engineofgod

2.9K posts

engineofgod

engineofgod

@engineofgod

just some dude. 🇺🇸

United States 参加日 Aralık 2022
177 フォロー中209 フォロワー
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
It is generally considered to be a bad decision to make illogical decisions. The brain dead are already dead as moral agents, so there is no issue there. Terminal cancer patients are already going to die, so no need for suicide. Just pain management. In that people interfere with pain management of terminal ill patients is the magnitude of the injustices of the action. But the terminally ill cancer patient could be wrong about the future in that they might not be terminally ill. A cure for their cancer could be announced tomorrow(an unlikely scenario I'll admit, but still possible). The chronically ill operate under the same framework as the cancer patient - make them as comfortable as possible and interfere with that comfort as little as possible.
English
1
0
1
11
RedDrift
RedDrift@ReddDrift·
@engineofgod @sanjehorah And the chronically ill, the braindead, or those with terminal cancer? Imposing your ideal that they should keep living when suffering is not a great argument for it being immoral. Not smart? Probably, immoral? Not really. Otherwise based on that any logical flaw is immoral.
English
1
0
0
21
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
@tenobrus If my mom passed blue, I would definitely press red and if you knew my mom you would press red too
English
0
0
0
44
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
@SalvMattera Not really, I'm really, really tired of hearing - we didn't know, in response to my question of how do we treat this disease. I want some damn answers.
English
0
0
3
55
Salvatore Mattera
Salvatore Mattera@SalvMattera·
The sad reality is that a large percentage of chronic illness patients want validation in their illness more than they want scientific progress. When given the choice, they'd take the validation over what could become an actual treatment. Of course, they deny this, but it's true
English
14
5
70
2.7K
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
@ignorantmusings @sanjehorah And we laugh at people who do stupid things and put themselves in danger for no reason. Hence the new article starting with - Ohio man today......
English
1
0
1
23
ignorant speculation
ignorant speculation@ignorantmusings·
@sanjehorah Pushing red is immoral for the same reason we don’t cull the vulnerable in society. We value police, firefighters, soldiers, lifeguards, paramedics… those that risk themselves for others, because we as a society think it’s good to protect the vulnerable… Reds are scum
English
1
0
0
13
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
@ReddDrift @sanjehorah Because it's logically flawed, it assumes nothing will change about your dire situation in life and that is unknowable. It's unknowable because if you have free will the future is unknowable and we can only guess at what the future might be.
English
1
0
1
30
RedDrift
RedDrift@ReddDrift·
@sanjehorah And why is suicide immoral. Genuinely. Not in terms of family or friends,since plenty of people ont have anyone. As an individual person, why is suicide immoral?
English
1
0
2
129
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
@FindingHomeland @TooLateBlue @IterIntellectus No the red button is the quintessential inconsequential choice there are no conditionals on it, the same can't be said for the blue button. Choosing possible death is the conditional for the blue button.
English
0
0
3
19
a rock
a rock@FindingHomeland·
@TooLateBlue @IterIntellectus Death is only introduced into the equation when someone first presses the red button. Sounds like there may be a lesson there.
English
2
0
4
71
vittorio
vittorio@IterIntellectus·
my only argument is that without blue button pressers we wouldn’t have communism or suicidal empathy or mass immigration or most of the problems afflicting humanity nowadays really
English
184
75
1.8K
120.2K
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
Fair enough, so your moral claim that red button people are bad rests on the premise that children who can't logically think through things might put their life in danger so everyone should put their lives in danger. How is that different than saying children should run things because they're dumb and we must do dumb things to save them from themselves? My thought is maybe we should be adults and not let them put their lives needlessly in danger and tell them to push the red button.
English
0
0
0
5
VE
VE@VeUghUgh·
@engineofgod @choffstein You're adding extra conditions that dont exist in the original prompt. "Everyone on earth" isnt only adults or only everyone over 10
English
1
0
0
8
Corey Hoffstein 🏴‍☠️
Bond Villain: "Press blue... or don't." Me: "What if I don't?" BV: "Nothing. You go home." Me: "And if I press it?" BV: "You die, along with everyone else who pressed blue, unless half of humanity also presses it." Me: "But I can just leave?" BV: "Correct."
English
31
58
2K
42.7K
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
@VeUghUgh @choffstein Let's make it simpler... Replace the red button option with "button not starting a global thermonuclear war" and blue button with " button starting a global thermonuclear war" . How would you choose?
English
0
0
0
7
VE
VE@VeUghUgh·
@engineofgod @choffstein Red pickers are either - dumb and haven't even considered that "everyone on earth" includes very small children - callous and dont care that millions of kids will die as long as they can live
English
2
0
1
24
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
@btaustin @ChrisPacia Let's make it simpler... Replace the red button option with "button not starting a global thermonuclear war" and blue button with " button starting a global thermonuclear war" . How would you choose?
English
0
0
1
57
Brandon Thompson
Brandon Thompson@btaustin·
@ChrisPacia The original poll was poisoned by the color choices. A significant portion of this country is unable to think critically beyond red vs blue. Many will press blue no matter what the result is…even if it will destroy them.
English
4
0
31
693
Chris Pacia
Chris Pacia@ChrisPacia·
If you vote differently in these scenarios congrats you are irrational. Time to do some introspection and figure out why you respond emotionally to things rather than logically.
Chris Pacia tweet mediaChris Pacia tweet media
English
161
57
865
70.2K
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
The money for employee wages isn't created per sè directly by their bank employer, because if it was created ex nilo their would be nothing to balance out the accounting entry from the account used to pay the employees. It's paid from interest income from the loans book and customer fees. That being said the loan interest comes from loans created not only by the employees bank employer, but other banks loans(and other financial intermediaries)as well via the bank employer customers fees. Basically the money has to go out to come back.
English
0
0
0
8
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
@peruvian_bull As a former banker, I'm not surpised by this. Most people in finance/banking have no idea how the system works or where loan funds are created from.
English
2
0
5
99
Roberto Rios
Roberto Rios@peruvian_bull·
Just got off a zoom call catching up with a friend of mine from the Boy Scouts who is now a bank manager. Told him that inflation has to be constant because loans create new money with interest and that interest has to be paid off somehow. explained that even the bank of england has written papers describing exactly this process. they all admit this openly. He was literally stunned and almost fell out of his chair. "You mean money is lent into existence? every time a customer draws a line of credit they just print it? and the money supply is constantly increasing?!" this is a guy who is a math major and works at a major bank. even the people running the system don't know how it works.
Roberto Rios tweet media
English
193
572
3.2K
108.2K
engineofgod がリツイート
The Culturist
The Culturist@the_culturist_·
Today is St. George's Day. St. George matters because his story contains the answer to the most important of all questions: What is evil, and how do you destroy it? This question has been asked by every civilization since the dawn of time. All societies can be judged by their ability to answer it. Those that provide a clear answer last the longest. For a period of time, there was one story in particular that people turned to for help answering this question: the story of St. George and the dragon. On the surface, it's a simple story: a brave knight slays a dragon, saves a damsel, converts a city to Christianity. The end. Except, it's not that simple. The legend of Saint George has endured for well over 1,000 years because it speaks to something eternal. First, note that the dragon is a perversion of the natural world. Its origin is in nature, like the snake or lizard, and that makes it compelling. It's close enough to something natural (something good) that we tolerate it. And notice the place from which it emerges. In Caxton's 1483 translation of the Golden Legend, it emerges from a stagnant pond: water without natural currents, which breeds decay. It is also outside the city walls at first, and thus overlooked. Things overlooked, however, cannot be ignored forever... When the dragon begin its reign of terror, it isn't by attacking people directly — it's his poisonous breath that kills. Thus, mere proximity to evil is enough to cause harm. You may think you're standing at a safe distance, but many of evil's effects are invisible to the naked eye. In this article, we dive further into the tale to see what St. George can teach us about overcoming evil... theculturist.io/p/how-do-you-d…
The Culturist tweet media
English
15
119
420
26K
engineofgod
engineofgod@engineofgod·
It's a start at least.
Hany Girgis@SanDiegoKnight

