PRSmith
7.5K posts


@EliteMan091 It's possible. While I like Rubio very, very much, I would never vote for him...he is not a natural born citizen and he attempted to usurp the Constitution.
English

I thought I had found a winner but when the Aspen Dental office in Tomball, TX adamantly refused to provide requested services, a cleaning and polishing only, as well as my request to speak with someone in charge, I decided I needed to continue my search. This is not medical care; it is profit driven, corporate control.
Demand Accountability for Aspen Dental Malpractice - Sign the Petition! c.org/Bdb7J9V9cM via @Change
English

@DavidJHarrisJr She's gaslighting. That's just throwing up smoke screens to avoid fixing the problem.
English
PRSmith がリツイート

@iranwarmap @lady_valor_07 This is not a new war. It is the continuation of a centuries old war. It is someone finally standing up, taking charge and protecting America. WTF is wrong with you?
English

@lady_valor_07 No I don't think anyone trusts him after his biggest campaign promise was no new wars. But thats his daughter bro.
English

You are pathetic...
"It was taken in 1991 at The Plaza Hotel in New York City.
The event was the Maybelline "Look of the Year" modeling competition finale (a major international talent search that Trump sponsored and hosted at his Plaza Hotel that year).
Photographer: Ron Galella (a well-known celebrity/paparazzi photographer).
Ivanka (born 1981) would have been around 9–10 years old at the time. The "gold dress" matches descriptions and similar shots from the glamorous black-tie gala portion of the event held in the Plaza's ballroom and surrounding areas.
Similar photos from the same night/event show Trump and a young Ivanka together in formal attire amid the fashion show setting. The "hotel hallway" appearance is likely them moving through the opulent interior corridors or pre/post-event areas of the Plaza (a landmark luxury hotel Trump owned at the time)."
English

@lovenotwar_wi @mr_muskxnews Abused? I would be 'abusing' it also if it would get me and my family into America. We are our own worst enemies.
English

@mr_muskxnews YES! Birthright citizenship is being abused by illegals making anchor babies.
English

@JohnK4700479717 @mr_muskxnews No, they don't think they can just do this, they CAN do it under current interpretation. I hope we get different rules soon to put a stop to it.
English

@mr_muskxnews Absolutely . The Chinese and illegals think they can just do this . Congress should do it if the Supreme Court doesn’t.
English

@askim419 @mr_muskxnews It's an industry and people are getting rich.
English

It's nine judges and their purpose is to discern constitutional issues like this one. Do you even know what 'under the jurisdiction of' means? It isn't clear which is why there are two sides and why the SCOTUS is taking until June to sort it out. I'm hoping they do it constitutionally using original intent but I'm betting that they will decide it politically which will be very bad for the country.
English

@mr_muskxnews No it part of our Constitution but you that doesn't mean anything to this administration or 6 justices
English

@maknudsen11 @mr_muskxnews Actually, there should be an amendment to properly define 'under the jurisdiction thereof' (and other phrases like "for the common good" and "regulate commerce" and "Law of Nations" and"general welfare" and "well regulated militia") based on original intent.
English

@mr_muskxnews Yes but it’s a matter of law for the Supreme Court to decide.
English

Unfortunately that is not true for all countries...
"Why Statelessness Is Possible
Real-world risks include:
Strict registration deadlines or bureaucratic requirements — Many countries require parents to register the birth at an embassy/consulate within a short window (e.g., 1 year in some cases). Undocumented parents or those fearing contact with authorities might miss this, and the child gets nothing.
Generational limits — Countries like Canada, Germany, Australia, and the UK often limit automatic transmission to the first generation born abroad. If the parent was also born outside their home country, the child may not qualify.
Gender-discriminatory laws (still in effect in ~20–27 countries) — In places like Qatar, Kuwait, Brunei, Lebanon, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, and others, mothers may be unable (or severely restricted) to pass citizenship if the father is not a citizen. Fathers usually can.
Other restrictions — Some nations require later residency by the child, prohibit dual citizenship (forcing renunciation that doesn’t happen automatically), or have no diplomatic relations with the U.S. making registration impossible. If both parents are stateless themselves, the risk is total.
Practical barriers — Fear of deportation, lack of documentation, or inability to travel to an embassy can prevent parents from securing foreign citizenship for the child.
Legal and advocacy analyses of Trump’s order (and the ongoing SCOTUS case as of April 2026) explicitly warn that this scenario would create stateless or effectively stateless U.S.-born children. Estimates suggest hundreds of thousands of babies per year could be affected overall, with a subset facing actual statelessness."
I think our laws would require special handling to prevent stateless babies which could include deportation back to parents' country of origin. I think we also need to become FAR more aware of the origin of pregnant women and the citizenship of their husbands.
English

@mr_muskxnews Basically, if the parents are illegal, then the child is a citizen of the country he or she came from be it Venezuela , Honduras Peru, whatever country it is that’s where they are a citizen of!!!
English

@mr_muskxnews YES! YES! YES! They had best get this right this time!
English

@nobleisawinner Nope, you didn't earn reparations. Your ancestors might have but they're not here to collect.
English

@janninereid1 I'd get a couple more dogs, especially the small yappy ones that never shut up.
English

@Victoria00025 Yep, I support that. With the exception of emergency health care, if you can't take care of yourself, don't come here.
English

@Geniustechw Yep, I absolutely am. That is interfering with the legal work of federal agents.
English























