Ark Protocol ⚛️
3K posts

Ark Protocol ⚛️
@arkprotocol
Travelling Broadens Your Mind! Your NFT Hub across @cosmos chains & beyond. Social engagement through cross-chain travels. https://t.co/ZSDjUlReus


Asteroid Protocol Shutdown We’ve decided to shut down Asteroid Protocol due to very low activity and lack of liquidity across @cosmos. Ongoing infrastructure and maintenance costs are no longer justified. Asteroid Protocol will be shut down on January 31, 2026.





Stargaze Migration Governance discussion is open for the Stargaze → Cosmos Hub migration proposal. It outlines a plan to move apps, collections, and users to the Hub and expand ATOM utility. Join the conversation: forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-mig…

May be the force be with us! @cosmos facts: 1. app chains, protocols, builders, community: many left, struggle or about to die / leave. 2. Cosmos Labs: a) heading to new directions and b) consolidating (dropping CW, "AEZ" does not include Cosmos OGs, etc.). Both may be good or not - in any case it hurts. Both 1) and 2) may not fit together - though both follow the same force: making Cosmos the place to be! Imho it's good having Plan B (curious about upcoming prop) in place. Imho whether the drop of $ATOM has something to do with this, just distracts about the fundamental direction Cosmos needs to go.



We brought @CosmWasm into existence. You brought it to life. Now it’s 6 years old, with v3.0 out in the wild. As Confio steps back from maintenance, we can’t wait to see where you take it next. Read the full update on what’s next👇 medium.com/confio/confio-… With ❤️ Confio Team


@RoboMcGobo @Curious__J @ATOMAccelerator It’s incredibly bullish for $ATOM that OG Cosmos twitter hates the new direction. The faster we purge the Terra refugees from mindshare that faster we grow.




Feel like this misrepresents the situation pretty significantly. Near has an on chain governance mechanism. Due to lack of quorum, this proposal failed. Putting it in a software upgrade regardless signals that this onchain governance mechanism is meaningless. If the proposal had received a majority "Nay" vote instead, what's to stop you from doing the same thing to push these changes through anyway? When you elect to usurp governance like this, it becomes an incredibly slippery slope from there. If you're going to choose to ignore gov outcomes and want protocol changes to be executed solely through upgrades, just get rid of Near's gov mechanism. It clearly isn't serving the purpose it was designed for.





