole point. That reaction makes sense. At the same time, Scripture does not ignore reality. Governments are described as having authority to use force to restrain evil. David was righteous and still fought wars. Nehemiah rebuilt while holding a weapon. There has always been a tension between spiritual truth and the realities of living in a broken world. That is where people are talking past each other. One side is thinking about ultimate truth and eternal authority. The other is talking about what happens on the ground when real threats exist. Those are not the same category. You can believe Christ has ultimate authority over all things and still recognize that not everyone submits to that authority, and that has consequences. I also think the reaction calling this “antichrist” is more emotional than thoughtful. You can disagree with how it was phrased and still understand the context. It was a statement about survival and power, not a denial of who Christ is. At the end of the day, Christianity has always held both realities at once. The cross settles the question of who ultimately wins. But until that final victory is fully realized, the world still operates with danger, conflict, and the need to protect the innocent. Ignoring that does not make someone more faithful. It just disconnects them from reality.