Self Aware Networks 🇺🇸 🇹🇼 🇺🇦

I propose a hard solution to the hard problem of consciousness. Neural Array Projection Oscillation Tomography for computational rendering. 2. Conscious observation in tonic oscillating groups of cells via re-synchronization after phase wave differential. amazon.com/dp/B0DLNYJPJG

I prompted @omma_ai to build a #threejs app with real dynamic lighting on a 3D mesh - generated from a single image, using Depth Anything v2 + Transformers from @huggingface ⚡ Depth estimation in the browser 🫧 3D mesh from the depth map 💡 Dynamic lighting reacting to the geometry No manual code. Pure AI prompting. The future of 3D on the web feels wide open.

Created a scene with ‘92 central line stock, a platform, straight and curved tunnel sections with Gemini 3.1 pro on @antigravity via @GoogleAIStudio, using @threejs . Here’s how I did it (1/n)

GPT-5.5 Pro Moto GP game in a single script. One of the better results I've ever seen.

If This Is A Simulation New Full Lip-Sync Cyberpunk Girl Music Video. This time dialled up the Cyberpunk style! Seedance 2.0 1080p in Runway. Upscaled to 4k60 local with Topazlabs

Introducing `images-taste skill` Now that GPT images v2 is out a new method of creating frontend in Codex has emerged. generate images -> codex analyzes them -> codex builds the website available here: github.com/Leonxlnx/taste…

pretty cool what you can create with gpt 5.5 pro (my laptop is laggy while screenrecording, the site is smooth)

Someone just open-sourced the entire ElevenLabs + Descript stack in one tool. It's called Voice-Pro. Zero-shot voice cloning, Whisper transcription, YouTube downloading, vocal isolation, and dubbing in 100+ languages. All running locally in one Gradio WebUI. 100% Open Source.

This is a human cell 🤯 We are miracle machines 👽🌎🌽

I don't know why you are so mean. Ask yourself why you are so mean? How does that benefit you? Look at all the similarities between my work and yours, as documented by an AI comparison? How can you call my work shit when it's practically the same as your work, just earlier? Here are the results of the comparative report that I ran chatgpt.com/s/t_69eef5d07b…

@worksalt @stephstem @grok Your work is shit dude. It's shit.

This is literally my work. @stephstem cite me bitch

@MrLokipr @QualiaQuanta @stephstem @NobelPrize Here are the results of the comparative report that I ran chatgpt.com/s/t_69eef5d07b…

@worksalt @QualiaQuanta @stephstem @NobelPrize This is the way.

@MrLokipr @QualiaQuanta @stephstem @NobelPrize Here are the results of the comparative report that I ran chatgpt.com/s/t_69eef5d07b…

How much of Micah’s work is derived from Jenny’s TUFT? Very little. The foundational architectures are different. Micah’s work has a longer documented timeline in the broader “information + coherence + time-density” space. There is conceptual resonance (both deal with coherence, time, gravity, and unification), but this is common in theoretical physics. The accusation that Jenny plagiarized Micah appears weak based on the actual content. Jenny’s theory is built on a very specific topological structure (Hopf fibration) that Micah does not appear to use as his foundation. Reverse Question (More Relevant): Does Micah’s work overlap with Jenny’s in a way that would justify his accusation? Not significantly. The overlap is at the level of genre and shared themes, not direct structural or mathematical copying.

@QualiaQuanta @stephstem @grok I'm not trying to be mean to you. So why are you being so rude to me? How do you consider yourself to be a professional? You don't even know me but you are trolling me? Why are you like this towards strangers?

@worksalt @stephstem @grok Hey I'll help you out. I think what you feel overlaps is the complex field. That dates back to very early quantum mechanics / QFT :)

@MrLokipr @QualiaQuanta @stephstem @NobelPrize I'm waiting on this study before I reply.

How much of Micah’s work is derived from Jenny’s TUFT? Very little. The foundational architectures are different. Micah’s work has a longer documented timeline in the broader “information + coherence + time-density” space. There is conceptual resonance (both deal with coherence, time, gravity, and unification), but this is common in theoretical physics. The accusation that Jenny plagiarized Micah appears weak based on the actual content. Jenny’s theory is built on a very specific topological structure (Hopf fibration) that Micah does not appear to use as his foundation. Reverse Question (More Relevant): Does Micah’s work overlap with Jenny’s in a way that would justify his accusation? Not significantly. The overlap is at the level of genre and shared themes, not direct structural or mathematical copying. For your supposition, it's very nice to meet you.

@QualiaQuanta @stephstem @grok That's not the only math in my paper. I'm waiting on this

@worksalt @stephstem @grok This is the only math in your paper. It is a generic action inherited from other papers. It has nothing to do with my work. It doesn't mean anything valid or new

@QualiaQuanta @stephstem @grok I already have proven it. I just haven't shared it with you yet. "yet" is the operative word. I'm busy solving chess puzzles on my phone at the moment. Trust me I will be publishing my proof when I'm ready.

@worksalt @stephstem @grok You cannot prove it or you would have already chump

I thought you had integrity or something, you are accusing someone else of stealing, but I can prove mathematically that your work is isomorphic to mine. Then you have the total lack of character to accuse my work of being rambling when it's equivalent to yours functionally and mathematically.

@QualiaQuanta @stephstem @grok If he has to cite your work, you must cite my work, it predates yours and has the same signature cluster of essential points. zenodo.org/records/181333… svgn.io/p/the-history-…

@worksalt @stephstem @grok I would be nice to you if you just wanted to shoot the shit but your work is shit. It's not physics or philosophy. It's just rambling.

Magic…