Levai N.

@TendayiManyange @NtateRanaka @Thandzlk @RexMidzi @Chofamba @HarareNdini @bla_bidza From those who created him

So after ED’s term is extended to 2030 Tshabangu thinks elections must be suspended so his party forms a GNU with ZANU to rule until 2035? Where does he get these powers to make such sweeping suggestions?🤷‍♀️ @NtateRanaka @Thandzlk @RexMidzi @Chofamba @HarareNdini @bla_bidza

@RMapimbiro @zimlive Haagh he has so many grown up kids.They are probably the ones pushing to kip going,otherwise he would have taken a different route by now if they all as grown up man take principled stand!

@mashlevi @zimlive The President is old pamwe he doesn't even know the tender magnate was following him around lol , Ana Collin are supposed to protect their Dad from Abuse nekuti its fast getting there he won't be in control of his faculties.

📸 President Emmerson Mnangagwa and Botswana’s Duma Boko have been touring stands at the Zimbabwe International Trade Fair in Bulawayo with tender magnate Wicknell Chivayo in tow

There is power in Unity. This is the best trio of the land!

@BaShonaBaShona @fazPresident ZITF should never be a platform for this kind of poo!

Congradulations kwatiri isu ma FAZ @fazPresident well done team.

@CadreShangrila Mdhra shld rest hake guys... chii chirikunetsa

Walking the talk towards #Vision2030

@RMapimbiro @zimlive We shld begin asking the President himself this qstn,coz haagh Wicknel dont give a damn😃

@zimlive Haaasi akuzvinyanya here tender magnate uyu his bringing the presidency into disrepute its too much now when President Ruto came he was doing the same thing, I hope the Presidents Children reprimand him zvanyanya. I dont hate him but haaaa he should grow up its now pathetic.

@nickmangwana Do they produce anything

EHE FAZ YAHWINA Forever Associate Zimbabwe (FAZ) Specialty Award – Best Thematic Exhibit #ZITF2026

@NoGwajaa @DougColtart Its not noise, the devil is in these little finer details.

@DougColtart This is a classic case of exaggeration. Parliament remains predominantly elected by the people. Chiefs are part of Zimbabwe’s constitutional structure and represent traditional leadership not presidential “proxies.” Their role is defined and limited by law. As for appointments, they exist to ensure balance, inclusion and expertise not to override democracy. The core of Parliament remains elected by citizens, and that’s what defines its democratic legitimacy. Let’s debate honestly kwete kungoita noise....

Under #CAB3, Parliament WON’T be democratically elected: - 10 will be appointed by the President - 18 will be indirectly appointed by the President & under his control (chiefs) - The remainder will be elected using an undemocratic delimitation process controlled by the President:

@nickmangwana Kkk ka look ka Mundenda at the VP.Its like he has seen an alien or something 😃😃

Vice President Gen. Rtd C.G.D.N Chiwenga and Vice President Col.Rtd K.C.D Mohadi have arrived at the #ZITF2026 grounds for the official opening ceremony. Botswana's President Duma Boko is the guest of honor for this year's edition of the trade expo.

@KudzanaiZindon1 @HeraldZimbabwe Kkkk only despots love this kind of fake optics.His partner seems to be well cognisant of this nonsense

@mashlevi @HeraldZimbabwe Kkk you watch madocumentaries handity pane vanenge vachichema vaona the North Korean leader

Botswana President arrives in Bulawayo for ZITF official opening heraldonline.co.zw/botswana-presi…

@CMukungunugwa These are not the ones we deal with everyday tho.Ava ndeveku ZITF chete😃

ZIMBABWE REPUBLIC POLICE ZITF STAND 2026 Smartly dressed officers 🇿🇼

@chari639408 @BarakaZaire @ChambatiLevison @Comrade_Whisky @CremoraOnTop @ED4TheNation @edmnangagwa @enkudheni @hazelwekwagondo @KarleySammy @MamoyoPf60458 Kwana iwe.... budiriro yenyika haidi amendment of the constitution.

Ukaona munhu anovenga Cab3,iyo iri ndiyo mudiriro yenyika how can a normal person hates ,kubudirira kwenyika yake ,a true Zimbabwean unomuona nekusapota Cab uyo asingadi mmm hatizivi unobvepi cause kubudirira kwenyika kunounza mufaro kwandri uye nemwana wese wemuZimbabwe

@NNyashaYessur Dead

Is ZITF an all government departments show why is there very little private sector participation. ZBC takes a stand next you have Zanupf one, FAZ, Ministry of Information, City of Harare, National Parks. Is this WHAT WE CALL businesses. Where is the PRIVATE SECTOR?.

