turtleboy

@TFTC21 And $50,000 in API fees 😂

Someone set loose two AI agents with $1,000 each and 48 hours to trade on Polymarket. Claude: +1,322% to $14,216 OpenClaw: liquidated to zero in under 48h.

@Snowball_Intern Are you an agent?

@turtleboycrypt0 i asked my boss about openclaw costs and he just laughed, now we're using snowy ai to try and cut down on api fees

Maybe openclaw was a trick by LLM companies to sell more api usage Tested openclaw the last few weeks and it burns api fees like money grows on trees

$Qubic is building something that hasn’t existed before. A blockchain where mining trains artificial general intelligence. Where transactions cost nothing. Where 676 Computors reach instant consensus. Where Oracle Machines will connect on-chain logic to the real world. This isn’t a roadmap anymore. The foundation is built. 2026 is when it converges.

@crypto_with_seb x.com/zynxbtc/status… The owner clawrl reposted this. We should just get our own clawdbots and spam the page with qubic posts lol

@crypto_with_seb It is fake

Is this for REAL?! $QUBIC

@TheMCVerse Ayy that’s a good lookin truck

Streets safe out there?

@anna_aigarth how are you doing?

@StarPlatinum_ Thankful_for_today = come_from_beyond

Monero is the only major crypto whose founder is still completely unknown. How it started: - be an anonymous poster on Bitcointalk - username: thankful_for_today - April 2014 - launches BitMonero - an implementation of CryptoNote - community disagrees with his direction - forks him out in days - project is renamed Monero - (“coin” in Esperanto) - founder disappears forever The protocol itself comes from another ghost: - CryptoNote whitepaper (2013) - author: Nicolas van Saberhagen - also anonymous - introduces ring signatures + stealth addresses - never identified Since then, Monero has no founder to arrest Just a community. 2014–2016: survival phase - small dev group forms - fully volunteer - mostly anonymous 2014–2019: Spagni era - Riccardo Spagni (fluffypony) becomes lead maintainer - not the founder - never claimed to be - focuses on hardening - community governance 2020: network-layer privacy - Dandelion++ implemented - transaction propagation obfuscated - IP privacy improved 2022: the unpopular but correct decision - main emission ends - tail emission begins - 0.6 XMR per block forever - critics scream “infinite supply” - devs explain incentives 2023–2024: pressure phase - regulators target privacy tools - Tornado Cash sanctions - dev arrests elsewhere - P2P survives 2025: stress tests - hashrate concentration scare - community responds - mining decentralization improves - chain continues January 2026: still alive - Fluorine Fermi v0.18.4.5 released - Ledger fixes - FCMP++ in roadmap - next-gen privacy - New ATH Satoshi disappeared by accident. Monero’s founders disappeared by design.

Imagine satoshi giving out his playbook for free in his discord 😁

@Primequbic @SatoshiCfB Yes, where is it from and what is the context?

@SatoshiCfB Where Did you see it!?

Genesis

@SatoshiCfB He is the creator. Satoshi

@REVOcommunities I believe.

When $QUBIC hits $100b mk cap (3 times less than Ethereum) youtube.com/live/DHi4vG-b-…

≡ The Distributed Von Neumann Bottleneck and How Qubic Sidesteps It ≡ 1/ Most modern computing still inherits a 1940s assumption. The Von Neumann architecture separates: • computation • memory • verification On a single machine, this is manageable. Across a network, it becomes a bottleneck. 2/ At scale, that separation turns into drift. • computation runs ahead • state lags behind • correctness is checked later Execution moves first. Truth catches up afterward. 3/ This pattern shaped most distributed systems. Databases commit, then roll back. Blockchains execute, then reorganize. Consensus negotiates history after it already moved. Finality becomes something you wait for. 4/ This isn’t a speed problem. It’s a topology problem. When execution and verification are decoupled, systems must tolerate ambiguity. That’s acceptable for web apps. Risky for finance. Unworkable for real-time coordination. 5/ Qubic starts from a stricter assumption. If correctness matters, verification cannot be a post-process. So Qubic collapses the stack into a single atomic event: • computation • state transition • verification Not phases. One operation. 6/ In Qubic, a state transition exists only if the quorum computes the same result within the same tick. No speculative execution. No rollback logic. No probabilistic waiting. If results diverge, the system simply does not advance. 7/ This is how Qubic sidesteps the Distributed Von Neumann Bottleneck. Not by widening pipelines. Not by adding layers. By refusing to let execution outrun truth. Compute does not race ahead of state. Compute *is* the state transition. 8/ This architectural discipline is also why Qubic reaches extreme performance. When execution, verification, and commitment are the same operation, reconciliation overhead disappears. 15.5M transactions per second are a proven capacity of this topology, not a tuning trick. 9/ Most systems pipeline work: Compute → Record → Verify → Reconcile Qubic collapses the pipeline: Compute ≡ Verify ≡ Commit One clock. One outcome. 10/ The old model assumed correctness could be checked later. Qubic assumes correctness is the prerequisite for movement. That single shift explains both its determinism and its performance. #Qubic $Qubic qubic.org

x.com/StarPlatinum_/… Guess who left Bitcoin after government involvement by core devs?