🚨House Republicans just introduced the End H-1B Visa Abuse Act of 2026 — a 3-YEAR PAUSE on new H-1B visas + massive reforms to protect American workers from Big Tech abuse! Key provisions of the bill include: • Reducing the annual H-1B visa cap from 65,000 to 25,000 and eliminating all existing exemptions. • Limiting visas to a single three-year term (instead of two). • Requiring applicants to maintain a foreign residence they intend to return to. • Mandating that employers attest they cannot find a qualified U.S. worker, that hiring the foreign worker will not harm American workers, and that they have not laid off (and will not lay off) U.S. workers in the prior or following year. • Setting a minimum salary of $200,000 for H-1B workers. • Awarding visas based on the highest wage offered, replacing the current lottery system. • Prohibiting H-1B workers from working for multiple employers or third-party staffing agencies. • Codifying President Trump’s $100,000 fee per H-1B hire. • Banning H-1B (and H-2A/H-2B) workers from bringing family members to the U.S. • Preventing the federal government from sponsoring or employing nonimmigrant workers. • Requiring nonimmigrant workers to leave the U.S. before changing to another immigration status. The bill is co-sponsored by Reps. Brian Babin (R-TX), Brandon Gill (R-TX), Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Wesley Hunt (R-TX), Tom McClintock (R-CA), Keith Self (R-TX), and Andy Ogles (R-TN). In the Senate, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) has voiced support for a temporary pause on the H-1B program.