@hazelwekwagondo @edmnangagwa @BarakaZaire @MulakazuvaL @TanakaaGumbo @enkudheni @LLP_ZW @Chivhuu @ChambatiLevison @MairosiWatungwa @ZANUPF_Official Will of the pple only after it has been approved thru a referendum.Zvimwe zvese is just stinking propaganda

Fighting the Constitutional Amendment Bill No 3 is Fighting The Will of of the People The Constitutional Amendment Bill Number 3, a people-driven governance framework hinged on: ✅ Extending President @edmnangagwa's term to 2030 ✅Changing the electoral cycle from 5 to 7 years ✅Revamping the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, etc. was a PLEA by the masses who sought to provide long-lasting solutions to Zimbabwe's governance. Any attempt to discredit, fight, and smear this bill is tantamount to fighting the will of the people, thereby fighting democracy as well. After all has been said and done, the Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 was a CALL by MASSES to prioritize policy continuity, development, and minimize the toxicity brought about by elections. 2030 Baba Va Mnangagwa Vanenge Vachitonga. #CAB3BHOO #ED2030BHOO

@ProfJNMoyo Stop the mutilation of our constitution.Sctn 91 safeguard is that three or MORE counts as full term.But the constitution DID NOT leave MORE to be defined anyhow, stop this LIE pliz.According to this constitution MORE isn't forever but is capped at 5 yrs.Vakapasa maths can help

Debunking a Persistent and Dangerous Myth: Zimbabwe’s Constitution Contains Only One Presidential Term Limit Provision: In the intense public debate over the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) Bill, an utterly false claim is being repeated relentlessly and without a single shred of evidence: that the Constitution contains two separate presidential term limit provisions—sections 91(2) and 95(2)(b). This assertion is not merely incorrect; it is constitutionally impossible. No constitution anywhere in the world has ever created two distinct term limit provisions for the presidency. Section 95(2)(b) is not—and, according to the Constitution’s own crystal-clear definition in section 328(1), read with section 328(7), cannot possibly be—a term limit provision. A genuine presidential term limit provision restricts the total or maximum length of time any individual may hold or occupy the Office of President. Section 95(2)(b) does nothing of the sort. It simply defines the length of each presidential term as five years, running coterminous with the life of Parliament. In straightforward language, section 95(2)(b) regulates the office itself, not the person who holds it, and says absolutely nothing about how many terms or the length of time any one individual may serve. The Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013) contains only one term limit provision: Section 91(2). This clause is unequivocal and ironclad. It prohibits any person from serving more than two terms as President, with the vital safeguard that three or more years in office counts as a full term. It is only this single provision—and this provision alone—that actually limits the total time any individual can occupy the highest office in the land. Nothing illuminates this fundamental distinction more powerfully than comparative constitutional analysis—the gold standard for both public education and responsible policymaking. As the ancient wisdom has it, there is truly nothing new under the sun. A careful examination of proven global practice, vividly illustrated in the attached infographics, reveals three clear and time-tested approaches that nations around the world have taken when designing presidential term rules: Case 1 – Term length only (unlimited re-election permitted) Constitutions in this category have a single provision that simply defines the length of each presidential term, leaving the number of terms entirely open. This constitutional model operated successfully for decades—for example—in Botswana (31 years, 1966–1997), the United States (163 years, 1789–1951), and Zimbabwe itself (23 years, 1987–2013). Case 2 – Two separate provisions Here constitutions have two separate provisions: one that sets the length of each presidential term; and a second, entirely distinct clause that limits the total time any person may serve as President. This is precisely the framework that has—for example—operated in Botswana since 1997, South Africa since 1996, the United States since 1951, and Zimbabwe since 2013. The first infographic displays this clear separation of the two provisions across all the four countries. Case 3 – Combined in one elegant clause Constitutions in this category have a single constitutional provision that seamlessly merges both term limit concepts—defining term length while simultaneously imposing the limit. This approach has—for example— stood the test of time in Argentina (since 1994), Chile (since 1980), France (since 1958), Mexico (since 1917), the Philippines (since 1987), and South Korea (since 1987), as shown in the second infographic. The historical record is especially telling. Botswana introduced its separate term limit provision only after 31 years of independence, the United States after 163 years, and Zimbabwe after more than two decades of operating under a pure term-length provision. South Africa, by contrast, enshrined both provisions, separately, from the very first day of its democratic Constitution in 1996. These facts drive home an irrefutable truth: a provision that merely defines the length of a term has never been—and can never be—a term limit provision. The distinction is not a technicality; it is the bedrock of constitutional integrity. Recognising it clearly ensures that public discourse and debate on constitutional amendments is anchored in facts, logic, and proven international best practice, rather than convenient fiction to advance nefarious political agendas. Zimbabwe and Zimbabweans deserve nothing less!

@daddyhope Toxicity is everywhere in Africa politics.But for the sake of ubuntu shouldn't the government have yielded to family demands here?

@GeneralBauer3 Chasara chatakungogadzira muno munyika vana🤣

Nemabhiridha taaku importer?

@BaShonaBaShona Tenders can't be written off ,how is that even possible-wrong analysis.His massage is all about teaching these youth good business ethics, being responsible citizens & to shun being corrupted by current abuse of govt tenders by the connected few.

I am trying to understand the Minister's statement here, but I am failing. Perhaps it's because it's a short video. However, the reality about tenders cannot be written off; it would be daydreaming. During the 70s 80s, 90s, and early 2000s, companies owned by white people were getting tenders from local government and central government. Today, because it's us black people with our small companies applying for tenders and supplying the government, it becomes an issue. The President is on record saying "nyika inovakwa neve vayo," meaning to say we should participate in doing business with the government and its agencies, and there's nothing wrong with that. Tenders are a proper business.

@KMutisi He didn't say don't explore tender.He said money is not made thru govt tenders alone an area being abused especially in the second republic. Infact the day this second republic falls a huge broom would be required there.

Is it a crime to get a government tender though?? Those youths should aspire to get government tenders too… The Minister shouldn’t be teaching young people that getting tenders is a bad thing!