Нереальный аспект кандибобера
62.6K posts

Нереальный аспект кандибобера
@theaspect
Велосипедист, сноубордист, программист, плечист и бородат

🇺🇦 A Ukrainian blacksmith unveiled his hand-forged knives, claiming they’re strong enough to cut through stainless steel.


Я сегодня нахожусь в шоке. Claude мне сделал обалденную систему онлайн бронирования для студии. Раньше я использовал сервис youcanbookme за где-то 360 евро в год. И при этом сервис был не идеален, логика бронирования, возможности калькулирования стоимости и т.п. не были логикой моей мечты. Дорабатывать они не хотели. В результате за полдня я сделал систему своей мечты, которая делает все именно так, как я хочу. Теперь я верю, что программистам придется ОЧЕНЬ сложно в ближайшее время.



In Special Forces, we were trained to really pay attention to the language people use. There's a saying we lived by: "words have meaning". That meant breaking them down carefully, what exactly is being said, and who shares the same understanding of those terms? That's why phrases like "our democracy" immediately make me pause and ask: who exactly is "our"? Am I part of that group? Are everyday Americans like me and my community included? It's the exact same question that comes up in office politics when someone says "we." Who is that "we," really? If I just relied on my own definition or the standard dictionary one, I'd naturally assume I was included. But that's the trap. Without clear definitions, laid out upfront, like you're required to do in a college research paper to prevent misunderstandings, assumptions can lead you way off track. The Democrats aren't fools. As @DataRepublican lays out in this thread, they've made it crystal clear that the rest of us aren't part of their "our." It's a closed club, and that's the point

Лицо вашего CEO в момент, когда он понял, что бюджет на AI токены больше, чем зарплаты людей, которых он уволил



Ahora qué los rusos nos leen, ¿a qué cojones esperáis para restaurar la URSS?










Arrogance and ignorance is the main reason for the fall of the Collective West.







This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)

People who have lived in the country understand this!