English
0
0
0
5
Paulo Macro
Paulo Macro@PauloMacro·
Don’t even know what to say
Naval@naval

Introducing USVC - a single basket of high-growth venture capital, for everyone. No accreditation required, SEC-registered, and a very low $500 minimum. Includes OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Sierra, Crusoe, Legora, and Vercel. As USVC adds more companies, investors will own a piece of that too. Liquidity typically comes when companies exit, but we’re aiming to let investors redeem up to 5% of the fund every quarter. This isn’t guaranteed, but if we can make it work, you won’t be locked up like in a traditional venture fund. It runs on AngelList, which already supports $125 billion of investor capital. And I’ve joined USVC as the Chairman of its Investment Committee. — Go back to the 1500s, you set sail for the new world to find tons of gold - that was adventure capital. Early-stage technology is the modern version. It says we are going to create something new, and it’s risky. It’s daring. But ordinary people can’t invest until it’s old, until it’s no longer interesting, until everybody has access to it. By the time a stock IPOs, most of the alpha is gone. The adventure is gone. Public market investors are literally last in line. This problem has become farcical in the last decade. Startups are reaching trillion dollar valuations in the private markets while ordinary investors have their noses up to the glass, wondering when they’ll be let in. Investing in private markets isn’t easy. You need feet on the ground. You need judgment built over years. Most people don’t have the patience to wait ten or twenty years for an investment to come to fruition. But there is no more productive, harder-working way to deploy a dollar than in true venture capital. USVC enables you to invest in venture capital in a broad, accessible, professionally-managed way, through a single basket of innovation, focused on high-growth startups, at all stages. It is how you bet on the future of tech: the smartest young people in the world, working insane hours, leveraged to the max, with code, hardware, capital, media, and community. Your dollar doesn’t work harder anywhere. There is an old line - in the future, either you are telling a computer what to do, or a computer is telling you what to do. You don’t want to be on the wrong side of that transaction. USVC lets you buy the future, but you buy it now. Then you wait, and if you are right, you get paid. Get access here: usvc.com

English
25
3
156
109.8K
Chris Martz
Chris Martz@ChrisMartzWX·
Manufacturers need to make laptop / computer keyboards that don't click. It's the most annoying sound in the world second to loud chewing. I have to wear noise-canceling AirPods in order to even use my laptop. Maybe I'm weird, idk.
English
75
3
100
8.5K
FXHedge
FXHedge@Fxhedgers·
TRUMP ORDER TO REQUIRE BANKS TO COLLECT CITIZENSHIP INFO 'IN PROCESS,' BESSENT SAYS. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that an Executive Order that would mandate that banks must collect citizenship information from customers is currently “in process.” Speaking with Semafor in an interview published on Monday, Bessent went on to say he doesn’t believe such a requirement would be “unreasonable, because: Why don’t we have information on who’s in our banking system? I have a place in the UK; they want to know who lives in every apartment. And how do we know that it’s not part of a foreign terrorist organization?” Full article: msn.com/en-us/news/pol…
FXHedge tweet media
English
4
11
70
12.8K