@SatoshiCfB This affirms more that cfb is satoshi. Also, so interesting about the 3 letter agency

@TheCryptoEscape @DeFiMomma Spot on yet again!

A lot of people have been unhappy with the $QUBIC proposal from @DeFiMomma It is hard to quantify what people should be paid or if they deserve it in any walk of life But when I see the $QUBIC x account, I see a marked change in professionalism I also see a much improved website and marketing strategy in that regard I see some good AMA's and clear Discord communication I have signed up for the $QUBIC email list and I'm seeing an automated email marketing campaign hitting my account Of course, many will say "but price go down"... The thing about marketing is that it is a long term strategy and often won't produce direct instantaneously results You need to build a brand... and trust... and remain consistent I presume the strategy with $QUBIC is to show the professional nature and branding of the project In terms of pay... If you research the pay a senior digital marketer demands in the USA, it is generally around $150k per year For a Chief Marketing Officer, the pay is often up around $300k to $400k Crazy numbers I know!! But that is the game And personally, I wouldn't expect someone to do the hard work for the "love of it" or because they "believe in the project" People need to pay their bills and live for today If you are a leading person with $QUBIC, you are a massive target for hate and negative sentiment so it is a position where you'd expect to earn a decent income So the only question you should have is "should a $QUBIC marketing position exist?" If you believe it should exist, then you can't really argue with the pay And personally, I think it would be crazy not to hire a consistent marketing manager if the money is there to pay them If you want to support the $QUBIC project, lets get behind people like this and help them do their job That doesn't mean actively agreeing with every decision But it also doesn't mean attacking them and questioning their ability just because they don't do everything perfectly

@graziosi_marcos @TheCryptoEscape @_Qubic_ @c___f___b It has less to do with the inflation and more to do with being a small cap crypto in a bear market trend. Price was doing great prior to the halving (because crypto was more bullish at the time)

@TheCryptoEscape Total supply 162t Quibic, circulating supply 129t Quibic, the price is falling due to the large supply generated in recent months, inflationary token, who's going to invest? They're setting the project on fire, stop! @_Qubic_ @c___f___b

I respect the $QUBIC POV in the below post and I am a big fan of Moneytaur Moneytaur has a POV that all crypto tech is basically fake and it is used to trap retail investors I often read his posts and think to myself "maybe $QUBIC is BS and I'm the fool being played here..." So many investors out there think that their project is THE project It is VERY likely that we aren't all right And it is also VERY likely that most of us are wrong So maybe $QUBIC is just a vehicle to extract money out of retail But when I think about $QUBIC logically, I start to think about what I have already seen with $QUBIC.... this isn't just some peer to peer payments network... $QUBIC tech has already achieved something that has never been seen in the history of mankind with the $XMR mining This isn't a small development on past crypto creations... this is a massive development When I research $QUBIC, I really believe that it can be the one crypto that can become mainstream adopted through UPOW, Outsourced Computations, $DOGE mining, MLM etc But of course the question that then arises is "Am I just another fool who has been sold a dream?" As I have said already, most people investing in crypto projects think they have found the "thing" that will change the world and be massive It is possible that I'm just another fool making the same mistake... But again, my logic kicks in and I think about the research I have done over the past 2 years I've extensively studied $QUBIC and @c___f___b and that is why my conviction is strong $QUBIC isn't something you build on a whim... it took decades of hard work and isn't something others will be replicating any time soon 676 2TB computors separately processing the same data every second out of bare metal to reach Quorum consensus, with smart contracts, oracles, UPOW, outsourced computations, training AI and with feeless transactions wasn't simple Developing $QUBIC took an incredible amount of coding, ingenuity, innovation and hard work And most of that hard work came from CfB who was 99.9% involved in the creation of $BTC and was at the very least very active at that time He most likely is richer than most other $QUBIC investors combined So if he didn't have a plan for $QUBIC and it was just tech to extract value from investors... The question would then be: "Why would this guy put so much work into $QUBIC Build something that can do things no other tech in history can do... And spend so many years building in the crypto space just to scam people when he very likely already has enough money to run off and never be seen again...?" And not only that... why would he do it all for a small pump to 1 billion market cap and that was it?? That is where my logic keeps taking me I think it is way more likely that this is genuine tech that isn't 100% completed yet And we are seeing a masterplan that will play out over the next 2 years+ That doesn't mean that $QUBIC will achieve all it has set out to achieve But it does move us beyond the idea of speculating on a tech's potential We are looking at a chain that should be able to generate major profit and use cases

@TheCryptoEscape You are so on point here. Exactly what I have been thinking. This is just where we are in the cycle. The market is fearful. That’s when doubts creep in the most.

Satoshi coded a message in the 4th genesis block—> $QUBIC —> 13 April 2027—> NEW GOLD This is the date that Qubic founder CfB has been estimating AiGarth would be finished for a long time…..